Essay by Eric Worrall
“… Overstating the dangers can overshadow the significant progress being made and can undermine public trust in scientific discourse. …”
Most people fear climate change will end the world during their lifetime
By Sanjana Gajbhiye
Earth.com staff writerA recent survey has unveiled a startling statistic: nearly half (48%) fear they will witness climate change wreak havoc on Earth within their lifetime.
The survey, conducted by Talker Research, found Hawaiians to be the most anxious, with 61% expressing this belief. Vermont and New Mexico residents followed closely behind, with 59% and 56% respectively.
However, this widespread fear might be misplaced. “Belief in the urgent fight against climate change has shot far past the territory of science and become an ideology,” notes Cambridge professor Mike Hulme.
…
Data scientist Hannah Ritchie of the University of Oxford offers a contrasting perspective. Once convinced of an impending climate disaster, she now believes that such extreme predictions can overshadow significant achievements.
In her book, Ritchie highlights that emissions per person have plateaued since 2012, suggesting some stabilization. She also argues that the dreaded 2.7°F (1.5°C) warming threshold is not necessarily a catastrophic tipping point.
Ritchie’s views suggest that while climate change remains a serious issue, it’s essential to recognize progress and avoid undue pessimism. She calls for a balanced approach that acknowledges both the ongoing challenges and the advancements made.
…
While acknowledging the potential impacts of climate change is crucial for raising awareness and driving policy changes, it’s equally important to avoid exaggeration. Overstating the dangers can overshadow the significant progress being made and can undermine public trust in scientific discourse.
…
Read more: https://www.earth.com/news/most-people-fear-climate-change-will-end-the-world-during-their-lifetime/
This tightrope act, maintaining a pitch of anxiety which facilitates desired political outcomes, while trying but sometimes failing to steer followers away from total despair, this has real consequences.
In 2019, Dr. Alex Wodak, a renowned Aussie drug rehabilitation specialist, testified to a government commission that fear of climate change was a significant factor driving young people to become addicted to hard drugs.
…
First, the threshold step is redefining drugs as primarily a health and social issue rather than primarily a law enforcement issue. Second, drug treatment has to be expanded and improved until it reaches the same level as other health services. Third, all penalties for personal drug use and possession have to be scrapped.
Fourth, as much of the drug market as possible has to be regulated while recognising that part of the drug market is already regulated, such a methadone treatment, needle and syringe programs, medically supervised injecting centres. It will, of course, never be possible to regulate the entire drug market. We have regulated parts of the drug market before. Edible opium was taxed and regulated in Australia until 1906 and in the United States Coca-Cola contained cocaine until 1903.
Fifth, efforts to reduce the demand for powerful psychoactive drugs in Australia have had limited benefit and require a new focus. Unless and until young Australians feel optimistic about their future, demand for drugs will remain strong. Young people, understandably, want more certainty about their future prospects, including climate, education, jobs and housing affordability. Change will be slow and incremental, like all social policy reform.
As Herb Stein, as adviser to President Nixon said:
Things that cannot go on forever don’t.Drug prohibition cannot go on forever and will be replaced by libertarian paternalism. Thank you.
…
Source:https://www.iceinquiry.nsw.gov.au//assets/scii/transcripts/Decriminalisation-round-table/Decriminalisation-Roundtable-Transcript.pdf(EW 6/8/23 – available on Wayback Machine)
Next time you look at the horror show Fentanyl death statistics in Western nations, ask yourself how many of those people got their start in addiction because most of the authority figures in their lives told them that climate change would destroy the world – except for those authority figures who told them there was room for a little optimism, providing we all support green policies.
“Most people fear climate change will end the world during their lifetime”
Then they must explain how this will happen?
The warmunists cannot thread the needle, finding just the right balance to justify taking over the planet by their smart people, and not scaring the shit out of everyone, especially ignorant young people who will tend to be the most despairing.
Can’t have it both ways.
The changes the warmunists demand are not compatible with the real world of free choice that at least most western nations enshrine, as well as even quite a few developing nations. Warmunism is only compatible with fascist governments that believe they are entitled to manage every aspect of everything within their borders, and beyond. Yet, the fascist governments of the world (I don’t mean the common misdirection that right of center is fascist, but rather the true meaning of the word that is entirely independent of right vs. left) have rejected warmunism, perhaps paying lip service to it for PR purposes, but taking no actions that would actually reduce their options in making tons of money from cowed subjects.
Most?
The 59% of Vermonters who are experiencing “Climate Anxiety” are most likely recent Pandemic transplants. This includes the State Legislature. The amount of false information coming from the state government agencies is breathtaking. It infects even the school system. Very akin to a junkie pushing drugs in a neighborhood.
Most of the population has been conditioned to accept insane ideas without thinking or questioning why. See the percentage of those who blindly took an experimental drug in contradiction to the Nuremberg convention, it’s about 50%.
I regard people concerned over potential climate change to be afflicted with a form of mental illness.
I think any so-called educators who heap this garbage on their young students are guilty of committing child abuse. There is no rational purpose for scaring young impressionable children about things that will never occur and/or about things they can’t do anything about regardless.
I doubt the veracity of that. When something doesn’t rank any higher than a 15th place concern of people, it’s not considered a threat, at all.
There are a lot of gullible, credulous people as Mencken, Mackay and Barnum observed.