Trump Twirls the Windmills of Doom: The Guardian’s Theatrical Take

Ah, The Guardian, ever the beacon of balanced journalism, has outdone itself yet again. With a flourish of melodramatic despair, they’ve painted a portrait of Donald Trump as an eco-villain, brandishing policies like a black cape in a horror show of environmental doom. Let’s dive into their latest apocalyptic prophecy.

Donald Trump has vowed to immediately halt offshore wind energy projects “on day one” of a new term as US president, in his most explicit threat yet to the industry and the latest in a series of promises to undo key aspects of the transition to cleaner energy.

The drama unfolds with Trump, the presumed puppet master of planetary destruction, vowing to dismantle the beloved wind projects. Never mind that the industry might warrant a critical inspection of its impacts; The Guardian is more interested in framing this as an opening scene of a Shakespearean tragedy.

Trump repeated false accusations about wind projects as being lethal to whales during a rally on Saturday in Wildwood, a resort city on New Jersey’s coast, promising to stamp out an industry that has been enthusiastically backed by Joe Biden.

Here, Trump is almost comically vilified, conjuring images of dead whales washing up by the dozens, courtesy of those nefarious wind farms. The Guardian, in its infinite wisdom, assures us these claims are “false,” brushing aside any pesky nuances about the environmental cost of these structures.

“They destroy everything, they’re horrible, the most expensive energy there is,” Trump said of the wind turbines. “They ruin the environment, they kill the birds, they kill the whales.”

One can almost hear the ominous music swell as Trump lists the crimes of these whirling dervishes of doom. Of course, The Guardian couldn’t possibly entertain the thought that he might be exaggerating but not entirely fabricating. Instead, they prefer their villains cartoonish and their plots black and white.

And just when you thought it couldn’t get more theatrical:

McLeod said that there has been a concerted misinformation campaign, funded by oil and gas interests, to mislead voters. “Big oil is benefiting from all of this fear mongering,” she said.

The plot thickens with the introduction of Big Oil, the shadowy antagonist lurking behind the curtain. According to The Guardian’s script, anyone who questions the sanctity of wind power must be a marionette dancing on petroleum-coated strings.

Finally, Trump’s distaste for the Paris Agreement is presented not as a policy position but as a nefarious scheme to single-handedly warm the globe:

“In one of the most vivid illustrations of his stance towards the climate crisis, Trump removed the US from the Paris climate agreement during his first White House term.”

“The Paris climate accord does nothing to actually improve the environment here in the United States or globally,” Mandy Gunasekara, Trump’s former EPA chief of staff, told the Guardian in February.

In the world according to The Guardian, this statement is less a legitimate argument and more a declaration of war against Mother Earth, conveniently ignoring any substantive issues with the agreement.

In this latest piece The Guardian crafts a narrative so richly woven with bias that one could mistake it for a tapestry of fiction. Trump’s environmental policy positions, whether one agrees with them or not, deserve a platform for discussion rather than dismissal as the raving of a would-be planet plunderer.

So here’s to The Guardian, our tireless sentinel against the apocalypse, ever vigilant, ever fearful, ever entertaining. If journalism ever tires them, there’s always a spot open in Hollywood scriptwriting. Cheers to that!

4.9 33 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

87 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Corrigenda
May 15, 2024 10:04 am

Yet as usual the Guardian misses the point. Trump is the only President to enforce a sensible science policy by ensuring a red team/blue team approach and he has been proved right to restart the Canada pipeline too.

Tom Halla
May 15, 2024 10:07 am

Trump must not only be a heretic, but The AntiChrist! TDS is rampant with the Green Blob.

Reply to  Tom Halla
May 15, 2024 11:37 am

comment image

Mr.
Reply to  MyUsername
May 15, 2024 11:58 am

Fairly accurate depiction of both characters from what I observe.
Especially the frump.

Reply to  Mr.
May 15, 2024 1:52 pm

Fairly accurate from the perspective of not knowing the meaning of fascism?

Mr.
Reply to  More Soylent Green!
May 15, 2024 2:41 pm

I was actually alluding to the general appearance of the frump holding the fascism sign.
Maybe I could have been more articulate.
For those whom I may have confused –
frump /frŭmp/
nounA girl or woman regarded as dull, plain, or unfashionable.
A person regarded as colorless and primly sedate.
A contemptuous speech or piece of conduct; a gibe or flout.

Reply to  Mr.
May 16, 2024 3:57 am

Lots of them at Smith College where you’ll seem them holding hands walking down the sidewalks of Northampton, Wokeachusetts.

Trying to Play Nice
Reply to  MyUsername
May 15, 2024 2:39 pm

Great cartoon from someone who has it all backwards.

Reply to  MyUsername
May 16, 2024 3:55 am

As always, elites love to put down “deplorables” who can’t speak with Ivy League polish. If Hillary Clinton had been smart enough to NOT do that, she would have become president.

Reply to  Tom Halla
May 15, 2024 9:49 pm

This should help Oersted, Siemens et al, NY and rest New England’s Nèt Zero boffins to decide what to do going forward! I believe the silliness of all this has recently begun to worm it’s way into a few slugish pokey pokey minds. The smarter ones will be quietly grateful to be backed away from certain disaster.

Europeans had had niggling doubts following their earlier energy scare that sent them far and wide grabbing up all the nat gas they could at spot prices 10x what they had turned down in contracts a couple of years earlier. Ironically the Net Zero Luddites themselves had campaigned to destroy the FF industry with a lot of success, not realizing that without FF renewables don’t work. Their prayers for salvation from torches and pitchforks likely to follow were answered by the Russian invasion. Smiles on the faces of European heads of state for the first time in years tell it all.

Reply to  Gary Pearse
May 16, 2024 5:54 am

“This should help Oersted, Siemens et al, NY and rest New England’s Nèt Zero boffins to decide what to do going forward! I believe the silliness of all this has recently begun to worm it’s way into a few slugish pokey pokey minds. The smarter ones will be quietly grateful to be backed away from certain disaster.”

The Climate Alarmists and the Windmill Promoters will start blaming all their problems on Trump now.

Trump don’t care.

The latest estimate for Trump’s last political rally a few days ago in New Jersey is 107,000 in attendance.

Trump says Joe Biden is so bad, that Trump may win All the States.

If the elction were held today, according to the polls, Trump would be the next president.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Tom Abbott
May 16, 2024 10:53 am

Except NY will find a way to indict Trump for his position on environment, aka climate catastrophe.

May 15, 2024 10:12 am

if only there was a vaccine for tds.

Reply to  joe x
May 15, 2024 10:33 am

Actually, I think there was one.

It just wasn’t very effective against TDS.

However, it did cause blood clots and myocarditis.

Reply to  pillageidiot
May 15, 2024 11:56 pm

All medicine has risks ….there is this other thing called benefits.
So you have the heart surgery despite the possible chance of dying on the operating table

Reply to  Duker
May 16, 2024 3:36 am

Yes and you can get an honest assessment of the risks of surgery.

John Hultquist
Reply to  Duker
May 16, 2024 8:47 am

I know of one case where death was near and open-heart surgery gave the person 10 more good and productive years.

Drake
Reply to  Duker
May 16, 2024 9:42 am

There was no need for the MRNA therapy. It was not a vaccine until the CDC changed the definition of VACCINE.

66 at the time, diabetic, I took hydroxychloroquine starting when I new I was exposed to the China Virus, and came through with just a week of annoying cough.

Had it ONCE and never again. Have heard for years of others having the MRNA therapy and getting the China virus time and again, such as Brandon.

So please explain the benefits of healthy young males OR children getting vaccinated, other than to the drug industry getting BILLIONS and passing MILLIONS on the their congressional and presidential (Brandon) cronies?

AND amazingly, once the federal government decided to pay hospitals for EVERY China virus death and patient, there were almost NO regular flue deaths OR hospitalizations. AMAZING what money can do to statistics.

Florida sequestered the old and infirm and had lower death rates than Michigan. Those from Michigan, including the governor, and MANY people from shut down states went to Florida for vacation.

Drake
Reply to  Drake
May 16, 2024 9:43 am

Oh and 2 weeks to stop the spread turned into 2 years in leftist controlled lunatic states and cities.

Ed Zuiderwijk
May 15, 2024 10:14 am

Bring it on!

May 15, 2024 10:15 am

If journalism ever tires them, they can write for this site 😀

MichaelMoon
Reply to  MyUsername
May 15, 2024 10:26 am

MyUserClown,

Did you know that if FF’s were ever banned, four Billion people would starve to death without the nitrogen fertilizer upon which the World’s population depends!

Reply to  MichaelMoon
May 15, 2024 10:36 am

The scarier thought is that he actually DOES know that, and still advocates for ending FF.

“Let the culling of humans begin! I am, of course, excluded.”

CD in Wisconsin
Reply to  MichaelMoon
May 15, 2024 10:46 am

Michael,

What makes you think that culling the planet of billions of people isn’t the plan?

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  CD in Wisconsin
May 16, 2024 10:54 am

It is the plan, but only those of the religion will be spared.

strativarius
Reply to  MyUsername
May 15, 2024 12:00 pm

Return of the enfant narcissist

It must be hell down there.

Mr.
Reply to  MyUsername
May 15, 2024 12:01 pm

They have no journalism proficiency to begin with.
A chorus of sheep would produce more informative content.

Reply to  MyUsername
May 15, 2024 1:54 pm

How’s your fossil fuel made and powered computer going, putz !

With fossil fuels, your life would be far more miserable than it already is. !

mal
Reply to  MyUsername
May 15, 2024 9:52 pm

He thinks killing humans is a plus, at best he can hope there is no hell. Also somehow he thinks yet won’t be parts of those billion just like the early deaths of those useful idiots in the past believe the left!

Curious George
May 15, 2024 10:17 am

On Day 1 on his presidency, Joe Biden scrapped the Keystone XL and with it about 14,000 unionized well-paying jobs. Undoubtedly he got them better jobs since, but he is not bragging yet.

Reply to  Curious George
May 15, 2024 10:24 am

Source for 14000 unionized well-paying jobs?

iflyjetzzz
Reply to  MyUsername
May 15, 2024 2:07 pm

Department of Energy put the numbers higher, but didn’t break out union jobs.
chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.energy.gov/sites/default/files/2023-01/Keystone%20XL%20Extension%20Permit%20Revocation%20-%20Energy%20Costs%20and%20Job%20Impacts_0.pdf

 if construction were to take two years, about 3,900 direct jobs would be created annually during construction, and 21,050 U.S. total jobs would be created, counting indirect and induced jobs. 

Couldn’t get the link to work. You can google Department of Energy Keystone for the report

iflyjetzzz
Reply to  HB
May 15, 2024 8:02 pm

Thanks

Reply to  HB
May 16, 2024 12:00 am

Doesn’t say 14000 jobs at all
50 permanent jobs once completed and 4000 jobs during construction

John Hultquist
Reply to  Duker
May 16, 2024 8:52 am

Try these search terms: “employment multipliers” or “ripple effects”

Covered in ECON: 101

Mr.
Reply to  Curious George
May 15, 2024 12:07 pm

Disappointingly (tragically) Trudeau said or did nothing of consequence to preserve Canada’s economic reliance on Keystone’s essential contribution to national productivity and export revenue.

In stark contrast, Trudeau has increased Canada’s federal public service by over 300,000 placeholders, most of whom are now resisting return to 3 days a week work after COVID fully-paid holidays.

Drake
Reply to  Mr.
May 16, 2024 9:50 am

Lie much Mr. leftist.

Trudope nationalized a pipeline from the tar sands to the Pacific ocean that private industry could not build because of GOVERNMENT obstruction and the Canadian government COULD get it finished.

SO US jobs spoken of were moved to Canada.

The problem with YOU is I KNOW you know this, but will lie through omission about it anyway.

Leftist is as leftist does, i.e. LIE.

Reply to  Curious George
May 16, 2024 4:01 am

but… but… green energy will create millions of jobs! /sarc

Drake
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
May 16, 2024 9:52 am

but… but… green energy will create millions HIGH PAYING of jobs! /sarc

There, fixed it. And solar panel window washer IS a high paying job for illegal immigrants. Way better money than in Mexico, Guatemala, Nicaragua, etc.

Reply to  Drake
May 16, 2024 10:20 am

And I hear there’s going to be a lot of jobs picking up dead birds and whales due to wind turbines.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
May 16, 2024 10:57 am

All will be paid activists or Biden’s Youth Climate brigades.

terry
May 15, 2024 10:43 am

Well they better get used to him. The US polls show a Trump landslide.

iflyjetzzz
Reply to  terry
May 15, 2024 2:13 pm

They just announced two debates today. This could the biggest landslide since Bush Dukakis.

Scissor
Reply to  terry
May 15, 2024 4:28 pm

Thus the dems will lawfare to jail anyone and everyone in order to protect democracy.

Reply to  Scissor
May 16, 2024 6:02 am

The Democrats are giving it their best shot

It looks like NY District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s persecution of Trump is about to blow up in his face.

The other three cases Biden is orchestrating against Trump are in various states of disarray.

Trump will be exxonerated in the end.

Reply to  terry
May 16, 2024 12:56 am

Didn’t read them did you. Margin of error only shows Trump leading in 2 of those states

Reply to  Duker
May 16, 2024 6:07 am

Trump is leading Biden in Nevada by 12 points. Hardly the margin of error. He’s leading in other Battleground States by similar amounts.

All Trump needs to do is win two of the Battleground States and win the ones he won in 2020 and he will be president.

Trump is only benind Biden by five points in New Jersey. Biden won New Jersey in 2020 by 16 points.

guidvce4
Reply to  Tom Abbott
May 16, 2024 9:02 am

Trump had better lead by far more than you predict or it won’t mean a thing in the morning. Need to overcome any doubt that is generated by the “magic” early a.m. appearance of ballots delivered to voting places by the dems. Just sayin’.

guidvce4
Reply to  Duker
May 16, 2024 8:57 am

“Polls”. Suspect all polls of dishonesty in actually reporting true results. If, they mean anything at all. What will be really telling is the extent the left will go to deny the folks the vote at all. Think “covid”, AZ malfunctions, etc. Interesting times we live in, eh?

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Duker
May 16, 2024 10:58 am

Which polls?
So many with so many different results due to different wording of questions and different demographics included.

John Hultquist
Reply to  terry
May 16, 2024 8:58 am

Average of recent polls has Trump up by 1%. Not a landslide.
Reagan/Bush beat Mondale/Ferraro by 58.8% to 40.6%. A landslide.

SteveZ56
May 15, 2024 10:55 am

I seem to remember that the famous “climate czar” John Kerry was opposed to wind turbines off the coast of Nantucket, because they would spoil the view from his Windsurfer.

NIMBY (Not In My Back Yard) works in both parties. Let’s focus on the economic and environmental effects of this “green” energy.

May 15, 2024 11:00 am

Liberal are upset about oil platforms spoiling the
view but I bet they think wind farms are beautiful.

Wind-Farm-Oil-Platform
iflyjetzzz
Reply to  Steve Case
May 15, 2024 2:17 pm

Let’s see how they hold up after a hurricane. I’m still laughing at the floating solar panels. https://uk.news.yahoo.com/worlds-largest-floating-solar-plant-220000440.html
And the land based solar panels. https://dallasexpress.com/state/hail-storm-exposes-risks-of-renewable-energy/

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  iflyjetzzz
May 16, 2024 11:01 am

I understand the humor and am not complaining.

I do not think destruction of anything is a thing of beauty.
The energy and resources and human labor used to construct those has no ROI, regardless of how fooling the idea was all along.
Now, the energy and resources and human capital needed to clean up the mess is also something that could be applied to better ends.

Not sure how much of the panels, etc., leached into the water. Hopefully there is no health harms from it.

technically right
May 15, 2024 11:03 am

I’d just like to hear a cogent, comprehensive national energy policy. From any politician. All we have now is the equivalent of “Fire, Aim, Ready.”

Reply to  technically right
May 15, 2024 11:12 am

Developing such a national energy policy would require input from knowledgeable energy professionals. Would that even be allowed?

Idle Eric
Reply to  Ed Reid
May 15, 2024 11:19 am

Is being a knowledgeable energy professional even allowed?

Not if you want a job it seems.

Reply to  Idle Eric
May 15, 2024 11:23 am

They are out there, keeping a low profile, waiting for the excrement to encounter the air moving device. 😉

iflyjetzzz
Reply to  Ed Reid
May 15, 2024 2:18 pm

I prefer fecal matter hitting the rotating oscillator.

Reply to  technically right
May 16, 2024 4:06 am

the policy for energy should be – lots of it, cheap and dependable

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
May 16, 2024 11:02 am

And free market driven. No tax payer dollars.

Reply to  technically right
May 16, 2024 8:16 am

I’m not convinced they’re doing the “aim, ready” part.

Drake
Reply to  technically right
May 16, 2024 10:02 am

In her own unique way, Palin told the crowd (part of the 15,000 attendees expected at NAPE this week) what they wanted to hear: oil and gas is the lifeblood of America. Keystone XL is a no-brainer. The Alaska National Wildlife Refuge should be opened to drilling. President Obama just doesn’t get it.

Drake
Reply to  technically right
May 16, 2024 10:06 am

WHERE SHE STANDS

Sarah Palin on Energy & Oil• Produce more of our own oil & gas, for national security. (Sep 2008)
• Gas pipeline:history’s largest private-sector infrastructure. (Sep 2008)
• More pipelines; more nukes; more coal; more alternatives. (Sep 2008)
• Claimed major triumph: $500 million subsidy for gas pipeline. (Aug 2008)
• Global warming affects Alaska, but is not man-made. (Aug 2008)
• Resource rebate: suspend AK 8-cent fuel tax for one year. (Aug 2008)
• Gasline Inducement Act: 1,715-mile natural gas pipeline. (Aug 2008)
• Commercialize Alaska’s North Slope natural gas. (Aug 2008)
• Appointed an Alaska oil and gas commissioner. (Aug 2008)
• To win, GOP must push energy independence. (Aug 2008)
• Agrees with Obama on more Alaska oil & gas production. (Aug 2008)
• Windfall oil profits tax prevents investment. (Aug 2008)
• Lift moratorium on offshore drilling. (Jul 2008)
• Convinced McCain to drill offshore; not yet on drilling ANWR. (Jul 2008)
• Exxon-Mobil should pay $507 million for Exxon Valdez spill. (Jul 2008)
• Unlock ANWR; we’re ready, willing and able to contribute. (Jun 2008)
• Energy relief plan: $100 per person monthly, for oil & gas. (May 2008)
• Bush is right: drill ANWR & develop our own supplies. (Apr 2008)
• Fully fund for the Petroleum Systems Integrity Office. (Feb 2008)
• $250M for proven alternative energy, including wind & hydro. (Jan 2008)
• Gas pipelines are approved if they meet Alaska’s needs. (Jan 2008)
• National energy policy not an either/or proposition. (Nov 2007)
• Fund cellulosic biofuel research in Farm Bill. (Oct 2007)
• Submitted legislation to build natural AGIA gas pipeline. (Mar 2007)
• Stranded Gas Development Act no longer applies. (Nov 2006)
• Get ANWR open. (Nov 2006)
• Chaired the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission. (Nov 2006)
• Pursue gasline plan that is best for ALL Alaskans. (Nov 2006)
• Met with producers and employee groups for pipeline deal. (Oct 2006)
• Firm start date as part of gasline incentive offer. (Oct 2006)
• Opposes natural gas reserves tax–it’s not earned income yet. (Oct 2006)
• Analyze potential costs associated with climate change. (Oct 2006)

Quoted from Time.

May 15, 2024 1:39 pm

Trump wants to return to what has proven to work and scrap the replacements that have proven to not work to supply a reliable power grid.
(How many brownouts and blackouts in CA before it went “green”?)

Drake
Reply to  Gunga Din
May 16, 2024 10:08 am

They had real problems when Enron was manipulating the system.

David Wojick
May 15, 2024 1:43 pm

Happily Trump’s statements will have a chilling (even freezing) effect on new US offshore wind financing. Woohoo

Reply to  David Wojick
May 16, 2024 6:13 am

A “further” chilling effect, as investors were already starting to get nervous about the problems facing the windmill industry.

Of course, the climate alarmists/Democrats will blame everything on Trump. They will say “Everything was going just rosy, until Trump came along and put the kaboosh on the windmill industry.”

Drake
Reply to  Tom Abbott
May 16, 2024 10:10 am

Of course, the climate alarmists/Democrats/main stream media will blame everything on Trump. They will say “Everything was going just rosy, until Trump came along and put the kaboosh on the windmill industry.”

There, fixed it.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Tom Abbott
May 16, 2024 11:03 am

How can you tell a politician (erm, Democrat politician) is lying? His/her lips are moving.

Edward Katz
May 15, 2024 2:13 pm

Would anyone expect any other type of reaction from a rag like The Guardian? It won’t be long before the BBC, CBC and the other woke media outlets join in with their next round of alarmist diatribes, but as usual the realists will ignore them.

May 15, 2024 3:00 pm

“They destroy everything, they’re horrible, the most expensive energy there is,” Trump said of the wind turbines. “They ruin the environment, they kill the birds, they kill the whales.”

There are no politicians anywhere in the world coming out with such valid criticisms.

Subsidy farmers have to be aware of the ever present sovereign risk.

Trump’s promise and good chance of re-election should be ringing alarm bells with offshore wind promoters and financiers.

USA has probably dodged a deadly economic bullet simply through this single promise.

USA has lagged the rest of the developed world toward the economic abyss primarily due to Trump’s first term.

Reply to  RickWill
May 16, 2024 6:20 am

Good comments.

Trump is poised to do it all again. First thing up, after outlawing offshore windmills is pulling out of the Paris Climate Agreement for a second time.

Climate alarmists will be down on their knees screaming at the sky, “Noooooo!!!”. Too late! Its a done deal. Don’t worry, the Earth’s climate will be just fine.

The political climate in the Democrat party will be in turmoil. That’s a good thing. That’s where imbeciles belong. They put themselves there because they live in a delusional world. The rest of us don’t want to live in that delusional world. Bye, bye.

May 15, 2024 3:11 pm

These articles in the Guardian will not even qualify for third rate SF.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Michael in Dublin
May 16, 2024 11:05 am

They rate about the same as The Day After Tomorrow.

May 15, 2024 3:17 pm

Here’s one for all the green luvvies…

‘Big Oil’ is The Emperor — Donald Trump his servant. Yes my Master….HAHA!!. But there will be no Luke to turn Vader, yes Big Wind will die.

R
Bob
May 15, 2024 7:01 pm

There is little need to sugar coat Trump’s statements. He knows we are headed down the wrong path, there is every reason to say that. The CAGW crowd has produced no science for decades to back up their views. They have nothing we need to let the world know they have nothing. The only measure for whether the trillions of dollars world governments have pissed away on CAGW is, has the average global temperature gone down? They have failed, their own statements admit everything they have done has failed. Wake up your hypothesis sucks.

guidvce4
Reply to  Bob
May 16, 2024 9:26 am

Was there ever any actual “science” which backed up their views? From folks who weren’t bought and paid for by grants/whatever for the desired outcomes. CAGW is bunk, pure grift. Now they are being exposed. Desperation is setting in.

UK-Weather Lass
May 15, 2024 11:01 pm

The Guardian’s reporting during the COVID-19 pandemic tells us everything we need to know about its Agenda and what it never got right, not once, during the whole pandemic – the Government did little right and neither did the press. It’s climate change agenda is equally poorly thought through evidenced by the absence of any truly qualified journalists on its books and its inability to tell us how Net Zero can possibly do anything other than cost a lot of money for nothing – not even a measurable fraction of UK’s CO2 let alone the world’s output.

The paper was once free spirited, prepared to discuss all sides of a problem but that has long gone. The replacement agenda must be down to the sponsors the Guardian has who are also top dollar virtue signalers. When it finally admits to its readership that it is no better and probably a lot worse than other rags available perhaps it can gracefully disappear from view and then RIP.

Reply to  UK-Weather Lass
May 16, 2024 1:02 am

Agree with a lot of that , and Im a liberal.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  UK-Weather Lass
May 16, 2024 11:07 am

New York Times has shifter from extreme Left to a bit more centric editorial policy.

Coeur de Lion
May 16, 2024 2:54 am

It used to be the Manchester Guardian, edited and printed up north in UK and away from London corrupt groupthink. Feared for its ruthless investigative journalism.

May 16, 2024 3:51 am

“The Guardian couldn’t possibly entertain the thought that he might be exaggerating but not entirely fabricating.”

Trump isn’t great at explaining issues. Regarding fires in CA a few years ago- he said it’s partly due to not practicing great forestry- he said “they need to rake the forests”. What he meant of course was to do great forestry- to minimize fire risk- and that’s true. It’s just that the way he says it sounds kinda stupid. The “smart” people here in Wokeachusetts say we must lock up all the forests to save the planet. At least in this case, the kinda stupid sounding idea is much better.

Sparta Nova 4
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
May 16, 2024 11:09 am

Raking is part of clearing the underbrush. Just raking the forest floor detritus would have helped.