When (And Why) Heat Pumps Suck

By Ron Barmby

When you need heat pumps the most, they pump heat the least.

This is according to an unbreakable law of physics that applies to the entire universe without exception, even black holes, and especially to heat pumps.

Heat pump promoters who claim otherwise must have defeated the second law of thermodynamics, which would theoretically also allow them to make time run backward.

In addition to denunciation by physics, the cost of operating heat pumps is often very high compared to natural gas-fired heating.

Heat pumps are often accurately described as an air conditioner in reverse. To understand how a heat pump works, it helps to know how an air conditioner works.

How An Air Conditioner Works

An air conditioner transports heat from inside a house to the outside in a continuous circuit using a chemical mixture called a refrigerant.

The refrigerant is piped into the house as a liquid under high pressure and at a temperature just above the outside air temperature. It expands into a gas across a valve that has a lower pressure on the other side and becomes very cold, about 4°C (39°F).

This part of the air-conditioning unit is called the evaporator because it causes the liquid refrigerant to evaporate into a gas. The cooling is a bit similar to when you let air out of a tire and the expanding escaping air feels cold. (If you want to know more details, look up the Ideal Gas Law.)

The pipe with cold gas-phase refrigerant is then passed in front of a fan inside the A/C unit (or furnace if it’s central A/C) to cool the room.

The second law of thermodynamics dictates that two bodies at different temperatures will equalize in temperature when brought into contact with each other.

How fast this equalization occurs is driven by the temperature difference between the two bodies: the bigger the temperature difference, the faster the heat exchange happens.

The pipe containing the refrigerant gets cold because it’s in contact with the cold refrigerant, and the air outside the pipe gets cold because it’s in contact with the cold pipe.

A fan speeds up the contact of the warm air in the room with the cold pipe and as the heat from the air is transferred to the refrigerant, the refrigerant gets warmer.

The low-pressure and now warm refrigerant is then piped outside the building to an electrically driven compressor, which reduces the gas in volume and increases its pressure.

The compressor puts energy into the gas causing it to heat up (the Ideal Gas Law again). The hot high-pressure gas is then cooled to near outside temperature by passing the pipe containing the gas for several loops in front of a fan that uses outside air to cool and condense the gas into a high-pressure liquid (which is why it’s called the condensing unit).

The high-pressure and near-outside-temperature liquid refrigerant is then piped inside the building and the whole circuit starts over again.

This circuit is called the Carnot Cycle after the French physicist Sadi Carnot who discovered it in 1824. It wasn’t until 1902 that American engineer Dave Carrier produced the first air conditioner.

How A Heat Pump Works

To convert an air conditioning unit into a heat pump, you place the evaporator (which attracts heat) outside of the house and the condenser (which expels heat) inside the house.

Furthermore, the heat pump refrigerant is chemically different so that it can be cooled in the evaporator to minus 25°C (minus 13°F). The refrigerant has to be colder than the outside temperature to absorb outside heat.

The two perceived advantages of a heat pump are:

  • If the electrical energy to run the heat pump was produced without carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, it’s considered a green heating source. But all electrical generation has some form of environmental impact, most likely out of mind at a remote site.
  • Because it collects free heat from the outside and delivers it inside, the only cost to run a heat pump is the electrical energy for the compressor and fans. A heat pump is more energy efficient because it transfers existing heat, rather than creating new heat by the combustion of a fossil fuel or biomass.

But here is the catch: Energy efficiency is not the same as economic efficiency.

At an outside temperature of 10°C (50°F) for every unit of energy used to run the heat pump (purchased electricity), the heat pump can collect four units of energy from the outside (heat delivered into your home). At this outside temperature, the efficiency of the heat pump is 400%.

When the outside air temperature drops to minus 20°C (minus 4°F), the efficiency of the heat pump drops to 200%; one purchased unit of energy input delivers only two units of free heating energy.

This is a result of the ambient temperature (minus 20°C) approaching the refrigerant temperature (minus 25°C) and reducing the rate of heat exchange between the two. It’s the second law of thermodynamics at play. The smaller the temperature difference, the more slowly the heat exchange occurs.

A conventional natural gas furnace delivers only 0.9 units of heat energy for each unit of purchased energy, for an energy efficiency of 90%.

When Heat Pumps Suck

Where I am writing normally has temperatures colder than minus 20°C 20 days per year, and the retail cost of electricity is nine times more than natural gas on an energy equivalent basis.

With an outside temperature of 10°C, to heat a room to the same temperature a heat pump would use only 22.5% of the purchased energy of a natural gas furnace (22.5% = 90%/400%). But the total cost of that purchased energy would be twice as much (22.5% X 9 = 2).

Under mild weather conditions, the heat pump already has twice the operating expense as a natural gas furnace. Under common winter conditions of minus 20°C, the energy efficiency of the heat pump drops to 200%. It uses only 45% of the purchased energy, but that purchased electricity costs four times more than natural gas.

Your natural gas bill charges you by the gigajoule (GJ) and your power bill charges you by the kilowatt-hour (kWh). Currently where I live natural gas is $4.89/GJ, and electricity is $0.16/kWh. I have a 90% fuel-efficient natural gas furnace.

The following temperature scenarios provide a rough approximation of the difference in cost between running a furnace and running a heat pump where I live:

  • The outside air temperature is 10°C or warmer—Divide the gas cost by 60 to get the kWh equivalent energy cost. If this number is smaller than the cost of electricity in kWh, then it is cheaper to operate a natural gas furnace than a heat pump. $4.89/GJ (gas) divided by 60 equals $0.08/kWh (electricity). In this scenario, heating my home with gas is half the cost of electricity needed to operate a heat pump ($0.08/$0.16).
  • The outside air temperature is near minus 20°C—Divide the gas price in GJ ($4.89) by 120 to get the kWh equivalent cost ($0.04). My natural gas furnace cost is one-fourth of the cost of operating a heat pump.
  • The outside air temperature is minus 25°C or colder—Most retail models of home-use heat pumps will probably not work at all because the refrigerant has to be colder than the outside temperature. Many heat pumps have a conventional electrical resistance heating element built in as a cold temperature backup. This is confirmation by the design engineers that they can not beat the second law of thermodynamics.

[Note to reader: One GJ of natural gas equals 278 kWh of electricity, and is roughly equivalent to one million British Thermal Units (BTUs).]

What Heat Pump Promoters Won’t Tell You

Granted, in moderate climates where winter home heating is more for comfort than survival, and especially where summer air conditioning is desirable, a heat pump that’s switchable to an air conditioner is probably worth looking into. They are more energy efficient, but there’s more to consider. For example:

  1. Compared to natural gas furnaces, heat pumps can have a much higher operating cost, which governments attempt to overcome by taxing fossil fuels and using those taxes to subsidize “green” electricity.
  2. Natural gas and other combustion furnaces provide instant heat and can warm up a cold house much faster than a heat pump can.
  3. In very cold weather heat pumps suck.

If heat pump promoters deny the above statements, they must be Oppenheimer-smart and have found a way around the universal second law of thermodynamics. Ask them if they are working on a time machine next.

This commentary was first published at Climate Change Dispatch on February 19, 2024.

Ron Barmby (www.ronaldbarmby.ca) is a Professional Engineer with a Master’s degree, whose 40+ year career in the energy sector has taken him to over 40 countries on five continents. His book, Sunlight on Climate Change: A Heretic’s Guide to Global Climate Hysteria (Amazon, Barnes & Noble), explains in layman’s terms the science of how natural and human-caused global warming work.

4.9 47 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

179 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
February 21, 2024 8:55 am

I have no idea if air conditioner have a defrosting unit built in as refrigeration equipment in super markets, where the evaporator often freezes. Could be a solution for heat pumps too.

MarkW
Reply to  Krishna Gans
February 22, 2024 8:36 am

Heat pumps come with “defrosting” units already.

Bob Armstrong
February 21, 2024 9:16 am

The stated efficiencies for electricity don’t consider the matching 50% loss at the power plant . Because the current is constant around the circuit , an equal amount needs to be expended at the power plant . It’s why the cooling stacks , or optimally , steam piping in cities to nearby buildings . Perhaps someone can explain the physics better . It’s something I learned reading AC Circuit Fundamentals as a teen .

On the other hand , in many places , like NYC , ground heat sinks are being used which are more efficient than air on cold days .

February 21, 2024 9:31 am

I recently shared results from monitoring my new mini-split for a few weeks, specifically recording internal temps when external was below freezing. It didn’t to horribly but it was still significantly colder than above freezing temperatures. That was WITH a heating element.

I would be VERY interested in seeing a similar comparison done with a heat pump without (or with a disabled) heating element.

The presence of that heating element is the part that always seems to be missing from the discussion about how well heat pumps work.

Kevin Kilty
February 21, 2024 11:15 am

At an outside temperature of 10°C (50°F) for every unit of energy used to run the heat pump (purchased electricity), the heat pump can collect four units of energy from the outside (heat delivered into your home). At this outside temperature, the efficiency of the heat pump is 400%.

No. The heat pump collecting 4 units of energy from outside, plus the one unit of work, transfers 5 units into the house and thus has a coefficient of performance (COP) of 500%. We do not use efficiency to characterize performance of heat pumps.

If the heat pump is looked at as a refrigerator, refrigerating the outside air, then its COP is 400%. The definition of COP changes between the machine acting as heat pump or refrigerator because its purpose is different. The maximum COP in either instance is governed by the second law of thermodynamics and related to the temperature difference between the colder place and the warmer place. Yet, a person still has to account for the first law too.

Maximum COP(heat pump) = 1/(1-T(cold)/T(hot))

Editor
February 21, 2024 11:59 am

I’m disappointed in the tone of this post.

I live in Sutton NH. Last February we got down to -17.7°F (-27.6°C). Two days later the low was 20.9°F, -6.2°C). This winter we haven’t gone below 0°F yet.

When I moved here, this small house was heated with two unvented propane space heaters. This town of 2,000 does not have natural gas, propane is just as clean, albeit far more expensive, some $5/gallon (please excuse the units). I replaced those with a “mini-split” heat pump upstairs and a vented propane space heater downstairs. I’ve been amazed at how much more I pay for propane and have taken steps to keep the first floor warm air there and out of the second floor. E.g. lower thermostat setting downstairs and a curtain (okay, big piece of foam rubber packing material that came with a desk chair) at the bottom of the stairs.

There’s probably significant is air infiltration around the granite block foundation. Mostly unmanaged except for a basement door, but it may be a big part of the propane expense.

Last heating season (mostly Oct-Apr) I spent $1400 on 267 gallons of propane (also used in cooking) and some $700 for heat pump heat. And a little space heater heat for when the heatpump gives up below -20°C. I’m astonished at the price difference and equally amazed at how much heat the mini-split can muster around 15°F (-10°C).

This is likely vastly better than a condo I was in in the 1980s where I used an older heat pump and added wood heat below freezing.

You note:

When Heat Pumps Suck

Where I am writing normally has temperatures colder than minus 20°C 20 days per year, and the retail cost of electricity is nine times more than natural gas on an energy equivalent basis.

So take advantage of your natural gas. Some of your readers don’t have natural gas. I do like propane’s cleanliness.

If heat pump promoters deny the above statements, they must be Oppenheimer-smart and have found a way around the universal second law of thermodynamics. Ask them if they are working on a time machine next.

When I sat down with the contractor, the main thing they didn’t say was that the mini-split shuts down at -20°C, Perhaps that’s because I told them upfront that I wanted a single stage unit and figured the propane space heater would not be so expensive to run. Also, I figured if the heat pump worked well, the propane unit wouldn’t be a big loss if I added a heat pump for the first floor.

Besides, I can run the propane unit for several hours off a car battery and UPS, so it at the very least it’s a good back up system.

Finally, I never would have written this. How do you use black hole to heat your house?:

This is according to an unbreakable law of physics that applies to the entire universe without exception, even black holes, and especially to heat pumps.

February 21, 2024 1:03 pm

We’ve had a Water Furnace geothermal system since 2010 here in Michigan. The temp is kept at 71 degF all seasons. It’s been a very good investment. Propane was costing us a fortune. Now we only use propane for the clothes dryer and stove. In summer hot water is basically “free”. In winter it’s dependent on how cold it is outside. The resistive element backup has never turned on.

The house was built in 1976 with insulation in the attic and foam in the walls about 5 years ago.

Kevin Kilty
Reply to  John W
February 22, 2024 6:25 am

Your experience shows that people can have very different impressions of heat pumps. Air sourced units, which urban people will have to use simply because there isn’t room or resource for enough ground source heat supply in crowded cities, don’t work all that well, and will use the aux resistance heat quite a lot. Ground source heat pumps in wet regions with the evaporator below the frost line can probably work just fine without aux electric resistance heat. The COP is a substantial function of temperature.

My biggest complaint, and I’ve had three buildings with aux heat pumps, is that units making use of forced air infrastructure in a building don’t get the plenum hot enough to feel comfortably warm air out the vents. The building may be 70F and just fine, but the breeze created by the forced air makes everyone uncomfortable.

NotBob43
February 22, 2024 6:15 am

I live in South Carolina, in the upstate area. Our house has a heat pump for heating and cooling. My electricity costs are higher in the winter than in the summer, but not excessively so. In the winter we sometimes supplement the heat with our gas fireplace. Especially when the morning temperatures are less than 25°F. I’d never have a heat pump where we used to live in MN.

MarkW
Reply to  NotBob43
February 22, 2024 8:43 am

Where I live, there is about 3 feet of soil, then bedrock.

cimdave
February 23, 2024 5:57 am

“When you need heat pumps the most, they pump heat the least.”
That’s why I love my coal stove.

Rational Keith
February 23, 2024 12:25 pm

So heat pumps are only viable when:

  • electricity cost is low (Anthony knows where it isn’t 😉
  • OAT is moderate to high (how cold does Chica CA get? Not much, a few degrees C negative at worst)
Verified by MonsterInsights