ROBERT SCHMAD
CONTRIBUTOR
A large ship being built to construct offshore wind farms in a way that complies with a labor union-backed law is behind schedule and over budget, compounding a series of setbacks that have complicated the Biden administration’s efforts to expand domestic wind energy, according to The Wall Street Journal.
Charybdis, a massive boat under construction in south Texas, would be the first vessel legally allowed and able to carry wind turbine components from an American port and then install turbines in the open ocean, the WSJ reported. The ship is about a year behind schedule, which has placed a strain on the offshore wind industry and made it less likely that the United States meets the Biden administration’s goal of producing 30 GW of wind energy by 2030.
In addition to being behind schedule, Charybdis is projected to have a final cost of $625 million, around double what a similar ship would cost elsewhere, according to analysts.
The AFL-CIO, the largest labor union in America, supports the Jones Act, the law that makes Charybdis necessary. The Jones Act requires that American-made and staffed ships carry wind turbine parts to offshore farm sites, according to the WSJ. (RELATED: One Of Biden’s Favorite Green Technologies Is Drowning In Logistical Hurdles)
No existing American ships have the capability to install the wind turbines many energy firms have planned, and foreign vessels that can build them are not allowed to pick up components directly from American ports.
Rather than large foreign ships directly picking up turbine parts from American ports, smaller American boats will shuttle parts from ports to the farm sites where foreign ships then use their cranes to pick up the parts and begin construction.
Turbine blades can be larger than football fields, and turbine towers can stand as much as 600 feet above water.
Ørsted, a Danish wind energy company, contracted Charybdis to construct two wind farms off the coast of New York but has since had to explore alternative options due to the delays, the WSJ reported.
There is an ongoing shortage of construction ships, contributing to wind energy projects being canceled and delayed, according to the WSJ.
Other wind power companies have paid tens of millions of dollars to get out of contracts to sell energy to utility companies after they were unable to complete projects, citing inflation and supply chain difficulties.
Cancellations of wind energy projects have complicated the Biden administration’s clean energy goals. The United States is only on track to meet about half of its 2030 offshore wind energy goal, according to Reuters.
Delays and cancellations will likely drive up the prices Americans end up paying for wind energy, according to the WSJ.
The Biden administration has financially supported the wind industry through tax credits and manufacturing subsidies.
Despite federal support, some experts think taxpayers could be on the hook to bail out failing wind companies.
“No one should doubt the willingness of the Biden administration and congressional Democrats to try to spend billions more debt-funded dollars to bail out their pet offshore wind industry,” David Blackmon, an energy consultant, previously told the Daily Caller News Foundation.
The AFL-CIO did not immediately respond to the DCNF’s requests for comment.
All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.
It is a jobs program, not a business, apparently. They also do not much care if the green prayer wheels produce power. They also do not give a flying f if they kill whales or birds.
They don’t care about jobs, either – just the kickbacks.
When the Audubon Society supports windmills, I know they are full of it and anti birds.
The MA Audubon also, now, supports clearcuts because the state has convinced them it’ll result in more “early succession habitats” with the birds that like such habitats. It’s a lie- and I’m amazed that Audubon fell for it- but it shows how governments can like and even the likes of Audubon can believe the lies. I think it’s partly because the top people in these enviro groups are also susceptible to encouragements to play along to get along.
correction “how governments can lie and even Audubon can believe the lies”
time to fix edit thing!
Time to prooof reed bettr.
I usually do- but I type super fast and sometimes I’m in a hurry to catch up on several essays here and read all the comments – then look at a few dozen YouTube videos and post comments there- not much time for pruf reedin.
In high school- took a typing course- I think I was the only male in the class- got a pin to pin to my shirt- which you get if you can type 50 words/minute with no more than one error. That pin was much better than wearing a sport’s jacket that you get if on the football team. Yuh, the girls would go wild when they saw me with that pin. 🙂 Especially the cheer leaders!
“It is a jobs program, not a business, apparently.”
When Milton Friedman was visiting India in the 1960s, a government bureaucrat proudly showed him a big canal project. Milton was shocked to see that, instead of modern tractors and earth movers, the workers had shovels. He asked why there were so few machines. The bureaucrat explained: “You don’t understand. This is a jobs program.” To which Milton replied: “Oh, I thought you were trying to build a canal. If it’s jobs you want, then you should give these workers spoons, not shovels.”
The perverse incentives of government projects spending OTHER people’s money are both universal and timeless!
In the US, and most other “western” countries, we have “social” programs that encourage NOT WORKING, either with a shovel of a spoon.
Make welfare recipients do SOMETHING for the money, and take a drug test before getting their stipend, would create a great incentive for the drug addled lazy to do SOMETHING to the benefit of the greater good.
Of course the first step is to use this new labor availability to build enough cages to hold all the thieves who will be “created” by their need to steal for their drugs, booze and cigs/vaps.
______________________________________________________________
My my my, what a surprise.
I know what that sentence is supposed to mean, but it’s kind of weird – I mean, where does the Fed get their money?
When the US Govt needs money, the Treasury Department auctions debt, called bonds, notes or bills. The auction is for the interest rate. The rate starts high, and bidders bid it down. In an open, competitive market, the rate will generally equal expectations of inflation. So if it’s a 10 year bond and people think inflation will be 2% per year, then bidders will bid the rate down to 2%. Or maybe lower, depending on the premium the bidders assign to security (because the bonds are guaranteed to not default).
Where things get squirrely is the Federal Reserve (called “the Fed”), which isn’t really part of the government, is tasked with managing inflation. So let’s imagine the the Fed wants the interest rate to be 1%, and the market has only bid the rate down to 3%. Since they don’t have any profit motive, the Fed can bid 1%. Since the Fed is a central bank, they just create the money necessary (that’s what a central bank does–create money).
So in the modern world, the Government can issue as much debt as it wants, and the Fed will buy it for whatever interest rate the Fed wants to pay, with an infinite supply of newly created money. Someone just sits at a computer termal and types in however much money is necessary.
“Since the Fed is a central bank, they just create the money necessary (that’s what a central bank does–create money).”
Don’t forget all the jobs created for “economists” and politicians. In general very high paying jobs.
Hoist by your own petard. Almost exactly.
These alarmists suffer from their own “petard” of climate science nonsense and still mange to survive. Now we can’t breathe or the planet is doomed.
Is that 30 GW or 30 GWH Biden wants?
30 GW but over 50 GW are in development at this point. Individual coastal states have 10 GW targets (MA, NY, NJ, VA) with many others a little less. All this while electric power usage is not going up. But there is the green dream of electrifying all fossil fuel use. A house of green cards.
A phrase that keeps popping up and each time I see it, it annoys me even more – this whole idea that an elected official (or in this case, an installed puppet) can make up any arbitrary “goal”, no matter how destructive, expensive, unconstitutional or just plain none of their damned business and expect the rest of the planet to abide with it no matter the cost or how much society hates the idea and the means it is imagined to be accomplished.
I have goals too; by what authority does anyone have to demand that everyone else surrenders their own ideas and sacrifice for another man’s folly? Especially when this particular guy is most likely to be dead from dementia long before 2030, and surely, unless he overstays his station and remains as a dictator for life, will not be able to see it through. Is the next regime supposed to surrender their own agenda to abide by this “goal” no matter how evil it is?
I’ve been impressed with how just about any random judge could shut down a Trump Presidential program or policy, but the Ds never seem to hit that snag for very long and the money never stops flowing.
What will they do with the ships once all the parts are delivered?
Replacement parts. You think these things last forever? Nah, always fixing or rebuilding. Thing break on the ocean a little faster than anywhere else.
More good news. The CAGW crowd can blame Charybdis if they like but the reason Biden’s energy plan isn’t working out is because it is a piece of crap. Wind, solar and battery are not up to the task of providing affordable, consistent power when we need it. They never will. A combination of fossil fuel and nuclear can easily provide the power we need when we need it at an affordable price. Every dollar pissed away on renewables in the form of subsidies, tax preferences and regulatory forgiveness should be matched building fossil fuel and nuclear. Do that and see which sources actually provide what we want and need. Renewables are a complete waste.
Our Leftist government doesn’t care about excess costs for which taxpayers and ratepayers are on the hook. Ideology and “campaign contributions” and jobs/contracts for their families are venal politicians need to justify spending/borrowing money to throw away.
Does Charybdis have a sister ship named Scylla?
old cocky came here seeking knowledge
things they would not teach him of in college
No but interesting that they should name a turbine installation vessel after a monster whirlpool, capable of destroying ships, whales, etc.
The ships needed to transport and assemble these offshore wind farms are made of steel. Steel is made in blast furnaces using coking coal and iron ore. Last year, the US had 19 operational blast furnaces, that dropped to 14 this year. China has over 800 blast furnaces, next year they will have over 900. Wind/solar/battery systems have not, and never will contribute in any meaningful way to steel, concrete, aluminum, glass, or solar silicon manufacture.
This is a sad fraud upon the US, and the world. “Clean”, “Renewable”, “Net Zero”…Not…
I believe that the intent of Net Zero program is that when fully implemented not only CO2 but also GDP, Dow, Nasdaq, S&P, etc. wall also be ZERO
the parasite is killing its host.
And, based on junk science, The Entire Earth
They fail to mention that the global foolish rush to build offshore Wind has created a global shortage of boats. The latest estimate is that 200 are needed. The wind targets are uniformly nuts. The boom is creating its own bust. Fine by me.
Yep.. In June 2022 Wind Europe warned that the lack of specialised vessels to build offshore wind farms “poses risk for project execution worldwide”
Three different types of vessels are used. Foundation Installation vessels (FIVs), Wind Turbine Installation Vessels (WTIVs) and Cable Laying Vessels (CLVs) to connect to land.
They said a shortage of FIVs and WTIVs would kick in by 2024/25 and the gap between supply and demand for CLVs would be even greater for the next eight years.
https://windeurope.org/newsroom/news/europes-offshore-wind-expansion-will-depend-on-vessel-availability/
Great info. Thanks!
Jones Act: only US ships can move freight between points within the US. Work around: ship parts to Canada first.
That is why Hawaii buys its oil from China.
Pay walled unfortunately
Noise, bird deaths: Windfarm ordered to close for first time in France
Campaign groups successfully argued that the turbines were causing harm to birds and residents
https://www.connexionfrance.com/article/French-news/Noise-bird-deaths-Wind-farm-ordered-to-close-for-first-time-in-France
There is a waiver route for the Jones Act..
Before the ship does any damage to our economy, they need to try to set a speed record near the icebergs of Newfoundland. Be sure and limit the number of life rafts.