Electric trucks at any cost should have conversations about the conundrums associated with this mandate, before implementing a Mandate.
Published Dec 5, 2023 at Heartland https://heartland.org/opinion/california-aims-to-force-adoption-of-electric-trucks-but-19-states-sue-to-block/
Ronald Stein is an engineer, senior policy advisor on energy literacy for the Heartland Institute and CFACT, and co-author of the Pulitzer Prize nominated book “Clean Energy Exploitations.”
The California GREEN movement, at any cost, is progressing at warp speed.
Earlier this year, California passed regulations that would turn the trucking industry upside down. Zero emission mandates would disrupt the industry, raise shipping costs, and put trucking companies out of business. A group including 19 states and several trucking organizations recently filed suit to block the California regulation.
A little background on the EV Truck mandate:California’s Advanced Clean Fleets (ACF) Regulation goes into effect on January 1, 2024. The ACF requires that truck operators buy only Zero Emissions Vehicle (ZEV) trucks for medium-duty and heavy-duty trucking operations as early as January 2024. The ACF also requires that trucking companies transition their fleets to 100 percent ZEV trucks by 2035 to 2042, depending upon class of truck.
This EV truck mandate lacks conversations about the many conundrums associated with this mandate, i.e., the elephant in the room that no one wants to talk about:
- For those huge EV truck batteries there is virtually non-existing transparency of the environmental degradation and the human rights abuses occurring in developing countries with yellow, brown, and black skinned people. Both human rights abuses and environmental degradation are directly connected to the mining for the exotic minerals and metals that are required to manufacture those EV batteries. The children used to produce the lithium for an EV battery is appalling.
- California has almost 400,000 miles of roadways used by the State’s 31 million vehicles. Those roadways are heavily dependent on road taxes from fuels that contribute more than $8.8 billion annually, the same gas tax revenues that also funds many environmental programs. That $8.8 billion revenue source will diminish in the decades ahead as EV’s begin to replace internal combustion engine vehicles.
- The heavier EV trucks will put more wear and tear on the California roadways. How will the State replace $8.8 billion from fuel taxes to maintain the California roadways?
- California is the 4th largest economy in the world and has three of the largest shipping ports in America—No. 1 in Los Angeles, No. 2 in Long Beach, and No. 7 in Oakland. Ships arriving and departing from the ports up and down the coast from San Diego to San Francisco.
- Many truckers are individual operators that may just stop coming to California! Those trucks that access three of the largest shipping ports in America move a lot of products for the entire country.
- Trucker’s travel all over the nation, thus heavy EV truck charging stations sites would need to be built all over the nation to keep those trucks moving.
- EV trucks are only for those in wealthy countries as Nearly Half the World Lives on Less than $5.50 a Day, as billions still struggle to meet basic needs. They may never be able to enjoy the materialistic living styles of those in wealthier countries.
- Electric trucks suffer major disadvantages when compared to diesel trucks:
- Diesel trucks can travel about 1,200 miles after filling the tank in 15 minutes. The range of electric trucks is about 150-330 miles, and recharging may take hours, even on a high-speed charger.
- EV truck cabs cost two-to-three times as much as diesel cabs, an incremental cost of as much as $300,000 per truck.
- EV cabs also weigh about 10,000 pounds more than comparable diesel versions.
- China emits more greenhouse gases in a day than California trucks emit in a year.
The California GREEN movement continues to be a National Security risk for America as 4th largest economy in the world is already importing most of its crude oil demands from foreign countries, to support the States’ 9 International airports, 41 Military airports, and 3 of the largest shipping ports in America, and is now mandating that the trucks that move many of the products to Americans be electric!
Ronald Stein, P.E.
Author | Columnist | Energy Literacy Consultant
https://expertfile.com/experts/ronald.stein
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
“The heavier EV trucks will put more wear and tear on the California roadways.” That is true only if the current California axle/weight laws remain on the books. California’s neighboring states allow trucks to gross 105,000 lbs. on an eight to nine axle combination, a set-up which causes less pressure on the roads per tire thus easier on the roads, creates faster braking times using 16 to 18 brake drums vs. the normal ten, and decreases the overall amount of truck traffic on the highways.
They get fun on icy roads.
Silly silly people. (Sorry, a Brit speaking. We have silly people too.)
If this were national, I’d suspect railroads of sabotaging the trucking industry to rail’s advantage. But it’s not even that low level of smart or principled.
A group including 19 states and several trucking organizations recently filed suit to block the California regulation.
There’s a part of me that hopes they fail. This insanity won’t stop until the masses start feeling the pain from these policies.
Unfortunately, there’s also a large portion of those masses who will never understand the cause of the pain.
This is a great analysis that shouldn’t need stating. When will we voters restrict ourselves to electing individuals with a proven intent of making our lives better and with the intellectual skills to reach, what to most sentient people are obvious conclusions, based on the available evidence.
Never… the voters like nice-looking, soft-spoken people, with no Critical Thinking skills.
Another article with an AI generated image without describing it as such.
WUWT should do better. They are setting themselves up for a disinformation campaign against them.
That is NOT Gov. Newsom in that image.
With regards to E Trucks,
The truck drivers are also going to sit around for several hours waiting for the batteries to get charged up for another 300 miles or so.
extra cost in driver wages? Who will pay for that?
Imagine this: A modified B double trailer configuration. The first trailer is modified to solely carry the E-truck’s batteries; the second is a standard double trailer carrying freight. Once in a Nevada hub, the freight-carrying trailers of two e-trucks are combined and joined to a traditional cab, and heads for the intended destination. E-trucks release their modified trailers and connect the trailers to charging stations, The driver then links his cab to a different modified trailer having a fully charged battery, and returns to its California port. You only need to develop a quick connection between the cab and battery trailer.
Material costs would add substantially to the total freight cost, but labor costs would not be substantially more. You eliminate drivers having to wait hours for their trucks to charge. You just need a whole lot of Ebattery trailers.
Or just expand a bloomin’ Mexican Pacific port and bypass CA entirely!