China To Save The World (Again)–AEP

From NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT

By Paul Homewood

h/t Doug Brodie/Ian Magness

Everything AEP writes about Net Zero seems to be infused with wishful thinking, no more so than where China is concerned:

China’s carbon emissions have either peaked already or will do this winter, seven years ahead of schedule. They may plateau for a year or two but will then go into exponential decline for mechanical and unstoppable reasons.

The country’s target of net zero by 2060 is likely to be achieved a decade earlier than previously assumed, and perhaps earlier than in Europe.

This is a remarkable turn of events. Xi Jinping has made a giant strategic and economic bet on clean-tech dominance, aiming to corner the world’s renewable market and to break dependency on sea-borne energy supplies running through the US 7th Fleet.

The International Energy Agency says China accounts for 60pc of all new solar and wind power being installed across the world this year and next. This roll-out has combined with a drastic slowdown in China’s rate of economic trend growth and the exhaustion of its Ponzi style property model.

China is building a gargantuan network of ‘clean energy bases’ in the Gobi, Ordos, and Tengger deserts, and further across the arid wastelands of the northwest. Solar and wind parks run along an arc from Inner Mongolia to Qinghai on the Tibetan plateau

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2023/11/21/chinas-carbon-emissions-falling-xi-jinping-net-zero/

Let’s start with a few simple, basic facts:

As I have been reporting for years, large scale investment in renewable capacity has not been enough to meet increasing demand for electricity in China, which has had to be met with additional coal power. Wind and solar still only accounted for 13% of China’s electricity in 2022, compared to 29% in what he describes as the foot-dragging UK!

China’s economic growth, and therefore energy demand, has slowed in the last two years, not least because of their disastrous lockdown policies. This inevitably means that the need for more coal power is reduced. Whether economic growth remains subdued is moot – so far this year it is up 4.4% year-on-year. And it may well be that the use of coal power does flatten off in the next few years. And it also may well be the case that eventually China will catch up with the UK in terms of the renewables share.

However AEP makes a schoolboy error, assuming that current trends will continue forward in a straight line, until all China’s electricity is supplied by renewables. He clearly still does not realise that neither we or China can run a modern economy on intermittent wind and solar power alone.

He also makes the mistake of ignoring all of the energy China consumes outside of the power sector, which accounts for half of total primary energy. A good indicator is their consumption of oil and gas, which are barely used for power generation. Since 2011, consumption has risen by 71%.

None of this energy can be replaced directly with wind and solar power.

China is of course building lots of EVs, which may help to reduce oil consumption eventually, but this begs the question of where the energy needed to build and run them will come from. It’s a fundamental misunderstanding to assume that this will come from wind and solar, as these are already maxed out on the grid. Any additional demand can only come from dispatchable sources, which basically means coal.

AEP is right about Xi’s concern for energy security, but that is precisely why China will want to maximise its own coal reserves. It is also why they have been strategically developing secure supplies of oil and gas, in particular from Russia and Turkmenistan, from where new pipelines are either being built or planned. China has also been assiduous in building relationships with the Middle East. Imports from Iran, for instance, are 60% higher than pre-sanction peaks in 2017.

Another indicator of China’s addiction to oil is the fact that the country’s oil refining capacity has grown by 40% since 2010, and is now bigger than the US.

AEP relies on Carbon Brief for advice in his article. Given that they are a lobby group set up specifically to campaign for climate action, they are hardly a reliable, objective source! Maybe he should have consulted Climate Tracker, another group keen to push the same agenda, but also determined to report the realities. This is how they sum up China’s climate policies:

https://climateactiontracker.org/countries/china/

As Climate Tracker suggests, China’s emissions may well start to level off by 2030. But there is nothing to suggest that they will actually start to fall drastically thereafter.

4.8 13 votes
Article Rating
28 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
strativarius
November 23, 2023 2:28 am

The Telegraph disappeared down the woke rabbit hole some time ago. A sort of less scruffy Grauniad.

China has had a bit of exceedingly good fortune – the undemocratic return of David Cameron as Foreign Secretary. Rice wine all round.

“According to a report by The Times, Cameron has been the focus of several ‘study tours’ organised by China, offering VIP access, opportunity to have dinner and “close-up exchange” to Chinese students, investors and officials. 

At a gathering in Beijing, Cameron once charged as much as £12,000 for a photo opportunity and dinner. On several occasions, he has been seen heaping praises on China’s highly controversial Belt and Road Initiative (BRI).

Regarding China’s role in Port City Colombo, Cameron once falsely claimed that the project was wholly owned and controlled by Sri Lanka. “
https://www.wionews.com/world/camerons-shady-links-with-china-in-spotlight-after-appointment-as-uks-foreign-secretary-660001

Oh dear. I can’t see the UK holding China to account, somehow.

Scissor
Reply to  strativarius
November 23, 2023 6:01 am

Ever notice that photos of Xi are often framed so as to exclude his perceptively tiny hands?

I don’t see Xi holding China to account either.

November 23, 2023 4:15 am

And for more “serious” words, complements of THE HILL:

We cannot wait for climate action — climate change will not wait for us 
BY JOHN OPPERMANN, OPINION CONTRIBUTOR – 11/22/23 10:00 AM ET
(John Oppermann is executive director of Earth Day Initiative.)

The summer of 2023 was the hottest on record. By the middle of September, 2023 ranked as the worst year on record for billion-dollar climate disasters in the United States. The extreme weather events we have seen this year have included wildfire smoke that blanketed vast swaths of our country, including large urban centers like New York City, for days at a time; the first tropical storm to hit southern California in more than 25 years; and the devastating firestorm that swept across Hawaii.

and

The destruction we see in war will be mirrored by the effects of the climate crisis, as droughts, floods, tropical storms, heatwaves, wildfires and other extreme weather events are accelerating and wreaking increasing damage to our way of life. Aside from these obviously destructive events, we face general and wide-reaching disruption to our way of life as the natural resources and ecosystems we take for granted change. For example, glaciers that provide a great deal of our fresh water are disappearing and thus threaten to disrupt existing agriculture, while changing temperatures will dramatically change how we cool our homes and workplaces.

He makes some interesting points, but I am not sure which end he is talking through.☹️

As everyone here knows, this climate change stuff is very serious. 

Reply to  nhasys
November 23, 2023 7:34 am

As everyone here knows, this climate change stuff is scientific fraud, and metaphsyical politics

Doud D
Reply to  nhasys
November 23, 2023 8:55 am

And as everyone knows the people pushing pseudo science know that is BS as well. There might not even be a Communist China by 2030.

Reply to  nhasys
November 23, 2023 11:37 am

He makes some interesting points,”

ie.. he MISINFORMS his butt off !!

The fires were exacerbated BY the climate/greenie agenda.

Real-world data shows there is no increase in extreme weather events

El Nino that brought the warmer summer to parts of the world has nothing to do with human causation.

Many of those glaciers didn’t even exist before the Little Ice Age.

strativarius
November 23, 2023 4:23 am

EV news

The Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) announced that it was reducing its forecast for electric vehicles’ share of new car sales in 2027 to just 38 per cent, a huge drop compared to the 67 per cent it projected in March.

Electric vehicles accounted for 16.5 per cent of new car sales in 2022/23, although this was more than one percentage point below the OBR’s March 2023 forecast of 17.7 per cent.

the ticket price of new electric cars, which tend to start above £30,000, would “likely still be disincentivising many consumers”.

More subsidies, please
“With the ban on new petrol and diesel sales delayed, drivers need more incentives to make the switch – they need more affordable cars, and confidence in charging points and running costs.

this could be done by slashing the VAT rate on public charging points, which is at 20 per cent, down to the level of domestic VAT at five per cent.”
https://www.gbnews.com/lifestyle/cars/electric-car-sales-plummet-obr-forecast-major-announcement

Of course, they missed The Citroën Ami. (a quadcycle)

Cost £8,095.00
Charging time (0-100%) 4 hours 
0-27.9 mph  10 seconds
Range (WMTC test) 46.6 miles 
Kerb weight including battery 487kg
https://www.citroen.co.uk/ami

comment image

Scissor
Reply to  strativarius
November 23, 2023 6:11 am

Perhaps a bill can be passed to limit petro vehicle fuel tanks to 1 or 2 gallons.

Drake
Reply to  strativarius
November 24, 2023 8:30 am

Boy, that sure looks safe to drive, on the same road with 80,000 lb. trucks.

David Wojick
November 23, 2023 4:37 am

Modes and wishful thinking define alarmism. It is all imaginary.

MyUsername
November 23, 2023 4:41 am

Climate Tracker updated the date to 2025 yesterday

Starman56
November 23, 2023 4:50 am

I’m in China right now traveling around. What I see is robust economic activity in need of cheap energy. During one flight I observed a large wind farm along a vast mountain range with only a few mills actually turning out electricity. I guess it was a bad wind day. I’m pretty sure the Chinese are using renewable growth as a strategy of window dressing for the eco idiots. Considering everything in China is vastly cheaper than elsewhere, putting up mills and solar are an easy and cheap solution to placate the oil nazis. They will continue to expand any cheap source of energy to fuel their growth in my opinion.

Reply to  Starman56
November 23, 2023 5:29 am

It’s telling that the Chinese energy production is as transparent as a brick wall in regards to individual plants output. By co-locating fossil fuel (mostly coal) power plants with renewable arrays within the same regional distribution hub they can hide the inefficiency and unreliable nature of renewables by reporting the fossil fuel contribution as less and the renewable contribution as far more, with no outside verification possible. This allows the Chinese leadership to signal their green credentials and the usual western media stooges lap it up without question or comment.

Reply to  Starman56
November 23, 2023 6:19 am

“I’m pretty sure the Chinese are using renewable growth as a strategy of window dressing for the eco idiots.”

I think you are correct.

William Howard
November 23, 2023 6:30 am

for leftists reality is whatever they say it is

barryjo
Reply to  William Howard
November 23, 2023 6:04 pm

Reality bites. Hard.

antigtiff
November 23, 2023 7:00 am

Taiwan is the China that works….Xi Jinping is creating a disaster….it will not end well. Xi ( a stupid name) is trying to become Mao II. Commies depend on power from the barrel of a gun….Xi is moving towards the N. Korean model of how to rule a country. Boycott China.

Reply to  antigtiff
November 23, 2023 7:24 am

Commies depend on power from the barrel of a gun

There are no firearms visible in those representing and enforcing power in the West.

Giving_Cat
Reply to  antigtiff
November 23, 2023 8:51 am

Socialism; you can vote it in but you have to shoot it out.

November 23, 2023 7:33 am

Ambrose has always been for sale to the highest bidder. He has praised solar panels in the Muslim occupied deserts, tidal power schemes, and just about anything else he can get a fat bung to pump. Occasionally he also writes genuinely good articles.

abolition man
Reply to  Leo Smith
November 23, 2023 8:48 am

What is almost comical about the machinations of Western politicos and urinalists is that they seem unable to grasp that they will become unwelcome trash if China is able to attain their goal of destroying the First World economies!
Ambrose had better make sure that he gets a cut of the 10% going to Ol’ Bribery Joe and other corrupt Western leaders. Then I would advise finding a hidey-hole far off the beaten track, and pulling the cover down tight over his head! Even if the ChiComs decide not to sweep up and dispose of their refuse, his fellow countrymen may take exception to his obvious betrayal!

michael hart
November 23, 2023 8:17 am

typo alert:

There is something gone strangely wrong in the cut/paste of the bar graph which is not present in the version at The Telegraph.
The Y-axis zero point has clearly been displaced upwards and the data truncated from below. This accounts for the apparent complete absence of much of the data from India and Brazil.

While trying to look further, The Telegraph then decided they wanted me to subscribe, so I can’t investigate further.
I wanted to see why the data didn’t bother to include a few earlier years of actual, not forecast, data.

Giving_Cat
November 23, 2023 8:30 am

> “China’s carbon emissions have either peaked already or will do this winter, seven years ahead of schedule. They may plateau for a year or two but will then go into exponential decline for mechanical and unstoppable reasons.”

Please, oh please, tell me Ambrose Evans-Pritchard is taking bets on this, his “unstoppable” future.

abolition man
Reply to  Giving_Cat
November 23, 2023 9:38 am

He tried, GC, but no one in Vegas wanted to cover them!

insufficientlysensitive
November 23, 2023 9:03 am

And Great Britain had some ‘highly respected’ historical analysts who fawned over Soviet Communism right through the 60s and 70s and 80s, stoutly insulated from the clear evidence of its murderous results. This AEP critter seems to be one of that herd.

Bob
November 23, 2023 2:22 pm

How on earth can anyone believe China’s CO2 emissions will level off by 2030? That is stupid. China is building new coal fired power plants faster than anyone else. Am I to believe that these new plants won’t emit CO2? That is just stupid. Why would anyone believe anything China says?

Kit P
Reply to  Bob
November 23, 2023 5:29 pm

I do!

Anyone here remember the web site peak oil?

China has passed peak population and manufacturing is leaving. When China reaches net zero it will be because of the collapse of the CCP economic ponzi scheme.

Drake
Reply to  Kit P
November 24, 2023 9:05 am

But they will still have complete new cities of unoccupied high rise residential buildings crumbling from poor construction techniques and maintenance for future generations to move into.

Verified by MonsterInsights