West Antarctica Temperature FALLS 2°C in 20 Years

From the DAILY SCEPTIC

BY CHRIS MORRISON

The continent of Antarctica is a difficult hunting ground for climate apocalypse fanatics since there has been barely any overall warming over the last 70 years. The exception is West Antarctica where there has been some local climate variation, possibly helped by significant geothermal activity. Of course this is enough for a scare or two, so don’t expect to see reported in mainstream media some startling new evidence showing significant cooling in West Antarctica starting in the early 1990s, with temperatures falling by 0.93°C each decade from 1999-2018, a total of 2°C over the 20 years.

In a paper published by the American Meteorological Society, a group of international scientists note the “statistically significant” rate of temperature decline with the strongest cooling occurring in spring. During this season, the temperature fell by a massive 1.84°C every decade between 1999-2018. In the winter, the decadal fall was 1.19°C. The cooling was measured by a number of databases, while an accurate consistent record was collected from the Marie Byrd weather station. Despite some differences in cooling, all the databases are said to have shared similar changes across seasons and throughout the region. The graph below plots the temperature record at Marie Byrd back to the 1950s.

So what has caused this precipitous temperature decline? As we have seen in many science papers, whenever temperatures fall, consideration of rising human-caused carbon dioxide levels is put to one side. The scientists come down firmly on the side of natural causes, with the changes mostly attributed to tropical Pacific influences. In particular, sea surface temperatures have dropped in the eastern Pacific equatorial region over the last 20 years. A reference to “atmospheric teleconnections” refers to the natural processes at work in the climate as heat is transferred around the planet in a not-fully-understood process involving ocean and atmospheric currents.

Almost needless to say, none of this cooling was forecast by climate models. The authors suggest that models are an “important tool” in making future projections of future climate changes over Antarctica. But they admit that the models did not pick up the recent significant cooling in West Antarctica. There is said to be “no robust agreement” among the models on the important sea temperatures driving the western Antarctica air temperatures. Tropical Pacific climate oscillation is still an important source of uncertainty in future projections of West Antarctica air temperatures, it is observed.

Was it ever thus? Forty years of hopelessly inaccurate temperature forecasts, along with unrealistic climate ‘tipping’ impacts driven by ridiculous suggestions that the temperature will rise by 4°C in less than 80 years, is hardly a record that inspires confidence. The recent appearance of clickbait attributions trying to pin individual weather events on human activities is little more than a scientific joke. These politicised attempts to measure the unmeasurable are a complete waste of time and money, the uncharitable might note. Not least because the models are corrupted by the notion promoted by the UN’s IPCC that all or most global warming since 1900 is caused by humans burning fossil fuel. This might seem an increasingly implausible suggestion in the light of much science including this latest paper on the recent dramatic drop in Antarctica temperatures.

Despite the refusal of Antarctica to show any significant warming, the climate apocalypse circus regularly rides into town to drum up catastrophe business. Last September, the headlines were full of a “mind-blowing” fall in winter sea ice to 17 million square kilometres. The BBC said it showed a “worrying new benchmark” for a region that once seemed resistance to global warming. The “mind-blowing” remark was attributed to Dr. Walter Meier, who monitors sea ice with the Colorado-based National Snow and Ice Data Centre (NSIDC). He added that it was “far outside anything we’ve seen”. Inexplicably, he seemed to forget that he was part of an earlier team that had reviewed photos from the 1960s Nimbus weather satellites that showed similar levels of ice in 1966. Just seven years ago, Meier held the view that extreme highs and lows of Antarctica sea ice “are not unusual”.

Of course, the 2023 low sea ice story has moved on. In mainstream media it would be considered very bad form to note that according to the latest figures from the NSIDC, the start of summer in October saw below-trend ice melt – 903,000 square kilometres compared with the average of 985,000 sq kms. Up in the Arctic, pickings have been thin for some years following the small cyclical recovery in sea ice that set in around 2014. As the winter takes hold, the NSIDC reports that the ice has increased “at a faster than average pace”. The freeze is said to have been particularly rapid along the Siberian seas where the ice cover expanded to the coast by the end of last month. Things are not look good for Sir David Attenborough’s claim in last year’s Frozen Planet II that summer sea ice could all be gone in 12 years. Over at the Greenland ice sheet, the latest information from the Danish Polar Portal shows winter ice growing back faster than the 1981-2010 average.

Chris Morrison is the Daily Sceptic’s Environment Editor.

H/T David Hagen, energywise

5 27 votes
Article Rating
41 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
November 12, 2023 6:30 am
wh
November 12, 2023 6:44 am

Yes it’s perplexing to me why alarmists would use the record low sea ice extent on the continent this year to support their narrative. It just proves that, at the end of the day, they like to play fast and loose with the facts. To be fair, there are certain skeptics that do that but they have nowhere near the same amount of people in their audience.

Reply to  wh
November 12, 2023 8:01 am

There was a singular blip in the weather earlier this year and, like a pack of hyenas, the opportunistic climate enthusiasts were all over it pulling it apart as ‘proof!’ of climate catastrophe. Some of us saw it as a slightly anomalous weather pattern which would likely not repeat but the climate enthusiasts need every little scrap of warming they can get their hands on.

Phil.
Reply to  Richard Page
November 12, 2023 9:06 am

“A singular blip”? The Antarctic sea ice extent was at a record low for the satellite era for over 260 days this year. The seasonal low broke the record set in 2022 so this ‘blip’ of yours appears to have lasted for about 2 years.

Reply to  Phil.
November 12, 2023 10:48 am

Antarctic sea ice has been melting very slowly and is nearly back to its usual levels for time of year…. data only to 10th Nov, but it will be equal to 2017 by now.

As you say, a blip.. that just happened to start occurring shortly after the HT eruption.

Certainly absolutely nothing to do with human released CO2.

Phil.
Reply to  bnice2000
November 12, 2023 6:59 pm

Antarctic sea ice has been melting very slowly and is nearly back to its usual levels for time of year….”

Just over 2 sd’s below the average for the date.

Reply to  Phil.
November 12, 2023 11:11 pm

Just above 2017 for the date.

The standard deviation is very small at this time of year and of course depends on the time period used to calculate it.

Essentially it is back in the NORMAL range

Again, I would love to see your pitiful and undoubtedly hilarious explanation of how human CO2 caused this.

Reply to  Phil.
November 13, 2023 1:06 am

Using this century.. current level is less than 2sd’s below the mean.

ie… back to normal

Phil.
Reply to  bnice2000
November 13, 2023 10:45 am

2sd for this century is ~1.5 million sqkm, currently more than that below mean.

Reply to  Phil.
November 12, 2023 11:34 am

Yes, a blip. Storm surge and high winds have broken up a lot of sea ice over the last couple of storm seasons but that has got bugger all to do with temperatures. The climate enthusiasts were going bananas over a period of unseasonably warm weather that settled in over Antarctica in Feb-April this year and raised the temperature slightly (but still nowhere near the temperature needed to melt ice).

Janice Moore
Reply to  Phil.
November 12, 2023 12:45 pm

Well, “blip” or not, it is meaningless in view of the Antarctic ice mass/volume which has not decreased to any meaningful degree.

wh
Reply to  Richard Page
November 12, 2023 1:40 pm

For sure. The hysteria this past summer was completely out of control. They take UHI and present it as dangerous heat waves.

Robertvd
Reply to  wh
November 13, 2023 4:09 am

We can’t save the West Antarctic. So what now?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8_BoZDS1gjU

Too many Gretas on this planet

Neo Conscious
November 12, 2023 7:21 am

Could it be that the increasing sea ice melt/cooling temperatures in Antarctica and decreasing sea ice melt/rising temperatures in the arctic are related?

I remember reading something 25 years ago that global warming was predicted to make Europe colder because the cold fresh water from the Greenland ice melt would stay along the surface of the salty sea water and cool the air flowing over it towards Europe.

Reply to  Neo Conscious
November 12, 2023 8:04 am

The Arctic and Antarctic are often ‘out of phase’ with each other, not just because one has its summer whilst the other has its winter but one will often be in a longer term cooling trend while the other isn’t or might be in a slight warming trend.

November 12, 2023 7:48 am

Looking at that temperature graph at the top it’s a complete inversion of what we are always shown for the “world”, or at least the north.

Cool in the sixties, warming through 70s then cooling during the 80s

A mirror image of countless examples of graphs I’ve seen

antigtiff
November 12, 2023 8:02 am

It’s complicated. The earth’s orbit around the sun varies slightly over time…the sun’s energy output varies….the solar system orbits around the Milky Way and sometimes encounters areas of higher gamma ray radiation… the earth’s axis wanders slightly over about a 40000 year period….unscheduled events like Younger Dryfus happen….and yes, man is building cities and flying airplanes and sailing ships around the planet. The last 8000 years have been cycles of a few centuries warming and a few cooling…it’;s about time for a cool one.

Reply to  antigtiff
November 12, 2023 11:37 am

For all we know- CO2 “could” be a dominate influence in climate- but we don’t know as there clearly are many other factors. What ticks me off is that the climate clowns insist it’s all about carbon.

Janice Moore
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
November 12, 2023 12:48 pm

The fact that ice core data shows that atmospheric CO2 rise lags temperature rise by a quarter cycle (or about 800 years) makes it highly unlikely that CO2 (much less human CO2 emissions which are < ~5% of total atmospheric CO2) drives shifts in the climate zones of the earth.

November 12, 2023 8:08 am

It’s worse than we thought, send money.

November 12, 2023 8:21 am

I am always amazed when people talk about the arctic sea ice extent without reference to the AMO. Looking at NCAR’s graph of the AMO, it seems to me that it explains the variation in Arctic sea ice quite well.

strativarius
November 12, 2023 8:32 am

Whaddabout the volcanoes!!

When will they confess it is not understood?

J Boles
November 12, 2023 8:42 am

Hide the decline, hide the decline, hide the decline. I love that song.

Reply to  J Boles
November 12, 2023 11:40 am

by Willie Nelson, of course 🙂

Bryan A
Reply to  J Boles
November 12, 2023 2:12 pm

It no longer shows up in a YouTube search for Hide The Decline but WUWT still has a valid link in the original 2010 post
https://m.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=2&v=dul_hYde0nk&embeds_referring_euri=https%3A%2F%2Fwattsupwiththat.com%2F&source_ve_path=Mjg2NjY&feature=emb_logo

rah
November 12, 2023 10:34 am

The facts have no bearing on them. For example, they’re still pushing this same old tired scare despite the fact that it has not happened, does not appear to be about to happen, and research makes it clear that coral atolls actually grow as with SLR. This article on my “news feed” today:

Which islands will become uninhabitable due to climate change first? (msn.com)

Reply to  rah
November 12, 2023 10:53 am

“Which islands will become uninhabitable due to climate change first?”
 
Those that have the newest airport and newest elite resort development, of course. 😉

No longer fit for islander habitation.

Bryan A
Reply to  bnice2000
November 12, 2023 2:22 pm

There were certainly Coral Atolls 8,000-14,000 years ago during the great thaw and associated Melt water pulses
<image&gtcomment image</image>
They seems to not only survive those extremely fast SLR events, not only survive them but thrive!

Janice Moore
Reply to  rah
November 12, 2023 12:51 pm

Praying every day (for Nikki and all of you). Take care.

rah
Reply to  Janice Moore
November 12, 2023 5:47 pm

Thank you. Cancer had not grown as per last week. New Chemo is at least working to arrest the growth.

Janice Moore
Reply to  rah
November 13, 2023 9:57 pm

Good!

November 12, 2023 11:29 am

The “mind-blowing” remark was attributed to Dr. Walter Meier, who monitors sea ice with the Colorado-based National Snow and Ice Data Centre (NSIDC). He added that it was “far outside anything we’ve seen”. Inexplicably, he seemed to forget that he was part of an earlier team that had reviewed photos from the 1960s Nimbus weather satellites that showed similar levels of ice in 1966. Just seven years ago, Meier held the view that extreme highs and lows of Antarctica sea ice “are not unusual”.

I dunno- sounds like he’s had one too many magic mushrooms in recent years. 🙂

Gary Pearse
November 12, 2023 11:37 am

“sea surface temperatures have dropped in the eastern Pacific equatorial region over the last 20 years.”

I noticed, and remarked
on a number of occasions here on WUWT that there has been a fundamental change in the distribution of cold water in the western Pacific temperate zones north and south of the equatorial zone in the form of large cold ‘blobs’ from which cold water slants toward the central part the equatorial belt.

The usual pattern of cooling for ENSO in the equatorial zone is from cold water welling up in the coastal waters of South america and tradewinds moving surface warm water to the west Pacific Warm Pool. This has been disrupted by the the new paradigm that “experts” don’t appear to see.

comment image

When the 2015 el Niño occurred I was struck by the lack of volume of warm water in the system. In addition, the el Niño took such a long time to develop with protracted period of false starts. I first noted that the system was being diluted by coldwater drawn from the aforesaid cold blobs above and below the equatorial zone. The end of the el Niño was accordingly abrupt, the ENSO temps dropped precipitously at the fastest rate ever observed! This was followed by several years of la Niña conditions. I’ve been a voice in the wilderness on this one.

Someone should review this paradigm change from 5 years before the 2015 el Ñino to the present . It won’t get done by The Dark Side and I’m a mining – metallurgical engineer and geologist!

Bob
November 12, 2023 12:07 pm

Very nice.

observa
November 13, 2023 1:38 am

Yikes! The Ice Age cometh-
Stunning once-in-a-decade ‘ice window’ forms on Alaska lake (msn.com)
Eat more beans and breathe heavily or we’re all doomed.

Louis Hunt
November 13, 2023 3:08 am

Is there enough temperature data yet to determine if the poles are actually warming faster than the rest of the planet? Recently, I read that the poles are warming 2 times faster. In 2022, Nature claimed 4 times faster. But back in 2014, Cowtan and Way claimed 6 or 8 time faster. So which is it?

Of course, if the rest of the planet isn’t warming, then 2X0 = 4X0 = 8X0. So, I guess, it doesn’t really matter what the real number is.

Reply to  Louis Hunt
November 13, 2023 3:46 am

Apart from the El Nino spike in 2015, UAH shows the NorthPole region as having basically zero trend. The El Nino effect gradually subsided back to that zerotrend line. (see chart)

According to this post, Antarctic has been cooling since 1999..

UAH shows basically no Antarctic warming over the last 45 years.

So your last line is essentially correct either way round.

0÷8=0, 0÷4=0,0÷2=0

UAH_Nopol Jul 2023.png
Louis Hunt
Reply to  bnice2000
November 13, 2023 4:43 pm

So, if the poles have basically zero trend, or have a cooling trend, the rest of the planet must be warming faster than the poles. That’s just the opposite of what the warmists have been claiming. When will they stop lying to us?

observa
November 13, 2023 6:10 am

Why do they keep wasting our taxes on this stuff when the science is settled and it’s CO2?
Scientists studying Antarctic Circumpolar Current to take closer look at ‘heat flux gates’ letting in warmer water (msn.com)
Besides that’s no recycled wood sailing ship.

LT3
November 16, 2023 12:02 pm

Well at least it’s getting a break from the cooling now.

StratosphericWaterVaporSouthPole.png