The Bitter Taste of Climate Alarmism in Your Beer

When climate science hops into the brewery.

Hops and Hyperbole

In a recent twist, global warming is now being blamed for potentially altering the taste of beer. A study claims that the quantity of European hops, responsible for beer’s distinctive bitter taste, is on the decline. “A new study reveals that the quantity of European hops… is declining.” But before jumping to conclusions, it’s worth examining the broader picture.

A Deep Dive into Dubious Data

The research compared aroma hop yields between two periods: 1971 to 1994 and 1995 to 2018. The findings? A supposed drop of nearly 20% in output in some hop-growing areas. The reason? “Drier conditions – probably due to climate change.” It’s curious how a complex system like climate can be so simplistically linked to the yield of a single crop.

The Inflated Cost of Inflation

Martin Mozny, a co-author, suggests that these changes might lead to higher beer prices. With beer prices already up by 13% since the pandemic, it’s convenient to have climate change as the next scapegoat for any future price hikes.

Flavor or Flawed Science?

The study also points to a reduction in the alpha bitter acids of hops, which influence beer flavor. The alleged cause? “Higher and more extreme temperatures.” Yet, with predictions of a 31% reduction in these acids by 2050, one has to wonder about the precision of such long-term forecasts, given the track record of past climate predictions.

Farmers’ Futile Fight?

While farmers are innovating and adapting their practices, the study insists more investment is needed. It’s commendable that farmers are always seeking ways to improve, but it’s questionable to suggest massive changes based on a single study’s narrow findings.

In Conclusion

This latest research, published in Nature Communications, is a classic example of the narrow lens through which many studies view the world of climate aka climate catastrophizing. Instead of jumping on the climate alarmism bandwagon, perhaps it’s time to enjoy a cold one and savor the rich history and tradition of brewing, rather than brewing unnecessary panic. Cheers to clear thinking and good beer!

Link to the Nature Study.

Nature Communications volume 14, Article number: 6028 (2023) Cite this article

570 Altmetric Metrics

Abstract

A recent rise in the global brewery sector has increased the demand for high-quality, late summer hops. The effects of ongoing and predicted climate change on the yield and aroma of hops, however, remain largely unknown. Here, we combine meteorological measurements and model projections to assess the climate sensitivity of the yield, alpha content and cone development of European hops between 1970 and 2050 CE, when temperature increases by 1.4 °C and precipitation decreases by 24 mm. Accounting for almost 90% of all hop-growing regions, our results from Germany, the Czech Republic and Slovenia show that hop ripening started approximately 20 days earlier, production declined by almost 0.2 t/ha/year, and the alpha content decreased by circa 0.6% when comparing data before and after 1994 CE. A predicted decline in hop yield and alpha content of 4–18% and 20–31% by 2050 CE, respectively, calls for immediate adaptation measures to stabilize an ever-growing global sector.

Introduction

Beer is the world’s third most widely consumed beverage after water and tea1, and traditional beer brewing in central Europe dates back at least to the Neolithic period circa 3500–3100 BC2. In addition to water, malting barley and yeast, a much more expensive hop is needed to give beer its incomparable taste3. The specific hop aroma emerges from its bitter acid content and many other compounds, including essential oils and polyphenols4,5,6. Changes in alpha bitter acids affect the quality of hops7,8,9,10,11,12, and there has been a recent change in consumer preference towards beer aromas and flavors that heavily depend on high-quality hops13,14. Amplified by the ongoing craft beer popularity13, this trend contrasts with previous demands for lower alpha content14. The recent craft beer expansion therefore not only triggered new microbreweries but also boosted the demand for aromatic hops globally15,16. Although linkages between hop production and climate variation have been reported at local to regional scales9,10,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27, relatively little is known about the possible, direct and indirect, effects of a predicted warmer and drier climate on the yield and alpha content of hops.

Since the cultivation of high-quality aroma hops is restricted to relatively small regions with suitable environmental conditions (Fig. 1), there is a serious risk that much of the production will be affected by individual heat waves or drought extremes that are likely to increase under global climate change28. Hop farmers can and have responded to climate change by relocating hop gardens to higher elevations and valley locations with higher water tables, building irrigation systems10, changing the orientation and spacing of crop rows, and even breeding more resistant varieties29. Changing the orientation of crop rows and combining irrigation with water-saving soil management practices have proven to be effective adaptation measures in viticulture30,31. It is important that the generative phase of hop plants occurs only in the appropriate photoperiod when sunshine duration is decreasing. This can be achieved by slowing plant growth via growth inhibitors or by building protective shading structures; which is, however, quite expensive. There is a similar problem in vineyards where shading by agrovoltaic panels has been introduced32,33. The higher probability of droughts can be partly mitigated by less frequent tillage and cultivation of hop fields, changes in fertilization and the use of row cover crops to support root growth34. A systematic and European-wide investigation of the impact of ongoing and predicted climate change on the quality and quantity of aroma hops is, however, still missing.

You can read the rest of the “study” here.

HT/Guy S

4.6 5 votes
Article Rating
39 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
rah
October 11, 2023 10:12 pm

How long have they been putting this story out there? Seems to me the first time some alarmist “scientists” declared this same thing was about 10 years ago. Anyway i KNOW this one of those recycled alarmist fairytales.

atticman
Reply to  rah
October 12, 2023 2:33 am

Frankly, I’m surprised we’re still allowed to brew beer when you consider all the CO2 that the process creates… oops! perhaps I shouldn’t have brought this to their attention.

strativarius
Reply to  atticman
October 12, 2023 4:08 am

Rest assured, the elites’ champagne bubbles are not included….

JD Lunkerman
October 11, 2023 10:44 pm

Climate change has definately led to an increase in brain damage. This much has been proven.

dk_
October 11, 2023 11:00 pm

Hops, added for preservation, make beer bitter. Not all beers are bitter, and not all preservatives are hops. European and UK crops are “managed” by European and UK agricultural authorities to decrease carbon footprints and other virtue signaling. The increase or reduction in the quantity and quality of any EU or UK crop is affected by government design, badly implemented energy policy, and the price and availability of insecticides and fertilizers.

If a source for bitter flavoring is desired, perhaps the European, we should recommend the tears of “Just Stop Oil” and Extinction Rebellion hsitrionic performance art are plentiful, and bound to overflow quite soon.

Reply to  dk_
October 12, 2023 11:15 am

“Hops, added for preservation, make beer bitter.”

I was told that back in the days of sail, beer sent to British troops in India would go bad. So they they loaded it with hops to survive the voyage.
Hence, the birth of the IPA, “India Pale Ale”.
PS My personal taste doesn’t go the the more hoppy beers.

expublican
October 11, 2023 11:31 pm

The 13% price increase since covid was a tax hike! Nothing to do with hops quality at all….

strativarius
Reply to  expublican
October 12, 2023 12:16 am

Petrol is around £1.70 for 1000ml

Beer is around £6.00 for 568ml….

Reply to  strativarius
October 12, 2023 1:29 am

There’s a nutty one one – work out the relative taxation on those 2 things

I’m in a Wetherspoon right now swigging coffee and Mr Spoon always reckoned that for every 3 pints you buy, the money for one of them went entirely to the Exchequer.
(Abbot Ale was always nice – he’s selling that today for £2.77 in rural Cambridgeshire. London may be different)

While the best I can find/recall for petrol was about 73pence tax/duty/VAT per litre….
Compared Abbot Ale:

  • 3 pints of Abbot would be £8.31
  • and tax on that = £2.77 (for 1.704 litres)
  • so a tax-rate on Abbot Ale of £1.62 per litre
  • compared petrol at £0.73 per litre

Not easy though is it –
e.g. For the £6.00 London Pint, just the VAT would be = £1.00 (per pint) or = £1.76 per litre
I strongly suspect that ‘a computer’ was involved in there somewhere…..

strativarius
Reply to  Peta of Newark
October 12, 2023 1:53 am

You don’t have to drill in the sea etc for beer

There are ways round the taxes. High gravity brewing – the brewer pays the duties at the outset. It then gets diluted….

Dave Andrews
Reply to  strativarius
October 12, 2023 7:38 am

I drink bottled IPAs at home from a variety of brewers. Most have reduced the alcohol content of their beers over the last 12 months or so to save money and keep prices lower. Some have gone too far and are off the list 🙂

strativarius
October 12, 2023 12:12 am

So, they’ve discovered isohumulone and isolupulone

And now they want to try to scare people…

October 12, 2023 1:08 am

More model mania. They used RCP4.5 to guesstimate future climate. Most studies jump right to RCP8.5, the completely ridiculous scenario, so using RCP4.5 shows a certain degree of restraint but it’s still overestimated since measured temperature and sea level trends are squarely in the RCP2.6 range. They then take those estimates and plug them into their homegrown model that assumes that acidity is caused by warming, the whole warming, and nothing but the warming. There are a lot of unproven assumptions in there.

October 12, 2023 2:11 am

Climate change must be why no one drinks Bud Light anymore.

strativarius
Reply to  Mike McMillan
October 12, 2023 2:15 am

Isn’t that a girly beer?

Reply to  strativarius
October 12, 2023 3:47 am

Most real girls probably won’t touch it. !

Reply to  strativarius
October 12, 2023 5:00 am

Well that depends on what kind of ‘girl’ you’re looking for.

Tom in Florida
Reply to  Mike McMillan
October 12, 2023 4:37 am

No, gender change is why no one drinks Bud Light anymore.

Scissor
Reply to  Tom in Florida
October 12, 2023 6:25 am

Seems like the market for cherry cola is expanding.

CampsieFellow
October 12, 2023 2:58 am

How much beer was consumed in this investigation in order to check the taste of the beer? Probably a lot judging by the conclusions.

strativarius
Reply to  CampsieFellow
October 12, 2023 3:08 am

If beer was consumed they will have also needed cheese to clear the palate. But that isn’t climate friendly as its dairy…..

Reply to  strativarius
October 12, 2023 5:03 am

Honestly a glass of water is the best way to clear your palate between beers. Leave the cheese to the wine drinkers!

strativarius
Reply to  Richard Page
October 12, 2023 5:33 am

Honestly, Richard I was in the brewing industry for 20 years. I do know how it works.

October 12, 2023 3:18 am

If one compare the beer brewed in Bavaria with beer brewed near the northern coast in Germany you find a large difference in the use of hops.
Northen breweries use much more of it.
It’s not a question of hops quality but quantity.

rah
Reply to  Krishna Gans
October 12, 2023 11:08 am

Though the claim of climate change causing this is BS, what you are saying about quality is not born out in this article. It is a matter of quality for them.

Germany’s Oldest Hops Thrived for Centuries. Then Came Climate Change. – The New York Times (nytimes.com)

Duane
October 12, 2023 3:56 am

These authors twisted their statistics to produce their warmunist claim by cherry picking data. They fail to mention that Ethiopia, the largest producer of hops in the world has a deathly hot and dry climate. The U.S., virtually tied with Ethiopia in hops production, is the second largest producer with most of that production occurring in the dry inland deserts of the Pacific Northwest (Washington, Oregon, and Idaho). Brazil is a rapidly growing hops producer – hardly an area depending upon cool wet weather.

The authors also failed to mention that world beer consumption has decreased rapidly in the last decade, hence depressing demand and therefore prices for hops.

There are a great many reasons why the production of any commodity varies in volume and location – economics and markets, land values and availability irrigation water,, insects, weeds, fungus, and so on. To claim that production of any given commodity in any given area is controlled solely by a climate that is most definitely NOT changing rapidly is simply utter nonsense.

strativarius
Reply to  Duane
October 12, 2023 4:09 am

Hops made it through the MWP and the LIA….

Fran
Reply to  strativarius
October 12, 2023 10:01 am

I planted hops on a fence years ago. I ended up digging up roots 6′ into the neighbour’s garden a couple of years later. Hops are invasive, vigorous and very hardy.

Reply to  Duane
October 12, 2023 5:06 am

I have a question about one point there. Has beer drinking actually declined or have beer producers vastly expanded the range of beers available, many of which are not fit to drink?

Duane
Reply to  Richard Page
October 12, 2023 6:45 am

Beer consumption is down as some consumers have switched to buying other alcoholic drinks such as hard liquors, wines, and mixed drinks. Lots of reasons involved.

Ed Zuiderwijk
October 12, 2023 9:04 am

Climate change will make beer worse? Is that possible?

old cocky
Reply to  Ed Zuiderwijk
October 12, 2023 1:57 pm

Not with American beer 🙂

JC
October 12, 2023 9:19 am

Let’s speculate about how climate change will effect hops and the future taste of beer shall we! But why?

So we can communicate the narrative that hop quality (and beer quality) is dependent on one variable, the impact of human civilization, aka climate change. Arrogant folk write articles like this thinking that no one is smart enough to see through the BS.

Storage time of hops is the greatest determinate of alpha acid in hops. One year of storage can reduce alpha acid by 54% https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Correlation-between-losses-of-a-acids-and-storage-time-of-hop-pellets-kept-under_fig1_250007283

Storage time for an ag product is is driven by supply and demand.

Every brewer through the ages adds enough hops to get the bitterness and aroma they want. Hop quality is variable due seasonal variation, variety, culture and how fresh they are. Beer quality is dependent on the brewer not climate change.

I grow my own hops in PA in my garden, Liberty, Willamette, Nugget, New Kent Goldings, Brewers gold. Of course I do not measure the alpha levels. I simply add the minimum amount the recipe calls for and the add more tasting the wort. I have been doing this since 1979 and have brewed hundreds of batches of beer. The summer of 2018 was dim and damp and the hops were a little weaker….just added a bit more. I still brew great beer with my own hops.

JC
Reply to  JC
October 12, 2023 9:28 am

“Oh No! my beer quality is falling AH!” My suggestion ,breath deeply, stopping whining like a powerless victim, then beg, borrow, share or buy some land you can grow a garden, plant some hops. some two row malting barley, learn to malt, grow some wheat and oats, learn to brew and make your own dang beer. No one is helpless. Join a brewing club and a scratch brew club and/or a a local home malting consortium and side step the commercial deal altogether.

Bottles. I have been bottling beer in the same bottles for over 40 years. I ‘ll be passing them on to my son soon and he will bottle with them for another 40 years.

JC
Reply to  JC
October 12, 2023 9:33 am

Champagne bottles are free just ask a restaurant or dumpster dive them. they can be reused for 10 or more generations of brewers. I have a few I still use that are 90 years old. Remember the European Bottles have take a larger crown cap since the early 1990 so go for domestic sparkling wine bottles. You can use the European bottle, just need to get a larger size capper and caps and it will cost you more. Or you can do a corker system which is even more expensive.

Reply to  JC
October 12, 2023 10:13 am

You bring up an important issue – what is going through the mind of these climate avengers when they produce science research that other scientists would clearly see to be crap? How did this pass peer review? By extension, is most science research crap then? Is that why there is a reproducibity crisis in science and medical research?

JC
Reply to  PCman999
October 12, 2023 10:51 am

I am not an expert nor a scientist per se. I am a clinical analyst in health care and armchair theologian with some decent training. I have conducted many studies in the realm of social science and have some statistical expertise.

I have been reading many science articles on superconductivity, polymer TEGS, AI, since 2008. I have been tracking it weekly since then….and WUWT daily.

I have watched science reporting get dumber and dumber and now think much of it is leveraged and corrupt like everything else. A one variable pseudo-science political movement is ruining all of it. In the end, is is all about leverage for money and power at the centralized global level….which requires corruption on a comprehensive scale.

For instance LK-99, recent study by South Korean scientists indicated that it was an all temp superconductor. There were many issues issues with replication but there is enough information provided by the scientist to replicate. Yet all the Climate change leaning periodicals like Scientific American and Nature….basically said ‘sorry Charlie LK99 doesn’t cut the mustard it’s an insulator’. Meanwhile the Navy gave a research grant a week or two ago to study LK99 film as a all temp superconductor. So WUWT?

The Study is out there with all the data and everything else to replicate the South Korean study yet all we have in the science journals is spin.

It’s not surprising since a all temp superconductor of lead and copper has the potential to rock the world markets and militaries and revolutionize electrical generation, storage and distribution.

The Green Regime wants to bury it as early on as possible. They don’t want Tech to emerge that could provide scalable energy generation, storage and distribution it might cause human civilization must not flourish on cheap energy. And it would ruin the economic plan of redistributing the wealth while the world depopulates and our communities re-wilded.

We must pay through the nose and suffer with high cost crappy tech like solar and windmills without great storage and distribution., The hypocrisy is that a great SC all temp electrical energy storage system with a fossil fuel input would greatly reduce demand for fossil fuel.

See the American Scientific article on LK99 as case in point.

Remember the movement climate change is an part of a larger growing anti-human civilization movement…. they don’t want to save the plant they want to rule it.

rah
October 12, 2023 11:15 am

I spent a total of about 4 years in Europe. The majority of it in Bavaria. I loved the beer and in fact when possible made a point of sampling all of them I could in Germany and other various European countries. But IMO the best beer of them all is made in Czechoslovakia.

Budweiser Budvar Brewery – Wikipedia

And it’s beer has no resemblance to the Amercian made Budweiser swill.

Bob
October 12, 2023 12:23 pm

I can tell you with complete confidence that so called climate scientists are the last people I would turn to for what beer I drink or what beer I prefer or what are the best qualities for beer. Climate scientists can take a hike.