“10k dead penguin chicks” more animal tragedy porn used to advance global warming agenda

From Polar Bear Science

Susan Crockford

Like the 2017 video of the National Geographic starving polar bear, the 2022 deaths of emperor penguin deaths promoted last week is emotional blackmail. Both are examples of preposterous fear-mongering pushed by activist scientists and the media for political purposes. Don’t fall for it.

Emperor Penguins in Antarctica
Emperor Penguins in Antarctica

Despite the hype last week over the newly published paper by Peter Fretwell and colleagues, there is no plausible ecological rationale for proposing that that a single season’s reproductive failure in four small colonies of emperor penguin (Aptenodytes fosteri), due to La Nina conditions — phenomena unrelated to carbon dioxide emissions — are signs of a future “quasi-extinction” of the species, as proposed in the BAS video hereNone of the estimated 282,150 breeding pairs of adult emperors were lost in 2022 off the Antarctic Peninsula and chicks born in several dozen other emperor colonies around the Antarctic continent survived, which means this was a tiny bump in the road rather than a catastrophe for the species.

Background

John Turner (British Antarctic Survey) and Josifino Comiso (NASA) stated in a NATURE paper in 2017:

Current climate models struggle to simulate the seasonal and regional variability seen in Antarctic sea ice.”

Despite emotional rhetoric about very recent declines, sea ice conditions in the Southern Hemisphere have not responded as predicted to global warming theory (Blanchard-Wrigglesworth et al. 2021, 2022; Comiso et al. 2017; Turner and Comiso 2017; Turner and Overland 2009). This has left activists of all stripes to shoe-horn any ecological anomaly into a narrative of impending doom, which the media spoon-feed to a naive public, even though a recent review showed Antarctic species dependent on sea ice are thriving (Crockford 2023).

For years now, several British Antarctic Survey (BAS) scientists and their allies have been lobbying the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) to up-list the emperor penguin conservation status to “vulnerable” on the basis of predicted “quasi-extinction” due to future sea ice loss caused by global warming (Jenouvrier et al. 2009). They want what polar bear scientists got in 2006, on similar shaky grounds.

In October 2022, under pressure from litigious activists in the US, emperors were added to the Endangered Species List as “threatened” (USFWS 2022). Out-of-date predictions of Antarctic sea ice known by industry experts to be flawed, combined with extreme climate scenarios known to be implausible (Blanchard-Wrigglesworth et al. 2021, 2022; Hausfather and Peters 2020), were peddled by penguin experts to support a preposterous narrative of climate change disaster in Antarctica (Jenouvrier et al. 2020; Trathan et al 2020).

From Jenouvrier et al. (2020). The “unmitigated scenario” or “business as usual” is known to be quite impossible (Hausfather and Peters 2020).

All this drama despite evidence that by 2019 about 600,000 emperor penguins were breeding in 54 known colonies scattered around the Antarctic continent, as the image below shows (Fretwell and Trathan 2020), including a number of previously unknown colonies discovered using satellite imagery, as well as an updated sea ice model suggesting stable ice cover should continue until at least 2050 and decline only slowly after that (Rackow et al. 2022).

From Fretwell and Trathan (2020), where colonies 8 (Bryant Coast), and 9 (Smyley Island) off the Antarctic Peninsula were among the emperor penguin colonies lost in 2022, while colony 10 (Rothschild Island) survived and colony 7 (Prfogner Point) was inexplicably abandoned.

But as of 2018, the IUCN held out, stating [my bold]:

This species is listed as Near Threatened because it is projected to undergo a moderately rapid population decline over the next three generations owing to the projected effects of climate change. However, it should be noted that there is considerable uncertainty over future climatic changes and how these will impact the species. [Birdlife International 2018]

This decision was clearly unacceptable to emperor penguin specialists, who still fervently desire the coveted IUCN “vulnerable” status for their species as well as “Specially Protected Species” status under the Antarctic Treaty, which was rejected in 2022 (Fretwell et al. 2020). Peter Fretwell, who is a remote sensing expert for the BAS, told the BBC in 2019 (9 October):

“Everything we know – all the experts, all the models – tells us that Emperors are going to be in real trouble. We need to pull out all the stops to help them. That’s going to be hard because we know the one thing that’s really going to save them is stabilisation of the global climate.”

Newest nonsense

Fretwell and his buddies are at it again, funded by the WWF and egged on by media outlets committed to promote the human-caused climate change agenda.

Summer sea ice around Antarctica has always virtually disappeared over the summer (down to 15% or less than winter extent) and no one pretends that emperor penguins require summer sea ice for survival. The loss of fast ice that struck in 2022 off the Antarctic Peninsula occurred in austral spring (late November), just weeks before emperor penguin chicks were fully fledged and able to survive on their own. This was an unfortunate, one-off mortality event associated with a localized sea ice anomaly likely caused by La Nina conditions in the Southern Ocean, as Fretwell and colleagues concede (Fretwell et al. 2023:5).

BBC-penquin-breeding-cycle

Yet these authors egregiously frame the assumed loss of more than 9,000 chicks as a significant portend of future catastrophe.

Claims that the 2022 loss of chicks was unprecedented are also nonsense, since a much larger colony failure happened in 2016 (involving perhaps 14,000-25,000 chicks) due to early sea ice breakup caused by bad weather that was similarly pegged as a disaster for the species. Except it wasn’t: subsequent research showed adult birds simply relocated to other areas the following year and successfully raised their chicks in new colonies, since suitable habitat exists all around the continent.

BBC report on the 2022 penguin colony loss contains a sea ice chart for 15 Novermber (copied below, with additions), which shows how localized this event really was. The region circled in red (by me) in the Bellingshausen Sea is where the failed 2022 colonies were located, while the X marks the area of the 2016 colony failure:

As Jim Steele pointed out yesterday on X (formerly Twitter), there are also some inconsistencies in the Fretwell and colleagues claim that early breakup of fast ice in 2022 caused four out of five colonies off the Antarctic Peninsula to be lost [my bold]:

  1. The Pfrogner Point colony was only discovered in 2019. Its estimated population of 1200 pairs bred on a stable ice shelf, not on fast ice. Yet they still abandoned the colony in November.
  2. There was no breeding failure on the Rothschild Island colony because there, fast-ice persisted as needed until the end of December.

The location map for the above-mentioned colonies from the Fretwell et al. (2023:3) paper, copied below, shows the abandoned Prfogner Point colony well outside the area of early sea ice breakup and the surviving Rothschild Island smack in the middle of it:

Bottom line

There is no scientific rationale for proposing that a single season’s reproductive failure in a few breeding colonies out of dozens is a sign of future “quasi-extinction” for emperor penguins. None of the estimated 282,150 breeding pairs of adult birds were lost in 2022 and chicks born in about 50 other colonies around the Antarctic continent also survived, which means this was a tiny blip in the life of emperor penguins rather than a catastrophe for the species. Activist scientists and the media are shamefully using emotional language to describe an almost inconsequential mortality event in order to manipulate public sentiment and force influential conservation organizations to accept a scientifically unsound political agenda.  

References

BirdLife International. 2020. Aptenodytes forsteri. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2019: e.T22697752A132600320. Downloaded on 26 October 2022. https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/22697752/157658053

Blanchard-Wrigglesworth, E., I. Eisenman, S. Zhang, et al. 2022. New perspectives on the enigma of expanding Antarctic sea ice, Eos 103. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022EO220076.

Blanchard-Wrigglesworth, E., Roach, L.A., Donohoe, A. and Ding, Q. 2021. Impact of winds and Southern Ocean SSTs on Antarctic sea ice trends and variability. Journal of Climate 34(3):949–965. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0386.1

Crockford, S.J. 2023. The Polar Wildlife Report. Global Warming Policy Foundation Briefing 63, London. pdf here.

Hausfather, Z. and Peters, G.P. 2020. Emissions – the ‘business as usual’ story is misleading [“Stop using the worst-case scenario for climate warming as the most likely outcome — more-realistic baselines make for better policy”]. Nature 577: 618-620

Fretwell, P.T. and Trathan, P.N. 2020. Discovery of new colonies by Sentinel2 reveals good and bad news for emperor penguins. Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation [open access], in press. https://doi.org/10.1002/rse2.176

Fretwell, P.T., Boutet, A. and Ratcliffe, N. 2023. Record low 2022 Antarctic sea ice led to catastrophic breeding failure of emperor penguins. Communications Earth and Environment

Jenouvrier, S., Caswell, H., Barbraud, C., Holland, M., Stroeve, J. and Weimerskirch, H. 2009. Demographic models and IPCC climate projections predict the decline of an emperor penguin population. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 106: 1844-1847. Available here: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/23951047_Demographic_models_and_IPCC_climate_projections_predict_the_decline_of_an_Emperor_penguin_population
Jenouvrier, S. et al. 2020. The Paris Agreement objectives will likely halt future declines of emperor penguins. Global Change Biology 26(3): 1170-1184. [paywalled] https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/gcb.14864

Rackow, T., Danilov, S., Goessling, H.F. et al. 2022. Delayed Antarctic sea-ice decline in high-resolution climate change simulations. Nature Communications 13:637. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-28259-y

Trathan, P.N. et al. 2020. The emperor penguin – Vulnerable to projected rates of warming and sea ice loss. Biological Conservation 241:108216. [open access] https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108216

Turner, J. and Comiso, J. 2017. Solve Antarctica’s sea-ice puzzle. Nature 547:275-277. https://www.nature.com/articles/547275a

Turner, J. and Overland, J. 2009. Contrasting climate change in the two polar regions. Polar Research 28(2):146-164. https://doi.org/10.3402/polar.v28i2.6120

USFWS 2022. ‘Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Threatened Species Status for Emperor Penguin With Section 4(d) Rule.’ Federal Register 87(206):64700-64720.

5 16 votes
Article Rating
55 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
2hotel9
August 29, 2023 6:06 am

And the Polar Bears, none can be found anywhere in Antarctica, clearly we have driven them to extinction already! (does it really need a sarc tag)

Scissor
Reply to  2hotel9
August 29, 2023 6:08 am

It must be hard to wear a tuxedo all the time.

Yooper
Reply to  Scissor
August 29, 2023 6:17 am

And make some good moves:

2hotel9
Reply to  Scissor
August 29, 2023 6:29 am

Their dry-cleaning bills must be horrendous!

Reply to  2hotel9
August 29, 2023 6:42 am

You probably started a cascading meme for the climate/insane.

“See, all the antarctic polar bears are gone, you want to wait until the pengies are gone too”!!!

Ron Long
Reply to  Pat from Kerbob
August 29, 2023 12:49 pm

Can you hunt them? Are they good to eat?

Reply to  Ron Long
August 29, 2023 1:54 pm

Of course, tastes like chicken!

Reply to  Ron Long
August 29, 2023 4:11 pm

You can if you want but you’ll likely not enjoy the taste – oily, fishy and tough. Having said that people have eaten far worse as a gourmet delicacy!

captainjtiberius
Reply to  2hotel9
August 29, 2023 8:57 am

If only alarmists would, literally, hug polar bears the problem would solved.

Reply to  2hotel9
August 29, 2023 9:47 am

Maybe that species should be renamed the Arctic Bear.

LT3
August 29, 2023 6:32 am

You left out current sea ice conditions for Antarctica.

antarcticseaice.png
Ian_e
Reply to  LT3
August 29, 2023 7:13 am

You know, of course, about the effect of onshore winds?

LT3
Reply to  Ian_e
August 29, 2023 10:02 am

Yes of course, I do not care about why it is, but it is something not to be glossed over. This has not happened (nothing even close) since record keeping of Antarctic sea ice statistics began, and it will cause problems for the penguins. A healthy dose of skepticism is warranted but cherry picking data results in a fail.

Reply to  LT3
August 29, 2023 11:27 am

Ok. Just to put this into perspective, there has been ice on and around the Antarctic for at least the last 11,000 years, the length of this interglacial or much longer and you are panicking based on a slight dip in a mere 44 years of data. Are you bonkers?

LT3
Reply to  Richard Page
August 30, 2023 5:59 am

Not a panick, just a fact, anything that changes rapidly on this planet has a detrimental effect on higher life forms. The Penguins breeding cycle depends on their timing of where the sea ice will be when their young will be ready to enter the ocean. They will adapt, but not without causalities.

And as far as bonkers, little fella…

what it is that you know about the significance of 44 years, the definition of “a mere dip”, and the equally pathetic statement that you know anything about Antarctic sea ice 11,000 years ago…. what is that you know about anything? Are you another mindless automaton, that repeats stuff it here’s.

Reply to  LT3
August 30, 2023 2:56 pm

Current sea ice is no further below the short term average, than 2014 was above. that short term average.

Are you saying that the young will have less distance to travel to get to the sea… that seems like a big plus.

Current level is not dis-similar to that of 1976. And we still have pingu. !

Antarctic Sea Ice Vs. 1976 | Real Climate Science

Are you another mindless AGW automaton that gullibly falls for AGW propaganda?

Reply to  LT3
August 30, 2023 5:25 pm

I know that this years ‘blip’ in the 44 years of data was due to an unseasonably warm shift in the winds at the Antarctic as well as an active storm season that broke up some of the thinner sea ice just as I know there has been a colder than normal spell of weather following that which has caused a refreeze in the Antarctic – all of which is weather, not climate. I know that some regions of the Antarctic exceeded the average sea ice extent this year, even though the weather-affected regions brought the overall average down. I know that there have been fluctuations in the sea ice extent going back over a hundred years because of historical records going back to early voyages around the Antarctic, many extremely precise. I also know that the significance of the 44 years of data is because modern sea ice extent uses satellite measurements and the first that could be used for such a purpose were launched 44 years ago. Well look at that, perhaps I do know one or two things after all!

Reply to  Richard Page
August 30, 2023 5:28 pm

Oh and, of course, ice core data shows that their has been ice on Antarctica for all of this interglacial (11,000 years) as well as the last glacial period – more than that I’d probably have to look up somewhere.

Reply to  LT3
August 29, 2023 2:05 pm

So , you think 16+ MILLION square km of sea ice…. is not enough for some penguins.

It just doesn’t extend out into the southern ocean as it usually has over the last 45 or years we have data for.

There is evidence that Antarctic itself had less ice mass during the early to mid Holocene, but studies of past sea ice extents are hard to find.

Stability of the Antarctic Ice Sheet during the pre-industrial Holocene | Nature Reviews Earth & Environment

It seems highly likely that there were long periods over the last 10,000 years which had significantly less sea ice… and guess what.. The penguins are still there. !

Reply to  Ian_e
August 29, 2023 11:32 am

Exactly – the winds are blowing towards shore, resisting the extent of ice (it’s basically compressing the ice, but also impeding the creation of ice). This will result in thicker, longer lasting ice shelves – which the climate insane should appreciate!

Robertvd
Reply to  PCman999
August 29, 2023 2:48 pm

And makes it much more difficult to feed the young. Offshore wind would create open water close to the coast making the distant to the colony (50–120 km) a lot shorter.

Reply to  PCman999
August 29, 2023 4:22 pm

Love that you are using my descriptor but don’t forget the slash

Climate/insane

😀

Reply to  LT3
August 29, 2023 12:46 pm

Dishonesty, as usual from you alarmists. You chose to grab the image from a couple of weeks ago that appeared to show it leveling off. Show an updated graph. Only include the 1981-2010 average, 2015, and 2023.
It was as ‘high’ in 2015 as it is ‘low’ now. Were you screaming ice age in 2015?
What was the antarctic sea ice extent in the late 60s? How about during the MWP? How about 100,000 years ago?
We have 44 years of data on a phenomenon that has been oscillating without concern to us for thousands of years. We are still in the information-gathering phase.

Reply to  Tommy2b
August 29, 2023 12:54 pm

Sorry, 2014 (not 2015), and 1979-1990 average. Here. I did it for you. Isn’t it fun to play with graphs?

arctic-sea-ice-extent.jpeg
Reply to  LT3
August 29, 2023 1:52 pm

You mean 16+ MILLION square km of sea ice..

That is one heck of a lot of area for a few penguins !!

Reply to  bnice2000
August 29, 2023 4:13 pm

Oh that’s ok, they only use the edges!

Reply to  LT3
August 30, 2023 4:43 pm

August 1966 (15.9 Wadhams), extent was less than August 2023. (16.2 Wadhams)

Image-2023-08-25-19-09-47-down.jpg (1008×818) (realclimatescience.com)

August 29, 2023 6:43 am

The real reason for penguin extinction:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=pkDtr0a1xzQ

Greg61
August 29, 2023 7:04 am

But if there is no crisis, who will fund these poor scientists?

August 29, 2023 7:22 am

…estimated 282,150 breeding pairs…
_______________________________________________

Not 282,100 and not 282,200 but 252,150 breeding pairs, a very precise estimate if ever there was one.

Considering the map of Antarctica put up here at WUWT the other day (see below), ~280,000 would have been more appropriate.

Reply to  Steve Case
August 29, 2023 7:28 am

Forgot to post map Duh!

Penguin Populations.png
Reply to  Steve Case
August 29, 2023 11:35 am

You’re not being very precise… Typo: 252,150

Reply to  PCman999
August 29, 2023 2:07 pm

Not accurate enough…. should be 252,149.538

Reply to  PCman999
August 29, 2023 4:50 pm

If yer gonna screw something up, you should do a bang up job of it.

John Oliver
August 29, 2023 7:28 am

The real question is : “ when does all the insanity stop?” I think that happens almost instantly when the masses wake up on a cold winter morning to find their “ allotment “ of electricity has already been used. Until then the insanity continues over penguins that will survive adverse conditions much better than virtue signaling warmists ever will.

Editor
August 29, 2023 7:38 am

“10k dead penguin chicks” Oy vey!! Did they use fingers and toes to count that high?

Regards,
Bob

Reply to  Bob Tisdale
August 29, 2023 8:24 am

No dead chicks were EVER COUNTED! Nor were live chicks ever counted!

As Fretwell reported, “There are no records of large aggregations of none-breeding emperors [“non-breeding”was this paper ever peer-reviewed?] between October and December, so we make the assumption that these sites, which are present in the same location every year in the breeding season, are breeding sites.”

The satellite detected pooh stains showed there had been an aggregation of penguins in the fall. That they were breeding was just an assumption. It is still possible it was an aggregation on non-breeders which make up a significant fraction of the populations. Based on Fretwell’s 2012 research, there were 238,000 breeding pairs and based on published values of the relationship between breeders and non-breeders, another 119,000 non-breeders exist for a total population of ∼595,000. Fretwell simply assumed pooh stains were from breeders.

Thus all the paper ever stated was “This paper describes the likely impact of this event
upon emperor penguin breeding success across the region.”

Reply to  Bob Tisdale
August 29, 2023 8:43 am

The number of new born chicks is modeled based on estimations of breeding pairs, However according to Winter (2023) Remote sensing of emperor penguin abundance and breeding success

“Of the 61 currently known emperor penguin breeding colonies, ground truth population counts conducted during the winter, at regular, frequent intervals, are only available for the colonies at Pointe Géologie in Adélie Land and Atka Bay in Dronning Maud Land”

Winter proposed a model for separating breeding pairs from non-breeders. After laying eggs, the females leave to forage, so departing breeders will cut in half the population at the time off egg laying. Skewed numbers will suggest what proportion of the aggregation were breeders.

Here are examples of possible observations. If the population was cut in half, one could estimate the aggregation was comprised of all breeders. If 90% of the penguins leave around egg laying time then most of the aggregation was non-breeders or failed breeders.

Based on what Fretwell (2023) has reported, the total departure of penguins at some colonies suggest it is most likely they were non-breeders, and estimates of new chick would be closer to zero, and thus there was no die-off as Fretwell hypothesizes.

John Oliver
August 29, 2023 7:48 am

I guess this might be categorized as a STORY TIP. When will the insanity end? We have one of the better groups here at WUWT. As I approach my retirement date I get more and more concerned with how to invest as well as defend my little nest egg against the current insanity( scientifically, socially , culturally etc) including where to live that protects one’s freedom. ( I live in one of the United States more woke states )I don’t think the insane who are currently running the asylums are giving up anytime soon. So… ?

Reply to  John Oliver
August 29, 2023 9:57 am

woke state? I live in Wokeachusetts!

August 29, 2023 7:53 am

Thank you Susan Crockford, for the hard work that you do exposing liars.

strativarius
August 29, 2023 7:58 am

Penguins was not available for comment

strativarius
Reply to  strativarius
August 29, 2023 8:00 am

PINGU….

Reply to  strativarius
August 29, 2023 4:17 pm

Well you’re right, he is an Emperor Penguin, just not sure what he’s saying.

NotChickenLittle
August 29, 2023 8:18 am

Perhaps now more than ever, people divide themselves into two camps: Those who seek the truth, and those who have no compunctions whatsoever against spreading lies, as long as it advances their agenda.

Fortunately for people who use their brains, and thanks to sites like WUWT, it’s easy to see who is who. Thanks Dr. Crockford for this article!

antigtiff
August 29, 2023 8:39 am

Oh my, the penguins are missing from the arctic….the polar bears are absent in the Antarctic…..SAVE THE WHALES!

August 29, 2023 9:45 am

Populations of almost all species go through rises and falls due to diseases and the rise and fall of that species predators. It’s perfectly normal. Wildlife biologists have been studying this for a long time.

Yooper
Reply to  Joseph Zorzin
August 29, 2023 10:13 am

What is the penguin’s predator?

Reply to  Yooper
August 29, 2023 10:36 am

Schoolchildren who often have 1 or 2 in their lunchboxes here in the UK!

Apart from the obvious chocolate bar joke, just about everything that lives in the Antarctic will eat penguin: Fur Seals, Sea Lions, Orca’s, Leopard Seals and Sharks are their usual predators although Bottlenose Dolphins have been known to eat them and avian predators like the Antarctic Skua will go after eggs or chicks.

Reply to  Yooper
August 29, 2023 2:44 pm

“The main predators of Emperor Penguins are Leopard Seals and Orcas. Chicks may be taken by birds including the Southern Giant Petrel and, occasionally, the South Polar Skua, although the Skua is more likely to scavenge dead chicks.”
(I googled it for you)

Beards
August 29, 2023 11:13 am

Quick! Lets kill a bunch of whales so we can maybe save some penguins!

August 29, 2023 12:39 pm

I’m off from work due to climate grief. Those [imaginary] thousands of penguin babies dying horrific deaths [in the researchers’ imaginations] was too much for me.
[/sarc.]

Reply to  Tommy2b
August 29, 2023 4:19 pm

My condolences. You must drink beer to dull the pain and watch TV to distract you from the ongoing suffering!

aussiecol
August 29, 2023 4:17 pm

The ”experts’‘ obviously need more funding.

August 29, 2023 5:12 pm

Record-Cold Antarctic Lake Waters Lead To Exceptionally Rare Ice – Electroverse

Super-saline Antarctic lake freezes

And from Aug 17 2023

The -61.1C (-78F) at the Vito AWS, located on the Ross Ice Shelf, which broke its previous all-time minimum record of -60.6C (-77.1F) set in August 22, 2008; the -59.9C (75.8F) at Willie Field, located at Ross Island Vicinity, which bested the old benchmark of -56.9C (-70.4F) from August 7, 2001; and the -56.7C (70.1F) at Lorne, also sited on Ross Island, which felled the -54.9C (-66.8F) set on July 17, 2010.