AEP, Carbon Brief & The European Climate Foundation

From NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT

By Paul Homewood

As reader Brian RL Catt points out, AEP, along with many other media sources, relies on an outfit called Carbon Brief for his so-called information:

The impression we are fed with implies that Carbon Brief are some kind of reliable, scientific source.

In reality, nothing could be further from the truth. In reality, Carbon Brief are no more than a political, climate lobby group, set up to promote the climate alarmist agenda.

Its director is Leo Hickman, one time editor at the Guardian, which alone should erase any suspicions about its objectivity. Other members of the team also put into question Carbon Brief’s reliability as an impartial, fact based resource. The team includes such impartial luminaries as Zeke Hausfather, Simon Evans, and former Independent “journalists” Daisy Dunne and Josh Gabbitas. Then there are the Contributing Editors, like Piers Forster, Richard Allen, Gabriele Hegerl, Simon Lewis, Tim Osborn, Camille Parmesan and Peter Stott.

The idea that any of this lot would give impartial advice on climate issues is an insult to the intelligence of anybody with an IQ above single figures.

But most of all, let’s see who funds this cornucopia of climate propaganda:

Yes, our old friends the European Climate Foundation, or ECF.

And just who are the ECF? This is what David Rose had to say about them a few years ago:

At the heart of the Blob is a single institution – the European Climate Foundation (ECF) – which has offices in London, Brussels, The Hague, Berlin and Warsaw.

Every year it receives about £20 million from ‘philanthropic’ foundations in America, Holland and Switzerland, and channels most of it to green campaign and lobby groups.

It refuses to disclose how much it gives to each recipient, and does not publish its accounts. But it admits that the purpose of these grants is to influence British and EU climate and energy policy across a broad front.

The most significant source for the ECF’s millions is a body called Climate Works – a private foundation which channels colossal sums to climate campaigners worldwide.

The Climate Works manifesto was set out in 2007 in a document entitled ‘Design to Win: Philanthropy’s Role in the Fight Against Global Warming’. It said that to be effective, a campaign to change government policies on energy and emissions would need at least $600 million from donors.

It was driven by the belief that without radical action, ‘we could lose the fight against global warming over the next ten years’.

It advocated the giving of generous grants to local campaigners in countries such as Britain who had detailed knowledge of the way their political systems operated.

As well as better energy efficiency, carbon taxes and emissions caps, they must ‘promote renewables and low emission alternatives’. Utility companies must be given ‘financial incentives’ – in other words, enormous subsidies from tax and bill payers – to make this happen.

Climate Works soon achieved its ambitious fundraising target, with a grant in 2008 of $500 million from the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, which spends the fortune amassed by the co-founder of the Hewlett-Packard computer firm. This was followed by further grants of up to $100 million, and donations of $60 million from the sister Packard foundation. In July, a report by a US Senate committee named the Hewlett foundation as a key element in a ‘billionaires’ club’ which effectively controlled the environmental movement, pumping more than half a billion dollars a year into green groups around the world.

It claimed these ‘wealthy liberals fully exploit the benefits of a generous tax code meant to promote genuine philanthropy and charitable acts’, but instead were transferring money to ‘activists’ to ‘promote shared political goals’.

One of the US-based Climate Works’s first acts was to set up and fund ECF as its European regional office. All ECF’s main funders are represented on ECF’s board, including Charlotte Pera, who is also Climate Works’s CEO. Susan Bell, ECF’s vice-chairman, was formerly the Hewlett foundation’s vice-president.

It is hard to assess the ECF’s full impact for a simple reason – although it publishes the names of some of the organisations it funds, it does not state how much it gives, nor exactly how this money is used.

The ECF’s Tom Brookes said: ‘The projects we fund all fall within the overall mission of the Foundation to support the development of a prosperous low-carbon economy in Europe.’

He would not explain why no amounts were stated, saying only that ECF’s annual report ‘describes the objectives of each ECF programme area and its significant grantees.

‘We are confident that this is a sufficient level of detail to provide insight into the work of the Foundation… Our policy on the information we publish reflects our responsibilities to our grantees and donors.’

Nevertheless, it is clear from the information that is available that the list of ECF funding recipients is a Who’s Who of the green movement, including Friends of the Earth, Greenpeace, the WWF, Client Earth, Carbon Brief, the Green Alliance, and E3G, the elite lobby group that persuaded the Government to set up the £3 billion Green Investment Bank.

https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.wordpress.com/2015/08/14/how-the-eciu-is-funded/

In short, far left political foundations, funded mainly by US billionaires, have been using their money to influence public policy for years, both here in the UK and in Europe.

Just why naive idiots like AEP are buying into what is quite obviously a propaganda exercise is up to them to explain.

4.9 22 votes
Article Rating
64 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Tom Halla
October 9, 2022 6:09 am

It is more that most foundations get taken over by The Left, unless the originators take precautions to prevent it.

strativarius
October 9, 2022 6:28 am

Ambrose… such a fine working class name, that. No wonder he went to the university of choice for traitors – Cambridge. 

Some may be familiar with an essay written by George Orwell at the height of the Blitz called England Your England. I have taken the liberty of updating a relevant section

“In intention, at any rate, the English climate alarmists are Europeanized. They take their cookery from Paris and their opinions from Greenpeace. In the general patriotism of the country they form a sort of island of misanthropic thought. England is perhaps the only great country whose climate alarmists hate the species – especially the working classes. 

In left-wing circles it is always felt that there is something slightly disgraceful in being an Englishman and that it is a duty to snigger at every English institution, from horse racing to suet puddings. It is a strange fact, but it is unquestionably true that almost any English climate alarmist would feel more ashamed of admitting the truth than of glueing themselves to a priceless work of art and damaging it.

Or something like that

Hickman has a BA in… Art under his academic belt, funnily enough. Even more egregious, Stott leads the Climate Monitoring and Attribution team of the Hadley Centre 

Carbon Brief – sounds like underwear.

Reply to  strativarius
October 9, 2022 8:23 am

The rest of the quote is apt without any changes

All through the critical years many left-wingers were chipping away at English morale, trying to spread an outlook that was sometimes squashily pacifist, sometimes violently pro-Russian, but always anti-British.”

BTW, I felt proud to say “God save the Queen”. Now I think I would be ashamed to say “God save the King” as I don’t think Charlie deserves it.

MarkW
Reply to  Redge
October 9, 2022 9:45 am

I’d be tempted to say “God take the King”, but I’m not sure William would be any better.

Reply to  Redge
October 9, 2022 12:08 pm

Charles needs saving.

Reply to  It doesnot add up
October 9, 2022 11:26 pm

From himself

MarkW
Reply to  strativarius
October 9, 2022 9:42 am

Hatred of the country where you grew up seems to be a common feature amongst those of the left. American leftists show an identical attitude towards the US. They despise anything that even hints of patriotism or law and order.

The only exception to this comes from those who grew up in smaller countries, they have been taught to despise any none leftists large country.

October 9, 2022 7:19 am

Progressives give high priority to making tax deductible contributions to fashionable ‘high brow’ causes such as universities, museums, climate, social justice, etc. Unfortunately, they also insist that the rest of us also help them feel good about themselves by driving huge public welfare programs that have the opposite of their intended effect.

Clearly, the tax code needs to be changed to limit deductibility only to those contributions that truly help the needy, i.e., food, clothing, shelter, medical care, etc.

Tom.1
October 9, 2022 7:39 am

Ok, but it’s still not enough to counter the climate denialism being funded by big oil.

Tom.1
Reply to  Tom.1
October 9, 2022 8:12 am

I would expect the people here to get the sarcasm, but it seems not.

Reply to  Tom.1
October 9, 2022 9:10 am

Sarcasm without /S or ‘end sarcasm’ is just an aboveboard comment.
Typically, the sarcastic commenter is often the only one who knows the comment is insider joke sarcasm.

To many thousands, they do not see nor understand the sarcasm. Instead, they take the commenter as providing honest commentary. Myself included.

MarkW
Reply to  Tom.1
October 9, 2022 9:35 am

For sarcasm to work, it must be distinguishable from what the other side routinely says.
For example, when I read your post, I re-checked the name to see if it was griff or simon.

H.R.
Reply to  MarkW
October 9, 2022 7:59 pm

“[…] I re-checked the name to see if it was griff or simon.”

Hah! Same here, Mark.

Scissor
Reply to  Tom.1
October 9, 2022 10:11 am

Maybe the negative votes were sarcasm too.

Reply to  Tom.1
October 10, 2022 9:48 am

Unfortunately your comment was easily interpreted as coming from a die-hard global warming catastrophist. In any event please accept the ratings as indicative of the clear heads of the readers, and not a personal affront.

Reply to  Tom.1
October 10, 2022 6:43 pm

That’s because you always suck at it
When you try you sound exactly like Griff

Dave Yaussy
Reply to  Tom.1
October 9, 2022 8:27 am

Does that make everyone who purchased hydrocarbons from big oil a fellow denialist? If so that’s a pretty big group. Maybe 100% of humanity?

[luckily I was able to spot the misspelling of your law firm’s name in your email because the a and s are adjacent keys. I don’t think this counts as doxing -cr]

Dave Yaussy
Reply to  Dave Yaussy
October 9, 2022 4:48 pm

Thank you!

[please correct the incorrectly spelled version cached in your browser (autofill) ~cr]

Teddy Lee
Reply to  Tom.1
October 9, 2022 10:49 am

Tom, I can why you are one!

Dave Fair
Reply to  Tom.1
October 9, 2022 11:18 am

Its amazing the number of people who don’t appreciate good sarcasm. Sarcasm is not intended to be obvious. Review of good sarcasm requires thought, not just knee-jerk revision to prejudice. Notations by the writer of sarcasm defeats the entire purpose of sarcasm; I never use them.

Martin Mason
Reply to  Dave Fair
October 9, 2022 12:19 pm

There is no good sarcasm really. As Oscar Wilde said, it is the lowest form of wit.

Zig Zag Wanderer
Reply to  Martin Mason
October 9, 2022 1:59 pm

What many people miss is that he was being sarcastic…

Richard Page
Reply to  Martin Mason
October 10, 2022 12:41 am

Ah he is generally misquoted in that – he actually said that sarcasm is the slowest form of wit.

October 9, 2022 7:41 am

Ambroses’s Energy Poppycock

Ron Long
October 9, 2022 7:45 am

“…funded by US billionaires…” is an interesting fact, which I do not dispute. However, the billionaires I have interacted with were not stupid, and were actually smart (high IQ). Sure, some inherited the family fortune and are in the process of liquidating it, but most are self-made, or at least partially self-made. What leads to this misguided funding of CAGW Loonies? Surrounded by friends that are onboard? Avoiding the attacks that are common if you’re not woke enough? Tax write-off? Money Guilt? I have no idea.

Reply to  Ron Long
October 9, 2022 8:16 am

From this article, it isn’t US billionaires providing the funds – it is charitable foundations that they set up, run by people who have been indoctrinated in our schools, reinforced by the MSM and the politicians.

Campsie Fellow
Reply to  Retired_Engineer_Jim
October 10, 2022 1:19 am

That try to some extent but don’t forget the likes of Soros and Gates.

Carbon Bigfoot
Reply to  Ron Long
October 9, 2022 8:52 am

Do i remember reading in these pages David Gilmour, Pink Floyd fame donated $160 million to fund climate causes??

MarkW
Reply to  Carbon Bigfoot
October 9, 2022 9:55 am

How one made their fortune does seem to make a difference. Actors and artists do seem to tend towards the left end of the spectrum. I attribute this to two factors.

First off acting, and singing don’t require much in the way of brain power.
Secondly, there is a large element of luck in determining who makes it big and who struggles all of their life in these fields. Getting the right song and your career takes off. Being in the right movie that makes it big, and you get more offers for better roles.
For every super star, there are dozens of other people with talent that is just as good who never got that big break. So there is an element guilt.

Add that guilt to the fact that few of them have ever been required to think deeply about anything, and it’s not unusual that many of them feel that everyone who is wealthy, got that way because of luck, not hard work.

And if your wealth is due to luck, then you have no reason to object if the government decides to take most of your wealth. Also, since your wealth is not due to hard work, there is no reason to believe that high taxes would do anything to prevent future wealth creation.

Reply to  MarkW
October 9, 2022 10:54 am

I believe that the prime cause of entertainer’s leftardism is due to their playing make-believe every day. They are incapable of understanding reality.

Old Cocky
Reply to  MarkW
October 9, 2022 4:13 pm

And if your wealth is due to luck, then you have no reason to object if the government decides to take most of your wealth.

George Harrison did. That’s why he wrote “Taxman”

Old Man Winter
Reply to  Ron Long
October 9, 2022 10:06 am

Since imaging’s an important part of salesmanship, attempts to maintain
their image can cause billionaires, corporations & military generals to look
as feckless as movie stars!

Reply to  Ron Long
October 9, 2022 10:57 am

I suspect that most of the wealthy lefty contributors are just trying to avoid the torches and pitchfork crowd. They are saying, “oh no not me, I am one of you.” Or, they are being extorted by boycott threats.

John
October 9, 2022 7:50 am

The use of foundations to obfuscate purpose and avoid taxation is one of the most powerful tools of the wealthy class to control the masses even from the grave. You wonder who controls the world and you only have to look at a consortium of large corporations and powerful foundations to know who pulls the strings. The key to wealth and power is the avoidance of taxes. Even the taxable portion of most billionaires income is lower marginally than the upper middle class wage earner. Buffet proved that when he posted his return showing he only paid 16% on his $14MM reportable income.

Most of these foundations are not actually charitable in nature, only by requirement. They generally produce more tax free income than they pay out hence grow in power and influence. Ironic how many of there largest recipients are related to each other and donate to each other. Imagine massive money laundering/transfer operations allowed under the most passive enforcement and reporting requirements.

October 9, 2022 8:10 am

So, a conspiracy has been identified. What practically can be done about it?

Yooper
Reply to  Steve Richards
October 9, 2022 8:21 am

RICO?

DipChip
October 9, 2022 9:01 am

Today’s increasing production and use of EV’s, wind, and solar generation is similar to positive feed back in electronic circuits they go into runaway and failure.
 
EV’s, wind, and solar generation require enormous amounts of fossil fuel to manufacture; both when acquiring and processing the materials for further manufacture.
 
The price of fossil fuel will simply increase as the need of additional fuel is required to manufacture more and more hardware for climate change resolution. Steel, copper, Aluminum, and cement will be the primary culprits. The cost of fossil fuel will increase
proportionally as the rate of manufacture increases.

AGW is Not Science
Reply to  DipChip
October 10, 2022 9:19 am

Climate change resolution?! No such thing.

No empirical evidence that CO2 “drives” a damn thing, so trying to make a measurable impact on climate by manipulation of human energy choices is like trying to transport shipping containers with a canoe.

Spetzer86
October 9, 2022 9:06 am

How many coal-fired power plants do you need to build each year to be leading in green power?

MarkW
October 9, 2022 9:38 am

Soros is not American.

Reply to  MarkW
October 9, 2022 10:17 am

Soros is a citizen of the world – which he would like to control as emperor.

griff
October 9, 2022 9:39 am

Seems only fair – seeing far right think tanks funded by billionaires are the main proponents of climate skepticism

cerescokid
Reply to  griff
October 9, 2022 10:11 am

griff

it takes only a modicum of research to see that skeptics have a better understanding of reality than the garden variety alarmist. Uncertainty drips all over the evidence. Billionaires and think tanks are not needed to see the obvious overstated threat. This assumes that someone has the cognitive ability to see complexity when it stares them in the face.

MarkW
Reply to  griff
October 9, 2022 12:50 pm

Tom.1, see what I mean?

Drake
Reply to  MarkW
October 9, 2022 6:42 pm

Ditto!

MarkW
Reply to  griff
October 9, 2022 12:50 pm

griff, do you have any evidence of this, or is just what you are paid to think?

Richard Page
Reply to  MarkW
October 10, 2022 12:45 am

Anybody that paid Griffy to think has wasted their money.

DaveS
Reply to  griff
October 10, 2022 5:31 am

Good grief, you do spout some garbage.

IanE
October 9, 2022 10:45 am

‘Just why naive idiots like AEP are buying into what is quite obviously a propaganda exercise is up to them to explain.’

Because he is a naive idiot? A more important question is why the DT keeps paying him for what must be the most unpopular, and plainly wrong, opinion pieces!

DaveS
Reply to  IanE
October 10, 2022 5:35 am

A long time ago AEP did some serious journalism.

DipChip
October 9, 2022 12:49 pm

How does the world expect to attain zero carbon electrical energy by 20250 when the electrical energy required with a growing economy is growing at five times the rate of wind and solar energy growth?

rho
Reply to  DipChip
October 9, 2022 2:06 pm

Unicorn farts?

AGW is Not Science
Reply to  DipChip
October 10, 2022 10:28 am

More to the point, why does the world have any expectation that such a stupid notion will ever occur, when wind and solar are 100% dependent on fossil fuels for their existence anyway?!

Bob
October 9, 2022 3:19 pm

How could the Europeans accomplish so much in the past and be so dim witted today? I don’t get it.

Drake
Reply to  Bob
October 9, 2022 6:50 pm

Mark Sisson, of the Primal persuasion has an opinion on that.

He believes, and I agree, that the Human race reached its peak of intelligence and athletic ability in the times BEFORE agriculture expanded to the extent that EVERYONE could survive, even those who did not contribute to the clan/family.

The weak did not survive to reproduce in most cases, therefore survival of the fittest.

Now, in the US, the “homeless”, welfare recipients, etc. i.e. those who do not contribute anything positive to society, are considered a special protected class and DO reproduce.

The degradation of the western society is apparent.

Richard Page
Reply to  Bob
October 10, 2022 12:45 am

Social Media.

SAMURAI
October 9, 2022 9:04 pm

10’s of thousands of Europeans will likely die from exposure this winter because of EU’s: dependance on Russia oil (which ended due to Biden’s bombing (most likely scenario) the Nord Steam pipelines, the EU’s insane dependence on expensive and intermittent wind/solar, and the EU closing down too many gas, coal, and nuclear power plants…

Ironically, Leftists believe the coming winter exposure deaths and skyrocketing utility bills will be a clarion call for the accelerated adoption of wind/solar to replace fossil fuel and nuclear energy…

The world is suffering from temporary insanity from Leftism..

MarkW
Reply to  SAMURAI
October 9, 2022 9:16 pm

Putin had no intention of resuming gas shipments to Europe. Collapsing the EU economy is one of his goals. Getting the world to blame Biden for something he did, is also part of his plans.

Richard Page
Reply to  MarkW
October 10, 2022 12:49 am

I just love the fact that you identify with him so much that you can read his very thoughts and disseminate them to all and sundry, whether they want you to or not. sarc (because you said you needed it)

SAMURAI
Reply to  MarkW
October 10, 2022 4:03 am

There is no reason Putin would have stupidly sabotaged his major leverage with the EU by blowing up Nord Stream 1 & 2…

As long as the pipeline was intact, Putin could strongly leverage it to get the EU to acquiesce to Russian demands because the EU is now completely dependent on Russian oil and gas for its survival.

Biden stupidly restricted US oil development and supply so the US can’t help our EU allies replace their lost Russian oil and gas.

Trump tried to warn the EU the Nord Stream pipeline was very dangerous, and the laughed at him..

They’re not laughing now…

What a terrible mess Leftist hacks have gotten us into..

Campsie Fellow
October 10, 2022 1:13 am

When I was teaching Modern Studies in a secondary school, the syllabus included an examination of the role of pressure groups in the UK political system. I was always on the look out for examples of the work of pressure groups. This article would have provided an extremely useful example.

John Oliver
October 10, 2022 5:48 am

This is a real problem. And i suspect if we really knew the numbers the “woke funding” would dwarf and funding behind fossil fuels promotion. I have seen maybe one add promoting conventional fossil fuel investment as opposed to literally thousands for “ green energy “ It ‘s just like obvious to anyone with their eyes open.

Geoff Sherrington
October 12, 2022 10:38 pm

Oh Dear, oh dear!

I was shocked to hear Charles on TV greeting the UK Prime Minister Truss at Buck Palace yesterday.
What a rude slob!!!
Geoff S
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2022/10/12/watch-king-charles-mutters-dear-oh-dear-meets-liz-truss/