Claim: New Study Finds Climate Change Could Spark the Next Pandemic

Alarmist fear mongering only that idiot Griff would believe shite like this

That’s because climate change increases odds of biolabs’ leaks.

There’s a pandemic that’s been raging since the mid 50’s
i.e. Sugar eating

Headline:“Foods to Avoid If You Have Anxiety or Depression
“Anxiety or Depression”Doesn’t that perfectly describe Climate Change Science?

On top of that, being depressed for a long time leads to paranoia, your brain loses its agility, its cognitive skill and its memory starts falling apart.
You lose your GSOH – and when you do, your girlfriend/wife/date dumps you.

Paranoia = You over-react to normal everyday triggers. Like the weather. Or someone disliking you on social media. Or driving a car when you don’t have one.

Would it be too big a leap to assume that the ‘Foods To Avoid‘ are the ones that also cause the anxiety/depression?

See them listed here

You don’t consume any of that shyte – do you?

And the really laughable thing about it all, is that the production of that mush is what’s creating the so-far observed Climate Change.
Even worse, the low-to-zero nutrient content of those foods leaves me/you/everyone wide open to any passing bug/virus/fungus, big/small, good/bad/indifferent.
They will all make us ill – to the tune of (its gone up) $3.8 Trillion pa in the US alone.
=Twice the military spend.

While the warmists assert that the consumption of mush, to the express exclusion of what we are supposed to eat, will Cure The Climate
And then, positive feedback rules the roost, because their high sugar and alcohol laden diet switches off their minds, they are totally impervious to any argument contrary to what they want to hear.
Be that climate, diet, Putin/Trump salt/fat/sugar/cannabis whatever whatever whatever

‘Never Betterers’ especially, think on……… before the ‘spare-tyre’ and accompanying pre-diabetes turns into Type 3 diabetes and you cannot think at all.

edit to PS:
No, we are NOT carnivores.
Apart from the hideous/toxic metabolites containing sulphur and nitrogen, when we eat a lot of protien, our bodies (liver I think) turns that excess protein into glucose sugar. We try to use it for energy
Thus: A high-protien diet is no different to a diet comprising iced doughnuts washed down with ‘Classic Coca Cola’

It is more likely that it is NOTHING to do with the climate and more to do with us have moved into their natural territory and are now in closer contact through our own actions of destroying their natural habitat. If only we would stop expanding and leave room for other species, we would be better off.

Climate change: There’s nothing it can’t do! Next thing you know, climate change will cause men to change into women!

“The authors report having no personal financial interests related to the study.”

Yeah Right.

So what do these twerps imagine they get paid for?

Obviously for nothing having anything even tenuously to do with science


Even though I had the opportunity to present a very similar comment just two articles ago, regarding a Princeton University peer-reviewed publication, it bears repeating here with just slight tweaking:

From the first paragraph, in the above peer-reviewed (no less!) paper out of Georgetown University Medical Center (no less!):
Blah, blah, blah . . .dramatically increasing the risk of a viral jump to humans that could lead to the next pandemic . . . blah, blah, blah, blah

One has to admire the utility of words such as “could”, “might”, “may”, etc., that offer such an appearance of a meaningful conclusion without actually requiring any committed reasoning from the author(s) writing such . . . just handwaving instead.

Indeed, I could win the mega-millions lottery tomorrow (but do I first need to go so far as to buy a ticket?).

As to lead author Dr. Colin Carlson’s statements further down the article:
“At every step, our simulations have taken us by surprise . . .but the models always lead us to these conclusions. It’s a really stunning example of just how well we can, actually, predict the future if we try.”
So try to put this into proper context with this lead-in sentence in the second paragraph of the above article:
“In their study, the scientists conducted the first comprehensive assessment of how climate change will restructure the global mammalian virome.” 
(my underlining emphasis added in both quotes above)

So, mindful that the above article is self-admitted to being published in the April 28, 2022 edition of the journal Nature (i,e,, just yesterday!) and that there is the claim of having spent “years double checking the simulation results”, there has actually been zero opportunity for independent, outside critical review—let alone model validation by independent reviewers—of the stated claims.

As a matter of fact, it is hard to understand how the phrases “at every step, taken us by surprise” and “the models always lead us to these conclusions” and “we can, actually, predict the future if we try” are not just oxymoronic when put in the context of mere “years”.

What the heck (in deference to using a more vulgar word) has become of the peer-review process???

Those pseudo-scientists should enter their paper in a fiction writing contest.
Anyone who does not know that the virus came from a lab is lying, believes every lie from the media and Fauci, or does not care enough to check.
The only question is was it deliberately released or was it accidental a little earlier than planned. There were meetings discussing trying to inject the whole world. The media was noted to be a “useful tool” in publicity of a panic.
This was a test run. They would like it to be worse the next time to sell more “injections” as they moaned that not enough people were lining up for the flu vaccine. They even tested the amount of poison in different batches.
And make no mistake, Gates is in on it.

A warming climate is the least likely type of climate change to affect pandemics. Historically it has always been that the most virulent pandemics occured during cold periods. It’s easy enough to understand why. Cold eras depress food production, less food results in starvation, starvation creates massive stress on the human body, and stressed bodies are far more susceptible to disease than are unstressed bodies.

After the virus problem was known China sent it’s people all around the world on business and vacation. It should be asked what was their intention.

This is the new but totally invalid and dangerous scientific paradigm that is infecting scientific research “..We’ve spent years double-checking those results, with different data and different assumptions, but the models always lead us to these conclusions. It’s a really stunning example of just how well we can, actually, predict the future if we try.” So we dont need to wait for empirical validation of predictions of the future and be cautious about them in the meantime, we can be sure now, declaring victory in advance, and act incautiously because a suite of modeller-instigated models agree! Havent they heard of Rumsfeld’s “unknown unknowns” including “lurking variables”, also is there any support of forward predictions from backward predictions i.e. hindcasting, or can we infer a degree of researcher confirmation bias, deliberate bias, “this will get it published” bias, “this will make us famous as scientific watchmen” bias etc etc?

The Ouija board professors.