A ring of planetary debris studded with moon-sized structures has been observed orbiting close to a white dwarf star, hinting at a nearby planet in the “habitable zone” where water and life could exist, according to a new study led by UCL researchers.
UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON
Planetary bodies observed for first time in habitable zone of dead star
A ring of planetary debris studded with moon-sized structures has been observed orbiting close to a white dwarf star, hinting at a nearby planet in the “habitable zone” where water and life could exist, according to a new study led by UCL researchers.
White dwarfs are glowing embers of stars that have burned through all their hydrogen fuel. Nearly all stars, including the Sun, will eventually become white dwarfs, but very little is known about their planetary systems.
In the study, published in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, an international team of researchers measured light from a white dwarf in the Milky Way known as WD1054–226, using data from ground- and space-based telescopes.
To their surprise, they found pronounced dips in light corresponding to 65 evenly spaced clouds of planetary debris orbiting the star every 25 hours. The researchers concluded that the precise regularity of the transiting structures – dimming the star’s light every 23 minutes – suggests they are kept in such a precise arrangement by a nearby planet.
Lead author Professor Jay Farihi (UCL Physics & Astronomy) said: “This is the first time astronomers have detected any kind of planetary body in the habitable zone of a white dwarf.
“The moon-sized structures we have observed are irregular and dusty (e.g. comet-like) rather than solid, spherical bodies. Their absolute regularity, one passing in front of the star every 23 minutes, is a mystery we cannot currently explain.
“An exciting possibility is that these bodies are kept in such an evenly-spaced orbital pattern because of the gravitational influence of a nearby planet. Without this influence, friction and collisions would cause the structures to disperse, losing the precise regularity that is observed. A precedent for this ‘shepherding’ is the way the gravitational pull of moons around Neptune and Saturn help to create stable ring structures orbiting these planets.
“The possibility of a planet in the habitable zone is exciting and also unexpected; we were not looking for this. However, it is important to keep in mind that more evidence is necessary to confirm the presence of a planet. We cannot observe the planet directly so confirmation may come by comparing computer models with further observations of the star and orbiting debris.”
It is expected that this orbit around the white dwarf was swept clear during the giant star phase of its life, and thus any planet that can potentially host water and thus life would be a recent development. The area would be habitable for at least two billion years, including at least one billion years into the future.
More than 95% of all stars will eventually become white dwarfs. The exceptions are the largest stars that explode and become either black holes or neutron stars.
Professor Farihi added: “Since our Sun will become a white dwarf in a few billion years, our study provides a glimpse into the future of our own solar system.”
When stars begin running out of hydrogen, they expand and cool, becoming red giants. The Sun will enter this phase in four to five billion years, swallowing Mercury, Venus, and possibly Earth. Once the outer material has gently blown away and hydrogen is exhausted, the hot core of the star remains, slowly cooling over billions of years – this is the star’s white dwarf phase.
Planets orbiting white dwarfs are challenging for astronomers to detect because the stars are much fainter than main-sequence stars (like the Sun). So far, astronomers have only found tentative evidence of a gas giant (like Jupiter) orbiting a white dwarf.
For the new study, researchers observed WD1054–226, a white dwarf 117 light years away, recording changes in its light over 18 nights using the ULTRACAM high-speed camera fixed on to the ESO 3.5m New Technology Telescope (NTT) at the La Silla Observatory in Chile. In order to better interpret the changes in light, the researchers also looked at data from the NASA Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS), which allowed the researchers to confirm the planetary structures had a 25-hour orbit.
They found that the light from WD1054–226 was always somewhat obscured by enormous clouds of orbiting material passing in front of it, suggesting a ring of planetary debris orbiting the star.
The habitable zone, sometimes called the Goldilocks zone, is the area where the temperature would theoretically allow liquid water to exist on the surface of a planet. Compared to a star like the Sun, the habitable zone of a white dwarf will be smaller and closer to the star as white dwarfs give off less light and thus heat.
The structures observed in the study orbit in an area that would have been enveloped by the star while it was a red giant, so are likely to have formed or arrived relatively recently, rather than survived from the birth of the star and its planetary system.
The study received funding from the UK’s Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC) and involved a team of researchers from six countries, including Boston University, the University of Warwick, Lund University, the University of Cambridge, the University of St Andrews, Wesleyan University, the University of La Laguna, Naresuan University, the University of Sheffield, and the Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias.
JOURNAL
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
DOI
METHOD OF RESEARCH
Data/statistical analysis
ARTICLE TITLE
Relentless and Complex Transits from a Planetesimal Debris Disk’
ARTICLE PUBLICATION DATE
11-Feb-2022
“The moon-sized structures we have observed are irregular and dusty (e.g. comet-like) rather than solid, spherical bodies. Their absolute regularity, one passing in front of the star every 23 minutes, is a mystery we cannot currently explain.
More data means that the ‘rules’ of celestial mechanics are constantly changing – the idea that a planet could exist in the Inner system of a white dwarf would have been unthinkable before these observations. Could a planet actually form after the star collapses, or is this a wanderer that’s found a new stable orbit? Fascinating stuff.
So, Dark Star didn’t take them out
“There is something fascinating about science. One gets such wholesale returns of conjecture out of such a trifling investment of fact.”
Let this be a lesson to you all you Climate Deniers® that if you don’t mend your ways and devote your life to privation and fear, then not only will your planet shrapnel, but you will also kill the sun.
“and thus any planet that can potentially host water and thus life would be a recent development. “
Life ? Fromwhere ? Planet had been ionised, externals comets withs complex structures pushed back… This is exactly the situation seen in Interstellar : a planet with water but sterilized, too clean…
The white star dwarf WD40 is easily recognizable, due to its logo.
Finally, there’s a place to send politicians to when they get too self-important!!! (sarc)
What? It’s juts an idea, y’know.
Excuse my nit-picking about the above article, but I believe the word “observed” his been misused repeatedly in the above article.
A careful read of the article shows that the only observation made was that of “measured light from a white dwarf in the Milky Way known as WD1054–226 . . . (having) . . .
pronounced dips in light corresponding to 65 evenly spaced clouds of planetary debris orbiting the star every 25 hours . . . (from which) . . . researchers concluded that the precise regularity of the transiting structures – dimming the star’s light every 23 minutes – suggests they are kept in such a precise arrangement by a nearby planet.”
No planet was observed directly and no “ring of planetary debris studded with moon-sized structures “ was observed directly.
Personally, I wish our telescopes (ground- or space-based) had the resolution necessary for such direct observations at such distances, but the laws of diffraction physics coupled with manufacturing limitations say it just ain’t possible.
The astronomers did NOT OBSERVE planetary bodies — the recorded “pronounced dips in light” from a star that is 117 light years away with entirely unknowable amounts of “stuff” between the star and the observers.
“The moon-sized structures we have observed are irregular and dusty (e.g. comet-like) rather than solid, spherical bodies.” An astronomer’s Just So story….. they did not observe any such thing — they speculate that if the signal is planetary-moon-like bodies that they might be dusty —
Einstein’s shoes might have been dusty the day he first formulated the theory of general relativity. Same amount of evidence.
If the planet is in the habitable zone of a white dwarf, that means the planet was inside the star when it was in the red giant phase. Which means that the planet has no water and no air. The chances of there being life on that planet is zero.
Nope.
Unless one of these planets in the habitable zone has a similar moon to the one around Earth, I wouldn’t waste time and keep on searching.
As an engineer, I find this sort of stuff interesting, but I must say that it seems like a colossal waste of money to spend on fabulously expensive equipment to satisfy curiosity that we can do nothing with. Better all that money be used to work on fusion and improved fission reactors to help an energy issue that we need solved, and maybe silence all the climastrologists (assuming they really want truly renewable and unlimited energy based on E=MC²)
Ringworld.
I’m not an astronomer but it seems to me these 2 data are incompatible with the idea of a planet shepherding rings.
If the 65 objects are passing so regularly, they are in the same orbit! I think they need a new explanation that might put 65 ‘moons’ into the same orbit – which seems so odd as to be not a feasible natural event.
So the ring(s) of matter are NOT the 65 mentioned above, or at best, the 65 are clumps of density within the rings, which is STILL a problem as far as I can work out.
How do you get 65 solid bodies in such sync. And if they are part of the ring(s) you’d expect collisions and/or the presence of a planet would have disrupted the perfect ‘1 every 23 minutes’ wouldn’t you?
I have some questions on this.