Opinion by Kip Hansen – 9 July 2021
The Climate News Cabal: a loose association of pseudo-journalists who have enlisted like-minded souls to strive to promote Climate Alarm in every news and media outlet in the world, and it should be noted that there is more than one of these nefarious outfits, are still at it. Worse than ever. I call them pseudo-journalists because they have abandoned all the mores of journalism for the thrill of viewpoint and political advocacy masquerading as journalism. One of these groups is Covering Climate Now which corrupts journalism out of, ironically, the Columbia Journalism Review.
I’m on their mailing list (Sun Tzu – “Keep Your Enemies Closer”). They email all their thoroughly nonsensical plans for making the world believe we are all going to die in . . . . countdown . . . 10 – 9 – 8 – 7 – … years if we-the-people “don’t do as we-the-elites say!” It is always a threat and the things that all of us must do is always the same – there is a prescribed list from the UN/IPCC/SDGs/Green-New-Dealers and everyone left of Ike Eisenhower: Give up all petroleum products, give up your gasoline and diesel automobiles, give up 24/7 electrical power (only those who have it must give it up, those who don’t yet have it must never be allowed to have it in the first place). And a few other odd little things: give up eating meat, give up having families with children, traveling anywhere you can’t walk or bicycle to.
Here’s CCNow’s latest tirade delivered to my email in-tray:
Do climate deniers really believe their nonsense?
JULY 8, 2021
It’s a trope in political journalism to wonder whether high profile climate deniers are “in on the joke.” That is, do they realize privately that the science is unequivocal but cynically choose to claim the opposite in public? Or are they truly, hopelessly uninformed?
In a video obtained this week by CNN, US Senator Ron Johnson, Republican of Wisconsin, said the following in June during a luncheon with GOP women: “I don’t know about you guys, but I think climate change is bullshit.” (Johnson mouthed the operative word, as if that makes a difference.) He further claimed, falsely, that “more and more” scientists are debunking climate change—and he unironically said that taking climate action will be “a self-inflicted wound.”
That’s pretty straightforward. And given the private setting, it’s reasonable to conclude that Johnson—a man with virtually unlimited access to expertise and resources—actually believes it.
It’s not only politicians, of course. On Tuesday, the Wall Street Journal Editorial Board called an effort by French President Emmanuel Macron to amend his country’s constitution to account for climate change “the latest example in Western democracies of the disconnect between elites obsessed with climate change and the public.”
In fact, studies and surveys repeatedly show that the public is urgently concerned about climate change. A June report by the Yale Program for Climate Communication found that majorities in each of 31 countries surveyed, often by large margins, want governments to make climate change a priority; in the US, the majority is smaller but nevertheless clearly in favor of taking action. This, despite the fact that only one in five Americans realize that scientists agree that climate change is real, human caused, and very dangerous.
Climate denial and misinformation will likely get worse now that meaningful action is finally on the table. Today’s weather extremes are making the emergency increasingly obvious, yet misperceptions still pervade segments of both elite and mass opinion, particularly in the US. Some climate deniers doubtless don’t want to know any better. Some of the misperceptions, however, are rooted in years of inadequate media coverage. Journalists must now make the facts unambiguously clear to all audiences–including the fact that only rapid, far-reaching action will preserve a livable climate for all of us.
No author taking credit, of course (who would put their name to that if they could dodge it?) As you can imagine, I might have written it this way:
“It’s a trope in skeptical journalism to wonder whether high profile climate alarmists are “in on the joke.” That is, do they realize privately that the science is nonsensical but cynically choose to claim the opposite in public? Or are they truly, hopelessly uninformed?”
“I mean, do Al Gore or Emma Thompson or Jane Fonda or Brad Pitt actually believe that flying around the world in private jets to spread climate alarm in countries where the people don’t even have toilets or electric lights is the right thing to do?”
That just might be me, but really?
You see how CCNow works, they try to shame a sitting US Senator, Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, for admitting his true personal understanding in public (of all places, after all, he is a politician):
“In a video obtained this week by CNN, US Senator Ron Johnson, Republican of Wisconsin, said the following in June during a luncheon with GOP women: “I don’t know about you guys, but I think climate change is bullshit.” (Johnson mouthed the operative word, as if that makes a difference.) He further claimed, falsely, that “more and more” scientists are debunking climate change—and he unironically said that taking climate action will be “a self-inflicted wound.”
Hmmm, Ron Johnson thinks climate change is BS – so what? He thinks that “’more and more’ scientists are debunking climate change” – we can’t fact check Senator Johnson’s opinion – its an opinion. But are “more and more” scientists debunking climate change? Let see. Try a brief Amazon search for recent books skeptical of climate change and climate change policy. Gee, more and more scientists are writing books debunking climate alarmism. As always, no one (almost . . some nut-cases out there) claims that the climate or climates don’t change.
Will some types of radical climate action be “a self-inflicted wound.”? You betcha! Some nations have already suffered self-inflicted wounds through their misguided climate policies. That’s supported by even more scientists, politicians and economists than are skeptical of climate change in general.
So, Senator Johnson, gives his unvarnished opinion on climate change (“BS”) and points out two true things but CCNow pretends that they are two false things.
But, wait, there is more! The link on the word “bullshit” in the CCNow email links to a progressive political hit-job show on CNN, ”Kfile”, from which these quotes are taken:
“In a statement, Johnson told CNN, “My statements are consistent. I am not a climate change denier, but I also am not a climate change alarmist. Climate is not static. It has always changed and always will change.” The senator offered a similar statement to the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel last week, and later posted a response with his opinion on climate change on his Senate website, in which he said humanity could “easily adapt” to climate change.”
“Also in 2010, Johnson falsely suggested that the country Greenland was “actually green at one point in time,” to dismiss the effects of climate change.”
My goodness, his sin is noticing that the climate has changed and changes, and admitting to not being a climate alarmist (which seems to be required in the eyes of CNN). Johnson foolishly, apparently believes that mankind can adapt to climate change (as we have done for all of the modern warm period). But to state that Greenland was actually green at one time — that must be labelled false.
Do you think that anyone at CCNow or our striving CNN climate alarmists have actually been to Greenland? Can they really not know that much of it’s coastal area is green today and much more of it was green during the last two previous warm periods?

That looks pretty green to me, all except the mountain tops – which is true in Los Angeles, California in the winter too.
To add insult to injury, CCNow goes beyond any supportable truth and claims: “scientists agree that climate change is real, human caused, and very dangerous.” That is NOT true.
This is my opinion which I believe to be far closer to the truth, closer to actuality:
“Most scientists agree that some notion of “climate change” is real – it ranges from ‘climate is always changing’ through ‘the Earth appears to be warming slightly’ to full-blown climate alarm. Many scientists agree that human changes to the environment – our many massive cities, ubiquitous land use changes, deforestation, widespread agriculture and so-called greenhouse gases added to the atmosphere – may or probably have caused some of that change. Only very few scientists public state, in published work, that climate change is currently “very dangerous” – many more are willing to state that it might become, some vague time in the future, dangerous enough to require adaptation. – Kip Hansen”
CCNow, Climate Desk, and other efforts of this type are destroying the trust that the general public once had in journalists and journalism and especially in science journalism – these advocacy cabals stretch, distort, misrepresent and warp both the facts and current events intentionally to “move the public mind” – which used to be called brainwashing – to make what is not real appear real. Despicable.
# # # # #
Author’s Comment:
I have strong opinions on this topic, but have restrained myself. Most importantly, readers should realize that their friends, neighbors, colleagues and relatives – all around the world – are being fed this type of intentional misleading climate news every day in every news story that climate alarm can be shoehorned into, whether it fits or not. It is no wonder that they are scared.
I haven’t bothered to debunk much of the obviously false and misleading stuff in the CCNow email … those wishing to contribute can do so in comments.
# # # # #“
Kip says: “The Climate News Cabal Just Can’t Quit”
Of course they can’t quit. Why would they quit when they’re winning?
Smart Rock ==> You must know what “digging ones self into a hole” means.
In my opinion, this is what they are doing. It becomes more and more obvious to thinking people that the stories in the media about climate are over-hyped. This is why climate change skepticism is higher among the more educated (college degrees and graduate work). The “average” Joe and Jane shrug it off on their daily lives or give it social lip service — “yeah, I’m recycling to save the planet” — when they know their recycling materials are not recycled at all.
Listen in a crowd — maybe a crowded restaurant or a bar — and make notes on the attitudes about Climate Change. Someone farts — someone else says “Global Warming!” — all laugh.
While oh-so-serious advocates create poll results that show majority support for fighting climate change, climate change gets shot down at the voting booth — even in climate mad Europe.
These zealots are making a mockery of the science — and educated people can see it.
The pretend-journalists in CCNow are so steeped in eco-disinformation that they don’t even realise it.
Ed ==> Anyone who has a TV can see wonderful programs of green Greenland. Like Alaska, Greenland isn’t just one big ice cube.
The indoctrinated mind has a wonderful ability to ignore that which is right in front of their eyes. I’m sure CCNew are convinced they are right, just like witchfinders and inquisiteurs were convinced they did the Lord’s work. History teaches that such delusions only are stopped when ordinary people realise what’s up and are fed up with it.
–“Only very few scientists public state, in published work, that climate change is currently “very dangerous””–
And therein lies the problem. The majority of climate scientists who find the A in AGW compelling but the C in CAGW not credible keep their mouths shut either because they don’t want the hassle of telling the truth or they favor the funding gravy train the loudmouth Mann’s of the world keep chugging down the track.
Either way it is in their power to end the “CLIMATE EMERGENCY!” BS but they choose to take the easy way out.
A pox on their houses too.
“It’s a trope in political journalism to wonder whether high profile climate deniers are “in on the joke.” That is, do they realize privately that the science is unequivocal but cynically choose to claim the opposite in public? Or are they truly, hopelessly uninformed?”
Here is how I would re-word this – “It’s a trope in political journalism to wonder whether high profile chickens are “in on the joke.” That is, do they realize privately that Col. Sanders is unequivocally acting in their best interests, but cynically choose to claim the opposite in public? Or are they truly, hopelessly uninformed?”
The question to these CNC clowns is this – why on earth would anyone want to legitimize something that promises to make their life miserable, or even cause their untimely demise?
BTW, lots of ancient societies “did something” about climate change – they sacrificed animals and often times other people in bloody rituals in order to placate various deities they believed would grant them perfect weather. I really see very little difference to what is going on today. Why would someone not want to see their first born child tossed into a well to try and change that which humans have no control over? Well, duh….
From the article: “It’s a trope in political journalism to wonder whether high profile climate deniers are “in on the joke.” That is, do they realize privately that the science is unequivocal”
LOL !
A new Rasmussen polls says 58 percent of Americans polled say the Media is “The Enemy of the People”!
That’s a good sign.
Trump had a lot to do with this. The Leftwing Media brought this on themselves with their spewing of political lies.
Leftwing Propagandists *are* the enemies of the people. No doubt about it. They lie to the people in an attempt to undermine our society and nation and turn it into a socialist hell-hole.
At least, a majority of the people are on to them now.
“A new Rasmussen polls says 58 percent of Americans polled say the Media is “The Enemy of the People”!
Not a surprise.
Thats is precisely what a certain recent POTUS encouraged them to believe.
Do you know of the history of Demogoges That came to power by restricting “Alternative facts”.
Try Germany under Hitler.
Now China, N Korea, Turkey, Russia.
What a pathetic thing to think.
Free press under a democracy is just that, free to present both sides of the polarity (that seems rabid in the US at least).
Under said certain POTUS it wouldn’t have been if it were possible for him.
You should thank Christ for the US constitution else you would have had another Xi Jinging or Putin as POTUS for life (mind Recent POTUS really, really admired Putin)
Result: wall to wall Fox News.
Under endless “Alternative facts”.
Which is fine if you worship there.
So what will the other >50% of the pop do?
Lie back and take it?
Really? Ya think?
In short people should learn from history.
Yes, I do.
Check out:
https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/todays-blacklisted-american-youtube-shuts-down-channel-that-routinely-broadcasts-trump-rallies/
If you mean Youtube.
Last I checked it is not a Demagog (as a person at the head of Government).
Which Trump most certainly was and who tried his best to overturn democracy …. whilst sucking up to Putin.
Ya’d all like to live in Russia??
Just because you may have liked what he did.
Doesn’t give you the justification to let him take over the US Constitution and become President for life …. ala Putin, Xi Jingping, Kim and, most recently Lukashenko in Belarus.
You really are delusional. Biden’s handlers are twice as tyrannical as CNN told us Trump was. And we know, by their own admission, that they were mostly lying.
If you say so.
“Thats is precisely what a certain recent POTUS encouraged them to believe.”
Yes, and for a damn good reason: The Leftwing Media *are* liars and propagandists.
And I contend – so are the “right wing” media.
SO shall we agree?….
ALL extremes are bad.
Just because you prefer one of the polarities, it is not wise to scrap all media and have one that only answers to the bidding of he/she that ordered it.
Just common sense.
Destruction of Democracy – which Churchill described as “The worst system of government – except for all the others we’ve tried”
From the quoted excerpt of CCNow‘s article included in the above overall article:
“This, despite the fact that only one in five Americans realize that scientists agree that climate change is real, human caused, and very dangerous.”
Notice the sleight-of-hand trick being played there?
OK, CCNow, I’m calling you out on that statement. Please provide the reference study/poll/publication that objectively establishes that “scientists agree that climate change” is human caused AND very dangerous.
Lacking such an objective, independent reference, I must conclude that you merely made this up and are claiming it as established fact . . . shame on you.
n.b.: By this very statement, CCNow is asserting that there was no such thing as climate change prior to humans beginning to use significant amounts of fossil fuels about 300 years ago, in the early 1700’s, with the introduction of the commercial steam engine. That is patently ridiculous!
As someone pointed out up thread, “scientists agree” was probably deliberately chosen to leave the impression that it refers to all or most scientists, and it could simply mean you can find two scientists would be willing to go on the record.
However you raise an additional interesting point demonstrating the sloppiness of the language. Does “human caused” mean partially or exclusively? It isn’t clear and probably the wording was deliberately chose to leave the impression that scientists agree it’s exclusively or almost exclusively caused by humans while having a fallback position that the defenders could claim it means some of it during some time.
Force them to nail down exactly what they mean, and the statement won’t be anywhere near as powerful.
Would the climate alarmist quacks please explain how man made CO2 melted the giant ice sheets that covered about a third of what is now the US? And that was, um, 15,000 years ago? Bunch of liars, frauds, grifters, and eco-terrorists.