Study: Global Warming is Raising the Tropical Wet Bulb Maximum Temperature

Guest essay by Eric Worrall

According to a study, for every degree of warming, peak wet bulb temperature in the tropics also rises by a degree, so even a small amount of warming is a grave threat to human health. But there are these things called thunderstorms which create a non-linear cutoff to maximum temperatures.

Global heating pushes tropical regions towards limits of human livability

Rising heat and humidity threatening to plunge much of the world’s population into potentially lethal conditions, study finds

Oliver Milman
@olliemilman
Tue 9 Mar 2021 03.00 AEDT

The climate crisis is pushing the planet’s tropical regions towards the limits of human livability, with rising heat and humidity threatening to plunge much of the world’s population into potentially lethal conditions, new research has found.

Should governments fail to curb global heating to 1.5C above the pre-industrial era, areas in the tropical band that stretches either side of the equator risk changing into a new environment that will hit “the limit of human adaptation”, the study warns.

The research team looked at various historical data and simulations to determine how wet-bulb temperature extremes will change as the planet continues to heat up, discovering that these extremes in the tropics increase at around the same rate as the tropical mean temperature.

This means that the world’s temperature increase will need to be limited to 1.5C to avoid risking areas of the tropics exceeding 35C in wet-bulb temperature, which is so-called because it is measured by a thermometer that has its bulb wrapped in a wet cloth, helping mimic the ability of humans to cool their skin by evaporating sweat.

Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/science/2021/mar/08/global-heating-tropical-regions-human-livability

The abstract of the study;

Projections of tropical heat stress constrained by atmospheric dynamics

Yi ZhangIsaac Held & Stephan Fueglistaler 

Extreme heat under global warming is a concerning issue for the growing tropical population. However, model projections of extreme temperatures, a widely used metric for extreme heat, are uncertain on regional scales. In addition, humidity needs to be taken into account to estimate the health impact of extreme heat. Here we show that an integrated temperature–humidity metric for the health impact of heat, namely, the extreme wet-bulb temperature (TW), is controlled by established atmospheric dynamics and thus can be robustly projected on regional scales. For each 1 °C of tropical mean warming, global climate models project extreme TW (the annual maximum of daily mean or 3-hourly values) to increase roughly uniformly between 20° S and 20° N latitude by about 1 °C. This projection is consistent with theoretical expectation based on tropical atmospheric dynamics, and observations over the past 40 years, which gives confidence to the model projection. For a 1.5 °C warmer world, the probable (66% confidence interval) increase of regional extreme TW is projected to be 1.33–1.49 °C, whereas the uncertainty of projected extreme temperatures is 3.7 times as large. These results suggest that limiting global warming to 1.5 °C will prevent most of the tropics from reaching a TW of 35 °C, the limit of human adaptation.

Read more (paywalled): https://www.nature.com/articles/s41561-021-00695-3

The claim that maximum wet bulb temperature will rise linearly with global temperature in my opinion is dubious. Unfortunately we can’t see their full study, but in the real world sea surface temperatures exhibit a sharp cutoff. From Willis’ post “Argo and the Ocean Temperature Maximum”.

Since the sea is 70% of the world’s surface, this sharp cutoff has a major impact on global temperatures.

Why is there such a sharp cutoff on sea surface temperature? The reason is if temperatures rise much above 30C, thunderstorms spontaneously form and cool the surface.

This is why the tropical belt wet season is so wet – all those storms are busy pumping excess heat from the surface, punching a hole through the bulk of the greenhouse blanket, and dumping excess heat at the cold edge of space. Anyone who has seen a thunderhead soaring into the sky has personally witnessed water vapour punching a hole through the bottom of the troposphere.

What if you live too far from the ocean or a large body of water to receive much benefit from this ocean cooling effect? In that case, you are not going to experience extreme humidity – so wet bulb temperature will remain at survivable levels. High humidity requires a source of water vapour.

But what if I’m wrong? Thankfully here in Australia we have pioneered a novel solution to surviving extreme heat.

In the tropical far North of Australia, people install solar heating systems for their swimming pools, not to warm the pools, but to run them at night time. These solar “heaters” at night time function as radiators, dumping excess pool water heat into the cooler night air. That way when wet bulb temperatures soar to uncomfortable heights, we have comfortably cool swimming pools available to help maintain a survivable body temperature.

We have also discovered drinking beer for medicinal purposes helps our bodies dump heat by expanding our surface capillary blood vessels, so to get the full benefit of our radiator cooled swimming pools you have to keep a sixpack of beer on ice in a floating cooler box, and drink bottles of beer at regularly intervals.

4.8 24 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

73 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Sara
March 10, 2021 4:25 am

Just a question: we’re really a tropical species that somehow managed to learn to survive in really, really bad cold weather (along with a lot of other mammals), so how come warmth is now a threat?

I have seldom run across anything as silly as “:warmth is a threat to Hoomans” in a long time.

If it’s a threat, then why do we run a furnace or set a fire in the fireplace in the winter?

Just askin’, because without even grazing across the sordid details, it comes off as just plain dumb to say that heat is a threat to Hoomans. Or maybe I’m on the wrong planet… again.

sky king
Reply to  Sara
March 10, 2021 5:34 am

Here in Subic Bay today was 77F-92F with 75% humidity. People are multiplying faster than Wuhu or Duterte can kill them. Heat and humidity just make us more randy.

Reply to  Sara
March 11, 2021 3:53 pm

Environmentalists don’t care about humans, they fantasize about getting the population down below a billion and even suggested a form of ebola as the means. Misanthropes can’t be trusted – they work for the enemy.

Lurker Pete
March 10, 2021 4:58 am

and the winner of the 2021 WUWT Bad Science award is…

OweninGA
Reply to  Lurker Pete
March 10, 2021 8:31 am

In hot competition with a large number of competitors. It is only March, they are just getting warmed up!

John Kelly
March 10, 2021 6:42 am

That’s what I love about your commentary Eric; all sorts of practical solutions for everyday life that boring climate scientists would never understand because it pops their theories.

Mohatdebos
March 10, 2021 6:53 am

As Judith Curry asked rhetorically, “how does a paper like this get published?” You would think they would map population density by latitudes. They will found density is highest in humid tropical and equatorial latitudes. I was at a seminar recently where the presenter showed charts (attributed to Brookings Institution) about how people will be moving to upper Michigan and Canada to avoid heat. As a property owner in Michigan, I was pleased. However, the presenter went ballistic when I pointed out that most of my neighbors moved south when they retired.

eyesonu
Reply to  Mohatdebos
March 10, 2021 8:15 am

“how does a paper like this get published?” —— Keep it behind a paywall and hope no one reads it.

Editor
March 10, 2021 7:50 am

Eric ==> Bruce Van Sant developed a method for comparing economies and their costs of living based on the cost of a bottle of beer: loaf of bread == 1 bottle of beer country X, 1.3 bottles country Z. I believe he called it “beer-onomy”.

March 10, 2021 10:10 am

Here we show that an integrated temperature–humidity metric for the health impact of heat, namely, the extreme wet-bulb temperature (TW), is controlled by established atmospheric dynamics and thus can be robustly projected on regional scales.

For each 1 °C of tropical mean warming, global climate models project extreme TW (the annual maximum of daily mean or 3-hourly values) to increase roughly uniformly between 20° S and 20° N latitude by about 1 °C.

This projection is consistent with theoretical expectation based on tropical atmospheric dynamics, and observations over the past 40 years, which gives confidence to the model projection.”

More self aggrandizing model nonsense

Dale S
March 10, 2021 11:13 am

“For a 1.5 °C warmer world, the probable (66% confidence interval) increase of regional extreme TW is projected to be 1.33–1.49 °C, whereas the uncertainty of projected extreme temperatures is 3.7 times as large. These results suggest that limiting global warming to 1.5 °C will prevent most of the tropics from reaching a TW of 35 °C, the limit of human adaptation.”

We already have a ~1 C warmer world from abritrary-19th-centry-levels already, 2/3rds of the way there. It would be useful to show what the observations from the warming so far actually show for “tropical land”, but without access to the paywall their figure 3 (seems to have observations) is unreadable. Figure 4 is readable, and shows a +1.5C impact of about +1.3C for tropical land, more than I would have expected. But the TMax for tropical land is about +2.0C and in a wide range between +1.0C and +3.5. Given that *most* of the warming has already occurred, this seems like an awfully large “projected” range, and contrary to what would be expected from a constant forcing.

Reply to  Dale S
March 11, 2021 4:27 pm

But it’s exactly what would be expected from scientists just making crap up.

S.K.
March 10, 2021 1:40 pm

Mother Nature knows how to deal with imbalances and she totally ignores uneducated opinions and advice.

March 10, 2021 4:29 pm

I’ve just been writing about the problems caused by decreasing tropical temperatures over the last 1000 years. I only read this because I thought it might have some actual data… but no! Yet again another silly speculative article with no scientific basis.

Loydo
Reply to  Mike Haseler (aka Scottish Sceptic)
March 10, 2021 10:22 pm

“decreasing tropical temperatures over the last 1000 years”

Really? Got a link?

observa
March 11, 2021 5:55 am

Seems children aren’t going to know what dust looks like in Britain-
Extreme rainfall in Britain to be 10 times more likely this century: Met Office (msn.com)

old construction worker
March 11, 2021 2:16 pm

Wet Bulb? I didn’t know Co2 had a “wet bulb” temperature? So, tell me again why we should regulate Co2? (sarc)

Verified by MonsterInsights