
By David Wojick |December 14th, 2020|Energy|
There is a revolution coming in geothermal energy. How big it will be and how fast it can grow remains to be seen, but the revolutionary technology is here now.
We already know about the new technology by name — fracking. But that is fracking for oil and gas, the energy revolution we are already living on, that the greens hate. The geothermal revolution is fracking for heat.
Here is the technical bit. The Earth’s crust we live on is just a thin film wrapped around an 8,000 mile diameter molten ball. In some places under the deep ocean this crust is estimated to be just 3 miles or so thick. It is somewhat thicker under the continents but the point remains; it gets hot fast as you drill down into the crust. That heat is geothermal energy.
We have used geothermal energy to make electricity for a long time, but only in tiny amounts. California does the most in the US and its entire generating capacity is about the size of a single large coal fired power plant, about 3000 MW. The whole world is said to just have a minuscule 15,000 MW.
The obstacle to doing more has been that useful energy sources are hard to find. You need a confined reservoir of hot water in fractured crust rock. The reservoir size, location and temperature of the water are all determined by nature. Suitable sites have been very few.
Now all of this has suddenly changed. With hydraulic fracturing (or fracking) we can make these geothermal reservoirs where we want them, the size we want them, and where the heat is the temperature we want, especially very hot. This includes the so-called “supercritical” water at 400 degrees C, which is now used in the most advanced power-plants.
It is like the difference between living on wild edibles, if and when you find them, and farming. Fracking for heat is literally a whole new world. Of course there are still pesky things like cost, feasibility and regulation, but the principal is clear; the technology of revolutionary thermal energy has arrived.
The greens are in a bit of a bind here. Geothermal juice looks like the ideal renewable. Unlike wind and solar, geothermal electricity is constantly available and it is not a land hog. But the greens despise fracking and have labeled it evil. Some States and even whole Countries have banned fracking for oil and gas. Whether this applies to fracking for heat remains to be seen, since the fracturing processes are rather different.
How this dichotomy will play out is anybody’s guess. As they say here in the mountains: “What goes around, comes around.” That is, don’t start trouble lest it bite you someplace soft. The greens desperately need geothermal fracking, they just don’t know it yet.
The US Energy Department has a Geothermal Technologies Office and they are understandably optimistic. They project something like 60,000 MW of advanced geothermal juice capacity by 2050. Mind you this is still small, given that our present generating capacity is around a million MW.
The amount of geothermal generating capacity installed by 2050 could be much larger, for one simple reason. It is probably the only way to make wind and solar work. A number of analysts, including me, have pointed out that electricity storage on the scale needed to power America with intermittent renewables is impossible. But many States have mandated a high level of renewables, even 100% in extreme cases.
This makes geothermal the perfect renewable, because its power can be available whenever the intermittent generators cannot provide the power we need. The more power we want from renewables, the more geothermal capacity we will need. It is that simple. We could be talking about many hundreds of thousands of MW. If the technology works cost wise it might actually be better than unreliable, land grabbing renewables.
Happily there is a massive frenzy of geothermal research going on, much of it aimed at reducing the obvious obstacles. Searching the engineering and scientific literature for the last five years on the word combination “geothermal” and “research” yields over 100,000 technical articles. That is a lot of research.
So there it is. Geothermal energy is potentially the second fracking revolution. No question the heat is there, thanks to the big molten ball we call Earth. And now we suddenly have the technology to create the infrastructure needed to tap into it. How practical it is, and how acceptable, still remains to be seen. Interesting times lie ahead.
Author
David Wojick, Ph.D. is an independent analyst working at the intersection of science, technology and policy. For origins see
http://www.stemed.info/engineer_tackles_confusion.html
For over 100 prior articles for CFACT see
http://www.cfact.org/author/david-wojick-ph-d/
Available for confidential research and consulting.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Geothermal; another soon to be ‘stranded asset’ in the portfolio of energy ‘extraction’ means and/or devices …
Here’s a record of the recent seismic events at Caharrack in Cornwall, where they are fracking for a geothermal project
http://www.earthquakes.bgs.ac.uk/induced/recent_uk_events.html
Fracking for gas was halted by events of over 0.5 ML. Geothermal us licensed in the UK to proceed at up to ML 4. No protest camps either.
Let’s say I am a little sceptical of the economics of using geothermal for storage and backup generation. The round trip efficiency is likely to be very poor. And the locations with suitable geology are surely very limited.
I was doing Geothermal Energy Research fifty years ago. The short comment on this proposed revolution is that this was done long ago by DOE as their Hot Rock GE Project. Frac with a nuc or whatever to create a huge heat exchanger way down under. Great but impractical idea that soon runs into heat transfer limitations as cited by others here.
Good GE situations involve porous, wet reservoirs over a hot spot that behave like a tea kettle, venting steam of adequate temperature to generate power and with required water recharge for continuity. Such sites are The Geysers, CA; Lardarello, IT; and maybe still Matsasuko (sp?) JP.
Deep hot water sites also exist, typically the Imperial Valley, CA and Cerro Prieto, MEX. Both of these developments lie astride/near the East Pacific Rise spreading center from the top of the Gulf of CA to the Salton Sea, CA. Most operations bring up a flashing mixed flow of steam and supersaturated brine, rejecting the brine and solids while using the steam for power. New Zealand has a similar resource.
Once again what goes around comes around in the case of the hot earth core and fracking to tickle out economic heat for power production. Working GE systems continue to struggle close to the margins.
Your referenced reservoirs were more shallow, and naturally fractured. Counterintuitively, that made them poor fracture stimulation candidates. Apparently, experimental work has been done in deeper geothermal reservoirs to add fracture perm with fracture stimulation, but I don’t know of any commercial, or even pilot endeavors. The only method of even qualitatively looking for the changes was with Ground Penetrating Radar. No a complete lit search, so you may know more.
All moot for mundane operational reasons. Wife and I love to rent hot springs heated hot tubs above Avila beach, drink adult bev’s, watch the sun set or the stars. Geo heat quite good for that…
Anywhere? Some places must be better than others. How deep (expensive)? Is there a closed loop of a fluid?