Guest post by Tony Brown,
The Ozone Hole returns to both Poles
Some years ago, relating to a project I was carrying out, I asked the Max Planck Institute and Cambridge University –both experts in this field-if it were possible that Antarctic ‘ozone hole’ -actually a ‘thinning’ – existed prior to it being first ‘discovered’ in 1957.
Prior to that date the apparatus did not exist in any convenient form that could measure the likely extent of any hole, should it have existed. This is the official explanation;
“The springtime Antarctic ozone hole is a new phenomenon that appeared in the early 1980s.
The observed average amount of ozone during September, October, and November over the British Antarctic Survey station at Halley, Antarctica, first revealed notable decreases in the early 1980s, compared with the preceding data obtained starting in 1957. The ozone hole is formed each year when there is a sharp decline (currently up to 60%) in the total ozone over most of Antarctica for a period of about three months (September-November) during spring in the Southern Hemisphere. Late-summer (January-March) ozone amounts show no such sharp decline in the 1980s and 1990s. “
https://uk-air.defra.gov.uk/research/ozone-uv/moreinfo?view=antarctic-ozone-hole
Both organisations I approached agreed it was theoretically possible the hole could have existed prior to 1957, but thought it unlikely, as it was proven that refrigerants and other man- made chemicals were the cause of the thinning and it must therefore be a recent problem, as the circumstances that caused it did not exist in the past.
.In 2019 there was a considerable amount of press and government comment that the ‘Hole’ was ‘healing,’ as it was unusually small, said to be due to actions taken by global governments in 1987 who signed the Montreal protocol ;
“The Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer is the landmark multilateral environmental agreement that regulates the production and consumption of nearly 100 man-made chemicals referred to as ozone depleting substances (ODS). When released to the atmosphere, those chemicals damage the stratospheric ozone layer, Earth’s protective shield that protects humans and the environment from harmful levels of ultraviolet radiation from the sun. Adopted on 15 September 1987, the Protocol is to date the only UN treaty ever that has been ratified every country on Earth – all 197 UN Member States.”
https://www.unenvironment.org/ozonaction/who-we-are/about-montreal-protocol
A year on however, there was this surprising announcement from the World Meteorological Organisation, made on 6 October 2020;
“2020 Antarctic ozone hole is large and deep”
“There is much variability in how far ozone hole events develop each year. The 2020 ozone hole resembles the one from 2018, which also was a quite large hole, and is definitely in the upper part of the pack of the last fifteen years or so”, Vincent-Henri Peuch, Director of Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service at ECMWF, said in a news release.
“With the sunlight returning to the South Pole in the last weeks, we saw continued ozone depletion over the area. After the unusually small and short-lived ozone hole in 2019, which was driven by special meteorological conditions, we are registering a rather large one again this year, which confirms that we need to continue enforcing the Montreal Protocol banning emissions of ozone depleting chemicals.”
The Montreal Protocol bans emissions of ozone depleting chemicals. Since the ban on halocarbons, the ozone layer has slowly been recovering; the data clearly show a trend in decreasing area of the ozone hole.”

https://public.wmo.int/en/media/news/2020-antarctic-ozone-hole-large-and-deep
The size of the 2019 hole is now seen as not being part of a welcome downwards trend that was proving the effectiveness of global measures, but as an ‘unusual’ event. The hole is expected to revert to its ‘natural’ condition by the middle decades of this century. Data on the progression of the ‘hole’ since 1979 can be seen in the left hand panel of this link
https://ozonewatch.gsfc.nasa.gov/
The Hole in the Arctic Ozone.
After researching further I note that earlier this year the Arctic hole was the largest on record, according to Nature magazine and Scientific American, exciting and concerning scientists. It was driven by exceptionally cold winter temperature. From “Nature”
Rare ozone hole opens over Arctic — and it’s big” ( 27 March 2020)
“Cold temperatures and a strong polar vortex allowed chemicals to gnaw away at the protective ozone layer in the north.
A vast ozone hole — probably the biggest on record in the north — has opened in the skies above the Arctic. It rivals the better-known Antarctic ozone hole that forms in the southern hemisphere each year.
Record-low ozone levels currently stretch across much of the central Arctic, covering an area about three times the size of Greenland (see ‘Arctic opening’). The hole doesn’t threaten people’s health, and will probably break apart in the coming weeks. But it is an extraordinary atmospheric phenomenon that will go down in the record books.
“From my point of view, this is the first time you can speak about a real ozone hole in the Arctic,” says Martin Dameris, an atmospheric scientist at the German Aerospace Center in Oberpfaffenhofen.
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-00904-w
“After looming above the Arctic for nearly a month, the single largest ozone hole ever detected over the North Pole has finally closed, researchers from the European Union’s Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS) reported.
“The unprecedented 2020 Northern Hemisphere ozone hole has come to an end,” CAMS researchers tweeted on April 23.”
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/north-poles-largest-ever-ozone-hole-finally-closes/
The Montreal protocol was seen as the global template for the Kyoto protocol on CO2 emissions adopted in 1997 and which entered into force in 2005 and the subsequent Paris agreement, a global attempt to curb CO2 emissions and limit temperature rises to 1.5C above pre industrial. Like the ozone hole, CO2 emissions seem surprisingly robust and any reduction in its rate of increase following the sharpest lockdown on human activity since the industrial revolution is difficult to discern at present.
Sept 2020 411.29ppm
Sept 2019 408.54ppm
Updated 6th October 2020
https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends/mlo.html
There is a useful link from here entitled “Can we see a change in the record because of covid19” indicating that “The International Energy Agency expects global CO2 emissions to drop by 8% this year. Clearly, we cannot see a global effect like that in less than a year.”
Only time will tell if Man’s culpability in both these important areas is greater or lesser than currently thought.
Tony Brown (tonyb) October 2020
So prior to 1957 there was no data at all regarding the ozone hole at the poles, and given that the earth is a few BILLION years old, we are to believe that “anomalies” observed since 1957 MUST be caused by human activity.
Really now.
So nobody considered that perhaps the entire data set could be an anomaly given the very short time frame over which the data was measured??
Nobody thought that maybe the ozone hole growing and shrinking has been occurring for, say, a Billion years or so, well before human activity could have been a contributing cause?
IF it rains four days in a row and then not on the 5th day, can one conclude that something out of the ordinary is occurring?
And we are supposed to “follow the science.”
Give me a F’n break.
Zombie Satellites, Killer Electrons, Ozone Depletion and Climate Change!
This is an AMAZING presentation by Craig Rodger at the University of Otago. He’s the most zany animated scientist who will leave you entertained as well as informed. 🧐
Rarely does a scientific presentation make me laugh and even more rarely does one bring me tears because the subject is so near and dear to my passion.
This is a remix of two presentations he did on the subject of ‘Killer Electrons’ which is really a catchy term scientists use for Energetic Electron Precipitation aka: EEP which as he explains is an upper atmospheric phenomenon that can have a dynamic effect on stratospheric ozone losses and climate temperatures.
The first one done in 2014 is the funnest to watch, though his 2016 presentation added new data regarding *long term* EEP-NOx effects on ozone variability.
~ ~ (Video RemiX ~32min)
U of Otago: Zombie Satellites, AARDDVARK Radio, Killer Electrons and Space Physics: [https://youtu.be/zuTFQ0nZ4do]
~
Space Talk at SANSA: Zombie Satellites, Killer Electrons and Physics in Space: [https://youtu.be/kzQsq9RkYFQ]
~
LASP UCBoulder: Zombie Satellites, Killer Electrons, and Physics in Space—AARDDVARK Radio research: [https://youtu.be/_qjk8RRzyrc]
~ ~ ~ Endnote and hat tip to the hypothesis of TIPER-NOx: Transmitter Induced Ozone Depletion👇
Long-Term Evolution of the Occurrence Rate of Magnetospheric Electron Precipitation into the Earth’s Atmosphere:
“The Energetic Electron Precipitation (EEP) events are associated mainly with high-velocity solar wind fluxes and are often observed during the decaying phase of the 11-year solar cycle.
A long-term growing trend that does not correlate with the parameters of solar and geomagnetic activity has been observed in the occurrence rate of EEP precipitation.
👉This trend could be due to the effect of ground-based VLF transmitters📡on the wave activity of the magnetosphere.👈
The part played by EEP precipitating magnetospheric electrons in atmospheric chemical reactions responsible for the dynamics of the ozone content and changes in temperature in the stratosphere and mesosphere is also poorly understood”
[https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333832733_Long-Term_Evolution_of_the_Occurrence_Rate_of_Magnetospheric_Electron_Precipitation_into_the_Earth’s_Atmosphere]
~ ~ ~ Further Research on EEP-NOx, Ozone & Climate 👇
Dr. Allison Jaynes on Cutting Edge Radiation Belt Research for the National Academy of Sciences 2018 – Energetic Electrons from the Earth’s Radiation Belts can cause ozone depletion affecting weather and climate: [https://www.facebook.com/ethan.clark.96930/videos/125481668610884]
~ ~ ~ No alarmism.. no denial.. no conspiracy.. just raw climate forcing mechanism ☝️🧐
Broadcast Theory of Climate Change ~ Transmitter Induced Ozone Depletion in the Early Twentieth Century Warming Period:
http://Www.BroadcastTheory.com ~ #tiperNOx
Reconsidering the Montreal Protocol as the reduction of Ozone Depleting Substances may have had less of an impact than previously thought ~ yet ozone depletion prevails as a leading cause of climate cooling.. and warming.
And it’s about as worse as its ever been. So what’s causing it?
The Montreal Protocol is considered a success story.. yet the largest ozone hole ever in the historic record formed in the Arctic 2020:
[https://www.washingtonpost.com/weather/2020/03/14/polar-vortex-spring-weather/]
~ ~ ~
Scientists now acknowledge that ozone loss plays a MORE significant role.. even if they continue to *predict* that Greenhouse gases *might* play a large roll in the future.
“This suggests that the ozone recovery [/depletion] is currently a stronger influence on the Southern Hemisphere than greenhouse gas emissions. The study indicates that changes in the *ozone layer* ARE the *primary* driver.” – March 2020
[https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/shrinking-ozone-hole-climate-change-are-causing-atmospheric-tug-of-war/]
~ ~ ~
“While ozone depletion has long been known to increase harmful UV radiation at the Earth’s surface, its effect on climate has only recently become evident. ..the ozone hole above Antarctica in particular was having a far-reaching effect on climate in the Southern Hemisphere.
It is now clear that ozone depletion is directly contributing to climate change across the Southern Hemisphere,” – June 2019
[https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2019/06/190624111536.htm]
~ ~ ~
“Chloroflourocarbons (CFCs) and other compounds involved in ozone depletion are also powerful greenhouse gases, but their contribution to global warming is reduced due to the cooling effect of the ozone loss which they induce.
Models informing an upcoming climate report disagree on the ozone loss and thus on the climate influence of these Ozone Depleting Substances (ODS).
Here we use observed ozone loss to reduce the resultant uncertainty in its overall climate influence and infer a larger cooling (ie. ozone loss is more influential)
Here we use observed ozone loss to reduce the resultant uncertainty in their overall climate influence and infer a smaller warming influence of these Ozone Depleting Substances than was considered likely in a 2013 climate report.
The result implies a smaller benefit to climate due to their phase‐out, mandated under the Montreal Protocol, than would have been the case under previous understanding.” – Sept 2020
[https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2020GL088295]
~ ~ ~
Take Away: The Montreal Protocol and the reduction of Ozone Depleting Substances may have had less of an impact than previously thought ~ yet ozone depletion prevails as a leading cause of climate cooling.. and warming.