Review: Climate Hustle 2 Movie coming on Sept 24th

In just a few days, the climate skeptic movie Climate Hustle 2 will be released. Originally planned for release in the spring in 800 theaters, it was delayed by COVID-19 issues. Now, it is set for an online streaming premier September 24th at 8pm in every local time zone internationally. Additionally, they are offering the broadcast of Climate Hustle Part 1 for instant viewing for those who missed it or need a refresher.

I was able to screen it before release.

Climate Hustle 2 looks at both popular scientific claims surrounding climate change and examines motivations of those clamoring for immediate action. Featuring leading scientists, politicians and policy experts, and hosted by actor Kevin Sorbo, the film showcases many instances of Hollywood hypocrisy, financial corruption, media bias, classroom indoctrination, political correctness and other troubling matters surrounding the global warming issue.

It also includes yours truly in a few scenes.

Here are two trailers:

More info is available at https://www.climatehustle2.com/

My take on the movie:

This movie covers virtually everything that has ever been said or discussed about climate change. It gives a true perspective of just how hard the media and climate alarmists are pushing an agenda, and how equally hard climate skeptics are pushing back.

If you want rhetoric and doom, watch Al Gore’s movie. If you want a practical and sensible view of what is really happening with climate, watch ClimateHustle2.

We really are being hustled by the left, and it’s depressing to see how much they want iron-fisted climate regulations put on us.

If you can’t make the LIVE event date,  you can still watch with your viewing ticket because the replay of both Climate Hustle 1 & 2 broadcasts will remain viewable through September 27th.

Get tickets here:

https://live.climatehustle2.com/index/climate-hustle-2

46 thoughts on “Review: Climate Hustle 2 Movie coming on Sept 24th

  1. So it was always about somehow controlling the rest of us, was it?

    I can’t figure out if they’re just after cash, or they’re trying to control food/fuel supplies, or what they think they’re up to. But The They are so removed from reality that they don’t make any sense.

    • Sara

      As always it’s the infection of inadequate people with the desire to control what others do.

      The most dangerous term in the world is “The government ought to do something about that”. Every time it’s uttered it’s another excuse to add another department, usually unelected and unaccountable, to the government of the day.

      These departments are then filled with bureaucrats who must at all costs justify their existence, even when the reasons for their existence has long since passed its sell by date. So they scurry about finding excuses to impose regulations and Taxes on the populace, proudly presenting how much revenue they have earned their governments.

      This is how socialism evolves. There is a political divide between left and right over the climate for very good reason. The right see a growing government and the imposition of regulations, and naturally resent it – whilst the left welcomes it.

      But it’s not a conspiracy, as demonstrated in this article, humanity is not actually capable of creating a genuine conspiracy over the subject, it’s just Chicken Licken behaviour.

      https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2020/09/17/covid-19-and-foxy-loxy/

      • “HotScot September 19, 2020 at 1:58 pm

        The most dangerous term in the world is “The government ought to do something about that”.”

        True indeed. The two countries I have lived in where I hear that so often is Australia and New Zealand. People bleat it out, literally, like sheep.

        • Bureaucracy will the be death of our current civilisation.

          More regulation creates more problems. The response to these problems is more regulation. We are at a tipping point. We are approaching the total regulation event horizon.

          Geologists of the future will find thin chalky line. The residue of the avalanche of paper which suffocated our world.

    • Government is incompetent, period. (Doesn’t mean it can’t get things done, only that they don’t get done well or efficiently) The only way for government to justify its existence is scare the populace into thinking only government can save them.

      WW II and the cold war stopped the expansion of FDR’s wet dream, but when the USSR collapsed 1989-1991, suddenly there was a power vacuum. It cannot be a coincidence that is when global warming suddenly became fashionable.

      Don’t overthink this. It doesn’t have to be rational, It has no specific goal except to keep the populace in thrall to government.

      “The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.” — H. L. Mencken

  2. “This isn’t bad science, this is the death of science.”

    Very few outlets that don’t toe the party line.

  3. I note that Amazon prime has Climate hustle 1 but not in the UK!
    Climate Hustle 2 is not available at all currently…

  4. Although I’m sure most climate alarmists genuinely believe in their religion; I believe it’s ultimately about being intolerant of dissenting opinion to their own, leading to them taking measures to control the narrative and not allow debate.

    What is happening is extremely dangerous to democracy, with main stream media and social media being the new ‘moderation police’ deleting anything that does not agree with the climate alarm group think. Liberal left, anti capitalist groups have then jumped on the bandwagon.

    It’s actually human nature to ostracise people outside of your own group, physicians and scientists do it, as demonstrated by the refusal of medics for many years to tolerate anyone suggesting the theory of bacteria in your stomach (Helicobacter Pylori) causing ulcers, or the refusal of scientists to accept the theory of plate tectonics (scientists proposing it were ostracised and would not get published; and undergraduates would probably have failed their course). It’s reached extreme levels now, as in most countries, climate scepticism is seen as being ‘right wing’, although I never expected the intolerance to debate to reach the stage where a university professor would openly state they wanted Trump supporters to die, if she has any undergraduates she thinks are Trump supporters I wouldn’t fancy their chances.

    • Most climate alarmists are the foot soldiers who know nothing, who have only glommed on to the cause because they are afraid of personal responsibility and want some rationalization for depending on government.

      The few leaders, well, I don’t know if any of them believe it or not. I do believe that these leaders want the government to be large and in charge.

  5. There is an aspect of the debate that is rarely considered or discussed and that is the conflation of the concept of “Global Warming” with that of “Climate Change”.
    The former, AGW, is the influence of human emission of greenhouse gasses and the consequent impact on surface atmospheric temperatures through the influence of “Thermal Opacity”.
    The latter is an entirely normal and natural phenomenon arising principally from Solar impacts and the resultant influence on atmospheric behaviour over its full depth. It has always occurred, it will always occur.
    One of the most observable erroneous concepts is the behaviour and temperature of the upper atmosphere – the Thermosphere. It is generally accepted that the Thermosphere is cooling rapidly and is currently at record low levels. This is said, by the “Warmists”, to be the result of thermal opacity preventing heat from surface levels radiating upwards. One only has to cross reference the graph for the Thermosphere Climate Index with that of the Planetary “Ap” Index to find that there is a very close correlation, showing exactly where the temperature influence arises from.
    Why this deception is promulgated, is accepted and continues is unclear.
    Why the attempt to distort the debate by confusing the two concepts of AGW and Climate change is so widespread is equally unclear, although the deliberate attempt to confuse is the immediate assumption.

    • If, and that’s a big if, Trump wins in November or whenever it drags out to be, he will be free to follow his convictions. Things could become interesting.

      • Steve

        “If, and that’s a big if, Trump wins in November or whenever it drags out to be, he will be free to follow his convictions.”
        Once he is not president, it is his convictions that will follow him… Fraud, Tax evasion, sexual assault. Which one to choose?

        • All of which are just FABRICATED far-left fake news,and like AGW , totally unsupported by any actual real evidence.

          Where is Hillary’s conviction.. give Trump a second term and the Democrats will be even further exposed for their lies and as being TRAITORS to the USA and the human-race.

          No wonder you are scared, being part of it.

          • Not scared… excited by the prospect of seeing Trump face the music. Watch the crook in action here. Mafia Don

            (Snipped the waaaay off topic video) SUNMOD

          • Like he faced the FAKE dumbocrat impeachment, ehy..

            Again it is noted that you avoid anything to do with actual science.

            You poor whinging, irrelevant little prat.

          • Both of them should have. !

            Only politics and the deep-state allows them to get away with all their criminal activity, corruption, fraud, molestation, etc etc

            But the left worship them for it… !

  6. I hope the editing is better in Part 2. I recall Part 1 had these irritatingly long section intervals that wasted time and were mostly affectation. Mr. Murano should’ve consulted with professional movie editors and not be afraid to trim excess. I’m guessing that since he hired a professional actor this time he might also hire professional editors.

  7. Good to see a sequel to a good previous documentary. Thought I would Google the original documentary to see what their objective summary is:

    From Wikipedia, that came up first in search results…

    “Climate Hustle is a 2016 film rejecting the existence and cause of climate change, narrated by climate change denialist Marc Morano, produced and directed by Christopher Rogers, co-written by Morano and Mick Curran, and funded by the Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow (CFACT), a free market pressure group funded by the fossil fuel lobby.”

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climate_Hustle

    • How can they write that somebody rejects the cause of something they think doesn’t exist? That doesn’t make sense as a sentence.

      Typical Wikipedia climate change garbage. My goodness, the subject is so badly presented on that site it is no wonder they can’t keep their arguments aligned.

      On that matter and HCQ for Covid-19 they could just put a short entry that reads, “Orange man bad!” Then we will get the message: We won’t let you discuss it because we are blinded by ideology.

  8. “…. and hosted by actor Kevin Sorbo, the film showcases many instances of Hollywood hypocrisy, financial corruption, media bias, classroom indoctrination, political correctness and other troubling matters surrounding the global warming issue.”
    So nothing on the science. Gee I wonder why?

    • Sorbo is just the host.. and yes basically EVERY AGW collaborator is a monumental hypocrite…

      And you know NOTHING about science.

      You can’t even support the very basis of your slimy far-left anti-human, anti-life AGW religion that has zero basis in actual science.

      Come on slimon, where is your evidence for warming by atmospheric CO2

      so far you continue to be a complete and utter failure.

    • So nothing on the science. Gee I wonder why?

      You remember this one, you know, with the science guy that confirms much of what’s being said by Sorbo?

    • I see that Simon left out first part of the quote:

      Climate Hustle 2 looks at both popular scientific claims surrounding climate change and examines motivations of those clamoring for immediate action. Featuring leading scientists, politicians and policy experts, and hosted by actor Kevin Sorbo, the film showcases many instances of Hollywood hypocrisy, financial corruption, media bias, classroom indoctrination, political correctness and other troubling matters surrounding the global warming issue.

      They do examine the science claims.

      Your dishonest post invalidated your whine.

  9. “We really are being hustled by the left, and it’s depressing to see how much they want iron-fisted climate regulations put on us.” Useful idiots and nothing more. They are being hustled by the Marxists who have an ideology all their own.

  10. Simon: “yes but the very accurate satellites say the sea is rising”

    Can you imagine the hopelessness of trying to measure the sea level of the ocean, from a satellite moving at 18,000 mph when it takes a measurement of the sea below, then only comes back to approximately same sea area once every two weeks?

    I know what, you say, lets invoke the law of large numbers and average the h@ll out of the measurments, if we do it enough we will be able to coax a slowly rising result out of it!

    Just imagine, one reading for each area, once per fortnight.
    Just imagine the state of the sea in this area, how it changes, hourly, daily, monthly.
    Just imagine how the sea level responds to high pressure areas, low pressure areas, fronts, gales etc.

    Simon, I know you like to make us laugh and I did appreciate your comment, but the words “very accurate” and satellite should never be used in the same sentence.

    Really!

  11. Another good doco is The Great Global Warming Swindle. The title says it all. What Sid Vicious was to music, Al Gore is to science.

Comments are closed.