Tim Flannery: “If there was a moment of true emergency in the fight to preserve our climate, it is now”

Guest essay by Eric Worrall

Tim Flannery, who once famously once predicted the dams would never fill again, and who held a very well paid position as climate prophet Aussie climate commissioner for a few years, now desperately wants us to heed his advice on Climate Change and the Coronavirus.

The megafires and pandemic expose the lies that frustrate action on climate change

If there was a moment of true emergency in the fight to preserve our climate, it is now

This is part of a series of essays by Australian writers responding to the challenges of 2020

by Tim Flannery

Iwas in Melbourne in late January, watching as more and more people donned face masks to protect themselves against the bushfire smoke that had thickened the air for weeks and that was causing hundreds of deaths. Turning on the news, I was surprised to see footage of crowds in China similarly masked, but for a very different reason. Hundreds were then dying in Wuhan, Hubei province, from a novel virus.

When I asked Australia’s chief medical officer about the virus that same week, I could see the concern in his eyes. But my attention was largely on the fires. They were unlike anything experienced on the continent previously, and climate scientists were beginning to piece together the link with climate change. What few knew back then was that three catastrophes would strike Australia in quick succession: the unprecedented, climate-fuelled megafiresthat were extinguished in February by damaging, climate-influenced floods. Then, in March, the Covid-19 pandemic that began to spread across Australia.

These three catastrophes are proof that things that travel invisibly through the great aerial ocean that is our atmosphere are a particular danger to our complex, global civilisation. The carbon dioxide molecule that accumulates imperceptibly as we burn fossil fuels causes an increase in average global temperature, which triggered the profoundly disruptive droughts, floods and fires that plagued Australia over the past year. But the coronavirus also travels unseen through the great aerial ocean, insinuating itself in lung after lung, killing person after person, until it threatens our health system, economy and society.

But if economic opportunity were the only driver of climate denialism, it could be countered by creating opportunity elsewhere, and to some extent this is happening. With enormous potential to be found in green hydrogen and the renewables sector, some bright young people are leaving the fossil fuel industry and staking their futures on the new, clean economy. What is holding back progress most strongly is the $80bn that corporations have invested in domestic gas infrastructure. Acting on the climate emergency would mean that these corporations will face huge losses. In ignoring the climate scientists and investing so heavily in gas they have made a bad economic bet but are unwilling to face the consequences.

I think that as the full consequences of the megafires begin to be understood, climate denialism will become more and more difficult to sustain. The economic impact of the megafires is not insignificant: estimates put the full cost between $100bn and $200bn. Because the damage is concentrated in certain regions, those communities will suffer for years as they strive to rebuild.

Tragically, the news from the climate scientists is getting worse and worse. Increasingly, many experts are viewing 2021, and specifically the UN climate change conference to be held in Glasgow late that year, as humanity’s last chance to avoid an environmental apocalypse. If there was a moment of true emergency in the fight to preserve our climate, it is now.

Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2020/sep/17/the-megafires-and-pandemic-expose-the-lies-that-frustrate-action-on-climate-change

The following is Flannery’s Dams will never fill quote, which in my opinion inspired Aussie state governments to waste of billions of dollars on unnecessary desalination plants.

The following is from the transcript of Flannery’s interview on the ABC:

SALLY SARA: What will it mean for Australian farmers if the predictions of climate change are correct and little is done to stop it? What will that mean for a farmer?

PROFESSOR TIM FLANNERY: We’re already seeing the initial impacts and they include a decline in the winter rainfall zone across southern Australia, which is clearly an impact of climate change, but also a decrease in run-off. Although we’re getting say a 20 per cent decrease in rainfall in some areas of Australia, that’s translating to a 60 per cent decrease in the run-off into the dams and rivers. That’s because the soil is warmer because of global warming and the plants are under more stress and therefore using more moisture. So even the rain that falls isn’t actually going to fill our dams and our river systems, and that’s a real worry for the people in the bush. If that trend continues then I think we’re going to have serious problems, particularly for irrigation.

Read more: https://www.abc.net.au/local/archives/landline/content/2006/s1844398.htm

Flannery is very good at projecting sincerity. He is a skilled public speaker, but Flannery’s track record of failed prophecies is seriously impeding his apparent attempt to reclaim the limelight.

For example, in addition to this effort Tim Flannery also gave us a climate change last chances in 2004, 2006, 2008, 2014, 2015, 2016, and probably lots of other occasions I can’t be bothered digging up. Clearly none of these occasions were actual last chances, because we are all still here.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
1 1 vote
Article Rating
67 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Crakar24
September 17, 2020 1:10 am

Thank God we still have one last chance left I thought we had run out of them

ColMosby
September 17, 2020 3:21 am

Hey, Tim!!! NASA data indicates no increase in wildfires worldwide. That mean those wildfires of yours cannot possibly be the result of global warming. The only thing that equals the ignorance of these folks about he climate is their solution for reducing atmospheric CO2 – renewables suck in every conceivable way and everyone with any energy knowledge knows that the only means of providing low cost, low carbon energy lies in small modular molten salt nuclear reactors – cheap, easy to build, reliable, load following, air cooled, utterly safe, fueled by “nuclear waste”, etc . But no alarmist leader will ever mention the word nuclear, as that provokes hysteria in the small, ignorant minds of his followers. Global warming alarmists are a sorry, stupid, dangerous bunch of people (I use the term loosely).

griff
Reply to  ColMosby
September 17, 2020 4:38 am

Up to 2015. Because that’s where the Watts article cut off. why was that?

fred250
Reply to  griff
September 17, 2020 4:54 am

4 years is NOT climate, griffool…

Thanks for CONFIRMING that the steady beneficial rise in atmospheric CO2 had nothing to do with it, griffool.

Or are you still totally incapable of telling the difference between WEATHER and climate ?

ozspeaksup
Reply to  griff
September 17, 2020 5:26 am

I may be wrong but I think the person collating the list of daft claims died or was too ill to continue
anyone else hat knows for sure feel free to correct me;-)

Dodgy Geezer
September 17, 2020 3:41 am

“…If there was a moment of true emergency in the fight to preserve our climate, it is now…”

Sorry. Prince Charles told me that the tipping point moment was 6 years ago, and I’m sure that he’s a better climate scientist than you are. After all, he talks to trees, and they have been around looking at the climate for longer than any of us….

AndrewWA
September 17, 2020 5:42 am

Tim Flannery know no shame!
I have zero interest in anything this snake oil salesman has to say.

observa
Reply to  AndrewWA
September 17, 2020 9:00 am

Our very own home grown Michael Mann.

Nylo
September 17, 2020 8:34 am

Tim Flannery: “If there was a moment of true emergency in the fight to preserve our climate, it is now”

So, all the previous moments were of false emergency? Thanks for letting us know.

observa
September 17, 2020 8:48 am

“When I asked Australia’s chief medical officer about the virus that same week, I could see the concern in his eyes. But my attention was largely on the fires. They were unlike anything experienced on the continent previously, and climate scientists were beginning to piece together the link with climate change. What few knew back then was that three catastrophes would strike Australia in quick succession: the unprecedented, climate-fuelled megafires”

Megafires unlike anything experienced on the continent before? You really are full of hyberbole and unscientific drivel again here Tim as usual. Remember the megafauna and the megafires Tim?
http://www.abc.net.au/science/future/theses/theses1.htm
A man for all seasons is our Tim the dams are never gunna fill Flummery and your typical dyed in the wool doomster.

Rod Evans
September 17, 2020 9:09 am

Well Tim is in good company with his false predictions isn’t he?
Some of us remember this gem from Prince Charles back in March 2009. “100 months to save the world from climate catastrophe”
Now that prediction of doom came right from the top. The future King of England no less, he should know, he certainly knows what the trees are telling him apparently?
His end of time date was thus July 2017. For those of you who missed the end of the world, do not feel too bad about it, you are in good company we all survived without any change in our habits, or change in the climate, or anything else.
Maybe the only real victim of the momentous end of the world was Prince Charles reputation. Then again remember this is the same loon that talks to plants, and was famously recorded smooching on the phone to his lover (while married to Lady Dianna) that lover is now his wife Camilla, his greatest wish was to be her tampon…..
He didn’t have much of a reputation to lose, did he?
Maybe, being a climate alarmist does something bad to your brain?
Enjoy
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/theroyalfamily/4952918/Prince-Charles-we-have-100-months-to-save-the-world.html

Travis T. Jones
September 17, 2020 3:02 pm

Climate’s last chance – 2006

“The main indicator of how long we have to address climate change is the state of the Arctic icecap, which covers Earth’s northern ocean.

Before 2004, the rate of melt was such that scientists believed the icecap would melt entirely by about 2100. At the trajectory set by the new rate of melt, however, there will be no Arctic icecap in the next five to 15 years.

James Hanson, director of NASA’s Goddard Institute, is arguably the world authority on climate change. He predicts that we have just a decade to avert a 25-metre rise of the sea. Picture an eight-storey building by a beach, then imagine waves lapping its roof. That’s what a 25-metre rise in sea level looks like.

https://www.theage.com.au/national/climates-last-chance-20061028-ge3fvb.html

Worst apocalypse. Ever.

tom McQuin
September 17, 2020 7:04 pm

Something useful that maybe is not really well know. Queensland Ag rainfall maps for the last 120 yrs, for all australia. One version even has cyclone tracks.
https://www.longpaddock.qld.gov.au/rainfall-poster/

thingadonta
September 19, 2020 12:52 am

unprecedented, climate-fuelled megafires that were extinguished in February by damaging, climate-influenced floods .

Climate influenced floods? Like air influenced breathing? I count 3 errors in that sentence.

Leon Warren
September 20, 2020 5:03 pm

Flannery wrote a book titled 1788 which was based on the diary of lieutenant of Marine, Watkin Tentch. Flannery failed to mention the temperature of that early settlement in 1788 at Sydney Cove.
David Hill also wrote a book of the same title also based on Watkin Tentch’s diary. On page 161 he wrote, “Watkin Tench was later to describe the fierceness and changeability of the hot summer winds, which were ‘like a blast from a heated oven’. The temperature one day ‘peaked at a hundred and nine degrees farhenheight, (42.9 C), which killed some of the vegetables that had been planted”….What does this failure to report this important statement do to Flannery’s credibility? That temperature would be as high, if not higher than any temperature we experience today!