
What’s Natural
Guest post by Jim Steele,
Published June 30, 2020 in the Pacifica Tribune
It’s curious how we find threads of good fortune interwoven with tragedy. Over a month ago I suffered a “widow-makers” heart attack, but I was graced with good luck. Just 2 hours earlier I was hiking on San Pedro Point. If the attack happened there, they would have carried my corpse off the mountain. As it was, the doctors still doubted my survival. But fortunately, one of the best heart surgeons was operating. But after 24 hours, he called my wife offering his condolences, telling her he did the best he could. Even in my drug-induced dreams I lay dead in a dark casket. But again, I was lucky. The surgeon’s best was just good enough. The next day he called my wife to say I was suddenly making progress.
Lying in ICU for 15 days, I reviewed my life and wondered if I would ever see family again. The COVID lockdown prevented all visitors, and my electronic devices were all home. I conjured up 60 years of friends, hoping to see their faces or hear their voices one more time. Sometimes a wave of melancholy would visit, thinking my passing would ultimately make little difference in their lives. But when I came home, I found hundreds of cards, email messages and texts wishing me well and I wept with heart-felt appreciation.
I was struck by friends who said that they “knew” I couldn’t die. Some because I was such a stubborn SOB. Others repeated I had so much more to give and my earthly mission was not complete. I confess loving to hear such sentiments, but they were just kind words. How could they know what my mission was? But then again, I had been on a solemn mission for 50 years.
In the late 1960s, I dropped out of ROTC and Engineering school not wanting to contribute to the horrors of the Vietnam War. After a few years of community organizing, I knew I had to go back to college, but for what purpose? In keeping with my love for nature, I had adopted some native American spirituality, so I went on my “vision quest”. The idea was to strip myself of all attachments to better know myself. I fasted in the middle of the wilderness for 4 days with just a blanket and bottle of water, then spoke to the universe about what I wanted. Amazingly, many lofty words only echoed back pathetically, but when I said I wanted to be a liaison between nature and people, my words rang strong. So, I enrolled at San Francisco State University in ecology and began my mission.
I embraced the beliefs of a great 1800s scientist, Thomas Huxley. He became known as Darwin’s Bulldog for his avid defense of many of Darwin’s theories. Studying fossils Huxley was first to theorize birds had evolved from dinosaurs. Relevant to my mission Huxley advised, “The improver of natural knowledge absolutely refuses to acknowledge authority, as such. For him, skepticism is the highest of duties; blind faith the one unpardonable sin.” Or as Einstein advised, “Never stop questioning.”
As director of SFSU’s Sierra Nevada Field Campus I expanded the environmental studies program. To know nature, we immersed students in nature. I began a 25-year study of how natural climate and landscape changes affected wildlife. When a meadow we were monitoring dried up and birds declined, many blindly blamed global warming. Avoiding Huxley’s unpardonable sin, I dug deeper. It became clear the real problem was stream flows had been disrupted over 100 years ago. By restoring the streams, the meadow became more resilient and the wildlife improved better than before. Judicious skepticism had made me a better environmental steward.
Unfortunately, researchers’ dramatic conclusions too often go unexamined. Fearful conclusions make us abandon our critical thinking and valid contrasting research gets ignored. Too often research gets designed to fit prevailing fears so that science now suffers from a “replicability crisis”. Ten years ago, Stanford epidemiologist tested over 400 research published claims and only one could be replicated and validated. The editor of Europe’s top medical journal, the Lancet, speculated half of their published research was likely false. Outside the laboratory, claims about ecology and climate are far more difficult to verify.
As science becomes more politicized, we get blinded by our beliefs. Honest points get dismissed as fake news, or the work of deniers. But more than ever “skepticism is our highest of duties”. All contradictory evidence must be examined, and respectful debate conducted. Indeed, this wretch is still on a mission to bring insights to the complexities of wildlife, wildfires, sea level, and climate. So, I want to thank Sherm Fredericks for providing the newspaper space for my columns. I also want to thank WUWT for posting my columns and analysses. I simply hope to make people think and dig deeper. I will have a long rehab, so I encourage you to email me to discuss those issues. Together we can become “improvers of natural knowledge”.
Jim Steele is director emeritus of the Sierra Nevada Field Campus, SFSU and authored Landscapes and Cycles: An Environmentalist’s Journey to Climate Skepticism.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
So sorry to hear of your heart attack, delighted to hear you are recovering. I bought your book several years ago – a great read, highly recommended. Hope you come back better and stronger. Keep up the good work!
Best wishes for a speedy and complete recovery,
TS
TS said almost exactly what I wanted to post. You are one of the most interesting and informative contributors on WUWT. It would have been a great loss had you been in the wrong place at the wrong time when you had this attack.
The immense breadth of your experience and knowledge is a national treasure. As is your joy and precision in communicating and sharing it. We are most fortunate that you are still here to continue educating us with facts amid the oceans of misinformation in which we ar swimming.
I hope to seeing your valuable contributions to a real scientific debate for a long time to come.
Sincere best wishes.
Greg Goodman.
excellent writing, many thanks. I wish you a speedy recovery and more articles
Interesting graphic, esp the bookshelf and where it is located.
Complex, convoluted, difficult to understand, wrong answers abound. Sometimes the truth is simple and bright but people are too attached to their preconceptions to notice.
Most people’s lives would be vastly improved if they just learned to pay proper attention and quit ignoring the glaringly obvious.
I’m sorry to inform you but Mr. Occam passed on some time ago.
William of Ockham.
Ockham’s Razor: “Don’t multiply entities beyond necessity.”
“To soothe thy skin, multiply essential oils as necessary.”
Occam’s shaving cream.
The idea that attention is centrally important goes back to the dawn of civilization. The Eye of Horus
Not to be callous, but for a minute there I thought you were going to blame your coronary disease on global warming – whew! Remember exercise is the best medicine…
Jim Fixx tried that course. Genetics rule.
Not just genetics.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phidippides_cardiomyopathy
Too much of a good thing can do you in. Similar to Jim Fixx others have died from excessive running.
Reggie Lewis. Hank Gathers. (with sadness) Cheers –
Thank you very much for the excellent piece of thinking. And congratulations on your recovery!
Huxley was right ofcourse.
Welcome back to the living (-: Not at all what I expected from the cartoon and title.
I was going to suggest that the cartoon had it wrong, that is to say that the complex answer is convincing the public that a warmer world with longer growing seasons etc. would be a disaster, a decades long tangled web of theories that can’t be verified and can only be supported by political means. Maybe the cartoon title should have been, “Science vs. Politics”.
“Guest post by Jim Steele,
It’s curious how we find threads of good fortune interwoven with tragedy. Over a month ago I suffered a “widow-makers” heart attack, but I was graced with good luck. Just 2 hours earlier I was hiking on San Pedro Point.”
Like mine, it was low down in the veins. Further up, death! My stent is secure!
I wish you a speedy recovery, Jim, as we need good people like yourself. I learnt a lot from your book about variations in local environments and how they are not a result of ‘global warming’ but of local changes as in the meadow case above. It also showed the lengths so-called environmentalists were prepared to go the support alarmism as opposed to truth and science.
Take care of yourself, Jim. Your posts matter to WUWT.
Stay safe and healthy, all.
Bob
Steele thyself,
Girder thine loins,
A warrior still walks
Among rhe lions.
—————
—————
I have missed your posts on climate and coral reefs and been wondering what happened to you.
Really greatfull to your medical team. I hope your recovery is complete. As is sometimes said, what does not kill you makes you stronger,https://news.northwestern.edu/stories/2019/10/science-proves-that-what-doesnt-kill-you-makes-you-stronger/
Welcome back.
Thanks Jim . . .
Jim it was 2007 I was driving my wife to Philadelphia International when I experience my LDA heart attack. A detour to University of Pennsylvania with a five day stay and stent placement resulted. That year we installed 2.4 Ghz WIFI. and I also had a disabling stroke. Thousands of studies suggest blood coagulation is caused by microwave radiation and with the advent of unproven safety of 5G and millimeter wave technology it does not bode well for human, animal and insect health—if the bees go we go. https://www.5gspaceappeal.org/
I suggest you remove EMF exposure or you’ll be back under the surgeons knife, or worse.
re: “Thousands of studies suggest blood coagulation is caused by microwave radiation and with the advent of unproven safety of 5G and millimeter wave technology”
What about sunlight? Even shorter wavelengths than 5G, and at 1,000 Watts/m^2 flux density.
And, the weasel word “suggests” was noted. C’mon, prove it, or, as the saying goes: “get off the pot.” Should be cinch simple to demo this effect with mice, or rabbits, or just a blood specimen viewed under a microscope WHILE uWave energy is applied.
I’ll TELL YOU what does get affected by LWIR (Long Wave IR, as from a burn barrel or raging camp fire) – the lens in your EYES. I experienced very rapid worsening of cataracts in the 2017 to 2018 time period over the course of months to the pointwhere I was not only legally blind but finally functionally blind. This worsening occurred after working with (feeding) a raging fire in a ‘burn barrel’ over the course of a day in late 2017. Surgery corrected all this in June-July 2018 BUT the prognosis wasn’t good going in, and coming out the recovery was a little extended (the eyes can get pretty ‘beat up’ during the surgical process w/bad cats.) Everything is hunky-dory now PBTG (praise be to God).
BTW, on those “Thousands of studies“, could you link to a few, a couple even? I’d like to see just what it is you’re reading. (I’ll also wager there are “thousands” more that don’t show any linkage. DO YOU KNOW what the relative field strengths are inter-molecule JUST due to atomic forces VERSUS an externally applied RF field LIKE from 5G?)
An additional note: If your eye doc says you’ve got cataracts, PLEASE don’t wait until late in the game to get them taken care of. I should have had the issue addressed in 2015 thereabouts.
I was once called on to inspect a uranium plant under demolition, where a worker had suffered a mysterious ailment. One of the first things I noticed was a charcoal-fed burn barrel , where workers would gather to warm up. I called a local official and requested replacement of the burn barrel with a propane heater or other device and installation of CO detectors in the building. I’m pretty sure the worker had been suffering from monoxide poisoning as a result of too much time spent inhaling charcoal fumes instead of working.
Jim your comment “what about sunlight”. Jim sunlight is natural and humans and animals have adapted over millennia. Human-generated microwaves and millimeter waves are un-natural. Creates oxidative stress, DNA destruction of mitochondria, interrupts voltage-gated calcium channels and creates peroxynitrite linked to the epidemic of 36 diseases of the Digital Age.
https;//bioinitiative.org
https://greenwavefilters.com/podcast-with-ali-fitness/
re: “Jim sunlight is natural and humans and animals have adapted over millennia.”
You cite “adaptions”, what are those adaptions? You realize, too, the ‘spectrum’ includes EM energy down into the LWIR (Longwave IR) region, NOT just visible light? Right?
And on top of that, IT IS STILL EM (electromagnetic energy)!!! Don’t give some ‘dodge’ you can’t explain. What are the effects of EM energy? The induction of ELECTRON MOVEMENT in the target it (the EM) impinges on. So, please, tell us (me) WHAT adaptation has taken place.
You are deep in religious belief territory and far from science and “natural”.
ATheok and Jim you are neophytes when it comes to the science of Biology and what is causing the exponential rise in auto-immune diseases.
https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/642029.pdf
https://www.advancedliving.com/the-5g-summit/
Exponential rise?
^2, ^3, ^x^n, or more?
Where may I find the research regarding the problem?
Yes, tongue-in-cheek. Grin.
OMG. That’s rather a lot of fertilizer.
Jim your comment: what about sunlight? Sunlight and its frequencies are natural and humans and animals have adapted over millennial. 2,3.4 & 5G frequencies are man-made and have never been proven safe despite what the industry & the FCC says to the extent of being taken to court by many organization the latest of which is the Environmental Health Trust. They were wrong on Climate but they have a handle on this…https://ehtrust.org/factsheet-need-know-5g-small-cells-science-policy-public-health/.
re: “Sunlight and its frequencies are natural and humans and animals have adapted over millennial”
Crap answer. Thanks for playing.
I ask for a FIRST PRINCIPLES explanation (cause and effect; what laws of physics and biology come into play here) and you give a vague hand-wave as an answer. Give us a break. You don’t KNOW this field, all you know is WHAT YOU’VE BEEN FED as propaganda.
Have a good day.
Jim I know enough that you are a MORON. Take it back– an exceptional minimally talented (lacks appropriate CV) self described MORON.
He’s probably selling the EMI meters.
They are calibrated in the “internationally recognized unit millivolts”! Awesome.
The challenge is to know what it MEANS. Mostly nothing.
EMI filters can be had at the local hardware store built into some power strips. Amateur radio operators benefit from such but I am pretty sure there’s no health hazard at millivolt levels. On the other hand, 600 volts of radio frequency is something not to touch.
I strongly doubt that there are thousands of studies on this subject. Heck, I’d be surprised if there are dozens.
Mine was high up LAD , 100% blockage … Doctor who placed first stents thought major damage … But heart normal pumping next morning … Went back later to place remaining stent in lower region that initially thought was not worth doing …
The world is a better place with you in it, Mr. Steele. Glad you are still with us and still willing to be a champion of scientific thought.
A heartfelt cry if you will excuse the pun, – yet the Mad media, social and otherwise, have all the attention What are we doing wrong? Sanity it seems is not contagious? Only one western leader is onside, all the rest are following the IPCC Pied Piper
Close call – but a miss is as good as a mile!
Get well soon. I’m sure stubborn bloody-mindedness assists a complete and fast recovery.
So glad you made it. We desperately need more sceptical, scientifically-trained environmentalists like you.
You said the meadow suffered because of disruptions over a hundred years ago.
Do you undo the disruptions if they were of a natural origin, beaver dams or mudslide caused by earthquakes.
it is one of my most fundamental questions do we save a species from going extinct if it is doing so because of nature.
do we stop habits that are preserving creatures that would go extinct without our intervention.
” I wanted to be a liaison between nature and people”
Yuh, me too- so I’ve been a forester for 47 years- but, unfortunately, here in Massachusetts. virtually the entire population is convinced of catastrophic climate change- all government agencies at all levels, and pretty much all of academia- even most of the forestry people. When I challenge the idea- I’m accused of ranting. There is now a movement here to stop all logging and forest management “to save the climate”. They’ve even enlisted E.O. Wilson and of course Bill McKibben who is nearby in VT.
…”virtually the entire population is convinced of catastrophic climate change”…
Never underestimate the power of carefully worded bullshit.
Point your critics to my paper, Joseph — especially the science literate.
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feart.2019.00223/full
Fully peer-reviewed and certainly correct. It shows the IPCC don’t know what they’re talking about. Nor do the consensus climatologists.
Many prayers for your speedy recovery, Jim.
Like you and Joseph Z., I found my calling in caring for nature (46 years as a professional forester in Oregon).
My epiphany moment came after 12 years of practice when it became clear to me that the forests I was tending had been similarly tended by human beings for hundreds, nay thousands, of years.
I have now spent decades researching the topic of historical human influences on the environment both in the literature and in the field. The evidence is overwhelming, ubiquitous worldwide, and the adherents of this paradigm shift in ecology are numerous.
It is a true paradigm shift. The old science proposed that Nature and Nature alone created forests, grasslands, savannas, and other vegetation types via plant succession and plant community development. The theories of seral to climax ecological development have held sway for more than a century.
But those theories are wrong. They do not explain old-growth forest structures, meadows, savannas, or other vegetation types that existed at one time but have disappeared and are not arising naturally again — because Nature did not create them, people did.
Untouched forests, indeed untouched landscapes, are a-historical. Forests did not develop absent human influences — not here, not anywhere. The removal of human tending from our landscapes has not only destroyed our shared natural heritage; it has led to unmitigated fuel accumulations and catastrophic fires — fires that are so unnecessary and could be avoided by restoring human stewardship.
That’s my solemn mission: to restore the human/nature connection so vital to both. It’s a mountain to climb, and I will probably never get near the peak.
I wish you, Jim, a fellow traveller, renewed health and reinvigorated spirit so that your mission can proceed as far as you can take it. And I assure you that long after we both are gone others will continue this climb, this struggle, and the summit will be reached some day.
Glad to see you have recovered. Stay well.
I have commented several times about how disappointing it is to see studies document changes in environment, species, or behavior and end up simply concluding it is due to “climate change” with no data to back up the claim.
Data detailing scientific observed data on changes in reproduction, growth, or survival that are without a doubt temperature based is usually sorely lacking.
I have concluded that climate change is having an adverse effect on scientific objectivity. Therefore, we (humans) must lower CO2 concentrations in order to preserve good science.
The world is a better place with you in it, and WUWT is better with you here.
Thanks and Godspeed.
You are a treasure Jim. Stick around! I first read you on the Edith Spot butterfly, which I had never heard of, after activist scientist Ms? Dr? Parmesan “showed” that Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming was wiping out Edith Spot in your stamping grounds the Sierra Nevada. You did a traverse parallel, and adjacent to Parmesan’s and found Edith was doing fine!
I’m not sure I’m right about this part, but It seems your rebuttal vitually put an end to Parmesan’s career. She packed up in the US and took quiet(?) refuge in a ‘friendly’ low impact UK university.
I guess she wasn’t prepared for an ecologist who didn’t toe the activist line. I think she might be right about the majority in your field, though, hence the “treasure” tag for my favorite practitioner of this most beautiful of the sciences when done with an objective inquiring mind. Give your diet a makeover. You obviously were getting good exercise.
Professor Camille Parmesan found funding in the multi-million initiative of France. Finding the truth was more difficult for her than finding the money:
“University of Plymouth academic Professor Camille Parmesan has been selected by the President of France Emmanuel Macron to receive funding as part of his “Make Our Planet Great Again” programme.
The multi-million pound initiative was launched after the United States decided to withdraw from the United Nations’ Paris Climate Agreement.”
https://www.plymouth.ac.uk/news/climate-change-scientist-to-receive-funding-from-president-of-france
WR: President Macron must have failed to reed about Jim Steele’s research: Fabricating Climate Doom: Parmesan’s Butterfly Effect
http://www.landscapesandcycles.net/climate-doom–parmesan-s-butterfly-effect.html
All the best Jim
As an Earth Scientist trained in the late 1970’s – early 1980’s and recently “retired” I have always related to the Huxley quote and had that pinned to my wall at several places of employment just to remind me of what science was all about
I don’t usually post but I have to comment on this wonderful article by Mr Steele.
Here is a man who has just survived a life threatening event which generally disorientates the mind for months at least.But,true to his name,he writes an erudite article of clear rational logic and thought.Quite impressive to say the least.
I also enjoy your posts and am glad they will continue;-)
be well
I see this eschewing of the complex truth … It fits in with my latest observation of modern culture.
We are seeing the end of the enlightenment … descending into an age of fear, superstition, mob rule … intellectual darkness. The new leadership–a mob of violence fostering, history erasing, anti-intellectuals.