The City Government’s Remarkable Feat Defies the Odds With Ambitious Climate Action Plan
BY Staff Report // 07.02.19 14
The City of Houston is a leader in renewable energy.
It’s no secret that oil and gas have long been Houston’s lifeblood. The energy industry runs through Space City’s veins, cushioning us while other cities struggle, propelling us ever forward.
But there’s something to keep in mind — energy encapsulates far more than oil and gas, from solar to wind. And the City of Houston is all about sustainability.
In fact, Houston is a straight-up leader in renewable energy across the United States.
That’s right. The City of Houston sources a whopping 92 percent of its power from wind and solar energy. According to a February EPA report, that impressive percentage ranks it higher in renewable energy use than any other city government in the United States.
Houston might carry an overall bad reputation in sustainability circles nationally, often getting painted as a polluted wasteland (often by those who’ve never visited). But the City of Houston is here to create a new one.
The City of Houston, dedicated to its ambitious Climate Action Plan, with aims for a 2020 implementation, is putting its money where its mouth is.
“Oftentimes, we think of Houston as the Oil and Gas Capital of the World. But really, we strive to be the Energy Capital of the World,” Houston’s chief sustainability officer Lara Cottingham tells PaperCity.
“As a city, we have a really long and strong history of sustainability. From a sustainability perspective, we’ve been the largest municipal user of renewable energy for some time now.”
Most of the City of Houston’s power — about 88 percent of it — comes from wind turbine operators, while the rest is sourced from an Alpine, Texas solar farm that spans 350 acres.
“Houston’s not traditionally viewed as a hotbed for climate action. But the fact that we’re doing this in our big cities just shows how far the idea of climate has changed, that’s it’s not just a political hot button issue but something we’ve realized that we have to work on,” Cottingham notes.
Mayor Turner has stepped up to the plate with renewed interest in renewables, trying to keep pace with the Paris Agreement. But Mayors Parker, White and Brown before him, set the ball rolling. “They wanted to lead by example,” Cottingham says.
The United States government pulling out of the agreement left a weight on state and city governments’ shoulders across the country. “That put a lot of pressure on U.S. cities. The cities had to step it up,” Cottingham notes.
Mayors Unite
At first, about 80 mayors across America pledged to honor the accords, Cottingham says. Now, that number has shot up to 430 mayors.
“Big cities, small cities, red states, blue states,” Cottingham says. “Everyone in between all coming together to say hey, We support the Paris agreement, what can we do?”
The City of Houston has advanced its goals through an emphasis on electric vehicles.
“That’s how we started investing in renewable energy. We’re one of the first cities early on to test out not just alternative fuels but really electric vehicles,” Cottingham says. “We have one of the largest green fleets in the country. That’s a pretty big commitment to make.”
The green transportation initiative launched back in 2002, and now the light duty passenger fleet is more than 50 percent hybrid.
“Vehicle manufacturers are saying that they’re going to start making more and more electric vehicles to the point that they might make only electric vehicles. That’s huge for Houston, for our emission reduction, for our air quality improvement,” Cottingham says.
HT/JS
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/07/06/from-the-ieee-a-skeptic-looks-at-alternative-energy/#comment-861197
[excerpt]
The Capacity Factor for land-based wind power is typically ~20-25%, but it is the Substitution Factor that really measures the usefulness of wind power, and that Substitution Factor can be as low as 4% of installed peak capacity. See Fig. 7 in E-On Netz Wind Report 2005.
That is, for every 100 units of installed wind power capacity, you can replace only 4 units of conventional energy generating capacity.
“WIND POWER – IT DOESN’T JUST BLOW, IT SUCKS!”
Solar power is even worse than wind power, in that solar requires subsidies (paid by the consumer) many times that of wind power.
“SOLAR POWER – STICK IT WHERE THE SUN DON’T SHINE!”
If true, then Houston must pay very little for their power.
What I want to know is who did replace Jonathan E as captain of Houston’s Rollerball team last year since Moonpie was effectively brain-dead after their match with Tokyo the year before?
I live near Houston. We can purchase electricity on the open market from a wide variety of retailers. It is nice because there is competition in the utility. If you want to pay more, you can get a 100% green plan. I ignore them. The 100% green plan is nice while the sun is shining and the wind is blowing at the right speed. All of Houston’s expensive electric vehicles are charged at night when solar is zero and wind is usually lower. I wonder if a good audit of these green plans would show how much energy is actually from more reliable sources.
Who would want to pay more for a 100% green plan, when it is known with 100% certainty that you are never guaranteed to get 100% green electrons. Probably get very few, if any, green electrons. I suppose it is reassuring to know you have the opportunity not to buy into the lie that they are telling. Poor OZ and the UK (and many others) doesn’t appear to have that choice anymore.
These posts document how Enron’s purchase of Zond in 1997 saved the wind industry. https://www.masterresource.org/?s=Enron+Wind