By Ron Stein
From predicting ecological collapse and the end of civilization to warnings that the world is running out of oil, all environmental doomsday predictions of the first Earth Day in 1970 have turned out to be flat out wrong.

More than three decades before Greta Thunberg was born — the Swedish environmental activist on climate change — more than 20 million Americans participated in the first Earth Day on April 22, 1970.
We now look back at quotes from Earth Day, Then and Now,” by Ronald Bailey of the spectacularly wrong apocalyptic predictions from Earth Day 1970.
Considering the current doomsday predictions scaremonger activists are verbalizing about global warming that will result in the demise of civilization within the next decade, many of those unscientific 1970 predictions are being reincarnated on today’s social and news media outlets.
Many of the same are being regurgitated today, but the best prediction from the first earth day five decades ago, yes 50 years ago, was that the “the pending ice age as earth had been cooling since 1950 and that the temperature would be 11 degrees cooler by the year 2000”.
The 1970’s were a lousy decade. Embarrassing movies and dreadful music reflected the national doomsday mood following an unpopular war, endless political scandals, and a faltering economy.
The first Earth Day was celebrated in 1970 — okay, “celebrated” doesn’t capture the funereal tone of the event. The events (organized in part by then hippie and now convicted murderer Ira Einhorn) predicted death, destruction and disease unless we did exactly as progressives commanded.
Behold the coming apocalypse as predicted on and around Earth Day, 1970:
1. “Civilization will end within 15 or 30 years unless immediate action is taken against problems facing mankind.” — Harvard biologist George Wald
2. “We are in an environmental crisis which threatens the survival of this nation, and of the world as a suitable place of human habitation.” — Washington University biologist Barry Commoner
3. “Man must stop pollution and conserve his resources, not merely to enhance existence but to save the race from intolerable deterioration and possible extinction.” — New York Times editorial
4. “Population will inevitably and completely outstrip whatever small increases in food supplies we make. The death rate will increase until at least 100-200 million people per year will be starving to death during the next ten years.” — Stanford University biologist Paul Ehrlich
5. “Most of the people who are going to die in the greatest cataclysm in the history of man have already been born… [By 1975] some experts feel that food shortages will have escalated the present level of world hunger and starvation into famines of unbelievable proportions. Other experts, more optimistic, think the ultimate food-population collision will not occur until the decade of the 1980s.” — Paul Ehrlich
6. “It is already too late to avoid mass starvation,” — Denis Hayes, Chief organizer for Earth Day
7. “Demographers agree almost unanimously on the following grim timetable: by 1975 widespread famines will begin in India; these will spread by 1990 to include all of India, Pakistan, China and the Near East, Africa. By the year 2000, or conceivably sooner, South and Central America will exist under famine conditions…. By the year 2000, thirty years from now, the entire world, with the exception of Western Europe, North America, and Australia, will be in famine.” — North Texas State University professor Peter Gunter
8. “In a decade, urban dwellers will have to wear gas masks to survive air pollution… by 1985 air pollution will have reduced the amount of sunlight reaching earth by one half.” — Life magazine
9. “At the present rate of nitrogen buildup, it’s only a matter of time before light will be filtered out of the atmosphere and none of our land will be usable.” — Ecologist Kenneth Watt
10. “Air pollution…is certainly going to take hundreds of thousands of lives in the next few years alone.” — Paul Ehrlich
11. “By the year 2000, if present trends continue, we will be using up crude oil at such a rate… that there won’t be any more crude oil. You’ll drive up to the pump and say, ‘Fill ‘er up, buddy,’ and he’ll say, ‘I am very sorry, there isn’t any.’” — Ecologist Kenneth Watt
12. “[One] theory assumes that the earth’s cloud cover will continue to thicken as more dust, fumes, and water vapor are belched into the atmosphere by industrial smokestacks and jet planes. Screened from the sun’s heat, the planet will cool, the water vapor will fall and freeze, and a new Ice Age will be born.” — Newsweek magazine
13. “The world has been chilling sharply for about twenty years. If present trends continue, the world will be about four degrees colder for the global mean temperature in 1990, but eleven degrees colder in the year 2000. This is about twice what it would take to put us into an ice age.” — Kenneth Watt
Need some review. NOAA’s website for CO2 emissions has a blurb about detecting the change in atmospheric CO2 due to COVID-19. Parentheses are my comments. 25% reduction in worldwide emissions would result in 0.2 ppm per year (0.8 ppm/yr if 100% reduction). From 2010 to 2020 CO2 increased by 25 ppm (2.5 ppm/yr, or 3 times that from emissions). Where is the other 1.7 ppm from?
What’s the measurement margin of error?
From IPCC AR5 summary: “It is extremely likely that human influence has been the dominant cause of observed warming since 1950, with the level of confidence having increased since the fourth report …”
From IPCC AR4 summary: “The primary source of the increase in carbon dioxide is fossil fuel use …”.
Seasonal changes are clearly seen on the year-to-year comparisons and “variability caused by how plants and soils respond to seasonal and annual variations of temperature, humidity, soil moisture, etc.” although large, follow a clearly repeating pattern.
It is the underlying trend that is claimed to be primary sourced from fossil fuels and that is where an observable change ought be apparent.
The statement that “… only measurements of carbon-14 in CO2 would enable us to cleanly separate fossil sources of CO2 from ecosystem sources and sinks …” is a bit of a smokescreen IMO.
https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/index.html#co2change
p.s. If there is no apparent change in the underlying trend the obvious question is what economic and social changes are needed to effect the *needed* change?
“Childbearing Will Be A Crime”
Still is, “they” just haven’t worked out how to prosecute in mass yet.
I think you mean “en masse”…
+1
5O years of failed predictions of doom. Ironically, we now have a global pandemic caused by the practice of running wet markets in China and doom is now descending upon us. Not only wasn’t this predicted by any of the earth days from the past, but the WHO has no intention of trying to stop the practice of wet markets, so we learn nothing and continue running with the fake doom predictions instead
“failed predictions of doom”
“doom is now descending upon us”
You can’t even see a failed prediction in real time and you complain about lack of learning?
Something few have recognised- Earth Day is Lenin’s birthday. 150 years this year. Kind of symbolic really- a covid operation.
May Day (May 1) is the formation day of the Illuminati in 1776.
The treachery is hidden in plain sight. We just have to open our minds.
https://news.sky.com/story/coronavirus-co2-emissions-likely-to-fall-6-due-to-coronavirus-11976910
So says the WMO
“The 1970’s were a lousy decade. ”
What a moron.
Well that was a useful and intelligent comment that can be totally ignored.
There was a guy by the name of Ray Avery who at fourteen was living under a bridge in London and yet he became New Zealander of the year because of his work. I can’t see you ever claiming that fame.
Where’s Loydo, Jack Dale, and the other sycophants on this post?
This one is a beauty:
“9. “At the present rate of nitrogen buildup, it’s only a matter of time before light will be filtered out of the atmosphere and none of our land will be usable.” — Ecologist Kenneth Watt”
But earth’s atmosphere is 78% nitrogen and has been for millions of years. Obviously Kenneth Watt (idiot) is no relation to Anthony Watts (smart dude).