NOAA Relies on ‘Russian Collusion’ to Claim January Was Hottest Month on Record

Other data shows the USA wasn’t even close to a record.

By Anthony Watts

In a report generating substantial media attention this month, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) claimed January 2020 was the hottest January on record. In reality, the claim relies on substantial speculation, dubious reporting methods, and a large, very suspicious, extremely warm reported heat patch covering most of Russia.

The January 2020 Climate Assessment Report, released by NOAA’s National Center for Environmental Information (NCEI), was accompanied by a map showing a giant red menace of extraordinary asserted warmth extending from the Russian border with Poland well into Siberia. Yet, the asserted hot spot appears nowhere else.

clip_image002

Figure 1: Map of temperature departure provided by NOAA/NCEII. Note the huge red spot over Russia.

Meanwhile, in the United States, Alaska was abnormally cold, and the contiguous United States wasn’t even close to a record.

While the media attempt to spin the NOAA announcement as more “proof” of a climate crisis, there are a few things to consider. First and foremost, January is the coldest month of the year for much of the Northern Hemisphere. You likely won’t find many people complaining that a particular January was warmer than usual. This is especially the case in Russia and Siberia.

January in Moscow is typically the coldest month of the year. Daytime high temperatures average 20°F, with average lows of 9°F. In Siberia, it is even worse. The Siberian city of Oymyakon, Russia, reached 88°F below zero (-66.67°C) in January 2018. The big red Russian “hot spot” in NOAA’s January temperature map simply shows Russia remained very, very cold, but not as excruciatingly cold as usual.

Yet, the Russian temperature data was the primary driver behind the asserted global January temperature record. This begs the question, why would Russia – and Russia alone – have such an unusual, giant red spot of unusual warmth compared to the rest of the world? Is Russia trying to influence and interfere with global climate data along with American elections?

Hardly, and the answer may be very simple and have little to do with climate change. In 2008, I identified a possible source for similarly odd reported warmth during the preceding Russian winter: Russian central-heating steam pipes.

Now before you say, “How could that possibly affect global temperature?” let’s take a closer look.

clip_image004

Figure 2: Steam generation plant and steam distribution pipes for central heating in the Russian village of Oymyakon Image credit: Amos Chapple via Radio Free Europe

In most of Russia, and especially in Siberia, a central power plant pipes steam via overhead pipes within towns and villages. The steam goes to radiators in homes to provide warmth during the brutally cold winters. The waste heat from these heating systems is dispersed throughout the town. Official temperatures are also measured in these same towns, meaning that waste heat raises the reported temperature above what it would normally be.

When you have much of the Russian nation using this inefficient central heating scheme, dumping huge amount of waste heat into the local atmosphere, you end up with a nationwide temperature anomaly – which might well explain the great temperature “red spot” over Russia and Siberia that appears almost every winter.

A similar effect happens in Barrow, Alaska, a town that is dependent on heating to survive the winter, just like towns in northern Russia. Science has found that Barrow has become its own Urban Heat Island (UHI) during winter. In a peer-reviewed study published in the International Journal of Climatology, “The Urban Heat Island in Winter at Barrow, Alaska,” researchers found Barrow’s urban heat island to create local temperatures an average of 3.96°F warmer that would otherwise be the case. Notably, this artificial heat signal was largest during the winter, when the indoor heating requirements for the town were greatest to compensate the cold, outside air.

It appears that the “warmest ever” January might simply have been influenced by Russian temperature data warmed up by waste heat. Maybe the U.S. House of Representatives will start an inquiry into Russian collusion to interfere with global temperature data and climate change legislation – but don’t hold your breath.


Anthony Watts (awatts@heartland.org) is a former television meteorologist and Senior Fellow for Environment and Climate for The Heartland Institute. He operates the most viewed website on climate in the world, WattsUpWithThat.com

.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

192 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
John Tillman
February 29, 2020 8:11 am

Well done!

But “begging the question” is the name of the logical fallacy of assuming what one is attempting to prove. It does not mean “raising the question”, although that misuse is increasingly common. Unfortunately.

This Siberian heating system could even affect satellite observations of tropospheric thermal radiation. To combat global warming and conserve fossil fuels, Russia should be encouraged to invest in decentralized heating systems.

John Tillman
Reply to  John Tillman
February 29, 2020 8:32 am

Much of CACA begs the question. GIGO models show what they’re programmed to find.

Observer
Reply to  John Tillman
February 29, 2020 10:10 am

“But “begging the question” is the name of the logical fallacy of assuming what one is attempting to prove. It does not mean “raising the question”…”

Good spot. Although trivial with regards to the (excellent) point Anthony is making, this kind of thing does incline many people to conflate the writer’s expertise in English with their expertise in whatever subject it is they’re writing about.

Like when Mr. Middleton deploys his puerile “schist” pun. It spoils everything else in his article. Which is a shame, because many of his analyses are fantastic.

But he won’t be told…

Reply to  Observer
February 29, 2020 4:15 pm

Sigh. Perhaps David should pull out some of the other phrases that he uses among his geologist peers, and give you a good reason to be offended.

Lord knows that I could pull some from my own IT field, but Anthony would ban me for life.

Observer
Reply to  Writing Observer
February 29, 2020 5:40 pm

With regards to Middleton, it’s not a matter of “offense”. It’s a matter of maintaining credibility amongst your target audience… which, presumably, is not people like us, who already believe that AGW alarmism is unwarranted.

If you want to persuade people that your contrarian point of view is worth considering, you don’t do this by (the verbal equivalent of) wearing a tin-foil hat and pushing a shopping cart full of incunabula.

PeterW
Reply to  Observer
February 29, 2020 7:37 pm

Observer…

The validity of your criticism becomes less apparent when you couch it in hyperbolic terms.

Pots, kettles, etc…..

TRM
Reply to  Writing Observer
February 29, 2020 6:55 pm

But Monty Python quotes are mandatory 🙂

MarkW
Reply to  Observer
February 29, 2020 6:49 pm

Not everyone is as closed minded as you make yourself appear to be.

Reply to  MarkW
March 1, 2020 6:54 am

Excellent summation regarding “observer’s” puerile selfish comments.
Thanks MarkW.

Patvann
Reply to  Observer
February 29, 2020 9:07 pm

Lighten-up Francis.
Mr. M needs no scolding from anyone, especially from someone who so readily gets his underwear in bundle over one silly word within his always FANTASTIC analyses.

Additionally, good job pointing out trivialities of our host’s article, but I’m not really feeling “conflated” about Anthony’s expertise…

-Talk about bullschist…

Reply to  Observer
March 1, 2020 6:52 am

“Observer February 29, 2020 at 10:10 am
…Like when Mr. Middleton deploys his puerile “schist” pun. It spoils everything else in his article. Which is a shame, because many of his analyses are fantastic.
But he won’t be told…

Just like you rarely tell David how good his articles are?

I do not consider use of “schist”. Frequent use of the word that schist replaces is puerile.
As is sniping with specious claims centered on your personal opinion, not facts or reality.

From Merriam Webster:

“Begging the question means “to elicit a specific question as a reaction or response”

Which directly contradicts your false strawman; as “begging the question” does “raise” the question.

Greg
Reply to  ATheoK
March 1, 2020 12:12 pm

The misunderstanding and mis-use of this expression has now apparently gained itself a place in Merriam.

A quick search finds near unanimous support for its original meaning of a logical fallacy.

https://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/beg-the-question.html

This is almost the opposite of the commonly understood ‘beg that the question be asked’ meaning in that it means ’cause the question not be asked’.

MarkW
Reply to  John Tillman
February 29, 2020 10:14 am

At least the satellites don’t measure just the towns, and use that one reading to cover 1000s of square kilometers.

Another point is that the global warming activists often complain that the satellites don’t measure the surface. This might be an instance where measuring several thousand feet up might be a good thing.

Reply to  MarkW
February 29, 2020 11:12 am

“At least the satellites don’t measure just the towns”
UAH also reported the equal warmest January in their record (equal with 2016).

COSMIC007
Reply to  Nick Stokes
February 29, 2020 2:28 pm

Good. A whole .50 warmer. Yay. I can finally retire to Siberia in comfort!

MarkW
Reply to  Nick Stokes
February 29, 2020 6:50 pm

The adjustments used by UAH are suspect. At best.

Greg
Reply to  MarkW
March 1, 2020 12:17 pm

They are a lot less suspect than everybody else’s adjustments. What’s your specific problem?

There is certainly no hint of the Russia/Poland hot spot so that does support the idea that it is ground level pollution of the data.

comment image

Reply to  Nick Stokes
March 1, 2020 4:33 am

1.) Due to the inability of very cold air to hold moisture, injecting a tiny (by tropical standards) amount of moisture at northern latitudes results in a disproportionate spike in dew points and temperature. This year has seen a pattern that poured mild and moist air west-to-east along the Siberian coast, spiking temperatures on the Siberian side of the Pole.

2.) As a side note, such a west-to-east flow in the north tends to create an east-to-west backwash to the south. If you look at the UAH map you will see below normal temperatures from China all the way to =North Africa. (White is below normal). There were record snows in Kazakhstan and northern Saudi Arabia. It should be noted at lower latitudes air is more able to hold moisture so the moisture has less of an effect on temperature.

jim hogg
Reply to  John Tillman
February 29, 2020 1:38 pm

Language evolves constantly, and these days “begging the question” is used commonly and intelligibly in the none formal way. I think it passed the acceptability threshold years ago.

Roger Knights
Reply to  jim hogg
February 29, 2020 3:20 pm

“Language evolves constantly, and these days “begging the question” is used commonly and intelligibly in the none formal way. I think it passed the acceptability threshold years ago.”
————–

“Winston tastes good like a cigarette should,” eh?

PeterW
Reply to  jim hogg
February 29, 2020 7:43 pm

Jim.

Common error does not make correct.

Language is a tool of communication.
It can only communicate accurately when it is used with precision, AND according to rules agreed to by both parties.

You do not get to use it improperly and then claim that the fault is with the hearer, if you have not first obtained his agreement to the new usage.

kgbgb
Reply to  jim hogg
March 2, 2020 8:45 am

Yes, language does change, and there is no point opposing new usages just because they are new. But when a new usage reduces the expressive power of the language, it is worth opposing it. This one certainly does.

The expression ‘to beg the question’ used to have one clear meaning — to engage in the logical fallacy of assuming what was to be proved. It was a really useful concept in logic, mathematics, philosophy and rhetoric, and it allowed the use of a single verbal phrase where otherwise you would have to have a complicated subordinate clause every time you mentioned the concept. A significant part of my doctoral thesis, written in the early 1980s, examined which side was begging the question in a certain dispute in the Philosophy of Mind. I was able to use the phrase without explanation, confident that most potential readers would be familiar with it, and that any who were not would have no problem looking it up.

Now that ignorant people replace all verbs immediately preceding the phrase ‘the question’ with the verb ‘beg’, we have two ways of expressing all those other concepts concisely, but no way of doing so for the original one! I shudder to think what a reader in the future will make of my thesis if people don’t keep reminding others of the correct meaning of the phrase.

Hivemind
Reply to  John Tillman
February 29, 2020 9:02 pm

In Russia, the source of steam was typically waste heat from electricity generation. However, I would think that it would work better if the pipes were buried several metres down for better insulation from the soil.

Phil Rae
Reply to  Hivemind
March 1, 2020 6:24 am

Permafrost, perhaps!

The heating pipes would melt the ice, destabilise the foundations and cause subsidence, if buried!

weatherdude
February 29, 2020 8:16 am

https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/hadobs/hadcrut4/data/current/time_series/HadCRUT.4.6.0.0.monthly_ns_avg.txt

Even the HadCRUT data shows that the el Nino years 2015 and 16 had higher anomalies. And you have to suspect the UK is fudging that data as much as they can.

Reply to  weatherdude
March 1, 2020 2:53 pm

January 2015 and 2016 were both cooler in HadCRUT than Jan 2020 according to your own link. Jan 2020 is the warmest January in the HadCRUT record. Not sure where you’re coming from.

Sunny
February 29, 2020 8:16 am

Hottest 😂 Come to england, its absolutely freezing, even today we had a little bit of sun, and now its cold enough to hurt your chest when breathing…

Greta was over here speaking the same old repetitive rubbish, she said change is coming, Hopefully its the sun and dome heat lol

BCBill
Reply to  Sunny
February 29, 2020 9:36 am

I have noticed through many decades of experience that breathing becomes difficult at – 40 or so. The UK must be suffering exceptional cold!

Reply to  BCBill
February 29, 2020 10:02 am

It depends on the person and the humidity too.
Weather’s blooming horrible here today, UK.

Anthony Banton
Reply to  BCBill
February 29, 2020 10:10 am

No it’s not, it’s actually still on the mild side ….

comment image

I think what he/she is experiencing is wind-chill which is not a temperature

Reply to  Anthony Banton
February 29, 2020 11:32 am

Trust me, it’s blowing a gale and sporadically deluging.
Strange for people to think they know more about what’s outside my window than I do.
Such trust in official reports over actual reports is slightly scary.

Anthony Banton
Reply to  M Courtney
February 29, 2020 12:06 pm

M Courtney:
I can’t see where an actual temperature for today was stated, so there was no “actual” report given.
A “feels-like” report is not a temperature as it incorporates the effect of wind-chill on the body, which in any case is not a thermometer.

FYI: afternoon temps in England today were in the range +3 to +8C.

https://www.wetterzentrale.de/en/observations.php?map=20&model=SYNOP&var=5&time=15&h=0#mapref

BTW: I live in Lincolnshire.

Scissor
Reply to  BCBill
February 29, 2020 2:05 pm

C or F?

Reply to  Sunny
February 29, 2020 11:16 am

“Come to england, its absolutely freezing”

Britain had the second warmest January on record.

Leedschris
Reply to  Nick Stokes
February 29, 2020 11:51 am

Not sure about Britain’s second warmest January? That would put it at odds with the Central England Temperature – the longest temperature series in the World and representative of the central part of the island of Great Britain. January 2020 was the 11th equal warmest in that series and with a mean of 6,4C was 1.1C cooler than the warmest January in the record, which is 1916, with a mean temperature of 7.5C. Since 1990 there have been three warmer Januaries

Hivemind
Reply to  Leedschris
February 29, 2020 9:08 pm

You’re confusing real data, aka facts, with the narrative the warmistas are pushing on the world. In an obviously coordinated effort the Australian BOM has also mad the usual announcements to push the believers over that cliff like a bunch of lemmings.

LeedsChris
Reply to  Nick Stokes
February 29, 2020 11:53 am

Your reference is to a 2007 newspaper report, NOT 2020!!!

Reply to  LeedsChris
February 29, 2020 12:18 pm

Oops, careless googling. You’re right, it was the sixth warmest.

COSMIC007
Reply to  Nick Stokes
February 29, 2020 2:32 pm

So we better decimate society and make it colder, right Nick? You believe we should make it colder and that we can through legislation and control, right Nick? Fool.

Reply to  Nick Stokes
February 29, 2020 3:08 pm

We shouldn’t be so sure of our statements on which supposed record is broken until the Oz Bureau Of Manipulation rearranges today’s temperatures in 40 or 50 years time.

MrGrimNasty
Reply to  Nick Stokes
February 29, 2020 11:54 am

CET says 14th, tied with 1736 and 1835, hardly worrying is it.

The Met Office doesn’t use a consistent set of data or any transparent method for the whole of the country, and switches between different sets of records to suit its agenda. The CET is the only remotely scientifically rigorous measure.

Going further back, does Pepys really need another outing:-

Monday 21 January 1660/61

“It is strange what weather we have had all this winter; no cold at all; but the ways are dusty, and the flyes fly up and down, and the rose-bushes are full of leaves, such a time of the year as was never known in this world before here.”

There is nothing unusual about the current climate or any unnaturally fast variation, as I’m sure you know in your heart.

On the other hand, in my opinion it has been unusually mild in Russia, and I wouldn’t be surprised if it was one of the mildest there in recent years (still icy cold though).

Mr.
Reply to  Nick Stokes
February 29, 2020 12:00 pm

Nick, I don’t get why you linked to a Jan 2007 story, saying that the (then current) month was the warmest average after 1921.
?

Reply to  Mr.
February 29, 2020 12:20 pm

Noted above – an error. It was only the sixth warmest. Still not “absolutely freezing”.

Darren Porter
Reply to  Nick Stokes
February 29, 2020 6:05 pm

Nick knows full well that South Australia had one if it’s coldest Summers on record. December may have been hot but January and February were extremely mild

Reply to  Nick Stokes
February 29, 2020 6:54 pm

“South Australia had one if it’s coldest Summers on record.”
Said with no backing, and as so often then, just not true. Max temperatures for SA are plotted here. 2018/9 was record high; 2019/20 was fourth highest in the record. On daily mean temp, it was fifth highest.

Or if you prefer Adelaine data, December was very hot; average max (West T^errace/a>) was 30.6°C vs normal 26.9°C. January was about average, at 28.7°C vs normal 28.6. Only February was cooler than average, at 26.4°C vs average 28.6.

LdB
Reply to  Nick Stokes
February 29, 2020 8:18 pm

Follow the detail in Nicks link of the source of the data and you end up here
http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/data/acorn-sat/
It’s acorn 2 data.
Anyone got a link to the older product acorn1 or even raw.

I would like to see the same chart without the acorn2 adjustments.

Reply to  Nick Stokes
February 29, 2020 8:28 pm

“Anyone got a link to the older product acorn1 or even raw.”

The Adelaide data is AWS, straight from the instrument.

Does anyone have anything to support the original claim that “South Australia had one of it’s coldest Summers on record”?

WXcycles
Reply to  Nick Stokes
February 29, 2020 9:26 pm

“ … Does anyone have anything to support the original claim that “South Australia had one of it’s coldest Summers on record”? …”

Don’t know about the whole Summer, I don’t live there, but SA did have one of the coldest mid-Summer days on record in January:

https://www.weatherzone.com.au/news/adelaide-almost-registers-coldest-january-day-on-record/530835

LdB
Reply to  Nick Stokes
February 29, 2020 10:59 pm

Equally do you have anything to support that it was in the normal range?

COSMIC007
Reply to  Nick Stokes
February 29, 2020 2:30 pm

Good for them. Lucky people.

Editor
Reply to  Nick Stokes
March 1, 2020 9:26 am

It was so warm in England that, according to CET, it was not even as warm as 1686!

https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/hadobs/hadcet/mly_cet_mean_sort.txt

michael hart
February 29, 2020 8:19 am

Probably just another case of krig-yourself-hotter.

Alasdair gray
February 29, 2020 8:29 am

What does the UAH record show. I would believe that over land based thermometers

Reply to  Alasdair gray
March 1, 2020 2:55 pm

UAH shows joint warmest January on record globally.

Richard M
February 29, 2020 8:30 am

The UAH temperature map for January shows a couple of warm areas including one over Russia. However, it looks nothing like the surface map shown.

https://www.nsstc.uah.edu/climate/2020/january2020/GTR_202001Jan_1.pdf

Reply to  Richard M
February 29, 2020 8:55 am

Just wondering – that map is so-called anomalies, delta-Temps, above is Temp.
Funny, above has grey “missing data” regions. The delta-Temps have no missing data.

And as Pres. Putin said they signed the Paris Accord, because of concern about entire cities on Permafrost.
Are they likely themselves to melt that, or have they other data?

COSMIC007
Reply to  bonbon
February 29, 2020 2:34 pm

And through legislation they will make it colder. IE control the weather. Idiots.

Bloke down the pub
Reply to  bonbon
March 1, 2020 2:00 am

Anthony, as pointed out here, the map is of temp anomaly. As communal heating has been used since the Soviet era, wouldn’t any waste heat already show up in the climate norms and therefore not create an anomaly?

ironargonaut
Reply to  Richard M
February 29, 2020 8:55 am

It does look quite similar if you look at the scales. The map mentioned here only goes up to part of the satellite map scale. So you can’t compare color to color without translating. Although this shifts the warm spot more to Scandinavia

Richard M
Reply to  ironargonaut
February 29, 2020 9:21 am

It looks like there were a couple of warm areas in/near Russia and over by Scandinavia. My guess is the surface data is infilled to create the massive warm area we see in the map. As a result it far exceeds reality.

Anthony Banton
Reply to  Richard M
February 29, 2020 10:29 am

No they are not infilled as Nick Stokes shows here ….

https://moyhu.blogspot.com/p/blog-page_24.html

Matt G
Reply to  Richard M
March 1, 2020 8:59 am

There are only about 2012 stations used for entire planet.

Over Russia and Siberia there are station gaps in area larger than England and Scotland put together, so of course it is infilled. The smallest infill being 250km otherwise Nick’s would also show these gaps.

https://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/station_data_v3/

Reply to  Richard M
March 1, 2020 5:44 pm

“There are only about 2012 stations used for entire planet”

No, that was V3. V4 has about 10000 in a typical recent month (9912 in Jan 2020, but they are still coming in).

Matt G
Reply to  Richard M
March 3, 2020 11:03 am

This is the link to version 4 and it does looks like there are now about 20,000 stations with 10,000+ alone over North America. Therefore an increases of about 10 times more, but mainly from high density in the usual areas.

https://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/station_data_v4/

David Blenkinsop
Reply to  Richard M
February 29, 2020 9:06 am

Ah, thanks, Richard M, for that University of Alabama anomaly map for “January 2020, lower troposphere”.

Quite different from the NOAA land temperature graph, isn’t it?

Anthony Banton
Reply to  David Blenkinsop
February 29, 2020 9:39 am

Indeed – As one would expect, as UAH LT is an averaged atmospheric temp, and not the surface.
Surface temps in Jan over Russia are dominated by overlying surface inversions (caused by strong surface cooling from snow cover).
Satellites cannot ‘see’ that.

Latitude
Reply to  Anthony Banton
February 29, 2020 11:38 am

..or just the fact there are no urban thermometers in Siberia

John McClure
Reply to  Latitude
February 29, 2020 12:09 pm

Latitude,
Well done, first intelligent comment.

IMHO, Anthony is once again pointing to NOAA’s abuse of data to support political funding for its unscientific endeavors.

Thankfully, we don’t have to pay for the BBC crap – or are we in our own country?

Anthony Banton
Reply to  Latitude
February 29, 2020 12:25 pm

There are plenty of thermometers in Siberia ….

https://moyhu.blogspot.com/p/blog-page_24.html

Peter
February 29, 2020 8:33 am

If the Russians do this every year, why would this have any influence on the year by year data?

Don Jindra
Reply to  Peter
February 29, 2020 8:45 am

“If the Russians do this every year, why would this have any influence on the year by year data?”

Exactly.

Eoin Mc
Reply to  Don Jindra
February 29, 2020 9:39 am

This whataboutery on the rationale for the Russian climate data seems valid enough but it presumes a static heating system in the centralised Russian town heating systems. The opposite whataboutery from your (apparent) climate alarmistas has been completely absent during the tsunami of scare stories over the last decade. Climate alarmist have little to worry about. Apart from the heroic work of the likes Of Anthony Watts et al in the climate science sceptic cohort the entire media in the First World – excepting Fox and Sky Australia – are the Boys Crying Wolf for the climate alarmist industry.

MarkW
Reply to  Don Jindra
February 29, 2020 10:17 am

So long as it’s wrong regularly, it’s ok?

Michael
Reply to  Don Jindra
February 29, 2020 3:33 pm

Honestly, this article should be an embarrassment to all WUWT readers. This simply gives the CO2 delusionalist cult an easy target to dismiss the many good articles here.

Russia was warm this winter, demonstrably. Just look at Russian youtube channels from Vladivostok , all through very remote rural Russia (Survival Russia – https://www.youtube.com/user/Moscowprepper ) to the Urals, to cities like SPb (“Pulse of the City” https://youtu.be/Uw-r8qjrpEk )
), to the Russian institute if science’s excellent and often long temperature records https://www.sbras.ru/en/organization/2395
*RUSSIAN HISTORIC TEMPERATURE / WEATHER DATA* https://cdiac.ess-dive.lbl.gov/ndps/russia_daily518.html
https://cdiac.ess-dive.lbl.gov/ftp/russia_daily/ )
– it’s simply a winter like they had in the 1870s. It is warm, but one season. So what?

But the number of infantile unsound logic in this utterly ideoligical, speculative , unscientic, unsound logic article shows you just how ordinary the thinking and rationalising bias is here. So silly i should not have to parse it for you.

John Tillman
Reply to  Peter
February 29, 2020 8:59 am

When it’s colder, they need to heat more, which means more waste heat released in cities.

MarkW
Reply to  John Tillman
February 29, 2020 10:18 am

When the economy is better, they also heat more.

Reply to  John Tillman
February 29, 2020 11:02 am

“When it’s colder, they need to heat more”

But it was very warm in January.

Jeroen
Reply to  Nick Stokes
February 29, 2020 1:41 pm

The Russians in small towns don’t use thermostats. The heat from their system is just always there. Did you know in some french block buildings the heating is completely turned off in some summer months. So during cold summers people buy electric heating appliances. Very efficient right.

Reply to  Jeroen
February 29, 2020 3:26 pm

“The heat from their system is just always there.”
So how does that explain that January was warmer than past Januarys?

MarkW
Reply to  Jeroen
February 29, 2020 6:54 pm

Anthony explained at least part of it in the above article.

COSMIC007
Reply to  Nick Stokes
February 29, 2020 2:37 pm

Very warm? Um in Siberia RIGHT NOW the temps are in the -30F to -46F range. Warmer by 2-3 degrees would make it -27F to -43F you disgusting liar.

Reply to  Nick Stokes
February 29, 2020 3:54 pm

Nick, did you see the discussion, above, about “begging the question”?

MarkW
Reply to  Nick Stokes
February 29, 2020 6:53 pm

Talk about your circular logic.

David Blenkinsop
February 29, 2020 8:44 am

That is indeed a somewhat strange looking “January departure from average” map that NOAA has put out!

So they are saying that much of central Siberia is ‘off the scale’ to the right on this ‘anomaly’ map, more than 5 degrees C above normal for January, along with much of central Eastern Europe as such, in the same condition?

If there is any sort of large scale reality to this, maybe the cause should be found in, you know, weather, shifting wind patterns, etc.?

Curious George
Reply to  David Blenkinsop
February 29, 2020 9:20 am

Make no mistake. This is not weather as you suggest; this is CLIMATE 🙂

Matt G
Reply to  David Blenkinsop
March 1, 2020 2:22 pm

It’s a dominate positive NAO phase during winter that causes this persistent warm pattern over Europe and Russia etc.

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-ajV48O6P-UY/UcUGj76KloI/AAAAAAAAVqo/FKK_fHtrCew/s1600/NAO2.jpg

Another winter the NAO will be less dominate positive and the temperature profile will be different again.

ralfellis
February 29, 2020 8:48 am

When I was in Russia (Moscow and Kirov) some 15 years ago, they had not invented the thermostat. I kid you not – none of the flats had thermostats, so room temperature was adjusted by opening the windows (-25 degrees c outside). Never seen such an inefficient system.

Ralph

John Tillman
Reply to  ralfellis
February 29, 2020 9:01 am

Russia has lots of oil and gas. They need to modernize their heating systems. Legacy of the communism so beloved by the Democrat front runner.

Crispin in Waterloo
Reply to  ralfellis
February 29, 2020 10:41 am

ralfellis

The temperature in most of the rooms is controlled by turning the little controller on the radiator called a “valve”. This sets the flow rate through the radiator. Some have an air temperature sensor built in.

I have stayed in numerous rooms heated by such district heating systems (as they are properly termed) and they are extremely efficient. There is a lot of heat wasted from the system overall, but nothing like what is wasted from a coal-fired power plant in the USA or Canada.

The system efficiency is on the order of 70-80% meaning only 20-30% of the heat available from the coal is not applied to usefully generating electricity or heating something. The outgoing temperature from the power station is about 300 C and the return temperature is usually below 15 C. The condition of the systems across the former soviet union differs.

The cost of heating an apartment attached to a district heating system is about $8 per month. The heat is sold by the Megajoule using a “heat meter”. It has a flow meter, an input and output thermocouple and an electronic logging system. They can be read remotely. The water circulating in the subsystems and individual buildings is not mixed. There are large heat exchanges separating them as the water quality is controlled carefully.

You may have heard that in W China there are many wind turbines that are not used in winter when the wind blows strongest. The reason is that the homes are heated by district heating systems that provide heat at very low cost. If they were to switch to electric heating from wind, the system would be dreadfully strained each time there was a change in the wind speed.

Bill Powers
February 29, 2020 8:58 am

Russian Collusion? Who’ya gonna call? Did anybody think to call Robert Mueller? This is nothing a special investigation can’s Obfuscate.

Never forget we wouldn’t have this Global Warming problem if it weren’t for gap tooth, Trump voting, fossil fuel burners.

Vuk
Reply to  Bill Powers
February 29, 2020 11:07 am

“Russian Collusion?”
Not the first time, Russkies did it during the Nixon presidency 1969-1971, as yo can see here
http://www.vukcevic.co.uk/69-71.htm

ironargonaut
February 29, 2020 9:06 am

Anyone who has ridden a motorcycle in cool to cold weather in rural areas can tell you UHI is real. You can literally feel the difference at approximately 0C when riding into town.

Andy Mansell
Reply to  ironargonaut
February 29, 2020 10:12 am

Absolutely- I live in ‘the sticks’, and when I pick my son up from the city centre the temperature is often 2-3 different as we get out into the wilds. Unreal.

February 29, 2020 9:20 am

I would be willing to bet money that a large part of that anomaly is just temperature from urban environments and smoothed so that it covers more land. The entire planet is covered in that map above, even places in Africa there is no data. Logically, the weather where I am at is not the same 100 miles away in any direction. The temperature in an urban environment where the thermostat is will be warmer than a rural one where no readings are available. There is a reason why NASA once said not to trust ground based temperatures.

https://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/122096963
“A report issued by the U.S. space agency NASA concluded that there has been no sign that the greenhouse effect increased global temperatures during the 1980s. Based on satellite analysis of the atmosphere between
1,500 and 6,000 metres above sea level, the report said that the study found “a seemingly random pattern of change from year to year.” While several government and university meteorologists around the world have concluded that average surface temperatures have increased significantly in recent years, the report’s authors said that their satellite analysis of the upper atmosphere is more accurate, and should be adopted as the standard way to monitor global temperature change.”

Newspaper article was April 1990.

Reply to  Wade
February 29, 2020 11:53 pm

Also, note the article about locusts the size of small sparrows.

February 29, 2020 9:25 am

My question would be that if CO2 is presumably well mixed, how would this happen if CO2 is driving surface temperature. The only logical conclusion is that CO2 is not well mixed and that an abnormal concentration of CO2 occurred at these locations. Note this would explain extra cold temps at other locations.

Anthony Banton
Reply to  Jim Gorman
February 29, 2020 9:43 am

No, it doesn’t work like that.
CO2 is well mixed, as any perusal of global monitoring station data reveals.
What you see here is not climate, rather it is weather.
However, climate provides a baseline on which weather operates.

chemman
Reply to  Anthony Banton
February 29, 2020 3:54 pm

Climate is constructed from weather data. So no it is not the baseline on which weather operates. In fact trying to reduce climate to a single temperature anomaly for the entire globe is a fools errand.

My weather station on my rural property doesn’t take into account long term climate averages it operates just fine without the data manipulation.

Anthony Banton
Reply to  chemman
February 29, 2020 4:31 pm

“ Climate is constructed from weather data. ”

Climate, as in, the average planetary energy available to “weather”.
That in simple terms is the GMST..

Reply to  Anthony Banton
March 1, 2020 6:35 am

You are equivocating. If CO2 is the primary gas causing heating on a daily basis then it should also “control” weather. If you try to argue otherwise you are denying CO2 is a control knob and other things are part of the equation.

I wonder what satellites show for outgoing radiation at this location.

les
February 29, 2020 9:34 am

The huge red spot heat is from Russian troll farms trying to influence the US election

LdB
Reply to  les
February 29, 2020 11:26 pm

Perhaps Mosher setup bit coin miners there to use that cheap Russian gas.

Vuk
February 29, 2020 9:38 am

Cold N. America warm Siberia is normal, it is what the Earth’s climate is like for the most of the time, but we are in an inter-glacial which is one of short interludes during the Ice Age.
This map shows the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) Eurasian Ice Sheet according to Svendsen et al. (2004)
comment image
“The last glacial began around 120 000 years ago. One massive ice sheet, more than 3 kilometres thick in places, grew in fits and starts until it covered almost all of Canada and stretched down as far as Manhattan. Then, 20 000 years ago, a great thaw began. Over the following 10 000 years, the average global temperature rose by 3.5° C and most of the ice melted. ”
We might be reaching climate tipping point, and could be far worse than previously thought.

David L Hagen
February 29, 2020 9:48 am

Polar vortex? Norway to Finland also reports higher temperatures

Temperatures in Europe were 0.2C higher than the previous warmest January for the continent – recorded in 2007, and it has been 3.1C warmer than the average January in the period 1981-2010. …Norway recorded its hottest January day since records began, with a reading of 19C – more than 25C above the monthly average – measured in the village of Sunndalsora, which is around 250 miles north of Oslo. . . .But in some areas there was colder weather, and even larger amounts of sea ice than in recent years – though less in other areas…. “Temperatures were substantially below average over Alaska and north-western Canada, and over Baffin and Ellesmere Islands in north-eastern Canada,” Copernicus said.

January 2020 was the warmest since records began
https://www.independent.co.uk/environment/january-temperature-record-warmest-ever-winter-europe-norway-latest-a9320956.html

Hugs
Reply to  David L Hagen
February 29, 2020 11:00 am

Jet stream.

The weather in Europe has been anomalously windy, wind bringing usually very cold areas nearer to North Atlantic +2°C. Record, who knows, but really mild winter. Heaven knows what the spring will be, probably not so warm.

Anthony Banton
February 29, 2020 9:50 am

The strong warm anomaly over Russia this winter is no surprise given the marked positive NAO.
Persistent and often strong Atlantic maritime winds penetrating across Europe and into Russia.
+ Strong SPV curtailing Arctic air migration.
In short weather.

Joe Armstrong
February 29, 2020 9:53 am

In his 20090 book, Heaven and Earth, Chapter 7 – Air, Ian Plimer talks about impacts both for stations and human processes in Russia, particularly Siberia that showed apparent warming.

Bob boder
Reply to  Joe Armstrong
February 29, 2020 10:30 am

Wow in another 19 centuries I will have it on my reading list

Lewis P Buckingham
Reply to  Bob boder
February 29, 2020 2:27 pm

Well it opened my eyes to the geological and historical argument.
Warming is on balance good for mankind.
CO2 has never in the Earth’s geological history caused runaway heating.

tty
February 29, 2020 9:57 am

Northern Europe and Western Russia have indeed had an extremely mild winter this year, but not Siberia as far as I am aware. And Greenland has been quite remarkably cold and so has Svalbard. Sea-ice in the Barents Sea and the Bering Sea is at near-record levels.

Ouluman
February 29, 2020 10:03 am

In northern Finland it has been exceptionally warm this winter. First time in 20 years that all snow melted in January here in Oulu. But -26c yesterday and gloriously cold and sunny. It’s weather and records are always to be broken. At midsummer we have had snowstorms quite often!

February 29, 2020 10:06 am

Of course the Russians will want to ‘upset the apple cart’. Climate Change (and Xtinction Rebellion probably through funding) is a Marxist construct filtrated through supporters working in places where they can have an influence, like Universities and schools, spreading their ‘propaganda’ from within to further their agenda of destabilising capitalist States (where they will have to invest trillions of dollars into totally unnecessary actions) whilst they, Russia, continue to carry on as normal, such as using their coal powered stations. (Instead of attacking from the outside, work from in (as close to the heart as possible) to out).
I await, with interest what reaction cooler temperature changes, brought about by the change from El Nino to La Nina, will be, possibly due before the end of the year. What excuse/s then?

kgbgb
Reply to  JoHo
March 2, 2020 10:48 am

Russia these days is at least as much a ‘capitalist state’ as are those in the West. In fact, Marxism is now much more influential in the West than in Russia. The Russians had it imposed on them by a hostile elite in the misnamed “Russian Revolution” of 1917, compromised with it for a while, and threw it off in the genuine Russian Revolution of 1991. They have certainly learned the lesson that, I fear, the West might have to learn over the next couple of generations.
If Russians were actively hostile to the West, they might wish to encourage Marxist disruption over here to remove a competitor as you suggest, despite having rejected Marxism themselves. But, from my reading of Russian politics, far from being hostile, they would like a co-operative, win-win relationship with Western countries. It is the insistence of the Western oligarchy that Russia accept a subordinate position that causes the friction – though that’s not how it’s presented in the West’s mainstream media, of course.

MarkW
February 29, 2020 10:12 am

The question remains, why do the boffins at NOAA readily accept such obviously erroneous data?

Every time there is an anomalous low reading, they bend over backwards to find a reason to adjust the data upwards. When the anomaly is hot, no questions asked.

Antero Ollila
February 29, 2020 10:12 am

Stay calm. There are UAH temperature measurements still intact. After two days we will get report from Roy Spencer what is the most reliable global temperature for January. Maybe you have noticed that the temperatures have been exceptionally high. I do not think that leaking Russian central heating pipes could be a cause.

Reply to  Antero Ollila
February 29, 2020 10:57 am

“After two days we will get report from Roy Spencer what is the most reliable global temperature for January.”

Roy’s report for January came out on February 5th. And yes, it was the equal warmest January in his record (equalled by Jan 2016).

And yes, I don’t think those productive pipes were warming the entire lower troposphere.

Babsy
Reply to  Nick Stokes
February 29, 2020 12:32 pm

Of course it is CO2 that causes the anomaly. All one has to do is place a Magic Molecule detector next to a thermometer and you can watch the effect of the evil gas on the temperature. In real time!

GregK
Reply to  Nick Stokes
February 29, 2020 9:30 pm

Nick Stokes …”Does anyone have anything to support the original claim that “South Australia had one of it’s coldest Summers on record ? ”

Freom BOM…

Adelaide airport Mean max Feb 2020 25.5C
Average Feb Max [1955-2020] 28.1C

Mount Gambier Mean max Feb 2020 23.5C
Average Feb max [1942-2020] 25.3C

Coober Pedy Mean Max Feb 2020 33.9C
Average Feb Max [1994-2020] 35.6C

Doesn’t prove that SA summer was one of coldest on record but suggests it wasn’t close to record warmth

Anthony Banton
Reply to  Antero Ollila
February 29, 2020 11:00 am

“After two days we will get report from Roy Spencer what is the most reliable global temperature for January. ”

They are out and have been for weeks.
There is a link upthread.

February 29, 2020 10:48 am

Ahh….”Central Planning” in the 70’s and 80’s allocated fuel supplies to Russian towns based on their weather station average temperature readings from the previous year….so at one time, towns would report a few degrees lower daily temperatures so that they would receive more allotment. When the government ceased that policy, mostly due to conversion of central heating systems to natural gas, many weather stations showed “global warming”….hmmm…. And a few thousand weather stations were shut down as “no longer required” in the 1990’s. We are now likely seeing a change to electronic thermometers at weather stations and the old thermometers that happily used to read “low side” are being phased out.
At least that’s what I think is a possibility…..Cue in Mosh’s “it makes no difference to Berkeley…” meme.

Zig Zag Wanderer
Reply to  DMacKenzie
February 29, 2020 12:50 pm

Exactly.

I think I learned this on this site over 10 years ago. I can’t believe that anyone thinks the data from the USSR is any more valid than data from China these days.

paul courtney
February 29, 2020 10:49 am

Dear Mr. Watts: The House would launch it yesterday if you alleged the Ruskies were doing this to help Trump. We had a two year spec. counsel who had to step around piles of “Russian collusion” with Hillary in a desperate, and ultimately unsuccessful, search for Russians working with Trump. Mueller indicted a few guys named Ivan in the least-funny part of the whole insane affair, but the progressive press understood, and was only interested in a specific Russian action. Let’s tell ’em this Russian “heat” zone is hurting Joe Biden, and your investigation gets launched!