UK Govt Committee: End All Private Vehicle Ownership Because Climate Change

Guest essay by Eric Worrall

h/t JoNova; Even EVs like Tesla are not safe from this new demand from the green British Conservative Government.

Ditch cars to meet climate change targets, say MPs
By Roger Harrabin
BBC environment analyst
22 August 2019

People will have to get out of their cars if the UK is to meet its climate change targets, MPs say.

The Science and Technology Select Committee says technology alone cannot solve the problem of greenhouse gas emissions from transport.

It says the government cannot achieve sufficient emissions cuts by swapping existing vehicles for cleaner versions. 

The government said it would consider the committee’s findings.

In its report, the committee said: “In the long-term, widespread personal vehicle ownership does not appear to be compatible with significant decarbonisation.”

It echoes a report from an Oxford-based group of academics who warned that even electric cars produce pollution through their tyres and brakes.

Read more: https://www.bbc.com/news/business-49425402

From the government press release;

Government’s target for ‘net-zero’ by 2050 undeliverable unless clean growth policies introduced

Plan for reducing vehicle emissions: The Government must bring forward the date of its proposed ban on the sales of new ‘conventional’ cars and vans to 2035 at the latest, and ensure that it covers hybrids too. In the near-term, the Government must reconsider the fiscal incentives for consumers to purchase both new and used vehicle models with lower emissions. The Government should also work with public services and owners of public land, such as schools and hospitals, to accelerate the deployment of electric vehicle chargepoints, and introduce measures to ensure that chargepoints are interoperable, compatible with a smart energy system, reliable, and provide real-time information on their current functionality. Although ultra-low emissions vehicles generate very little emissions during use, their manufacture generates substantial emissions. In the long-term, widespread personal vehicle ownership therefore does not appear to be compatible with significant decarbonisation. The Government should not aim to achieve emissions reductions simply by replacing existing vehicles with lower-emissions versions.

Read more: https://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/science-and-technology-committee/news-parliament-2017/clean-growth-report-published-17-19/

If you ever attempted to get anywhere by British public transport you would know how absurd and out of touch this demand is.

Sure, getting about on the London metro underground is easy enough, but there are vast swathes of the country, even in the home counties close to London, where public transport, if available, is expensive, slow and unreliable.

When I lived in Britain I was approached on more than one occasion in London and elsewhere by groups of gentlemen hanging around public transport terminals, who seemed to want me to share the contents of my wallet with them. Though to be fair, after vigorous discussion, everyone always agreed that I could keep my money.

No remotely plausible investment in British public transport would replace the convenience, safety and accessibility of private vehicle ownership.

Of course if this policy is implemented, politicians and other important people would still enjoy a chauffeured limousine service; the prohibition will only affect private ownership of vehicles.

3 2 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

127 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
August 23, 2019 5:20 pm

In 1948, UK, just finished my 3 1/2 year Army service, bought a sports bicycle , 9 miles to work, we lived in the country, soon got a ex. army Enfield motor cycle, by 1957 now better off bought our first car. Now at 92 legs not good enough to drive , but we enjoyed the cars, no way would we have given them up.

If the nutty Greens tried to force that idea, then it would be truly a
“Bridge too far” , the end of the nut cases.

MJE VK5ELL

fred
August 23, 2019 6:01 pm

If the human race ceased to exist the climate would keep changing.

Nothing Britain does will change the climate beyond a reasonable doubt.

Arild
August 23, 2019 6:55 pm

The Overton window keeps expanding. First it is thought about, then hinted at, then spoken about out loud, then self referencing proof that everyone wants it and then it is done. “So let it be written, so let it be done”

Ewin Barnett
August 24, 2019 3:03 am

Converges to socialism.

David Cage
August 24, 2019 3:49 am

While we had no car I used public transport to get to an important appointment. It ended p taking over an hour and three quarters for a fifteen minute worst case car journey. It would have been quicker to walk but there are no pavements on this stretch of road so walking is more dangerous than Russian roulette.
Our MPs are not just out of touch they are mentally deranged. I suppose that is why they take their advice from Greta dumbo who they can identify with intellectually.

August 24, 2019 11:10 pm

idiots say that CO2 is a pollutant! all life would end without CO2I

observa
August 25, 2019 11:57 pm

No good me getting a new ICE car now as the wise perfessor has spoken-
https://www.msn.com/en-au/motoring/news/electric-cars-will-be-price-competitive-with-petrol-by-2023-professor/ar-AAGkXRE
What would this ignorant bozo know eh? Where’s his models?
https://thenewdaily.com.au/life/auto/2018/10/11/electric-cars-petrol/

a_scientist
August 26, 2019 9:48 am

“Although ultra-low emissions vehicles generate very little emissions during use, their manufacture generates substantial emissions. In the long-term, widespread personal vehicle ownership therefore does not appear to be compatible with significant decarbonisation. ”

Ah, so the emissions are not the issue…they want to destroy the manufacturing, the goal of the greens all along, to destroy modern industrial society and all the benefits it has brought to the average person. They want complete control, how you drive to the store or work, what food you can eat (no meat now!), and how much electricity you will be able to afford to use.

As explained in their green dream, NPR on Morning edition (March 11, 2019) explained that even electric cars are not allowed in their 2050 vision.

“So, you want an autonomous vehicle? Bless your heart, but it costs you more to drive that autonomous vehicle on the road by yourself. If you ride-share, it’s a little bit less.”
“And this is even if they are electric vehicles?” I ask.
“Even more if they’re electric vehicles!” Hoornweg says. Personal electric cars for everyone couldn’t solve the problem, he explains. First of all, electricity is precious. We can’t waste it powering everybody’s electric car.
Second, electric cars could have clogged the streets of our densely populated cities the same”

Yea, electricity precious, instead of cheap and reliable, their wind and solar fantasy will make it rare, expensive, and intermittent. So not even Teslas will be usable.

Johann Wundersamer
August 27, 2019 7:25 am

“When I lived in Britain I was approached on more than one occasion in London and elsewhere by groups of gentlemen hanging around public transport terminals, who seemed to want me to share the contents of my wallet with them. Though to be fair, after vigorous discussion, everyone always agreed that I could keep my money.”

______________________________________________________

No more lady killers. London has fallen. Tottenham burning.

https://www.google.com/search?q=Tottenham+burning&oq=Tottenham+burning+&aqs=chrome.

Verified by MonsterInsights