From The Daily Caller
9:54 AM 05/30/2019 | Energy
Michael Bastasch | Energy Editor
Former Vice President Al Gore said President Donald Trump’s “assault on science” threatens “the capacity of the human species to endure” on Earth.
Gore issued his warning in a speech to Harvard University students and faculty Wednesday, stressing “reason” and “rational debate,” indeed democracy itself, were under threat from the “ideology of authoritarianism.”
Science “is now being slandered as a conspiracy based on a hoax,” Gore said, likely referring to a 2012 Trump tweet where he called man-made global warming a “Chinese hoax.”
WATCH:
“The subordination of the best scientific evidence to the cynical greed of those buttressing the power of a would-be-autocrat is yet another strategy for controlling policy by distorting and suppressing the best available information,” Gore said.
“So the ideology of authoritarianism is not only a threat to democracy in America, now because of the attacks on climate science, it has become a threat to the survival of human civilization as we know it and even potentially to the capacity of the human species to endure,” Gore continued.
“In order to solve the climate crisis, we must solve the democracy crisis,” Gore said.
While Gore, a Harvard alumni and producer of two films of questionable accuracy on global warming, did not refer to Trump by name, the former vice president’s message was clear.
“The system of checks and balances that has protected the integrity of our American system for more than two centuries has already been dangerously eroded,” Gore said.
Gore, however, also went after social media, which he claimed is driven by “surveillance capitalism.” Gore said social media “enhances cynicism and magnifies divisions” that erode society. (RELATED: Supreme Court Asked To Hear Case Involving Leaked ‘Climategate’ Emails)
Former U.S. Vice President and 2007 Nobel Peace Prize winner Al Gore speaks this year’s Nobel Peace Prize Forum, in Oslo, Norway December 11, 2018. NTB Scanpix/Heiko Junge via REUTERS.
Gore went on to blame rampant flooding and tornado sightings in the Midwest on man-made global warming, echoing recent attempts by Democratic presidential candidates to do the same in Iowa.
“Speaking of wind, the winds are increasingly destructive in our world,” Gore said. “Yesterday was the thirteenth day in a row when multiple tornadoes touched down in the United States — 500 this month.”
“Hurricanes have become much stronger. Today, the Arkansas River is four feet higher than the all-time record flood stage. The Mississippi River is setting records as the longest flood ever. Thirty-nine million Americans today are at risk from flooding,” Gore said.
Gore also implored Harvard to divest its endowment from fossil fuel holdings, comparing it to the 1980s campaigns to pull investments in South Africa during apartheid. Gore has often compared climate activism to the anti-apartheid, civil rights and abolition movements.
“It was immoral to continue investing in apartheid,” Gore said before going on to accuse fossil fuel companies of using the tobacco industry’s strategy to keep the American public ignorant of climate science — a narrative pushed by some liberal media outlets.
“The American people have been the targets of a massive, well-organized and lavishly-funded campaign of disinformation, designed to spread doubt and confusion and prevent the formation of a political consensus necessary to adopt new policies to save the future of human civilization,” Gore said.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Looks like Al (my family made a fortune in the coal industry) Gore never took an Earth Science or Geology course. How else could he explain the climate changes that went along with the 4 major Ice Ages?
If memory serves, he did take a course in Natural Science in which he got a D. He revealed his college grades when he ran for President. At the time, everyone laughed at his grades because they were below those of GWB who was alleged by the media to be stupid.
Yeah – and this guy’s speaking to (supposedly) the best up and coming minds.
Irony abounds.
Well I am gobsmacked…Al Baby is admitting the truth (with a slight spin to subvert the nature of it’s true culprit)
I’m still trying to figure out how returning to the temperatures the world enjoyed during the Medieval Warm Period is supposed to end life on this planet.
Yes. Right with you on that one Al.
Darn, he is good. Stupid but good!
Bryan A – plus several gazillion
It’s the 3rd Law: SJWs Always Project.
More generally, whenever holier-than-thou types are hissing and shrieking about anything, it almost invariably turns out to be either exactly what they do, or within spitting range of that.
Gore took his single science course at Harvard when he was an undergrad. His professor was Russ Revelle who was the first scientist back in the 1950s to suggest that CO2 might have somthing to do with global warming. Gore became obsessed with the idea and ran with it. That’s how this whole thing got started. In later years, professor Ravelle repudiated his thery that CO2 might cause global warming, and he was appalled that global politicians were actually adopting policy based on his original discredited theory.
He did win the Nobel Prize for Hypocrisy
It was actually a price for promoting neomarxism/International socialism Agenda.
The amazing thing is, every word he said is exactly true, but it was all psychological projection of his own self, party, and belief mob.
I wonder how many layers deep in the psyche one has to plumb to find the place where he and his ilk know they are talking about themselves?
http://Www.ecosense.me
Isn’t it very inappropriate for him to advance his $$ agenda at a commencement address. He has no class.
He probably said all of that with a straight face. What irony! The hypocrisy of that man is astounding.
He isn’t hypocritical, he is plain stupid. I worked with this guy back in the 80’s.
Gore is living proof that family money and political power can overcome stupidity.
You worked with Al back in the 80s? I can’t help but thinking that you could tell some interesting stories. I’ve heard nothing but bad about him.
Accomplished liars like Gore, the Clintons, and Obama are snakes. They lie with ease and comfort.
Easy enough to tell when they’re lying too, thier lips are moving
This guy is waaaaay past his sell-by date. Hope there’s SOMEONE up thayah in Hahvahd Yahd with more brains than he has. Just embarassing.
The statement, that the assault on science is a grave danger to humanity, is absolutely correct!
Think about it. I leave it to you as an exercise. 🙂
I am so grateful that Gore lost when he ran for president.
I recall with mirth how Gore tried to invade GWB’s personal space, in a very threatening manner, during a televised debate.
GWB chuckled at him, and Gore’s bravado collapsed.
Democrats shot themselves in the foot on that one. As they usually do. Despite their claims to the contrary, history tells us Democrats never can muster the moral courage to do the right thing when politics of their ideology gets in the way.
Had they not defended the Sexual Predator in the White House‘s behavior toward a young female intern there, and had they pressured him to resign instead of rallying around him when it was discovered he lied straight into the cameras to all Americans in denial of that sexual harassment, then Vice President Al Gore would have been President Al Gore for the final 2 years or so –1998-2000.
An incumbent President Al Gore likely would have easily defeated the GOP challenger then in November 2000, and the history of the first decade of 21st Century would have played out very differently.
But when it comes down to it, Democrats never can do the the right thing. And Al Gore lost in 2000 because of that. Just as they could never bring themselves to tell Crooked Hillary to bow out in 2016 and let someone else try to defeat the GOP challenger.
In the Liberal mind, politics of their ideology and pursuit of power overrides integrity. And it costs them election after election. But that is their nature.
Someone blew it in other words.
Yeah, Monica. 🙂
“the Sexual Predator in the White House‘s behavior toward a young female intern there”
Triumph of the Willie.
I have vowed to keep my climate footprint below that of Al Gore’s, so I’m good.
ROTFLMAO!
Serous question: Who has a ‘smaller’ CO2 footprint – Al or Leo? I’d love to see someone post the numbers on that contest.
Who has a ‘smaller’ CO2 footprint- Al or Sierra Leone?
Leo has to keep his physique for his acting, and Leo doesn’t have fat US government pension. Big Al obviously never passed up a free meal. So I’d guess Leo’s carbon footprint is smaller.
Leo is a bit of a little wad.
Even with personal chefs & trainers … a bit of a small wad.
Good idea. Perhaps I ought to sell 10 of my houses, 5 of my cars, 2 of my jets, and 2 of my boats. /Sarc
Quote: “Gore issued his warning in a speech to Harvard University students and faculty Wednesday, stressing “reason” and “rational debate,” indeed democracy itself, were under threat from the “ideology of authoritarianism.”
Wow…the headline should have read “Assault on Truth Threatens Humanity’s Survival”. This is real rich from a guy who supposedly represents the CAGW industry.
Al..if you say reason and debate are under threat in our liberal democracy, then let’s have an honest and truthful debate about the science and facts of climate change and what is really going on. I will take all this and you a little more seriously when real discussion and rational debate are indeed upheld. Until then, it is you and your ilk who are the real authoritarians with the way you are lying about the science of climate understanding.
Considering he made a substantial piece of his $200 million net worth from selling his failing media network to Al Jezeera, which is owned by Qatari government and thus is oil money, the hypocrisy is even richer. Most reports gave it as Al Gore netted $100 Million for his 20% share from that sale.
As I vaguely recall, and I might be wrong on this, I seem to remember watching an interview with him where he was asked about his tobacco farming future.
He stated that he would be giving it up as his sister tragically dies from lung cancer; but not until he found another income.
Climate change seemed to happen along quite conveniently, something few of us would imagine would provide anyone an income, I mean it’s a global disaster so who can make money from that?
Not that any of us would have even thought about carbon credits. And again, forgive me if I’m wrong, but Al Gore seems to have done rather well from carbon credit trading, or something similar.
Funny how things work out.
Earthling: there were a number of debates in the early years, all of them won handily by sceptics. The warming proponents, to the last individual, now obey a centralized consensus ordinance to never debate a sceptic. This was the beginning of the warmist canard “the science is settled” therefore debate is a waste of time.
It is actually stomach turning to listen to Alarmists, who are the ones actually assaulting science with their corrupt politics, projecting their crime onto others.
Silencing debate? What debate? Reflexive name calling (that ends every attempt at debate) is not debate.
Like his book, Al Gore’s speech should be labeled science fiction. At least in his book, “State of Fear”, Michael Crighton uses facts to make his case against radical environmental groups. I wonder how many of those Harvard students know that a judge in Great Britain ordered Gore’s film not be shown in schools without disclaimers pointing out the many untruths and exaggerations.
The storyline of the movie ‘The Blob’ is far better than Gore’s fairy tail!
A practiced liar. It is only wild, speculative coming climate disasters being accepted by the masses that threatens humanity.
The energy and re-distributive policies that are claimed to address that wild speculation are the real disaster-in-waiting for humanity.
The wild speculative claims of coming climate disaster are having real pathological psychological impacts on the younger generations as well. It is just difficult to determine how that will play out over the next few decades.
I assume rage, Joel, when today’s children realize the price they will have paid in money and lost opportunities.
Still obsessed with Al Gore? Like a pack of old, angry white men shaking yer fists at clouds. The atmosphere has warmed 0.3 C in the 13 years since 2006 when An inconvenient truth was released. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_warming#/media/File:Global_Temperature_Anomaly.svg
Bah, humbug.
You are funny Loydo. From February 2016 to February 2018, “global average temperatures dropped by 0.56 degrees Celsius.”
https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/climate-change-global-warming-earth-cooling-media-bias/
The projection is strong in this one..
“The American people have been the targets of a massive, well-organized and lavishly-funded campaign of disinformation, designed to spread doubt and confusion and prevent the formation of a political consensus necessary to adopt new policies to save the future of human civilization,”
I wonder if he had Michael E Mann and the other alarmists in mind when he said this?
Perhaps he didn’t realise he was uttering the truth for once.
And even thus is a lie…the Petrol Industry has not heavily financed any campaign against the $Trillion Climate Catastrophe Industry.
For the most part, big oil has climbed aboard.
Meanwhile…the government hands out roughly $500,000 annually to EVERY (and mostly new) government climate scientist…who would lose that funding if their “studies” failed to confirm CAGW/Climate Change.
Lies upon lies…the common currency of Socialists (who are the only authoritarians in the room).
It’s good to see he is still collecting speaking fees for bullshit.
Has he been taking fugly pills?
Only if they are high calories. What poundage he has put on in his dotage!
The guy can get a part-time job as a mo-ai sculpture on Easter Island.
I guess when you are a billionaire you don’t miss too many meals.
I have a really hard time accepting the claims of catastrophe given that the planet has had more than 1000 ppm of CO2 for most of the history of the planet and there does not seem to be a causal correlation between CO2 and temperature anywhere in the geologic record.
If the top picture of Gore really represents the severity of the involuntary nervous tic he seems to have developed then he clearly has more urgent things to worry about than alleged slow motion warming, which is merely cyclical on the balance of evidence so far.
These neo-Lysenkoists just can’t stop projecting. They are mentally ill.
At least he got one thing right: that “reason” and “rational debate,” indeed democracy itself, were under threat from the “ideology of authoritarianism.” You can’t get much more authoritarian than the Green Blob which, in Orwellian fashion continues in its efforts to impose a world government based on lies and pseudoscience, to the detriment of humanity.
And what about the fact that none of his climate predictions, zero. zilch, nada have come remotely close to being accurate. Why should anyone believe anything he says on this subject?
The American people have been the targets of a massive, well-organised and lavishly-funded campaign of disinformation, designed to spread doubt and confusion and prevent the formation of a political consensus necessary to disrupt new policies to “save the future of human civilization “. There, fixed it.
Well… as my dad use to say: “Just consider the source.”
..and what about the fact that none of his previous climate related predictions have been remotely accurate? Why should anyone believe anything he says on this subject?
Rational debate? Gore refuses to debate anyone.
“The American people have been the targets of a massive, well-organized and lavishly-funded campaign of disinformation, designed to spread doubt and confusion and prevent the formation of a political consensus necessary to adopt new policies to save the future of human civilization,” Gore said.
Yes, and Al Gore is one of the people promoting the misinformation. He is part of the threat.
I’m still hoping for the day when a major endowment divests fossil fuel holdings, I’d love to pick up some Exxon at 58 bucks a share
I’d love to pick up some Exxon at 58 bucks a share
You’ll have to get in line… :>)
Was he talking about his assault on science, if so I agree completely with him
The irony of his rhetoric is that while he lacks the scientific chops to assault the science himself, he’s certainly one of the biggest enablers of that assault which is led by the IPCC and the false consensus surround its horribly flawed scientific assessments.