Guest essay by Eric Worrall
h/t Dr Willie Soon – An Oxford Professor has been busy promoting his view that aliens are breeding with humans to produce alien / human hybrids which have a better chance of surviving the coming climate catastrophe.
Oxford Professor Argues Invisible Aliens Are Interbreeding With Humans
26 April 2019 The News Team
…
The Oxford Student has learnt that Dr Young-hae Chi, Professor at Oxford’s Oriental Institute, believes in a strong correlation between climate change and alien abductions.
In 2012, Dr Chi gave a lecture at the the Ammach Conference, titled ‘Alien Abduction and the Environmental Crisis’ in which he outlined his theory concerning the presence of aliens on earth.
Dr Chi began his lecture with the statement that “perhaps human civilisation is coming to an end”.
In his fifty-five minute presentation he cited Dr David Jacobs, an ‘abduction researcher’ in the US, who argued that aliens’ primary purpose is to colonise the earth, by interbreeding with humans to produce a new hybrid species. Second generation ‘hybrids’ are, according to Jacobs, walking unobserved among us.
Dr Chi argued that “it is not only scientists and theologians, but also non-human species who appear to be greatly concerned about the survivability of the human species”.
He pointed out that the timing of aliens’ appearance coincides with the earth facing major problems, climate change and nuclear weapons in particular.
He concludes that “it may be more or less assumed that the hybrid project is a response to this impending demise of human civilisation”.
…
Read more: https://www.oxfordstudent.com/2019/04/26/oxford-professors-theory-on-climate-change-and-alien-abduction/
The following is a video of Professor Chi’s 2012 lecture;
You might think in the absence of extraordinary evidence, Dr. Chi’s ideas are utterly preposterous, but evidence free assertions are not unusual in the climate science community.
Some climate scientists demand we accept their model projections without getting hung up about the simplistic version of scientific falsifiability we learned as children; they claim their climate expertise is all the evidence we need to accept their predictions.
Update (EW): Sharp eyed readers might have noticed my aliens vs global temperature graph shows the opposite of what Dr. Chi is asserting, but getting data upside down is OK in climate science.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Dude is a language lecturer in Korean.
teaches Korean as a second language.
There is a reason why you should get your science from a good summary source
like the IPCC.
hey some skeptics think we didnt land on the moon, therefore….
You mean these guys?
March 28, 2012
The Honorable Charles Bolden, Jr.
NASA Administrator
NASA Headquarters
Washington, D.C. 20546-0001
Dear Charlie,
We, the undersigned, respectfully request that NASA and the Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) refrain from including unproven remarks in public releases and websites. We believe the claims by NASA and GISS, that man-made carbon dioxide is having a catastrophic impact on global climate change are not substantiated, especially when considering thousands of years of empirical data. With hundreds of well-known climate scientists and tens of thousands of other scientists publicly declaring their disbelief in the catastrophic forecasts, coming particularly from the GISS leadership, it is clear that the science is NOT settled.
The unbridled advocacy of CO2 being the major cause of climate change is unbecoming of NASA’s history of making an objective assessment of all available scientific data prior to making decisions or public statements.
As former NASA employees, we feel that NASA’s advocacy of an extreme position, prior to a thorough study of the possible overwhelming impact of natural climate drivers is inappropriate. We request that NASA refrain from including unproven and unsupported remarks in its future releases and websites on this subject. At risk is damage to the exemplary reputation of NASA, NASA’s current or former scientists and employees, and even the reputation of science itself.
For additional information regarding the science behind our concern, we recommend that you contact Harrison Schmitt or Walter Cunningham, or others they can recommend to you.
Thank you for considering this request.
Sincerely,
(Attached signatures)
CC: Mr. John Grunsfeld, Associate Administrator for Science
CC: Ass Mr. Chris Scolese, Director, Goddard Space Flight Center
/s/ Jack Barneburg, Jack – JSC, Space Shuttle Structures, Engineering Directorate, 34 years
/s/ Larry Bell – JSC, Mgr. Crew Systems Div., Engineering Directorate, 32 years
/s/ Dr. Donald Bogard – JSC, Principal Investigator, Science Directorate, 41 years
/s/ Jerry C. Bostick – JSC, Principal Investigator, Science Directorate, 23 years
/s/ Dr. Phillip K. Chapman – JSC, Scientist – astronaut, 5 years
/s/ Michael F. Collins, JSC, Chief, Flight Design and Dynamics Division, MOD, 41 years
/s/ Dr. Kenneth Cox – JSC, Chief Flight Dynamics Div., Engr. Directorate, 40 years
/s/ Walter Cunningham – JSC, Astronaut, Apollo 7, 8 years
/s/ Dr. Donald M. Curry – JSC, Mgr. Shuttle Leading Edge, Thermal Protection Sys., Engr. Dir., 44 years
/s/ Leroy Day – Hdq. Deputy Director, Space Shuttle Program, 19 years
/s/ Dr. Henry P. Decell, Jr. – JSC, Chief, Theory & Analysis Office, 5 years
/s/Charles F. Deiterich – JSC, Mgr., Flight Operations Integration, MOD, 30 years
/s/ Dr. Harold Doiron – JSC, Chairman, Shuttle Pogo Prevention Panel, 16 years
/s/ Charles Duke – JSC, Astronaut, Apollo 16, 10 years
/s/ Anita Gale
/s/ Grace Germany – JSC, Program Analyst, 35 years
/s/ Ed Gibson – JSC, Astronaut Skylab 4, 14 years
/s/ Richard Gordon – JSC, Astronaut, Gemini Xi, Apollo 12, 9 years
/s/ Gerald C. Griffin – JSC, Apollo Flight Director, and Director of Johnson Space Center, 22 years
/s/ Thomas M. Grubbs – JSC, Chief, Aircraft Maintenance and Engineering Branch, 31 years
/s/ Thomas J. Harmon
/s/ David W. Heath – JSC, Reentry Specialist, MOD, 30 years
/s/ Miguel A. Hernandez, Jr. – JSC, Flight crew training and operations, 3 years
/s/ James R. Roundtree – JSC Branch Chief, 26 years
/s/ Enoch Jones – JSC, Mgr. SE&I, Shuttle Program Office, 26 years
/s/ Dr. Joseph Kerwin – JSC, Astronaut, Skylab 2, Director of Space and Life Sciences, 22 years
/s/ Jack Knight – JSC, Chief, Advanced Operations and Development Division, MOD, 40 years
/s/ Dr. Christopher C. Kraft – JSC, Apollo Flight Director and Director of Johnson Space Center, 24 years
/s/ Paul C. Kramer – JSC, Ass.t for Planning Aeroscience and Flight Mechanics Div., Egr. Dir., 34 years
/s/ Alex (Skip) Larsen
/s/ Dr. Lubert Leger – JSC, Ass’t. Chief Materials Division, Engr. Directorate, 30 years
/s/ Dr. Humbolt C. Mandell – JSC, Mgr. Shuttle Program Control and Advance Programs, 40 years
/s/ Donald K. McCutchen – JSC, Project Engineer – Space Shuttle and ISS Program Offices, 33 years
/s/ Thomas L. (Tom) Moser – Hdq. Dep. Assoc. Admin. & Director, Space Station Program, 28 years
/s/ Dr. George Mueller – Hdq., Assoc. Adm., Office of Space Flight, 6 years
/s/ Tom Ohesorge
/s/ James Peacock – JSC, Apollo and Shuttle Program Office, 21 years
/s/ Richard McFarland – JSC, Mgr. Motion Simulators, 28 years
/s/ Joseph E. Rogers – JSC, Chief, Structures and Dynamics Branch, Engr. Directorate,40 years
/s/ Bernard J. Rosenbaum – JSC, Chief Engineer, Propulsion and Power Division, Engr. Dir., 48 years
/s/ Dr. Harrison (Jack) Schmitt – JSC, Astronaut Apollo 17, 10 years
/s/ Gerard C. Shows – JSC, Asst. Manager, Quality Assurance, 30 years
/s/ Kenneth Suit – JSC, Ass’t Mgr., Systems Integration, Space Shuttle, 37 years
/s/ Robert F. Thompson – JSC, Program Manager, Space Shuttle, 44 years/s/ Frank Van Renesselaer – Hdq., Mgr. Shuttle Solid Rocket Boosters, 15 years
/s/ Dr. James Visentine – JSC Materials Branch, Engineering Directorate, 30 years
/s/ Manfred (Dutch) von Ehrenfried – JSC, Flight Controller; Mercury, Gemini & Apollo, MOD, 10 years
/s/ George Weisskopf – JSC, Avionics Systems Division, Engineering Dir., 40 years
/s/ Al Worden – JSC, Astronaut, Apollo 15, 9 years
/s/ Thomas (Tom) Wysmuller – JSC, Meteorologist, 5 years
Says Steven, a ‘dude’ with an English qualification, and the title of scientist handed to him by his employer, who instructs scientists on here to listen to the IPCC.
Is that irony?
An English major lecturing others about listening to what a Korean major has to say on a subject outside their major. Oh the irony.
Mosh has had his irony gene’s removed.
Either that or he’s been paid to suppress them.
Really Steve, with all the other problems in your life, you want to spend time on this?
There is a reason why you should get your science from a good summary source like the IPCC.
You may not understand irony but you certainly know humor (you were trying to be funny, right?).
Arise David Icke, you moment has arrived.
With quality of thought like that, I’m surprised he’s not in the climate and environment field.
I knew it !
Invisible Aliens rotate CO2 molecules so that they always radiate backward, in the alarmists brains !
This does kind of explain why the Navy has instituted an outlet for reporting UFO sighting without being in danger of losing your position, rank or AD status. This is because Navy planes routinely run across UFOs when flying over large waterbodies (oceans) and since they record everything with their gun cameras, sometimes in the infrared spectrum, it shows there is something there.
No, that is not a joke. Here’s the Navy Times report: https://www.navytimes.com/off-duty/military-culture/2019/04/25/aliens-ahoy-navy-developing-guidelines-on-reporting-ufo-sightings/
It seems the recorded sightings are picking up in number, too, since Pres. Trump announced a few weeks ago that he wants to establish a US Space Force.
Well, we didn’t know about sprites and jets until they were recorded by astronauts on the ISS, did we?
UFOs are likely. Extraterrestrial beings are possible. It is philosophy for most people. It may be science that has been hidden from general knowledge. From a scientific perspective, it cannot, should not, be dismissed outright. And, unlike extra-universal entities, these beings, their technology, and their space, may be directly accessible through human perception and means.
UFO’s are real, just like climate change. They are both descriptions of things that we do not understand, and therefore we give them vague names that really mean nothing.
UFOs are real. They’re any Unidentified Flying Object. You see something in the sky that you can’t identify – that’s a UFO. Just because UFOs are real doesn’t mean space aliens are real.
I am sure, this was a comedy show. What puzzles me, no one was laughing. Well then again, most comedy shows these days are void of laughter due to polical correctness…. At least the clown pulled it off. He kept his face straight!
Mr Chi is incorrect. Aliens have been among us for a very long time. They call themselves Dutchmen and women.
Genesis, chapter 6 relates the case of an intelligent alien species (not space aliens but fallen angels, “sons of God”) interbreeding with humans. This mating produced giant human/demon hybrids called the “Nephilim.” It was partly because of this that God destroyed the Earth in the Flood.
So this guy doesn’t have a new story, he’s just turning an old story upside down – instead of the hybrids bringing destruction, they’re like the government: they’re here to help.
Wait……just wait a minute here…..
Are you all saying that aliens aren’t real? They haven’t been doing the horizontal mambo with humans? There are NO hybrids? That’s very disconcerting. Not as much as…… gasp!….NO UNICORNS! WHAT do you mean there are NO Unicorns!!
Next you all will be telling me there aren’t pink elephants dancing in my living room! OMG! My head is going to explode with all this concrete knowledge! Don’t tell me there is a 90% consensus….just don’t! I don’t think I can take anymore.
/sarc
On a funnier note, did anyone else miss it? It’s right there. Right in the forefront. Catastrophic Climate Change has officially jumped the shark and it took an Oxford professor to do it. Once in the realm of Aliens, human hybrids, and sadly unicorns…the preposterous “theories” have become a joke. It’s done.
It’s not the hot climate the aliens are acting on.
Humans are the hottest, sexiest sentients in the universe and the word has gotten out…that’s why abductions are increasing.
“Scientists” just can’t seem to latch on to obvious facts and correlations any more.
By George I think you’ve got it Doc. It’s not the hotness of the climate what gets those randy aliens going, it’s the hotness of the humans.
At least he didn’t report “It’s a cook book”.
You want evidence? The alien Bill Clinton attended Oxford.
It’s why Mann, Gavin Schmidt, Andrew Dessler look the similar.
Alien clones.
/sarc
It’s more evidence of a brain infection.
https://convictionreview.com/harvard-scientists-strange-asteroid-could-be-a-probe-from-an-alien-civilisation/
For those doubting the veracity of this story. I can confirm it is settled science, 97% of all Korean scientists lecturing at Oxford on Alien breeding programmes can vouch for this.
The BBC will add this to their ever growing list of events being affected by Climate Change…
Rod Evans
The BBC won’t report this, it’s far too rational for them.
They would far rather have a 16 year old, barely educated child, with mental health issues, instruct every scientist with an interest in climate science on how to think.
That’s our rational BBC.
The aliens have warned us and we must heed their warnings or all humanity will perish!
¯
Ahh, invisible aliens, invisible pregnancies, invisible climate catastrophe!
It’s all fitting together…
If crossbreeding with aliens is the most efficient solution, that must mean they don’t have effective carbon-capture technology that they could share. If such an advanced race hasn’t been able to come up with the technology, it would seem that we should stop wasting money trying to figure it out.
There you go …. thinking again ….
😉
Most “climate scientists” seem to be just crooks. This poor chap is clearly mad. It’s needlessly cruel to mock him. Some of you should be ashamed of yourselves.
Young-hae Chi
Position:
Instructor in Korean
Faculty / College Address:
Oriental Institute / Regent’s Park College
(Deleted the e-mail address, don’t do this again) MOD
Research Interests:
Instructional technique in the acquisition of modern languages
Christianity in Korean religious culture
Dialogue between ethics, politics, and Christianity
North Korean refugee problems and the role of NGOs
Current Projects:
Comparison of regional dialects in North Korea and the change of language habit in the case of North Korean refugees
The adaptability of UK-educated Korean children to the contemporary culture and the school system of South Korea
So you are saying that he is the Korean version of Steven Mosher?
How insulting. You owe Prof. Chi an apology.
Ok, this sounds very weird, but hey that is one of the science’s points, dealing with the weirding, some way or another.
But still even in that given context, it will depend in the conceptual definition of terms used.
In this case the definition of the concept “Alien”.
As far as I can tell, that definition does not by default accommodates the meaning of “extraterrestrial” or “not of this world” or “out of this world”, in the main basic conceptual meaning.
So, at some point we got to consider that “characters” in the consideration of “history” of humanity, like
from the far back, like Gilgamesh, or Noah, or Abraham, or Moses, or Hannibal, or Mark Anthony, or Alexander the Great, or Socrates, or Da Vinci, or Aristotle, or Pilate,
or Joan of Arc, or Descartes, or Alan Turing, or so many others in far and between, could only be addressed in the concept of, too “Alien” for our liking…and consideration.
Where, well, Joan of Arc, is quite what it may be considered as the 100 carat Mozart “Alien” in that prospect… far too “Alien” by the act of her achievement, like no one before or after.
A female, a girl, a woman…far too “Alien” to be considered otherwise in the historical terms…
So what really the definition of “Alien” is, or will, or it could be?
Not “extraterrestrial” by default… or “out worldly”, by default.
Oh, well, still me exploiting here, maybe… 🙂
cheers
Anyone who doubts that universities are repositories for kooky academics needs to read this article. Yet it’s a good thing these institutions exist; otherwise, these head cases would be roaming the streets.
The aliens already ARE among us https://images.app.goo.gl/hTRS5LhCQpq1haZV8 – alien / human hybrids which have a better chance of surviving the coming climate catastrophe.
Are you kidding me.
The Russians couldn’t put together a collusion, now we are talking aliens.
It just gets better and better.
(The stories I could tell).
Oh no, they are coming!!!
https://thedailyconspiracy.com/2019/04/26/lapd-helicopters-face-off-with-ufos/?stella_list=stella_list
Well I reckon there’s a distinct lack of imagination in evidence hereabouts.
Issac Asimov, Arthur C. Clarke, Michael Crichton & Robert Heinlein would have been well disappointed to read most of these replies.
Even David Icke, top researcher, would be miffed.
I’ve read Timothy Good’s Above Top Secret The Worldwide UFO Cover Up.
& genius journalist Jim Marrs’ Our Occulted History, Do The Global Elite Conceal Ancient Aliens? I just started re-reading his Alien Agenda.
Opening sentences:
The controversy over the existence of UFOs is over. UFOs are real.
Might give a clue.
I also enjoyed Icke’s The Biggest Secret.
All these books are well referenced & indexed. All are enjoyable reads.
Personally, I reckon we know just a tad more about science & time & space travel than an isolated Amazonian tribe knows about the model T Ford.
& remember Ford said: “History is bunk.” Another way of saying this is “history is written by the winners.”
Weird fact, there is tons more evidence of UFOs than there is of Jesus, who appears only in The Bible. Even his contemporary Josephus makes no mention of the Man who could walk on water. A curious omission.
You should read Icke’s theory on the origins of Jesus.
The Bible is apparently based on way older Sumerian clay tablet records which tell of mankind created by a race of aliens who mixed their own DNA with that of Earth hominids, via test tube experiments, using an alien host mother. The virgin birth?
I’d start with Marrs’ Occulted History. Is the Moon an alien spacecraft?
Please let me know what you think.
Thanks,
John Doran.
I’d start with Marrs’ Occulted History. Is the Moon an alien spacecraft?
Nah, it’s a giant Space-dragon egg. See the Doctor Who episode “Kill the moon”.
The moon is way, way, too dense to be a hollow spaceship.
And the Earth is way to spherical to be flat, doesn’t stop some from believing nonsense.
I think we need a little historical and scientific context, here. A logical chain of causality must always lead to the truth.
Josephus makes two mentions of Jesus.
Regardless, Josephus as most chroniclers of his day focused on the rich and powerful, he would not be likely to mention an itinerant preacher who met an inglorious end.
As to your theory about the origin of the Bible, perhaps if you knew 1/10th as much you think you do, you would realize what an idiot you are.
BTW, the vast majority of so called UFO sightings are easily explained.