Fossil site preserves animals killed within minutes of meteor impact
University of California – Berkeley

A meteor impact 66 million years ago generated a tsunami-like wave in an inland sea that killed and buried fish, mammals, insects and a dinosaur (Triceratops), the first victims of a cataclysm that led to Earth’s last mass extinction. The death scene from within an hour of the impact has been excavated at an unprecedented fossil site in North Dakota. Credit: Graphic courtesy of Robert DePalma
The beginning of the end started with violent shaking that raised giant waves in the waters of an inland sea in what is now North Dakota.
Then, tiny glass beads began to fall like birdshot from the heavens. The rain of glass was so heavy it may have set fire to much of the vegetation on land. In the water, fish struggled to breathe as the beads clogged their gills.
The heaving sea turned into a 30-foot wall of water when it reached the mouth of a river, tossing hundreds, if not thousands, of fresh-water fish — sturgeon and paddlefish — onto a sand bar and temporarily reversing the flow of the river. Stranded by the receding water, the fish were pelted by glass beads up to 5 millimeters in diameter, some burying themselves inches deep in the mud. The torrent of rocks, like fine sand, and small glass beads continued for another 10 to 20 minutes before a second large wave inundated the shore and covered the fish with gravel, sand and fine sediment, sealing them from the world for 66 million years.
This unique, fossilized graveyard — fish stacked one atop another and mixed in with burned tree trunks, conifer branches, dead mammals, mosasaur bones, insects, the partial carcass of a Triceratops, marine microorganisms called dinoflagellates and snail-like marine cephalopods called ammonites — was unearthed by paleontologist Robert DePalma over the past six years in the Hell Creek Formation, not far from Bowman, North Dakota. The evidence confirms a suspicion that nagged at DePalma in his first digging season during the summer of 2013 — that this was a killing field laid down soon after the asteroid impact that eventually led to the extinction of all ground-dwelling dinosaurs. The impact at the end of the Cretaceous Period, the so-called K-T boundary, exterminated 75 percent of life on Earth.
“This is the first mass death assemblage of large organisms anyone has found associated with the K-T boundary,” said DePalma, curator of paleontology at the Palm Beach Museum of Natural History in Florida and a doctoral student at the University of Kansas. “At no other K-T boundary section on Earth can you find such a collection consisting of a large number of species representing different ages of organisms and different stages of life, all of which died at the same time, on the same day.”
In a paper to appear next week in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, he and his American and European colleagues, including two University of California, Berkeley, geologists, describe the site, dubbed Tanis, and the evidence connecting it with the asteroid or comet strike off Mexico’s Yucatan Peninsula 66 million years ago. That impact created a huge crater, called Chicxulub, in the ocean floor and sent vaporized rock and cubic miles of asteroid dust into the atmosphere. The cloud eventually enveloped Earth, setting the stage for Earth’s last mass extinction.
“It’s like a museum of the end of the Cretaceous in a layer a meter-and-a-half thick,” said Mark Richards, a UC Berkeley professor emeritus of earth and planetary science who is now provost and professor of earth and space sciences at the University of Washington.
Richards and Walter Alvarez, a UC Berkeley Professor of the Graduate School who 40 years ago first hypothesized that a comet or asteroid impact caused the mass extinction, were called in by DePalma and Dutch scientist Jan Smit to consult on the rain of glass beads and the tsunami-like waves that buried and preserved the fish. The beads, called tektites, formed in the atmosphere from rock melted by the impact.
Tsunami vs. seiche
Richards and Alvarez determined that the fish could not have been stranded and then buried by a typical tsunami, a single wave that would have reached this previously unknown arm of the Western Interior Seaway no less than 10 to 12 hours after the impact 3,000 kilometers away, if it didn’t peter out before then. Their reasoning: The tektites would have rained down within 45 minutes to an hour of the impact, unable to create mudholes if the seabed had not already been exposed.
Instead, they argue, seismic waves likely arrived within 10 minutes of the impact from what would have been the equivalent of a magnitude 10 or 11 earthquake, creating a seiche (pronounced saysh), a standing wave, in the inland sea that is similar to water sloshing in a bathtub during an earthquake. Though large earthquakes often generate seiches in enclosed bodies of water, they’re seldom noticed, Richards said. The 2011 Tohoku quake in Japan, a magnitude 9.0, created six-foot-high seiches 30 minutes later in a Norwegian fjord 8,000 kilometers away.
“The seismic waves start arising within nine to 10 minutes of the impact, so they had a chance to get the water sloshing before all the spherules (small spheres) had fallen out of the sky,” Richards said. “These spherules coming in cratered the surface, making funnels — you can see the deformed layers in what used to be soft mud — and then rubble covered the spherules. No one has seen these funnels before.”
The tektites would have come in on a ballistic trajectory from space, reaching terminal velocities of between 100 and 200 miles per hour, according to Alvarez, who estimated their travel time decades ago.
“You can imagine standing there being pelted by these glass spherules. They could have killed you,” Richards said. Many believe that the rain of debris was so intense that the energy ignited wildfires over the entire American continent, if not around the world.
“Tsunamis from the Chicxulub impact are certainly well-documented, but no one knew how far something like that would go into an inland sea,” DePalma said. “When Mark came aboard, he discovered a remarkable artifact — that the incoming seismic waves from the impact site would have arrived at just about the same time as the atmospheric travel time of the ejecta. That was our big breakthrough.”
At least two huge seiches inundated the land, perhaps 20 minutes apart, leaving six feet of deposits covering the fossils. Overlaying this is a layer of clay rich in iridium, a metal rare on Earth, but common in asteroids and comets. This layer is known as the K-T, or K-Pg boundary, marking the end of the Cretaceous Period and the beginning of the Tertiary Period, or Paleogene.
Iridium
In 1979, Alvarez and his father, Nobelist Luis Alvarez of UC Berkeley, were the first to recognize the significance of iridium that is found in 66 million-year-old rock layers around the world. They proposed that a comet or asteroid impact was responsible for both the iridium at the K-T boundary and the mass extinction.
The impact would have melted the bedrock under the seafloor and pulverized the asteroid, sending dust and melted rock into the stratosphere, where winds would have carried them around the planet and blotted out the sun for months, if not years. Debris would have rained down from the sky: not only tektites, but also rock debris from the continental crust, including shocked quartz, whose crystal structure was deformed by the impact.
The iridium-rich dust from the pulverized meteor would have been the last to fall out of the atmosphere after the impact, capping off the Cretaceous.
“When we proposed the impact hypothesis to explain the great extinction, it was based just on finding an anomalous concentration of iridium — the fingerprint of an asteroid or comet,” said Alvarez. “Since then, the evidence has gradually built up. But it never crossed my mind that we would find a deathbed like this.”
Key confirmation of the meteor hypothesis was the discovery of a buried impact crater, Chicxulub, in the Caribbean and off the coast of the Yucatan in Mexico, that was dated to exactly the age of the extinction. Shocked quartz and glass spherules were also found in K-Pg layers worldwide. The new discovery at Tanis is the first time the debris produced in the impact was found along with animals killed in the immediate aftermath of the impact.
“And now we have this magnificent and completely unexpected site that Robert DePalma is excavating in North Dakota, which is so rich in detailed information about what happened as a result of the impact,” Alvarez said. “For me, it is very exciting and gratifying!”
Tektites
Jan Smit, a retired professor of sedimentary geology from Vrije Universiteit in Amsterdam in The Netherlands who is considered the world expert on tektites from the impact, joined DePalma to analyze and date the tektites from the Tanis site. Many were found in near perfect condition embedded in amber, which at the time was pliable pine pitch.
“I went to the site in 2015 and, in front of my eyes, he (DePalma) uncovered a charred log or tree trunk about four meters long which was covered in amber, which acted as sort of an aerogel and caught the tektites when they were coming down,” Smit said. “It was a major discovery, because the resin, the amber, covered the tektites completely, and they are the most unaltered tektites I have seen so far, not 1 percent of alteration. We dated them, and they came out to be exactly from the K-T boundary.”
The tektites in the fishes’ gills are also a first.
“Paddlefish swim through the water with their mouths open, gaping, and in this net, they catch tiny particles, food particles, in their gill rakers, and then they swallow, like a whale shark or a baleen whale,” Smit said. “They also caught tektites. That by itself is an amazing fact. That means that the first direct victims of the impact are these accumulations of fishes.”
Smit also noted that the buried body of a Triceratops and a duck-billed hadrosaur proves beyond a doubt that dinosaurs were still alive at the time of the impact.
“We have an amazing array of discoveries which will prove in the future to be even more valuable,” Smit said. “We have fantastic deposits that need to be studied from all different viewpoints. And I think we can unravel the sequence of incoming ejecta from the Chicxulub impact in great detail, which we would never have been able to do with all the other deposits around the Gulf of Mexico.”
“So far, we have gone 40 years before something like this turned up that may very well be unique,” Smit said. “So, we have to be very careful with that place, how we dig it up and learn from it. This is a great gift at the end of my career. Walter sees it as the same.”
###
Co-authors with DePalma, Smit, Richards and Alvarez are David Burnham of the University of Kansas, Klaudia Kuiper of Vrije Universiteit, Phillip Manning of Manchester University in the United Kingdom, Anton Oleinik of Florida Atlantic University, Peter Larson of the Black Hills Institute of Geological Research in South Dakota, Florentin Maurrasse of Florida International University, Johan Vellekoop of Katholieke Universiteit Leuven in Belgium and Loren Gurche of the Palm Beach Museum of Natural History.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Please examine my letter to USAF (similar one to Trump) to see if you agree with any of my points. Thanks kindly.
Are they sure about the 30 foot wave? Or was it 50 foot?
Can’t say for sure until the tree ring data comes back analysis.
Looking at Cataclysmic events in our history, I have just come across a book, The Adam and Eve Story by Chan Thomas, which the CIA had classified at some point after it’s 1963 publication only for a recent FOIA to have a sanitised copy declassified in 2013, in document form.
The PDF file can be found in the CIA website under the Library section.
The book relates the cyclical history of Cataclysmic earth events due to the Crustal Displacement theory, which I am sure many people here will have some thoughts on. (psuedoscience?)
Crustal displacement of 90 deg, back and forth over time, every 6,000 to 10,000 years, or thereabouts, which the author explains and expands upon the last 2 events from historical writings, Noa’s great flood and Adam and Eve, plus from cross scientific research and archaeological anomalies.
Ultimately he tries to find the trigger for such events.
If anything, it gets the imagination going, especially as to why it was deemed by the CIA the necessity to classify it!
Don’t they worship iridium in Mecca?
Don’t forget what was done to Velikovski for his daring to suggest that Earth’s “geological and evolutionary” history might have been determined, not by “steady state”, but also very much by cataclysms attributed to periodic meteor or comet impacts. (Answer, everything but physically “hung from the yardarms”.)
I guess they are assuming only one meteorite in a single rifle shot scenario without any breakup fragmentation on entry in the stratosphere.
Or any fragmentation from whatever collision set it on its path towards Earth.
That probably happened hundreds of million years earlier. However such collisions can cause very high frequencies of meteorite impacts for a while afterwards. Google “Ordovician meteor event” and “L-chondrite body”.
There only seems to be a single, very big, crater of that age, but that may change in the future. The Boltysh crater in Ukraine is about the same age, and it has been suggested that it might be related. There is certainly only one impact layer, so any multiple impacts would have to be very close in time.
Multiple impacts are difficult to prove, and I think that Rieskessel + Steinheim is the only well-documented case. It has been suggested that five mid-Triassic craters might be from a single crater-chain type serial impact, but that is very uncertain:
https://geosci.uchicago.edu/~rowley/Rowley/Publications_files/Nature%201998%20Spray.pdf
Map of the globe at the time:
http://dinosaurpictures.org/ancient-earth#90
That’s a cool site. I really like the concept.
However, I take exception that, while the inland sea was present in the image of North America 90 million years ago, it is not present in North Dakota on the 66 million years ago image. If the hypothesis is that waves in a shallow inland sea in present day North Dakota buried this site during the impact event approximately 66 million years ago, why isn’t that sea present in the image depicting the earth 66 million years ago?
Very strange. Maybe I’m missing something.
This must be the April Fools’ Day post here, it has to be…
Is it???
cheers
Tsunami vs. seiche
There is another possibility that could reconcile the difference in time between the proposed wave that deposited the fossils and the rain of tektites. The impact would have created an earthquake. The earthquake in turn could have created a rockslide or landslide nearer to the fossil site. The rockslide or landslide could have in turn then created a tsunami like the one that happened in Lituya Bay, Alaska in 1958.
As a matter of fact we do know that the impact caused massive submarine slides, so that is definitely a possibility, though North Dakota was pretty flat in the Cretaceous too.
Phil – The authors consider other factors such as landslides in their section called ‘Emplacement Mechanism’ in the proof of the paper that is now available on-line. They seem to have solid arguments for their preferred mechanism. I put a link to the paper above in a reply to tty (I’m afraid repeating it might annoy the moderator).
I’m hoping that DePalma’s interpretation is correct, but the skeptic in me will await the paper, the inevitable reviews, and the sets of fresh eyes that need to evaluate the site. DePalma has some heavy hitters on his side so I am tentatively trusting the story, but it has yet to pass both academic review and independent field study. The discovery of an essentially instantaneous snapshot (i.e. within an hour) of the K-T Chicxulub impact is an extraordinary claim and must be subject to intense scrutiny.
Its all very interesting but I am puzzled that we still had life surviving.
I would think that with modern DNA that it should be possible to trace back
the various major groups of life to that single punt when we had the 3 %
of life surviving, and what form was this life, and how was it that it survived..
The birds from dinosaurs for example. Yes there were small dinosaurs but they to had to eat, so what on if it was all destroyed by fire. Was it possible that this mass extinction did not occur all over the planet ?
MJE VK5ELL
“I would think that with modern DNA that it should be possible to trace back
the various major groups of life to that single punt when we had the 3 %
of life surviving”
And that is exactly what we find when we study the DNA of birds. Almost all major groups differentiated in a very short time (geologically speaking) about 65 million years ago. Only a very few lines go back into the late Cretaceous. Probably very few bird species, perhaps less than 10, all belonging to a single sub-group of the very diverse Cretaceous birds (the ornithurines) survived.
http://cdn.sci-news.com/images/enlarge/image_2340e-Avian-Family-Tree.jpg
Frightened birds take to flight and that probably didn’t help. Frightened rats go underground and that probably helped. Anything on the surface or the air had a slim chance of surviving. Marine critters coped a little bit better. In any case macroscopic life was nearly wiped that day and the following months. Every surviving species must have lost nearly all its individuals as survival was anecdotal. Life on Earth took many millions of years to recover, and that is an awful lot of time considering how fast life reproduces.
And that probably finished off a few more species… with survival so rare, another survivor of the same species but opposite gender could be thousands of miles away, so they couldn’t possibly live long enough to find each other. Not every survival story has a happy ending.
Birds would have a better chance in that respect, being more mobile. But on the other hand a single pregnant female mammal could be enough to perpetuate a species while this is less likely for birds.
And no, the mass extinction occurred everywhere. But there are some hints that it may have been slightly less severe in and around Antarctica. Several of the surviving groups seem to come from there.
I’m doubtful.
lets repeat the experiment
An excellent suggestion, Steven! We should set up a GoFundMe account to support this.
When would you be available to be hit with a 30 foot wave, pelted with 100 mph/5 millimeter diameter glass balls for 10 – 20 minutes, and then entombed in sand and silt by a second wave for the next 66 million years?
};>)
Just wait, it will happen.
Fortunately not very soon on that scale. It is extremely unlikely that any 10-km earth-crossing asteroid hasn’t been found and had its orbit calculated by now, but a smaller one could impact tomorrow.
And of course there is always the chance of some new comet coming in from the Oort cloud and scoring a direct hit. The warning time would only be a few months in that case. At best.
Copy of the paper as published:
A seismically induced onshore surge deposit at the KPg boundary, North Dakota
Supplementary Information for A SEISMICALLY INDUCED ONSHORE SURGE DEPOSIT AT THE KPG BOUNDARY, NORTH DAKOTA
Another link to the main paper:
A seismically induced onshore surge deposit at the KPg boundary, North Dakota
This is a fascinating paper! From a fascinating find! A 30-minute slice of time captured and preserved from 66-million years ago, well the odds against that happening might be even higher than the odds against the creation of life itself (if it had to rely solely on chance alone)! The author’s interpretation of the data may be all wrong, but he’s (they’re?) putting it out there where everyone can see it and argue about I mean discuss it (I can understand concerns about vandalism and/or sabotage, and data integrity, but they’ll have to allow other researchers access to the actual site itself sooner rather than later), but just the sheer volume of data, that many species represented, the mud funnels for the larger tektites (there’s a research field all by itself… they can get the grain size from the rock, but what masses, what velocity, what temperature, what moisture content, does it take to get mud to behave like that?), even the presence of the triceratops, an amazing wealth of data. This is the way science should be done!
Here is a recent YouTube which is well narrated that discusses the recent stusy showing that the impact carter in southern Chile dates to arouns 12,800 years ago. Thus leading to the conclusion that it was this impact along with other fragments striking elsehwere around the lanet which caused the YD, …