Influence of solar activity on European rainfall

Dr. Sebastian Luening writes to advise us of this.

Press Release

Institute of Hydrography, Geoecology and Climate Sciences (IFHGK), www.ifhgk.org

15th February 2019

Influence of solar activity on European rainfall

A balanced level of precipitation provides the basis for a wide range of economic and social activities in Europe. Particularly agriculture, drinking water supply and inland waterway transport are directly affected. However, the amount of rain fluctuates strongly from year to year. While it may pour torrentially in one year, rain may remain absent for weeks in another year. The population is used to this variability and knows how to deal with it.

The chance discovery by an agricultural scientist from Münster, Germany, now suggests that in certain months rain over Germany and other parts of Europe follows a pattern that up to now has remained undetected. As part of agricultural consultation, Ludger Laurenz analyzed decades of rainfall records of his home weather station in Münster and noticed a constant up and down that followed an 11-year rhythm – especially in February. After detailed examination it was clear that this rhythm correlated closely with the activity of the sun: the well-documented 11-year sunspot cycle.

Laurenz next teamed up with two colleagues to examine the extent to which the observed pattern from Münster is reproducible in other parts of Germany and Europe, and whether the phenomenon also exists for the other months of the year. Horst-Joachim Lüdecke from the HTW University of Applied Sciences in Saarland gathered the precipitation data collected in Europe since the beginning of the 20th century. The physicist emeritus then developed a computer algorithm to determine the similarity of changes in rainfall and solar activity. All 39 European countries and every one of the 12 months of the year were quantified over a total of 115 years using mathematical correlations.

In order to include possible delay effects, the data series of rain and sunspots were systematically checked for shifts. For this purpose, the time series were gradually shifted in time against each other like combs and the respective change of the correlation quality was noted. The multidimensional data obtained in this way were evaluated for systematic trends by geoscientist Sebastian Lüning and visualized cartographically. Lüning is associated with the Swiss Institute of Hydrography, Geoecology and Climate Sciences (IFHGK) and is specialized in the research of solar climate effects.

The mapped out results show that the link between February precipitation and solar activity originally discovered in Münster is valid for large parts of Central and Northern Europe and has good statistical significance there. Towards southern Europe, however, the correlation weakens significantly.

The statistical investigation was also able to demonstrate systematic phase shifts across the continent. In Germany and neighboring countries, February precipitation was particularly low when the sun was very strong four years earlier. The delay seems to be due to the slow deep circulation of the Atlantic, as earlier work had already suggested. On the basis of the statistically-empirically determined correlation, February 2018 in Germany with particularly low precipitation can now also be explained, which followed a particularly high intensity peak of solar activity at the beginning of 2014.

Similar relationships between rainfall and solar activity have been observed in other months, although somewhat weaker, especially in April, June and July, which account for a large part of the vegetation period in Central Europe. The result was a complex interplay of sun and rain in Europe, which showed clear trends over 1000 km and varied strongly from month to month.

The study thus confirms the concept of a solar participation in the European hydroclimatic development, which had already been indicated by a whole series of local case studies of other authors. The exact mechanism by which the solar signal influences precipitation is still largely unclear and requires further research.

The solar precipitation effect now mapped out across Europe for the first time opens up new possibilities for improved medium-term precipitation forecasts. Agriculture in particular, but also protection measures against extreme weather damage in connection with heavy rainfall and droughts could benefit from this. The next step in refining the forecasting methodology is a more precise quantification of the effects of Atlantic Ocean cycles, which also play an important role in rainfall, especially in Western Europe.

Original publication:

Laurenz, L., H.-J. Lüdecke, S. Lüning (2019): Influence of solar activity on European rainfall. J. Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 185: 29-42, doi: 10.1016/j.jastp.2019.01.012

The pdf version can be downloaded free of charge at the following link until early March: https://authors.elsevier.com/a/1YXWZ4sIlkiVhv

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
5 1 vote
Article Rating
70 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Johann Wundersamer
February 18, 2019 3:10 pm

Similar relationships between rainfall and solar activity have been observed in other months, although somewhat weaker, especially in April, June and July, which account for a large part of the vegetation period in Central Europe. The result was a complex interplay of sun and rain in Europe, which showed clear trends over 1000 km and varied strongly from month to month.

The study thus confirms the concept of a solar participation in the European hydroclimatic development, which had already been indicated by a whole series of local case studies of other authors. The exact mechanism by which the solar signal influences precipitation is still largely unclear and requires further research.
___________________________________________________

https://www.google.com/search?client=ms-android-samsung&ei=wWplXPuON8eorgSZrJe4BA&q=lesser+coronal+ejections+sunspots+&oq=lesser+coronal+ejections+sunspots+&gs_l=mobile-gws-wiz-serp

lesser coronal ejections lesser water drops condensation nuclei.

Simple as that.

Chris Norman
February 18, 2019 6:48 pm

William Herschel pointed this out some time ago.

February 19, 2019 7:30 am

Ian says

Make a hypothesis based up [sic} a physical mechanism that could cause a link –> propose an observational test that would fairly test this hypothesis –> see if the observational data either supports or disproves the hypothesis.

Let me try:
comment image

Do you see it? You can draw bi-nomials from top to bottom and from bottom to top for the solar magnetic field strength from 1971 -2014 showing exactly one half of the Gleissberg cycle. The 11 year cycle is only a portion of the story. There are more solar cycles. The whole solar cycle is actually 22 years [on average] and it makes for only one quadrant of the GB cycle.

But how does global cooling work? [it is happening already]

i.e. good correlation of certain planets’ position with sunspots/ solar magnetic activity – may be causal or not –
means
=> lower solar magnetic activity
=> more of the most energetic particles being able to escape from the sun
=> more ozone, N-oxides and peroxides formed TOA [good correlation found between increasing ozone and decreasing solar magnetic field strength]
!!! earth’s atmosphere is protecting us – hence do not go to Mars before you have created an earth-like atmosphere.
=> more ozone & others formed TOA means less energy coming through the atmosphere [good correlation found between decreasing Tmax and Tmin and decreasing solar magnetic feild strengths andincreasing ozone ]
=> apparently more UV being deflected off from earth by ozone & others
=> also less UV [heat] going into the oceans
=> it is globally cooling.

What does global cooling mean for the future?

Simple physics tells me that as the temperature differential between the poles and equator grows larger due to the cooling from the top, very likely something will also change on earth. Predictably, there would be a small (?) shift of cloud formation and precipitation, more towards the equator, on average. At the equator insolation is 684 W/m2 whereas on average it is 342 W/m2. So, if there are more clouds in and around the equator, this will amplify the cooling effect due to less direct natural insolation of earth (clouds deflect a lot of radiation). Furthermore, in a cooling world there is more likely less moisture in the air, but even assuming equal amounts of water vapor available in the air, a lesser amount of clouds and precipitation will be available for spreading to higher latitudes. So, a natural consequence of global cooling is that at the higher latitudes it will become both cooler (winters) and warmer (drier summers). It is happening already, is it not?

Again, this probably not the whole story. There are signs that the greening of earth – as is also happening on a big scale – both in the oceans and on land – is also trapping heat again. This is what currently seems to delay the global cooling. Also the shift of earth’s inner core, more north east, is another factor causing the warming of the nh.
Click on my name to read my relevant final report.

Reply to  henryp
February 19, 2019 8:49 am

Sorry Ian. I forgot about the moon. It is currently at its nearest point to earth?
Would that not cause more upwelling of the cooler water from the bottoms of the oceans, and, hence, enhance global cooling?

February 19, 2019 8:50 am

Sorry Ian. I forgot about the moon. It is currently at its nearest point to earth?
Would that not cause more upwelling of the cooler water from the bottoms of the oceans, and, hence, enhance global cooling?