‘True polar wander’ may have caused ice age

From Phys.org

 

November 19, 2018, Rice University
truepolarwan
Illustration depicting the minimum (interglacial, black) and maximum (glacial, grey) glaciation of the northern hemisphere during the ice age that began about 3.2 million years ago. Credit: Hannes Grobe/AWI/Wikimedia Commons

Earth’s latest ice age may have been caused by changes deep inside the planet. Based on evidence from the Pacific Ocean, including the position of the Hawaiian Islands, Rice University geophysicists have determined Earth shifted relative to its spin axis within the past 12 million years, which caused Greenland to move far enough toward the north pole to kick off the ice age that began about 3.2 million years ago.

Their study in the journal Geophysical Research Letters is based on an analysis of fossil signatures from deep ocean sediments, the magnetic signature of oceanic crust and the position of the mantle “hot spot” that created the Hawaiian Islands. Co-authors Richard Gordon and Daniel Woodworth said the evidence suggests Earth spun steadily for millions of years before shifting relative to its spin axis, an effect geophysicists refer to as “true polar wander.”

“The Hawaiian hot spot was fixed, relative to the spin axis, from about 48 million years ago to about 12 million years ago, but it was fixed at a latitude farther north than we find it today,” said Woodworth, a graduate student in Rice’s Department of Earth, Environmental and Planetary Sciences. “By comparing the Hawaiian hot spot to the rest of the Earth, we can see that that shift in location was reflected in the rest of the Earth and is superimposed on the motion of tectonic plates. That tells us that the entire Earth moved, relative to the spin axis, which we interpret to be true polar wander.”

By volume, Earth is mostly mantle, a thick layer of solid rock that flows under intense pressure and heat. The mantle is covered by an interlocking puzzle of rocky tectonic plates that ride atop it, bumping and slipping against one another at seismically active boundaries. Hot spots, like the one beneath Hawaii, are plumes of hot solid rock that rise from deep within the mantle.

Gordon, the W.M. Keck Professor of Earth, Environmental and Planetary Science, said the new findings build on two 2017 studies: one from his lab that showed how to use hot spots as a global frame of reference for tracking the movement of tectonic plates and another from Harvard University that first tied true polar wander to the onset of the ice age.

“We’re taking these hot spots as marked trackers of plumes that come from the deep mantle, and we’re using that as our reference frame,” he said. “We think the whole global network of hotspots was fixed, relative to the Earth’s spin axis, for at least 36 million years before this shift.”

1-truepolarwan
True polar wander occurs when the entire Earth shifts relative to its spin axis. Credit: Victor C. Tsai/Wikimedia Commons

Like any spinning object, Earth is subject to centrifugal force, which tugs on the planet’s fluid interior. At the equator, where this force is strongest, Earth is more than 26 miles larger in diameter than at the poles. Gordon said true polar wander may occur when dense, highly viscous bumps of mantle build up at latitudes away from the equator.

“Imagine you have really, really cold syrup, and you’re putting it on hot pancakes,” Gordon said. “As you pour it, you temporarily have a little pile in the center, where it doesn’t instantly flatten out because of the viscosity of the cold syrup. We think the dense anomalies in the mantle are like that little temporary pile, only the viscosities are much higher in the lower mantle. Like the syrup, it will eventually deform, but it takes a really, really long time to do so.”

If the mantle anomalies are massive enough, they can unbalance the planet, and the equator will gradually shift to bring the excess mass closer to the equator. The planet still spins once every 24 hours and true polar wander does not affect the tilt of the Earth’s spin axis relative to the sun. The redistribution of mass to a new equator does change Earth’s poles, the points on the planet’s surface where the spin axis emerges.

Woodworth said the hot spot data from Hawaii provides some of the best evidence that true polar wander was what caused Earth’s poles to start moving 12 million years ago. Islands chains like the Hawaiians are formed when a tectonic plate moves across a hot spot.

“True polar wander shouldn’t change hot spot tracks because the hot spot track is the record of the motion of the plate relative to the hot spot,” Woodworth said.

Gordon said, “It was only about a 3 degree shift, but it had the effect of taking the mantle under the tropical Pacific and moving it to the south, and at the same time, it was shifting Greenland and parts of Europe and North America to the north. That may have triggered what we call the ice age.”

2-truepolarwan
The movement of the Pacific plate across a mantle hotspot created the Hawaiian islands over millions of years. Credit: National Geophysical Data Center/USGS/Wikimedia Commons

Earth is still in an ice age that began about 3.2 million years ago. Earth’s poles have been covered with ice throughout the age, and thick ice sheets periodically grow and recede from poles in cycles that have occurred more than 100 times. During these glacial cycles, ice has extended as far south as New York and Yellowstone National Park. Earth today is in an interglacial period in which ice has receded toward the poles.

……………

More information: Daniel Woodworth et al, Paleolatitude of the Hawaiian Hot Spot Since 48 Ma: Evidence for a Mid-Cenozoic True Polar Stillstand Followed by Late Cenozoic True Polar Wander Coincident With Northern Hemisphere Glaciation, Geophysical Research Letters (2018). DOI: 10.1029/2018GL080787

Journal reference: Geophysical Research Letters search and more info

Read more at: https://phys.org/news/2018-11-true-polar-ice-age.html

 

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
121 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Johnny Cuyana
November 24, 2018 12:00 pm

If you please … for the curious layman, please provide a bit more description from the sentence fragments extracted from your paragraph: “By volume, Earth is mostly mantle, a thick layer of solid rock that flows under intense pressure and heat. The mantle is covered by an interlocking puzzle of rocky tectonic plates that ride atop it, bumping and slipping against one another at seismically active boundaries. Hot spots, like the one beneath Hawaii, are plumes of hot solid rock that rise from deep within the mantle.”

[1] “… mantle, a thick layer of solid rock that flows under intense pressure and heat.” How does this solid rock flow — it is relatively plastic? — and, are the heat and pressure primarily from the underlying core or from within the mantle itself … or both?

[2] ” … of rocky tectonic plates that ride atop it …” Are there “detachment surfaces” between the base of the tectonic plates — that is, of these crustal plates as seen at the surface — and its contact with the underlying mantle? If yes, generally, what is the thickness variability of these plates? Is there a name for such detachment surfaces? And, if yes, is this detachment surface observable … via some means [such as indirect reflection or refraction seismic technique]?

[3] “Hot spots, like the one beneath Hawaii, are plumes of hot solid rock that rise from deep within the mantle.” Are these plumes — that is, the hot solid rock — sourced in any way, ultimately, from some molten volume of rock “leaking” out from the underlying molten core, or, are they hot because of some mechanism internal to the mantle?

Note: I saw co-author Gordon’s “maple syrup and pancakes” metaphor, but, I needed to get a more precise understanding of the notions described in the above-cited paragraph before visualizing and understanding these other parts of this article.

Note: I did note this portion from that comment, above, of Gordon Lehman: “Both hotspots and spreading ridges are shallow melt features in the upper mantle, not deeply rooted. We know spreading ridges move relative to the spin axis. It is no surprise that hotspots do too.” If true — the not deeply rooted part — this would seem to rule out the source of heat and pressure resulting from molten rock from the core, yes?

TIA.

PS: regarding the above crust, mantle and core matters, if more convenient for you, perhaps you can reference a text or paper — latest and/or greatest earth model interpretation of components — by some author who you may trust.

Johann Wundersamer
December 2, 2018 5:05 am

If the mantle anomalies are massive enough, they can unbalance the planet, and the equator will gradually shift to bring the excess mass closer to the equator. –>

If the mantle + newly built ice sheet MASS imbalances

[anomalies] are massive enough, they can unbalance the planet, and the equator will gradually shift to bring the excess mass closer to the equator.
_________________________________________________

sounds reasonable. Could explain ongoing glaciation / deglaciation cycles.

Anyway interesting.

Johann Wundersamer
December 2, 2018 5:19 am

and the mass balance / equilication is not gliding but jerky by stick / slip effect:

Otherwise we would not notice any glaciation / deglaciation expiration.

https://www.google.at/search?client=ms-android-samsung&ei=VtsDXJu8DK6QmgXqj4WwDA&q=stick+slip+effekt+&oq=stick+slip+effekt+&gs_l=mobile-gws-wiz-serp.

Johann Wundersamer
December 2, 2018 5:31 am

and the mass balance / equilication is not gliding but jerky by stick / slip effect:

Otherwise we would not notice any glaciation / deglaciation expiration.

https://www.google.at/search?client=ms-android-samsung&ei=d9sDXJPhM4GdsgGIs7LQBw&q=stick+slip+effect&oq=stick+slip+effect&gs_l=mobile-gws-wiz-serp.

Said stick / slip effect is propagatet by / due to

– first build up the new mass imbalances by adding new ices heels

– then let them tectonic plates rock again

Johann Wundersamer
December 2, 2018 5:35 am

Damned spell check: ices heels –> iceshields

and the mass balance / equilication is not gliding but jerky by stick / slip effect:

Otherwise we would not notice any glaciation / deglaciation expiration.

https://www.google.at/search?client=ms-android-samsung&ei=d9sDXJPhM4GdsgGIs7LQBw&q=stick+slip+effect&oq=stick+slip+effect&gs_l=mobile-gws-wiz-serp.

Said stick / slip effect is propagatet by / due to

– first build up the new mass imbalances by adding new iceshields

– then let them tectonic plates rock again