New lithium battery design eats up carbon dioxide while charging

Lithium-based battery could make use of greenhouse gas before it ever gets into the atmosphere

CAMBRIDGE, Mass. — A new type of battery developed by researchers at MIT could be made partly from carbon dioxide captured from power plants. Rather than attempting to convert carbon dioxide to specialized chemicals using metal catalysts, which is currently highly challenging, this battery could continuously convert carbon dioxide into a solid mineral carbonate as it discharges.

While still based on early-stage research and far from commercial deployment, the new battery formulation could open up new avenues for tailoring electrochemical carbon dioxide conversion reactions, which may ultimately help reduce the emission of the greenhouse gas to the atmosphere.

The battery is made from lithium metal, carbon, and an electrolyte that the researchers designed. The findings are described today in the journal Joule, in a paper by assistant professor of mechanical engineering Betar Gallant, doctoral student Aliza Khurram, and postdoc Mingfu He.

Currently, power plants equipped with carbon capture systems generally use up to 30 percent of the electricity they generate just to power the capture, release, and storage of carbon dioxide. Anything that can reduce the cost of that capture process, or that can result in an end product that has value, could significantly change the economics of such systems, the researchers say.

However, “carbon dioxide is not very reactive,” Gallant explains, so “trying to find new reaction pathways is important.” Generally, the only way to get carbon dioxide to exhibit significant activity under electrochemical conditions is with large energy inputs in the form of high voltages, which can be an expensive and inefficient process. Ideally, the gas would undergo reactions that produce something worthwhile, such as a useful chemical or a fuel. However, efforts at electrochemical conversion, usually conducted in water, remain hindered by high energy inputs and poor selectivity of the chemicals produced.

Gallant and her co-workers, whose expertise has to do with nonaqueous (not water-based) electrochemical reactions such as those that underlie lithium-based batteries, looked into whether carbon-dioxide-capture chemistry could be put to use to make carbon-dioxide-loaded electrolytes — one of the three essential parts of a battery — where the captured gas could then be used during the discharge of the battery to provide a power output.

This approach is different from releasing the carbon dioxide back to the gas phase for long-term storage, as is now used in carbon capture and sequestration, or CCS. That field generally looks at ways of capturing carbon dioxide from a power plant through a chemical absorption process and then either storing it in underground formations or chemically altering it into a fuel or a chemical feedstock.

Instead, this team developed a new approach that could potentially be used right in the power plant waste stream to make material for one of the main components of a battery.

While interest has grown recently in the development of lithium-carbon-dioxide batteries, which use the gas as a reactant during discharge, the low reactivity of carbon dioxide has typically required the use of metal catalysts. Not only are these expensive, but their function remains poorly understood, and reactions are difficult to control.

By incorporating the gas in a liquid state, however, Gallant and her co-workers found a way to achieve electrochemical carbon dioxide conversion using only a carbon electrode. The key is to preactivate the carbon dioxide by incorporating it into an amine solution.

“What we’ve shown for the first time is that this technique activates the carbon dioxide for more facile electrochemistry,” Gallant says. “These two chemistries — aqueous amines and nonaqueous battery electrolytes — are not normally used together, but we found that their combination imparts new and interesting behaviors that can increase the discharge voltage and allow for sustained conversion of carbon dioxide.”

They showed through a series of experiments that this approach does work, and can produce a lithium-carbon dioxide battery with voltage and capacity that are competitive with that of state-of-the-art lithium-gas batteries. Moreover, the amine acts as a molecular promoter that is not consumed in the reaction.

This scanning electron microscope image shows the carbon cathode of a carbon-dioxide-based battery made by MIT researchers, after the battery was discharged. It shows the buildup of carbon compounds on the surface, composed of carbonate material that could be derived from power plant emissions, compared to the original pristine surface (inset). Courtesy of the researchers

The key was developing the right electrolyte system, Khurram explains. In this initial proof-of-concept study, they decided to use a nonaqueous electrolyte because it would limit the available reaction pathways and therefore make it easier to characterize the reaction and determine its viability. The amine material they chose is currently used for CCS applications, but had not previously been applied to batteries.

This early system has not yet been optimized and will require further development, the researchers say. For one thing, the cycle life of the battery is limited to 10 charge-discharge cycles, so more research is needed to improve rechargeability and prevent degradation of the cell components. “Lithium-carbon dioxide batteries are years away” as a viable product, Gallant says, as this research covers just one of several needed advances to make them practical.

But the concept offers great potential, according to Gallant. Carbon capture is widely considered essential to meeting worldwide goals for reducing greenhouse gas emissions, but there are not yet proven, long-term ways of disposing of or using all the resulting carbon dioxide. Underground geological disposal is still the leading contender, but this approach remains somewhat unproven and may be limited in how much it can accommodate. It also requires extra energy for drilling and pumping.

The researchers are also investigating the possibility of developing a continuous-operation version of the process, which would use a steady stream of carbon dioxide under pressure with the amine material, rather than a preloaded supply the material, thus allowing it to deliver a steady power output as long as the battery is supplied with carbon dioxide. Ultimately, they hope to make this into an integrated system that will carry out both the capture of carbon dioxide from a power plant’s emissions stream, and its conversion into an electrochemical material that could then be used in batteries. “It’s one way to sequester it as a useful product,” Gallant says.

###

The study: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542435118304057?via%3Dihub

MIT’s Department of Mechanical Engineering provided support for the project.

Written by David L. Chandler, MIT News Office

Related: Research update: Team observes real-time charging of a lithium-air battery

http://news.mit.edu/2013/real-time-charging-of-lithium-air-battery-0513


Interesting concept, but with only 10 charge/discharge cycles available, highly impractical.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

125 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
michael hart
September 21, 2018 4:23 pm

No shortage of valid criticisms above. While it is common to see researchers trying to put a positive shine on a failed project, this is one where it is difficult to see what realistic and worthwhile end they were ever trying to achieve in the first place.

John Tillman
Reply to  michael hart
September 21, 2018 4:26 pm

They achieved political correctness, which when it comes to funding, matters more than practical applied scientific results.

2hotel9
September 21, 2018 5:10 pm

I call bullshit. Lithium batteries are sealed units, they don’t “eat” anything, and if they did OSHA would ban them because they would be a safety hazard.

Chris
September 21, 2018 5:14 pm

“Currently, power plants equipped with carbon capture systems generally use up to 30 percent of the electricity they generate just to power the capture, release, and storage of carbon dioxide. Anything that can reduce the cost of that capture process, or that can result in an end product that has value, could significantly change the economics of such systems, the researchers say.”

Assuming such carbon capture systems are environmentally necessary (I am not making that assumption), this new battery configuration would at least reduce the cost of it. The researcher does not claim perpetual energy, nor does the chemical reaction violate the laws of thermodynamics. Like many of you, am I trying to keep an open mind to scientific discovery. And not all discoveries of value have a clear and irrefutable economic or environmental benefit.

nobodysknowledge
Reply to  Chris
September 22, 2018 3:01 am

Good point Chris

pat
September 21, 2018 7:05 pm

I don’t get it. I can’t think of a single useful application except perhaps on a submarine or space capsule, in which case a carbon monoxide collector may be more applicable.

WXcycles
September 21, 2018 9:15 pm

“ … Rather than attempting to convert carbon dioxide to specialized chemicals using metal catalysts, which is currently highly challenging, this battery could continuously convert carbon dioxide into a solid mineral carbonate as it discharges. … ”

Actually Li metal is commonplace, straightforward and currently very cheap to mass-produce and supply to consumer markets. We had “carbon batteries” when I was a boy and they were incomparable and very inferior to what we have today. Unless there’s a significant performance increase or significantly lower market cost why would anyone bother investing in such a battery tech?

Well, unless they’re hand-waving to lobbying for a public subsidy to save the world, i.e. losers should win.

A real battery tech breakthrough would take over the market without much fuss via being better and out-competing and supplanting other battery technologies–the good old fashioned capitalist way.


“ … This early system has not yet been optimized and will require further development, the researchers say. For one thing, the cycle life of the battery is limited to 10 charge-discharge cycles, so more research is needed to improve rechargeability and prevent degradation of the cell components. “Lithium-carbon dioxide batteries are years away” as a viable product, Gallant says, as this research covers just one of several needed advances to make them practical.

But the concept offers great potential, according to Gallant. Carbon capture is widely considered essential to meeting worldwide goals for reducing greenhouse gas emissions, but there are not yet proven, …”

ah-huh … gimme money … 10 cycles … as opposed to thousands.

tty
Reply to  WXcycles
September 22, 2018 6:44 am

“..currently very cheap to mass-produce and supply to consumer markets”

Is $ 18,000 per ton really “very cheap”?

John Tillman
Reply to  tty
September 26, 2018 1:05 pm

Zinc-air batteries are now rechargeable. Could eventually replace dangerous (flammable and explosive) and toxic (because of cobalt) Li-ion batteries:

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/26/business/energy-environment/zinc-battery-solar-power.html

Also cheaper than lithium.

Backed by billionaire surgeon and scientist Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong, a South African more honest than his fellow entrepreneur and compatriot Elon Musk.

John Hardy
September 22, 2018 2:57 am

This sounds to me like flow battery akin to the Lithium-air battery – From Wikipedia “The lithium-air battery (Li-air) is a metal–air electrochemical cell or battery chemistry that uses oxidation of lithium at the anode and reduction of oxygen at the cathode to induce a current flow.”

i.e quite unlike the batteries used in EV’s today

September 22, 2018 6:21 am

Another revolutionary battery! Runs your EV straight to the moon. Zoom!

Yawn……

Donald Schmitt
September 22, 2018 7:07 am

Idea for Science Fiction disaster story:

CO2 eating batteries eat up all the CO2

Peter
Reply to  Donald Schmitt
September 22, 2018 6:50 pm

I do not want to be in the same room as these things, or down wind of scaled up versions. CO2 is essential for life, and lack of CO2 even in the trace concentrations found in our atmosphere is dangerous. I used to do anesthetics, we had monitors to make sure CO2 didn’t get too low and hurt the patient.

M__ S__
September 23, 2018 10:40 am

An incredible waste of money and time.

Paul Hogan
September 24, 2018 3:01 am

We humans breathe out 44000 ppm of co2 with every breath we exhale. Should we all commit suicide or what?

Paul Hogan
September 24, 2018 4:51 am

We humans breath out 44000, yes, forty-four thousand ppm co2. Should we all commit suicide to please a corrupt gang of fraudsters?

Robert Clark
September 24, 2018 8:29 am

Sounds way too much like a something for nothing gimmick. where does that captured carbon and oxygen go when the battery is discharged.
Any way, taking CO2 from the atmosphere reminds me of “Fallen Angels”. Wait, It’s just a novel. Right Guys. Right.