From the “law of unintended consequences” department comes this finding, suggesting that the push for eco-friendly energy savings may be doing more harm to us than good.
Study links night exposure to blue light with breast and prostate cancer
Researchers used images taken by astronauts to evaluate outdoor lighting in Madrid and Barcelona

A study performed by an international team led by the Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), a centre supported by the “la Caixa” Foundation, reports a link between exposure to blue light at night and higher risk of developing breast and prostate cancer. Blue light is a range of the visible light spectrum emitted by most white LEDs and many tablet and phone screens. The results have been published in Environmental Health Perspectives.
“WHO’s International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has classified night shift work as probably carcinogenic to humans. There is evidence pointing to an association between exposure to artificial light at night, disruption of the circadian rhythm, and breast and prostate cancers. With this study we sought to determine whether night exposure to light in cities can affect the development of these two types of cancer”, explains Manolis Kogevinas, ISGlobal researcher and coordinator of the study. “We know that depending on its intensity and wave length, artificial light, particularly in the blue spectrum, can decrease melatonin production and secretion”, says Martin Aubé, physics professor at CÉGEP in Sherbrooke, Canada and study co-author.
The study was conducted within the framework of the MCC-Spain project cofunded by the ‘Consorcio de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública’ (CIBERESP), and includes medical and epidemiological data of more than 4,000 people between 20 and 85 years of age in 11 Spanish regions. Indoor exposure to artificial light was determined through personal questionnaires, while outdoor levels of artificial light were evaluated for Madrid and Barcelona, based on nocturnal images taken by astronauts aboard the International Space Station.

Results obtained for both cities show that participants exposed to higher levels of blue light had a 1.5 and 2-fold higher risk of developing breast and prostate cancer, respectively, as compared to the less-exposed population.
Ariadna García, ISGlobal researcher and first author of the study, says: “Given the ubiquity of artificial light at night, determining whether it increases or not the risk of cancer is a public health issue”. At this point, further studies should include more individual data using for instance light sensors that allow measuring indoor light levels. It would also be important to do this kind of research in young people that extensively use blue light emitting screens”.
“Currently, the images taken by the astronauts on the Space Station are our only way of determining the colour of outdoor lighting at a large scale, and the spread of blue light-emitting white LEDs in our cities”, comments Alejandro Sánchez de Miguel, scientist at the Astrophysics Institute in Andalucía-CSIC and Exeter University.
###
Reference
Garcia-Saenz A., Sánchez de Miguel A., Espinosa A., Valentín A., Aragonés N., Llorca J., Amiano P., Martín Sánchez V., Guevara M., Capelo R., Tardón A., Peiró-Pérez R., Jiménez-Moleón JJ., Roca-Barceló A., Pérez-Gómez B., Dierssen-Sotos T., Fernández-Villa T., Moreno-Iribas C., Moreno V., García-Pérez J., Castaño-Vinyals G., Pollán M., Aubé M., Kogevinas M. Evaluating the association between artificial light-at-night exposure and breast and prostate cancer risk in Spain (MCC-Spain study). April 2018. DOI:10.1289/EHP1837. Environmental Health Perspectives
The full study is here: https://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/EHP1837/
I did some research into this.
There’s a Harvard study on night light, and in particular blue light.
But we may be paying a price for basking in all that light. At night, light throws the body’s biological clock—the circadian rhythm—out of whack. Sleep suffers. Worse, research shows that it may contribute to the causation of cancer, diabetes, heart disease, and obesity.
…
While light of any kind can suppress the secretion of melatonin, blue light at night does so more powerfully. Harvard researchers and their colleagues conducted an experiment comparing the effects of 6.5 hours of exposure to blue light to exposure to green light of comparable brightness. The blue light suppressed melatonin for about twice as long as the green light and shifted circadian rhythms by twice as much (3 hours vs. 1.5 hours).
In another study of blue light, researchers at the University of Toronto compared the melatonin levels of people exposed to bright indoor light who were wearing blue-light–blocking goggles to people exposed to regular dim light without wearing goggles. The fact that the levels of the hormone were about the same in the two groups strengthens the hypothesis that blue light is a potent suppressor of melatonin.
…
If blue light does have adverse health effects, then environmental concerns, and the quest for energy-efficient lighting, could be at odds with personal health. Those curlicue compact fluorescent lightbulbs and LED lights are much more energy-efficient than the old-fashioned incandescent lightbulbs we grew up with. But they also tend to produce more blue light.
See: https://www.health.harvard.edu/staying-healthy/blue-light-has-a-dark-side
So it appears that a nighttime blue light component equals less sleep and therefore more stress on the body. With more stress, then susceptibility to cancer increases.
I don’t know how accurate the methodologies in these studies are, but one thing is for sure, many white LED’s tend to have a larger blue light component:

Have a look at the CREE guide to LED color mixing.

In cool white LED’s, the two colors (blue and yellow) mix to create a white. This is shown below on the CIE 1931 color space:

Note: about 15 minutes after publication, reference to the Harvard medical study was added.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
All the filament LEDs I’ve seen to date emit a warm yellow-biased light, not unlike an incandescent.
http://www.designingwithleds.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Archipelago-lit-600×448.jpg
But you can’t make plasma in the microwave with an LED.
But not as much as actual darkness. Go outside. During the day.
Its not “blue light” that stops people from doing that! And for the “researchers” stop doing “research” that finds correlations and expects causation based on what they want to show (ie the blue light change part) whilst apparently ignoring behavioural change.
I imagine we can come up with any number of increasing independent variables that correlate with one thing or another. It’s this rush to cause-effect assignment that is responsible for a lot of junk science and superstitions.
Show me the controlled experiments
So which is worse? The cancers resulting from exposure to LED lighting, or the cancers resulting from the combustion of fossil fuels to power incandescent or other less efficient forms of lighting?
I’m sure one of these geniuses can develop a computer model…
Confounding factors.
Elementary statistical techniques, look it up under confounding factors. Where do you find those blue lights? In cities. Where do environmental causes of some cancers concentrate. In cities.
Where do you find the blue lights? In cities. Where do you find cinemas? In cities. Therefore those lights must have something to do with movies.
Utter nonsense.
“Where do environmental causes of some cancers concentrate”
Which ones? The contraceptive pill? Hormone substitution treatment?
Infrequent ejaculations?
The key for me is that the group behind this claim was caught fabricating evidence to support another so-called study claiming glysophate, a weed killer, causes cancer.
And then lied and stone walled about it.
Also, deciding that blue light is a “likely” carcinogen based on the poor quality evidence of the report discussed in this blog post implies strongly that the decision was made prior to the study. The evidence offered is barely coincidental, much less linking in a causative manner.
I guess any herbicide is going to be statistically linked with almost any other legal pesticide and all types of cancer known to be higher in agricultural regions.
UV light is proven carcinogenic and girls like UV tanning
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2013/01/22/article-2266457-064F863B0000044D-146_634x407.jpg
I’d like to point out that LED lighting can be modulated in frequencies that are not noticeable to alter mood and attitude. There will come a time when wise people will install a low-pass filter on the power coming into them. If you think this is beyond the nefarious thinking of the Deep State and their controllers, you are badly mistaken.
Correlation, linked to superstitious thinking.
International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC),
have declared that virtually EVERY item / substance
they have ever tested causes cancer —
causes cancer — I think there was one exception:
The French International Agency
for Research on Cancer (IARC)
received over $48 million
from America’s National Institutes of Health (NIH).
They have “tested” over 900 chemicals,
and 899 were claimed to be carcinogenic !
Complete nonsense!
IARC must be ignored and should not be partially funded
by NIH !
French of IARC is CIRC, pronounced cirque (circus).
Dissolve the IARC, WHO and CDC!
Regardless of cancer. These lights have killed my sky watching nights to zero. So much light pollution that even with a 12 dobsonian I can’t see anything!
Why isn’t the massive breast cancer screening program even discussed? They know the bigger number in “cancer” (tumors) is caused by cancer screening, right?
I can’t stand yellow light. I call it jaundiced, it almost makes me nauseous. If a monitor is too “warm” at “cool” settings I will dispose of it.
Am I an alien or am I just doomed to all the ailments blue light is supposed to cause?
Or is all this just a consequence of generic internet hysteria?
Breathing air may be giving us cancer.
Drinking water may be giving us cancer.
We should probably stop doing both, We will die, but we won’t get cancer.
The New LED lights were designed to make you unhealthy look up the companies behind them you will find the Rockefellers. this has been well documented.
Stay away from them the Light Bulbs are harmful!