Canadian Government: "consider the gendered impacts of climate change"

Catherine McKenna
Catherine McKenna. By US Embassy Canada – Flickr, CC BY 2.0, Link

Guest essay by Eric Worrall

Catherine McKenna, Canadian minister for the Environment and Climate Change is training “woman negotiators” to combat global warming.

Canadian Climate Minister Urges Attention to the ‘Gendered Impacts’ of Climate Change

by THOMAS D. WILLIAMS, PH.D. 10 Mar 20183407

Canada’s Minister of Environment and Climate Change is urging environmental activists to address the “gendered impacts” of climate change, especially its effects on women and girls.

In a recent post on Twitter, Catherine McKenna, the 47-year-old Trudeau appointee from Canada’s Liberal Party, called on followers to “consider the gendered impacts of climate change on women, girls and children” while praising Canada’s leadership in training “women negotiators” in the fight against manmade global warming.

Apparently, at least in the minister’s mind, the weather is now waging its own “war on women.”

Read more:

I am shocked by the narrow minded gender insensitivity displayed by Catherine’s comment.

How can you possibly consider the gendered impacts of climate change without also considering the transgendered impacts of climate change? Why restrict the training program to women negotiators when there are so many other under-represented genders? Of course I am using the word transgendered in its broadest sense, no offence intended to people who identify as perigender, vapogender or any of the constantly growing list of other genders.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
March 10, 2018 11:10 pm

The climate’s “war on women” is as ephemeral as the moon’s impact on the typical honeymoon.

Reply to  RockyRoad
March 11, 2018 3:13 am

That’s a relief as its now Women made global warming. Lol.

Reply to  B.j.
March 11, 2018 6:49 am

Headline – World ends tonight – WOMEN AND MINORITIES HARDEST HIT!!!!

Reply to  B.j.
March 11, 2018 8:44 am

Well, they invented hot flashes, didn’t they???

Reply to  B.j.
March 11, 2018 9:51 am

I heard it was the manufacture of Blond Catherine McKenna Barbie dolls working 24/7 over little computer’s to calculate Climate models favorable to the green blob vision, that are contributing to the woman made climate change disruption and that nasty Co2 presently ravaging Canada!
Warning Ban on all Co2 Fizzy drinks coming soon to all insane nations soon!!!!

The Expulsive
Reply to  RockyRoad
March 11, 2018 6:36 am

We are dealing with a government here that seems to be more concerned with the ephemeral nature of many things, which like shiny objects attract their attention for the purposes of a headline or virtue signalling. When they don’t achieve what they spoke of, they quietly move on to a new message signaling their commitment to some other virtue and hope no-one remembers. In trade they talk about the same importance, resulting in rejection by places like China. In internal trade they fail to uphold the need to trade what we have to trade, letting the Marxist leadership of BC dance its happy dance.

John Harmsworth
Reply to  The Expulsive
March 11, 2018 7:37 am

As a Canadian it’s embarrassing but on the other hand they apparently have a constituency for this intellectual tripe. However, Justin is down a fair bit in the polls and a recent national survey says 70% of Canadians think we should have balanced budgets. I cling to hope but he’ll probably win the next election, maybe with a minority.

Reply to  The Expulsive
March 11, 2018 7:45 am

The problem with a balanced budget is that most people think it should be balanced by raising taxes, on other people, and by cutting subsidies, used by other people.

F. Leghorn
Reply to  The Expulsive
March 11, 2018 12:05 pm

They aren’t worried about anyone remembering their previous lies. After all – we’ve always been at war with Eastasia.

Reply to  RockyRoad
March 11, 2018 9:32 am

Nicely said RockyRoad:))

Reply to  RockyRoad
March 11, 2018 9:45 am

Shouldn’t she be at home raising children or something? Canaduh is lead by women and children.
It’s how every civilisation eventually destroys itself. The men give up and say ” meh, why bother”

Reply to  RockyRoad
March 11, 2018 11:54 am

Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds.

Reply to  RockyRoad
March 11, 2018 6:57 pm

Canada’s Trudeau:
“No country would find 173 billion barrels of oil in the ground and leave them there”.

Paul r
March 10, 2018 11:11 pm

Let’s face it we men are just bastards that are responsible for everything that’s wrong with the world. Well us and divorce lawyers

Tom in Florida
Reply to  Paul r
March 11, 2018 5:05 am

Yeah but god made us that way so why blame us. That’s my excuse and I am sticking with it.

Reply to  Paul r
March 11, 2018 7:21 am

Marriage, the only reason for divorce lawyers.

Reply to  RHS
March 11, 2018 7:20 pm

Research has shown that 97% of divorce cases involved marriage. Correlation or causation?

Reply to  Paul r
March 11, 2018 7:24 am

Sorry, it is only the tiny minority of men who are of Western European origin who are bastards. Don’t you know that none of the other men of the world are ever sexist, racist or damaging to the environment. I know that must be true because every single day CBC interviews people who assure me that Canada is the worst place in the world. They only moved here to save us from ourselves.

Reply to  BCBill
March 12, 2018 8:30 am

Yep, you would be very hard pressed to find an African-American that is sexist, and/or treats women poorly, in any way at all.

Steve Case
March 10, 2018 11:22 pm

Will they ever put a cork in it?

M.W. Plia.
Reply to  Steve Case
March 11, 2018 4:09 am

Not anytime soon Steve.
It’s rather amazing. In Ontario (where I live) and the rest of Canada our educated, political, media and corporate elites do not publically question Al Gore’s alarmist AGW narrative.
Other than places like WUWT I’ve yet to witness a detached and reasoned explanation of the uncertainties surrounding the issue. IMHO the deception has infected the whole planet.

Reply to  M.W. Plia.
March 11, 2018 6:05 am

‘ educated ‘ !!!!!!!!

Gerry, England
Reply to  M.W. Plia.
March 11, 2018 6:29 am

Being a complete moron seems to be very helpful for a career in Canadian government.

Tom Halla
Reply to  Gerry, England
March 11, 2018 7:54 am

But they are rather good looking dull-normals. to use a later euphemism.

Reply to  M.W. Plia.
March 11, 2018 7:46 am

Not just the Canadian government.

Reply to  M.W. Plia.
March 11, 2018 9:15 am

The fitting title is morosoph: n. a learned fool.
Lots of knowledge with no sense on how to apply it.

Colin Peterson
Reply to  M.W. Plia.
March 12, 2018 7:46 am

it’s not that bad. Mulroney said she was going to cancel the carbon tax. I bet Doug Ford will do the same. his platform is not out yet, but he mentioned Tanya Allen in his speech, and she is more conservative than Mulroney Tanya is endorsed by Brad Trost who openly declares global warming to be a hoax. so with Tanya a certain in the new government Ontario may become more climate change denier than Trump.

M.W. Plia.
Reply to  Steve Case
March 12, 2018 12:01 pm

You may be right Colin. Hopefully Ford will bring some long needed balance to the discussion of the importance of “The Green Energy Act” and the logic may spread to the rest of the country.
Ontario is one of the best (worst?) examples (per capita) of the $damage man-made global warming alarmists can do. A fiscal boondoggle of waste unmatched in Canadian history.
And it’s approaching $100 billion so electricity prices can only go up. Shutting down coal (even though our air quality was and remains superb), refurbishing old nukes (that should have been de-commissioned), building huge, costly wind and solar parks with the necessary and also costly conventional back-up and finally, the excess power from wind, solar and nuclear sold to the spot market for a fraction….total $fiasco and no reason for it.
All they had to do was keep the coal going, shut down the old nukes and hook up to Quebec’s abundant hydro power…but what do I know?….instead double digit $billions of debt….madness, just madness.

Reply to  M.W. Plia.
March 12, 2018 12:39 pm

Ontario (with one of the best environmental records in the world/one of the worst environmental records in Canada) is 97% made up of pristine wilderness. Along with the rest of Canada, Ontario has the most to gain from a little warming. Yet they are doing untold harm to their economy in a hopeless attempt to curb warming. It is the offspring of the guilt complex of the wealthy.

March 10, 2018 11:26 pm

Climate Barbie is yet again showing her insanity.

Reply to  mikebartnz
March 11, 2018 12:52 am

now it’s clear to me. everything bad in the world comes from CO2 and everything good comes from vagina.

Reply to  gnomish
March 11, 2018 7:05 am

Half right… maybe.

Reply to  mikebartnz
March 11, 2018 7:33 am

No this is straight out of the ICC playbook from the last COP meeting. I commented at the time it was strange the whole gender push to climate change.

Komrade Kuma
Reply to  mikebartnz
March 11, 2018 7:53 am

Climate Barbie is the perfect ( I initially typed ‘pertfect’ now isn’t that ironic) companion to your Ken doll PL. I just loved his excruciatingly sycophantic ‘dress ups’ during his Indiaa trip. At first I thought the pics just must have been Photoshopped but no they were real. OMG, he is like some 14 yo who was awarded “PM for a week” for beeing soooo pretty. Have we seen anything like this since the floating world of Versailles in the 18th century or do we have to go back to first century AD Rome and Caligula or Nero?

Reply to  Komrade Kuma
March 11, 2018 9:22 am


Reply to  Komrade Kuma
March 11, 2018 10:42 am

George Carlin said:
“You know how stupid the average person is, right? Well, half of them are stupider than that!”

Reply to  Komrade Kuma
March 11, 2018 10:46 am

George Carlin – on global warming alarmists (warning – language)

Reply to  mikebartnz
March 11, 2018 9:58 am

I agree. Ken is just as ravaged by global warming.

Mickey Reno
Reply to  mikebartnz
March 11, 2018 12:54 pm

Maybe not. She’s living it up in Cancun in late winter, on the taxpayer’s dime. Nice work if you can get it.
Meanwhile, the Brietbart article quotes another snowflake woman living it up on the Mexican Riviera that’s just too funny that I must quote it here:

Environmental activist Leehi Yona has written that climate change is connected to an array of issues spanning from transgender justice to immigration reform.
Writing in The Nation, Ms. Yona denounced the President for his appointment of a string of “climate-change deniers” before expounding her own theory of the centrality of climate change in understanding every other issue.
“Climate change isn’t just about the planet. It’s about justice: racial, social, socioeconomic, reproductive, and environmental,” she wrote. “It’s about immigration reform, LGBTQIA+ rights, and religious freedom.”
“I find myself unable to think of climate change on its own,” Yona writes.

Reply to  mikebartnz
March 13, 2018 7:42 pm

I believe she does not like being called that, even tho that who she looks like and is maid with a plastic personality. Perhaps she is one of these new fangled robots w AI I keep seeing stories about. A woman like that makes me head for hills.

March 10, 2018 11:27 pm

The Lettuce, Bacon, Gherkin, Tomato sandwich needs consideration.

Ron Long
Reply to  Paddy
March 11, 2018 3:00 am

Paddy, you forgot Q, which I think stands for Queso, or cheese in Spanish. Around 80% of Canadians live within 150 miles of the USA border, why they don’t want ti to warm up so they can spread out a little is beyond me.

Another Doug
Reply to  Ron Long
March 11, 2018 7:14 am

Leftover Bacon, Gravy and Tabasco Quail

Reply to  Ron Long
March 11, 2018 7:31 am

Canadians being upset by global warming, man-made or not, is in keeeping with our national objective to be economic failures. Based on that objective, Climate Barbie is the “man” for the job.

Reply to  Ron Long
March 11, 2018 5:25 pm

I may have posted this before but it fits here better.
For seventy-five winters I have grown old
But seldom have seen a New Year so cold
Supposed to be warmer I’ve heard them say
Was not very obvious, this New Year’s Day
To fight climate change we have to pay
Taxes on heat to keep winter at bay
It’s becoming a sin to drive to the store
Cause driving our car will make it warm more
Excuse me for saying I think it’s a crock
Our leaders only tell lies when they talk
I think it is funny a Canuck can be told
We have to pay more to make it stay cold

Jeff Labute
Reply to  Ron Long
March 13, 2018 1:44 pm

I find “B” for “bi” perplexing since it refers to Male and Female, and not gender. Once we convert Bi to mean gender, then we will get an infinite number of variations… example, we now must add ‘Tri’, and ‘Quad’, which add more gender categories/letters so now we have to add ‘Quint’ and ‘Sex’ which is more gender categories and therefore more combinations of genders you can be attracted to… and so on. There could be some people who are dodeca… attracted to 12 different genders. Counting the days to the end of the liberal reign.

Reply to  Paddy
March 11, 2018 3:13 am

Wow, I was really out of touch with the choice of “genders” we have these days. It’s better than the choice of self-mixed paints at your local DIY shop.

“Biogender: a gender that feels connected to nature in some way”

Jeezus, we even have something that “feels” related to nature? Maybe that is just there to cater for the odd freak who still thinks gender has something to do with biology and the reason we are on the planet and not politics.
Hey, I’m a biogender ( dick’n’balls flavour ) !! I feel so much better now I know who I really am !

Reply to  Greg
March 11, 2018 7:35 am

I have a mate who is at the Non PC end of the spectrum and he is seeking to be recognized as a toaster for his gender. He figures if these idiots want to open things up that wide he is going to take the mickey out of them.

Roger Graves
Reply to  Greg
March 11, 2018 8:20 am

Don’t forget sprenchgender, which encompasses those of us whose gender is defined by an all-consuming passion for sprocket wrenches. And by the way, we absolutely insist on our own pronouns, which as I’m sure you all know, are zhing, whang and b’dong.

Tom in Florida
Reply to  Paddy
March 11, 2018 5:06 am

What about the Honeymoon Sandwich? You know, lettuce alone.

John Darrow
Reply to  Tom in Florida
March 11, 2018 8:02 am

‘lettuce’ alone – I like that!

March 10, 2018 11:30 pm

I found the perfect loon to lead the charge.

Reply to  Max Photon
March 11, 2018 12:14 am

Hi Max,
A long time have I watched this one and I must confess that I no longer think she believes what she says (any more anyway).
Just an intuition.
It’s like she has just found a niche that pays well and sheer cynicism keeps her going at this point post-red-pill.

Reply to  Jones
March 11, 2018 3:25 am

Wow , that is one seriously dumb bitch. Not the slightest idea of how stupid you sound saying the majority on people in a country are “still the minority” ( despite being in the majority ).
If women want to be treated equally they really need to stop talking this kind of decisive, hypocritical shite.

Reply to  Jones
March 11, 2018 9:58 am

When men hand the leadership to the women folk, this is what happens. Every. Time.
Next, they lower the voting age and by proxy, women hand the reigns over to the teenagers.
Eventually you get a 16 y.o. PM. Seriously, you think that can’t happen, when men give up?

Doug in Calgary
Reply to  Max Photon
March 11, 2018 12:34 am

Conservatives want you punished if you break the law… the left want you punished because they think you might break the law.

Reply to  Doug in Calgary
March 11, 2018 3:05 am

Ha! Love it!

Reply to  Doug in Calgary
March 11, 2018 8:55 am

Or might not be enthusiastic enough in obeying the law.

Reply to  Max Photon
March 11, 2018 4:02 am

I think she’s a trans-girafe. Look at her neck. Can the blood rise up there?

Tom in Florida
Reply to  s-t
March 11, 2018 5:07 am

Apparently not.

John Darrow
Reply to  s-t
March 11, 2018 8:11 am

Uh yes – osmois

Reply to  Max Photon
March 11, 2018 6:55 am

Did you get the part where Tucker asks her about men opening doors for women, and she replies that opening doors for some women would be considered abuse and NOT opening doors for other women would be considered abuse, too!
So are women going to be required to put signs on their forehead indicating their preference, or will we just have to avoid women altogether?
I can see two types of signs:
“Open a door and I sue, buddy”
“Failure to Open a door and I sue, buddy”.
Talk about abject, pure, and unadulterated INSANITY! (Although I nearly laughed until my sides ached at that contradiction.)
And that’s not the first time this woman has be-clowned herself on Tucker Tonight.
Yet I must digress: should I call her a “wo-person” because the word “woman” contains that nasty word “man”? Or has “man” suddenly become the exclusive domain of the feminine gender and those of us with an extra appendage must find another word; perhaps “mo-person”, but I’m just guessing: There’s no logic with insanity.
These people are circling the drain and they’re dragging everybody else down with them.

John Harmsworth
Reply to  RockyRoad
March 11, 2018 7:43 am

How about locking the door so she can’t get in? What’s she gonna say about that?

Reply to  RockyRoad
March 11, 2018 9:55 am

“There is no logic with insanity”. Why then, do we keep engaging with them? Just ignore them.
I once held a door for a female coming along behind me. She started with the “What are you doing? I can open my own doors, thank you.” My reply was ” So sorry. I thought I was dealing with a lady. Obviously I was mistaken.”

Richard of NZ
Reply to  RockyRoad
March 11, 2018 12:16 pm

No the word person includes the word “son” which is male sexist. To use a non-sexist made-up word perhaps wo-per-offspring would suit. Wo-child is no good because child is usually ageist.

Reply to  RockyRoad
March 11, 2018 5:32 pm

Wopeople, to follow Justin’s rules.

Gunga Din
Reply to  Max Photon
March 11, 2018 4:39 pm

Abolish the word “Mailman”?
What would she replace it with?
What a kook.
PS Why is it that anyone who disagrees with what the (US) left is promoting is filled “hate” or has a “phobia”?
How “inclusive” is that?
Would this gal send everyone to jail that is allergic to nuts? 😎

Coeur de Lion
March 10, 2018 11:37 pm

I feel harassed. Who do I sue ?

Reply to  Coeur de Lion
March 11, 2018 1:00 am

Since 2017 when a pressure group successfully lobbied the Canadian parliament, you no longer “sue”, you now “kevin”. It was thought that the verb “to sue” was oppressing women of that name because of its unpleasant connotations.
That said, I don’t know who you should kevin about this.

Reply to  Coeur de Lion
March 11, 2018 1:47 am

As this woman seems to discriminate against men, I’m not sure.

Reply to  Coeur de Lion
March 11, 2018 7:36 am

You sue everyone and often apparently for gender bias.

March 10, 2018 11:54 pm

My wife used to get mad at me when we would be driving along and I would see some people along side of the road and say “They obviously should not be allowed to breed”. She doesn’t anymore.

Reply to  RAH
March 11, 2018 3:03 am

So the people along side of the road are breeding and your wife would like to unsee? I’m sorry I’m not getting your message.

Reply to  RAH
March 12, 2018 8:38 am

Obviously u have berated her into submission. the poor dove.

March 11, 2018 12:08 am

I’m sure Saudi Arabia would be very receptive to being told off by them and ordered to cease pumping out all that sexist carbon poison.
Go girls!.
Just popping out for some popcorn……

John V. Wright
March 11, 2018 12:17 am

The Labour party in the UK – the right-on home of all that is Politically Correct – has got itself into a delicious bind, much to the delight of everyday folk. This is the political party that long ago adopted women-only short-lists for MP candidate selection in some parts of the country in order to try and find a more ‘gender-balanced’ House of Commons which they see as too ‘male, pale and stale’.
With the advent of men who are ‘transitioning’ to be women, these po-faced guardians of gender neutrality have been vociferous in the media that such people must be treated as women even if they only self-identify as women and are just at the start of their ‘journey’. The women MPs of the Labour party have been particularly noisy about the need for everyone to accept that these men as women, one even tweeting that “just because you have a penis does not mean that you are not a woman”.
Then, horror of horrors – these transgender blokes started applying to join the all-women groups of candidates for MP selection. Cue squeals of outrage from yes, you’ve guessed it, female Labour MPs who insist that these lists are only for ‘women who were born as women’. They even formed a secret committee to identify those who were promoting trans-men to join the short lists and getting them expelled.
That’s the thing about those who demand we all change our societal attitudes to the latest political show-pony cause celebre – it only applies to US not THEM.
Needless to say, this hilarious tale of unintended PC consequences has been massively ignored by those hard Left bastions of British ‘journalism’, the BBC and the Guardian who are so morally transfixed by this unexpected dilemma that they cannot bring themselves to write about it.

Reply to  John V. Wright
March 11, 2018 12:36 am

I’m sure the esteemed Edna would be outraged by such bias.comment image

Reply to  John V. Wright
March 11, 2018 12:57 am

so what pronoun is appropriate for the transfixed?

Reply to  gnomish
March 11, 2018 4:54 am

Vlads and vladesses

Reply to  John V. Wright
March 11, 2018 1:32 am

No further comment

Reply to  Leo Smith
March 11, 2018 3:13 am

not available

Pamela Gray
Reply to  Leo Smith
March 11, 2018 6:54 am

Funny! Doesn’t match the persona of female pioneer stock, but funny nonetheless! However, I have, at times, demanded that fish bite my hook NOW!

Reply to  John V. Wright
March 11, 2018 5:47 am

Big problems with the petitioning of governments and corporations to promote women to higher positions of authority are: a) the ones doing the advocacy are political activists of a certain ideology, b) the women successfully being advocated for are very often beholden to those who lobbied to get them to their higher position.

Reply to  John V. Wright
March 12, 2018 4:46 am

You can read it yourselves here –
Best comment has to be “I bet a lot of female labour supporters will be sitting around scratching their nut-sacks trying to figure this one out.. “

AGW is not Science
Reply to  John V. Wright
March 13, 2018 8:21 am

LMFAO – that’s both priceless AND predictable.

Hokey Schtick
March 11, 2018 12:26 am

Women against carbon dioxide.

March 11, 2018 12:32 am

In 50 years > this < will still be your historical legacy Canada … not that there's anything wrong with that … at least you meant well … I suppose .. but experimental dystopia for idiots is now a thing.

March 11, 2018 12:37 am

Eric –
Re -Your link to that list of genders- Long though the list is (113 genders in all) there is no male and no female gender. I’m sure there are clearly some male and female people in the world, and they have every right to be alarmed and hurt by this thoughtlessness

Reply to  Eric Worrall
March 11, 2018 12:54 am

nature is a systemic microagressor.

Bruce Cobb
Reply to  Eric Worrall
March 11, 2018 6:39 am

“Male and Female” are now “legacy” genders.

Reply to  Eric Worrall
March 11, 2018 7:44 pm

I didn’t see genderbenders on your list. Microaggression?

save energy
Reply to  mothcatcher
March 11, 2018 1:09 am

I can’t Imagen what ‘gender fluids’ taste like

Mike Schlamby
Reply to  save energy
March 11, 2018 3:36 am

I tried some vaginal jelly once. Didn’t taste anything like it.

Reply to  save energy
March 11, 2018 5:53 am

I tried some vaginal jelly once
From the tube or some other, umm, place? Was it by accident?

Gunga Din
Reply to  save energy
March 11, 2018 4:43 pm


(A cincinnati radio guy who made crank calls.)

Reply to  mothcatcher
March 11, 2018 12:17 pm

There’s no mention of chronogendric *things*. These people really lack immagination.

Jeff Alberts
Reply to  mothcatcher
March 11, 2018 2:32 pm

Male and Female aren’t genders, they are sexes.

Dodgy Geezer
March 11, 2018 12:50 am

I can see that Climate Change is exceptionally dangerous to persons of gender.
So I have decided to have no gender at all…

Reply to  Dodgy Geezer
March 11, 2018 12:52 am

Bruce Willis pitched it just right I feel……..

Pamela Gray
Reply to  Jones
March 11, 2018 7:07 am

I don’t get it. Frozen meat?

March 11, 2018 12:52 am

“Manmade” climate change? How sexist. Don’t you mean Personmade climate change?!?

Thomas Gasloli
Reply to  Steve
March 11, 2018 5:32 am

No, because womyn are not responsible for Global Warming, only us men.

Reply to  Thomas Gasloli
March 11, 2018 8:18 am

I dunno. We could probably drop a great deal of carbon emissions by banning driving to the mall.

Walter Sobchak
Reply to  Steve
March 11, 2018 7:03 am

“Person” is sexist because it has the word son in it which carries the freight of enforced gender stereotypes. Please use the phrase “anthropogenic climate change”, because absolutely no one knows what that means.

Reply to  Walter Sobchak
March 11, 2018 2:38 pm

‘Anthropos’ is Greek for ‘Man’. Therefore, ‘anthropogenic climate change’
is ‘climate change caused by men’.

Walter Sobchak
Reply to  Walter Sobchak
March 11, 2018 5:45 pm

Shh. There aren’t 3 sentient creatures under the age of 60, in the United States who know that. Greek is DWEM stuff. True SJWs abominate Greek.

March 11, 2018 12:56 am

According to a UN report,
“Climate change ‘impacts women more than men'”

Reply to  quaesoveritas
March 11, 2018 4:40 am

CAGW is lowering the sperm count. That’s covered the men. Now let’s get some press releases out for the women.

Reply to  quaesoveritas
March 11, 2018 5:56 am

“Women, children, transgenders and all minorities hardest hit”

March 11, 2018 1:24 am

Aren’t transgender people limited to one generation? Unless of course they resort to cloning like Dolly the sheep.

Peta of Newark
March 11, 2018 1:26 am

Look at that picture of her.. lets read some body language
Showing her teeth = trying to appease, to get into someone’s favour. She wants and needs to be ‘liked’
Generally she is nervous in that photo, she is scared= she is maybe being shall we say ‘economical with the truth’?
Enough of that.
What is it?
Easy you say: soft music, candles & low lighting, nice places, ‘romantic’ fiction & literature, fairy-tale weddings and honeymoons.
Honeymoon= The newly-wed pair retire somewhere into each other’s exclusive company for 28 days (a moon) and the drink fairly copious amounts of mead (fermented honey) – something almost guaranteed to cure any/most/all inhibitions.
Meanwhile on Planet Earth, a rather different narrative is at play, another one where everyone comes over all coy and hard-to-get..
Read(listen) and learnSorry, it’s not p0rn, not smutty or durty

March 11, 2018 1:29 am

Shocking. Absolutely shocking.
At least in the UK we have left this sort of narrow prejudice behind and are using as Brexit negotiators, a Terrier a Great Dane and a Poodle.

Reply to  Leo Smith
March 12, 2018 1:00 pm

Maybe way off topic, but why is the UK negotiating Brexit. Why not just put immigration checkpoints at the Chunnel and along the Irish boarder and be done with it.

March 11, 2018 3:41 am

The reality is that the climate change we have been experiencing is caused by the sun and the oceans over which women and girls have no control. There is no real evidence that CO2 has any effect on climate and plenty of scientific rational to support the idea that the climate sensivity of CO2 is zero. The climate change that we have been experiencing is so small that it takes networks of sophistic sensors to even detect it yet this climate change has been going on for eons and will continue to go on whether woman and girls are still here or not. We must be careful to not mix up weather patterns and cycles which are part of the current climate with real climate change. We should not be waisting time, effort, and money trying to solve problems that we, including women and girls just cannot solve.

Reply to  willhaas
March 11, 2018 3:47 am

Well said!

AGW is not Science
Reply to  willhaas
March 13, 2018 8:25 am


March 11, 2018 3:09 am

oh lordy i hope whatever bug shes got isnt contagious! though it seems shes planning to try n spread it
fools like her and the bimbo on the carlson clip make me cringe as a female..
and make feminism/feminist a word of ridicule

Bloke down the pub
March 11, 2018 3:18 am

Perhaps Ms Mckenna should also consider that women and girls are also the ones who gain the most from the carbon based economy. All that time that they currently spend collecting drinking water and firewood could be much better spent if they had access to mains electricity and piped water.

Mike Schlamby
March 11, 2018 3:34 am

Yet another example of the “women and girls” madness (a.k.a marketing campaign):
I walk through a large transit hub daily. There’s now an advertisement there from some UN body saying that “water is unfair” because women in undeveloped countries have to go to the well and carry it back, and so therefore I should give them even more of my hard-earned money (they leave only poorly specified what they would actually do with that money).
It made me wonder why those women, if women are so smart, don’t organize themselves to build aqueducts (if they can’t afford pipes and pumps) from the plentiful stone that they trip over on their way to the well. The ancients did it.
It also made me wonder why, after decades of similar such campaigns (5 that I can remember), they still haven’t advanced.

Reply to  Mike Schlamby
March 11, 2018 6:43 am

If they did, they’d stop being heartstring-pullers and the contributions would dry up.
It’s the ultimate flaw of Big Charity. If it solves the problem it claims to want to solve, it loses the justification for its existence. And the administrators (read: bureaucrats) lose the justification for their paychecks. So only half-solutions are pushed, which always leave the original problem with a starter crop.

Rhoda R
Reply to  drednicolson
March 11, 2018 12:18 pm

The March of Dimes is the only charitable organization that I can think of that successfully transitioned once it’s original goal was achieved.

Doug Huffman
March 11, 2018 4:19 am

Gender is a grammarian’s term of art, and its ignorant use impeaches the user.

March 11, 2018 4:28 am

Global Warming Is Now A ‘Women ’s Issue’ Due To ‘Ecofeminism
Environmentalists are increasingly claiming that global warming is a “women’s issue” and that the world needs “eco-feminism” as a path forward.
Ecofeminists believe that women and nature are bonded by traditionally “feminine” values and their shared history of oppression by a patriarchal Western society. This patriarchal society is built on four intersectional pillars of sexism, racism, class exploitation, and environmental destruction.

tom s
Reply to  brent
March 11, 2018 9:10 am

My head is spinning….good God the idiocy, the dumbfoundedness, the the….ARGGGGGHHHH BOOM!!

Gordon Pratt
Reply to  brent
March 11, 2018 1:05 pm

Your analysis explains a lot, including why white male trade unionists are such insincere bleeding hearts.
At bottom are the billionaires who think there are way too many people on earth. Not content with birth control, abortion, feminism, safe sex and same sex to reduce the rate of new births they seek higher food prices for an outright reduction to population.
Americans who travel in Canada notice two things. Both energy taxes and food prices are much higher north of the border. Taxes on energy are the cause because food production is energy intensive.
At the behest of the billionaires governments yield to enviro demands for higher energy taxes and food prices, compensate the Indians who in their own words “walk softly on the land”, fund feminism and obstruct development.
The above amounts to the worship of nature which the billionaires expect to enjoy more when the ” useless eaters” are gone.
The true radical will heed God’s words to Noah: Go forth and multiply!

Reply to  brent
March 12, 2018 4:51 am

Stop the world – I really, seriously need to get off this planet that has gone stark staring mad.

Reply to  brent
March 12, 2018 1:04 pm

As if “Western society” is the only one that formed on patriarchal values. the western society is the first to grow past it though. But we aren’t given credit for that. Instead we are berated for perceived sins.

AGW is not Science
Reply to  Jeff in Calgary
March 13, 2018 8:34 am

Yes, THAT. I’d like to see these eco-social justice warrior females sally forth into the middle east and southeast Asia and find out just how good they have it in their modern western societies.

Tom Judd
March 11, 2018 4:30 am

Apparently, any male who’s ever worked on an oil rig, or in a coal mine (even if they’ve never ever seen a woman in their life), can now be guilty of s•e•x•ual assault.

Reply to  Tom Judd
March 11, 2018 11:01 am

Drilling for oil = raping Gaia.
As millennials would say: literally.

March 11, 2018 4:32 am

Transgender woman in the bathroom:
“Just ignore that.”

March 11, 2018 4:47 am

Since women make up the majority of the human species it is scientifically incorrect to refer to manmade global climate change. “Womanmade climate change” you sexists.

Reply to  Rob Dawg
March 11, 2018 5:08 am

Why not: “Whoever–you–Identify–as “made Global Climate Change and/or Warming.
Now that about covers it.

March 11, 2018 5:07 am

According her bosses way of thinking, the Castro and Mao loving soyboy, junior Trudeau, that should be, people made climate change.

Reply to  Rob
March 11, 2018 6:04 am

comment image

Reply to  Rob
March 11, 2018 6:04 am


Reply to  TA
March 11, 2018 6:16 am

Right you are.

March 11, 2018 5:26 am

what about us transsexual lesbians? and trans-race and trans-age?
if gender is an accident of birth then why not age and race. who is to say an ancient white man isn’t actually a hot young Oriental female with an interest in same? surely it is discrimination to not acknowledge this.
after PM trudoze playing Mr dress-up in India and being seen globally for the fool he is, nothing. should surprise us about the current government.

Reply to  ferdberple
March 11, 2018 6:08 am

Yeah, Trudeau did kind of make a fool of himself over in India, didn’t he. This is called “cluelessness”.

Cold in Wisconsin
Reply to  TA
March 11, 2018 8:27 am

And caused his wife and children to do the same. Child abuse.

March 11, 2018 5:31 am

…and out of the other side of their mouth….they say we’re all equal and don’t need special treatment

Tom Halla
March 11, 2018 5:39 am

This discussion is almost as good as the Feminist Glaciology thread for sheer snark.

March 11, 2018 5:41 am

We can easily see what happens when you place people in positions based on gender rather than merit. This sexist bungling disgrace is just one example of what we have to contend with here in Canada under this Liberal government.

March 11, 2018 5:50 am

The “Gender Impact” of Man-Made CO2 has been Hugely Positive for Women
Identify politics have infected climate science, but this is a case where you had better be careful what you wish for, you just might get it. Canadian Climate Minister Urges Attention to the ‘Gendered Impacts’ of Climate Change In a recent post on Twitter, Catherine McKenna, the 47-year-old Trudeau appointee from Canada’s Liberal Party, called … Continue reading

Reply to  co2islife
March 11, 2018 6:14 am

What exactly are the “Gendered Impacts’ of Climate Change”? She failed to point them out in her tweet.
It’s all just another emotional appeal to promote CAGW. The Alarmists are flailing around in every direction to try to find something that will successfully sell the CAGW narrative. So now they try to make it out to be a gender thing.
They keep trying to sell CAGW but nobody is buying. That must be frustrating for the Alarmists.

Bruce Cobb
Reply to  TA
March 11, 2018 6:17 am

I see “Appeal to Gender” as just one of many “Appeals to Emotion” that the Alarmists have in their kit bag. And yeah, it has gotten old, but it’s all they’ve got.

Reply to  TA
March 11, 2018 6:52 am

Yep, sad, very sad, but true.

Reply to  TA
March 11, 2018 2:46 pm

“… Golgafrincham is a red semi-desert planet that is home of the Great Circling Poets of Arium and a species of particularly inspiring lichen. Its people decided it was time to rid themselves of an entire useless third of their population, and so the descendants of the Circling Poets concocted a story that their planet would shortly be destroyed by a giant mutant star goat. The useless third of the population, consisting of hairdressers, tired TV producers, insurance salesmen, personnel officers, security guards, management consultants, telephone sanitisers, and the like, were packed into the ‘B-Ark’, one of three purported giant Ark spaceships, and told that everyone else would follow shortly in the other two. The other two thirds of the population, of course, did not follow and “led full, rich and happy lives until they were all suddenly wiped out by a virulent disease contracted from a particularly virulent telephone”.
The B-Ark was programmed to crash-land on a suitably remote planet on one of the outer spiral arms of the galaxy, which happened to be Earth, and the Golgafrinchan rejects gradually mingled with and usurped the native cavemen, becoming the ancestors of humanity … ”

Take a guess where it landed?

Tom Judd
March 11, 2018 6:19 am

I must apologize to Catherine McKenna. I realize how right she is. It’s simple: women, and especially children, are shorter than men. So, when the sea level rises from climate change, well, they go burbling under water first. Sorry, Catherine, I was too stupid to realize this.

Reply to  Tom Judd
March 11, 2018 6:31 am

I wouldn’t fret about it to much. When climate Barbie goes dancing, she straps on her jackboots and does the goosestep.

Reply to  Rob
March 11, 2018 8:13 am

High-heeled jackboots.

March 11, 2018 6:38 am

This is such an absurd reach that women will recognize this as transparent attempt at identity politics. All but the most gullible or political women are far smarter than to fall for this nonsense and have more pride than to feign acceptance this sex pandering as a legitimate issue.

March 11, 2018 6:47 am

All I can think of is, that’s the face of vacuity.

March 11, 2018 6:53 am

More proof that climate change has NOTHING to do with the environment.

March 11, 2018 7:08 am

Unable to logically provide information on climate change this woman desperately resorts to the typical leftest approach of resorting to claims like racism, or women’s rights devoid of the facts of how constantly demeaning men has a negative impact and American men are actually in crisis.
Tucker Carlson provides some inconvenient facts.

March 11, 2018 7:18 am

She has a valid point. Should the alarmists agenda pass and the world descend into the energy poverty they desire, poor children and women are likely to suffer the most.

Reply to  dbakerber
March 11, 2018 7:39 am

Exactly how do you figure the woman and children will suffer more … what exactly are the men doing at this point living on another planet?

Tom Judd
Reply to  LdB
March 11, 2018 9:04 am

Yes. Women are from Venus. Men are from Mars.

Reply to  LdB
March 11, 2018 10:13 am

Men are from Earth women are from earth. Deal with it.

Reply to  LdB
March 11, 2018 12:22 pm

Men are from Mars and feminists are from REEEEEEEEEEEE

Reply to  LdB
March 12, 2018 5:28 am

ITs a matter of income, single women supporting children are likely to have less money available to pay for the ridiculously high prices of renewables.

March 11, 2018 7:43 am

I’ve read that global warming is turning all sea turtles into females. Is that what he’s talking about?

March 11, 2018 7:55 am

“When the only tool you have is a hammer, everything begins to look like a nail.”
By analogy, when the only thing you think you understand is gender, everything begins to look sexist.

Reply to  tadchem
March 12, 2018 9:05 am

When the only intellectual tool you have is an appeal to emotion, everything begins to look “ist”.
(I have a nail-gun & air compressor).

Cold in Wisconsin
March 11, 2018 7:59 am

Well the article did say that it was “manmade” climate change, which shows that it is obviously an assault on women. I am surprised that Trudeau did not specify that it was “peoplemade” climate change, but then again, he may agree it is all men’s fault.

March 11, 2018 8:08 am

Quote: “Of course I am using the word transgendered in its broadest sense, no offence intended to people who identify as perigender, vapogender or any of the constantly growing list of other genders.”
I don’t thing an apology is necessary to those mentally ill people who can’t figure out their own gender by taking a quick peek into their own drawers.

John Darrow
Reply to  Dale
March 11, 2018 8:25 am

‘a quick peek into the FRONT of their own drawers’ – with cases like these you must be specific!

March 11, 2018 8:20 am

(Slightly OT re gender & climate)
Let’s take the ‘Canada and CO2’ argument (in the Warmists’ eyes) to its logical conclusion.
If CO2 were the control knob; and if reducing CO2 lowered global temps; and if lowered temps reduced the margin between current climate and the next glacial onset…wouldn’t a push to reduce CO2 by Canadians arguably be a push to hastening their own demise by inviting the Ice to ‘march again’ and cover the bulk of its land?
Seems to me that anyone who loves Canada would push for exactly the opposite… (btw I am not saying I buy into that cause/effect.)

March 11, 2018 8:33 am

As a woman, I can tell you that I do not support this in any way shape or form. And as a man, I think its pretty daft too.
I look at Barbie and I identify a new gender, the CondecenderGender

Christopher D Hoff
March 11, 2018 8:35 am

As a Canadian, I’m embarrassed. But it makes perfect sense that anyone dumb enough to believe in an anti-male gender supremacist hate ideology would also be a Luddite when it comes to science(with apologies to Luddites).

Eyes Wide Open
March 11, 2018 8:43 am

Expect no less from Climate Barbie!

March 11, 2018 8:45 am

Let’s find a place where we can welcome all the Socialists in the world so they can gather in one place to live their ideology. We can call it Venezuela. Next we can find a place where we can welcome all the people that believe sexual identity is fluid and they can make up their own minds and have other people pay for their self identified sexual fantasy (not to be confused with those that know what their sexual identity is and don’t feel the need for others to know). We can call it California. Last on the list is a welcome spot for all the people that believe using fossil fuels is a crime against humanity. We’ll call it Africa. Problems solved.

tom s
March 11, 2018 8:49 am

The STOOOPID runs very deep among LEFTISTS.

Reply to  tom s
March 11, 2018 9:14 am

At least the truly stupid have an excuse sometimes. Not so for the smart-stupid, or smarpid.

Christopher D Hoff
March 11, 2018 8:55 am
So California cities are suing the very energy companies whose NGO components finance the environmental movement that accuses them of changing the climate. I suspect collusion between defendant and prosecution, the alarmists need court victories to have any legitimacy or precedent in other legal contests with skeptics. The energy companies stand to make far more money from the cap and trade than selling energy, plus they can drive up prices by switching to “renewables”.

March 11, 2018 8:59 am

The warmists like to say we’re in the anthropocene epoch. I think we have truly entered the stupidocene epoch. Thankfully, I’m 81 years old and won’t live to see how this all ends.

Nick Werner
March 11, 2018 9:04 am

…“consider the gendered impacts of climate change”…
Okay, at the behest of our Environment Minister I’ve given the subject all the consideration it deserves. Possibly even more than it deserves. But I might need her guidance to determine whether my conclusion is sexist or healthy: If I can’t avoid getting blown, I’d prefer Irma or Maria to Harvey.

March 11, 2018 9:14 am

As a Canadian, I apologize for having a fool like this in our government. She, like our “Prime Minister” is an embarrassment.

Reply to  Joey
March 11, 2018 10:27 am

Typical Canadian, apologizing for something that you are not responsible for.
For example: I’m out shopping and accidentally bump into someone with my shopping cart. They turn around and apologise to me. I laugh and do it to someone else’s cart. Same response. So far, my empirical data suggests that Canadians have this strange idea that they must apologise for almost everything that they aren’t responsible for. Truly indicative of a self hating culture, or maybe the result of having no identifiable culture at all. Further study is merited.

Reply to  Mick
March 11, 2018 11:17 am

Let me apologize for Mick.

Reply to  Mick
March 11, 2018 3:31 pm

In some cultures, self-effacement is built into the traditional etiquette. The Japanese are one example.

Steve Keppel-Jones
Reply to  Mick
March 12, 2018 6:14 am

So you’re the clumsy oaf who bumped into me the other day! Twice! 🙂

Stop the BS.
March 11, 2018 9:18 am

She spews this kind of nonsense, but then expresses indignation when the right wing commentators refer to her as Climate Barbie. Did she happen to indicate how the effects of climate change will affect the female gender differently than the male gender? Perhaps Trudeau’s new buddy, Bill Nye, can shed some light on that.

John Darrow
Reply to  Stop the BS.
March 11, 2018 2:43 pm

Justin Trudeau and Bill Nye – a meeting of the mimes.
For one example see Trudeau’s recent visit to India
For another see Nye pretending to be a scientist

March 11, 2018 9:23 am

Women, including neo-women? Perhaps males with feminine traits, including a sexual orientation that favors other males?

March 11, 2018 9:25 am

I suppose the “target group” attendees at the Trent (Canada) University workshop on Anti Whiteness will be from Justin Trudeau’s praised Islam and Muslim communities.
Ha ha

March 11, 2018 9:36 am

Sorry, I came in late. How are Canadians of either/any gender damaged by temps increasing even 4-5 degrees?

Reply to  Dave Magill
March 11, 2018 9:55 am

Re Dave Magill: Bingo!

March 11, 2018 10:28 am

She reminds me of Stormy Daniels. Appropriate, in light of the fear mongering associated with Catastrophic Anthropogenic Climate Change (CACC). Also because she is a sucker for the theory of CACC.

John Robertson
March 11, 2018 10:37 am

Canadians truly express our contempt for the status quo, when we deliberately elect person such as this.
Climate barbie is proud of her ignorance.
A feature not a bug..
The rush to the logical conclusion of our current mass delusion is on.
Venezuela here we come.
Why support(Vote) conservative when they are not?
Every political parasite in Canada is out to help us, help us into poverty that is.
All support huge government imposition onto the individual.
None advocate property rights,civic responsibility and personal responsibility.
And none dare contemplate that the stealing by government must end.
As a consequence we elect pretty vacant people.
My best hope is the current kleptocracy crashes and burns while we still have skilled builders left alive.
These useless preening parasites are impossible to parody, to mock them is to feed their delusions of competency.
The vast distance between maker and taker seems like a chasm.
End Rant.
Carbonista; Seeking to cool the frozen waste lands of Canada.
Degree growing day, not in policy handbook.

chris moffatt
Reply to  John Robertson
March 11, 2018 12:50 pm

Too late for Ontario – it’s gone. Maritimes to follow soon along with BC, Sask. and Man. Maybe some hope for Alberta and Labrador but that’s about it.

Reply to  chris moffatt
March 11, 2018 2:18 pm

Is there any significance in Quebec not being mentioned above, and I can’t help feeling that it seems rarely either applauded or derided here for its climate policies – if it has any.
(No doubt someone will point out the numerous posts involving Quebec whilst I have been asleep at the back of the class).

March 11, 2018 11:26 am
All this absurdity with gender politics leads to self inflicted reverse racism, sometimes by clueless white women themselves, apologizing for being caucasian. Women in Canadian cabinet didn’t honestly win the right to be 50% represented in the Cabinet of Canada: They were appointed out of sympathy and Minister of Environment and Climate Change Catherine McKenna was one of them.

March 11, 2018 12:01 pm

I am egogendric and I feel profoundly TRIGGERED by all the xhit I read in this article about all these inferior genres.

Nathan Antoniuk
March 11, 2018 12:06 pm

I have been saying it for years …the next Anti-Christ will be a women.

chris moffatt
March 11, 2018 12:46 pm

Won’t somebody please, please think of the furries?
It’s getting more embarrassing every day to be from Canada.

March 11, 2018 3:00 pm

“Of course I am using the word transgendered in its broadest sense,”
You just capitulated, you know that right ?

March 11, 2018 3:18 pm

Climate Barbie. Another innumerate Lawyer in the Bold Tradition pioneered in Canada by Lucien Bouchard pontificating on Climate!!
Flashback 1988
David Suzuki was originally a fruit fly breeder before he became a journalist. So who does David rely on for sound scientific advice on fields with which he is unfamiliar. Well it turns out that one such scientific mentor was none other than Lucien Bouchard. Notice the dynamic : )
After that election, I asked the prime minister’s brightest star, Environment Minister Lucien Bouchard, what issue was most important for Canadians. He replied, “Global warming.” When I asked how serious it was, he said, “It threatens the survival of our species. We have to act now or we’re in deep trouble.”
David Suzuki’s other Scientific Mentor was none other than Al Gore!
Forecast Earth In Depth: David Suzuki, Part 2

March 11, 2018 4:00 pm

I could only see this whole thread unfolding into a series of jokes, and so I have not read all the comments yet, but am skipping right to the joke that this story is.
Does “freezing one’s balls off” count as a “gendered impact “of climate change? If yes, then I am quite dismayed that the “gendered impacts” discussed above seem so narrowly defined (exclusively for women and children). Not surprised, of course, … just dismayed.
Perhaps this is my wake up call to get a sex change operation, since the parts that would be frozen by a climate shift toward cold would now no longer be an issue, and I could then join the legion vocal activists championing the causes of every nuance of modern sexual identity conceivable, excluding, of course, the traditional delineations [that’s just old fashioned, man … uh, … woman, … uh, … whatever).

Edward Katz
March 11, 2018 5:49 pm

Whatever the Canadian government says about the necessity of fighting climate change should be taken, not with merely a grain of salt, but the whole box. In order for it to meet its Paris commitments of reducing its emissions to 17% below 2005 levels by 2020, it would have to shut down the country’s entire electricity sector plus almost of its agricultural one. To reduce these emissions to 30% by 2030 would require the shutting down of the whole transportation sector plus 66% of the waste disposal. Considering Canada couldn’t come anywhere close to meeting its Kyoto pledges and finally pulled out of the whole deal in 2011, and considering that between 2013 and ’14 it reduced its emissions by a mere 5 megatonnes annually, it will again fall far short of any targets. A couple more things to consider: surveys show Canadians are 60% opposed to any carbon taxes and are making few moves to adopt Green technologies. So it’s obvious climate change is strictly a low priority item on the citizens’ to-do lists. In fact, most consider any carbon pricing as little more than a tax grab.

March 11, 2018 8:44 pm

I would like to apologize as a Canadian for the pronouncements of “Climate Barbie”…not to insult the intelligence of all the Barbie dolls… She, unfortunately DOES represent the IQ of the current Liberal Government of Justin Trudope…Trudeau. We can only hope this is a one term Government.

March 12, 2018 3:57 am

I await a study on the negative impact on the environment by females….
[The mods are quick to point out that most males earn their money specifically to keep their families warmer, better fed, and more happy than if they did not work. The energy and money needed to keep the typical male happy (beer, a steak) is much, much less than that needed to keep a family happy (the rest of the budget). .mod]

Reply to  Pogo1000
March 12, 2018 6:03 am

A beer, a steak, a 60 inch HDTV.

March 12, 2018 5:02 am

Liberalism wherever it is is a social disorder. There are examples everywhere. Liberalism need to be capped, The media has raised it to a level of pure stupidity and the masses are ignorant.

March 12, 2018 5:12 am

Political stupidity is like a radioactive element. In small concentrations it does little noticeable damage. It needs to be concentrated to be hazardous. Or you can get a similar effect by being exposed to it for long periods—-like a carbon tax built into budget assumptions and spending programs.

March 12, 2018 6:06 am

Also, such liberal stupidity adds to the confirmation feedback to Xi and Putin to seize power for life. The chaos of real elections is deemed inefficient and dangerous.

Reply to  ResourceGuy
March 12, 2018 9:21 am

Hadn’t thought of that. I can envision Putin sitting there with a glass in his hand, his feet up shirt half buttoned saying,
“See. Look what could happen if we let ’em decide for themselves. They blabber about freedom and try to justify the cost … but just look at the result. I don’t want that bitch in my face at any cost.”

March 12, 2018 7:30 am

In keeping w/the cultural marxism, Climate Barbie can’t be addressed as a she. So should it be “it”? I vote for she-it.
[And the mods vote for a very careful pronunciation of the phrase “she-it” in conversations. .mod]

Reply to  beng135
March 12, 2018 1:58 pm

Of course. Definitely two-syllables, w/a slight pause between. 🙂

March 12, 2018 9:14 am

“We need to consider the gendered impacts of climate change on women, girls and children. I am proud that Canada is training up women negotiators so that we have more female voices around the table”
First, show ANY real impacts to ANYONE.
Then you can break it down to specific harm groupings.
When you do it in reverse order it becomes obvious that you have no basis, and are just reaching for an undeserved sympathetic response.

March 12, 2018 6:59 pm

Well, I don’t blame Justin Trudeau. I blame all the stupid turds that voted for him.

Reply to  coldinsaskabush
March 13, 2018 1:06 pm

Yes but he is SO goodlooking………..I just cannot believe my ears when I hear women openly admitting to that as a reason for voting for pretty boy!

March 12, 2018 10:48 pm

I got womansplained.

March 13, 2018 4:59 am

Facebook in the UK recognises 71 genders. I hope they are taking them all into account.

Reply to  graphicconception
March 13, 2018 10:32 am

She is from the gender “stupid beyond belief.” However, her boss, Justin Trudeau, easily exceeds stupid beyond belief. There was a collective brain fart in Canada the night this government was elected. Methinks the smell will leave the country after the next election.

March 13, 2018 1:05 pm

Don’t you just love it when their real agendas show themselves pathetically veiled as climobabble. That she is an idiot is not in doubt. That she uses her over promotion to this position as a platform for the real outcomes she and her string pullers want which are nothing to do with equality because how can you claim equality and actively promote only one gender? I get angry with this stuff because of the level of cynicism involved.

March 14, 2018 6:46 am

I am embarrassed to be Canadian

%d bloggers like this:
Verified by MonsterInsights