New heated airport runway concept may sharply bias 'global warming' signal in the global climate monitoring network

Recent winter-weather related airport delays have become something that airport managers and airline executive want to solve. This story from NBC’s today show back in January 2018 highlights the issue and a potential solution:


Could heated airport runways melt away your winter travel headaches?

There have been thousands of flight delays and cancellations due to winter weather this year, and it’s only January. Not only that: snow and ice at airports can send planes skidding off slippery runways.

What if there were something that could fix all that? At Des Moines International Airport in Iowa, TODAY national investigative correspondent Jeff Rossen got a look at a new technology in action: heated runways and tarmacs.

Jeff Rossen at (chilly) Des Moines International Airport. Note the melted patch he is standing on.

“We have stainless steel electrodes embedded within the concrete,” explained Halil Ceylan, head researcher of the Iowa State University team that developed the technology. “Then we connect it to power, turn the electricity on. It generates heat and it melts ice and snow on it.”

When Rossen tossed snow onto a slab of prototype heated runway, it melted into water in seconds. A thermal gun showed the heated pavement to have a temperature of 62 degrees Fahrenheit, in contrast to 22 degrees for unheated pavement nearby.

Full story here


Here is the research:

Self-Heating Electrically Conductive Concrete Demonstration Project

About the research

Highway agency staff are always in search of innovative, implementable, and cost-effective solutions to address their winter pavement maintenance issues and challenges. Considering the economic implications of even partially shut-down bridges, roadways, and highways due to ice/snow, combined with the negative impacts of applying deicing salts to pavement surfaces during snow and ice events, there is a critical need for an alternative ice and snow removal technology that is dependable, fast, and cost-effective, and has minimal impact on the environment.

Recent research studies have tried to address this need through the development of mechanical material modification and thermal- and electrical-based technologies. Among these, the development of so-called self-heating concrete surfaces, by enabling the concrete to be electrically conductive, has gained attention with potential applications for driveways, sidewalks, pedestrian crossings, city and county roads, state highways, and airport pavements.

Through a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)/PEGASAS-sponsored research grant, the Institute for Transportation’s Program for Sustainable Pavement Engineering and Research (PROSPER) team at Iowa State University has demonstrated the potential for developing and implementing cost-effective, best-performance electrically conductive concrete (ECON) by adding conductive materials to normal concrete. Their ECON research is at a stage where it can be further expanded and demonstrated on a full-scale basis through a field demonstration project.

Using a smartphone to open an app and call up remote controls, ECON concrete slab stays dry and ice-free during snow event at the Des Moines International Airport in December 2016

The Iowa Department of Transportation (DOT) maintains thousands of linear miles of roadway and several properties across Iowa including roadways, roadway shoulders, maintenance shops, and rest stop areas. The versatility of the ECON technology is such that it can be custom-designed and optimized for each specific transportation infrastructure application, including sidewalks, driveways, bridges, city and county roads, and state DOT maintained rest areas, visitor centers, and state and interstate highways, depending on the need and interest.

A thermal image of the heated airport pavements.

This versatility stems from the fact that the ECON technology is typically implemented as a conductive concrete overlay on top of the existing structure. The ECON design requirements and considerations are obviously somewhat different for each specific application warranting detailed research investigation before implementation in each situation.

For instance, implementing ECON technology in bridges requires that the design take into account the potential for corrosion of steel reinforcement, availability of a low-cost energy source (ideally geothermal energy) to power the ECON system, finding the optimal location for placing the electrodes, etc. On the other hand, ECON implementation in sidewalks has slightly different requirements, as reinforcement is rarely used in sidewalks.

In going forward with this full-scale demonstration of ECON technology for Iowa transportation infrastructure, the research team will work with the project technical advisory committee (TAC) in identifying a suitable location (ideally an upcoming construction project by the city, county, or the Iowa DOT) for field demonstration. One such site of interest to the Iowa DOT is near I-80 Eastbound in Council Bluffs, on the shoulders. There has also been interest in implementing this technology in rest areas and Iowa bridge systems.

The primary objective of this research is to do a full-scale field demonstration of the ECON technology and its efficient deicing benefits for Iowa city and county roadways and state highways. Expected benefits from this research include the following:

  • A cost-effective methodology for producing electrically conductive concrete for Iowa pavement snow and ice removal application
  • An understanding of electrically conductive concrete at different scales (cement paste, mortar, and concrete) and their properties
  • Detailed insights into the challenges and issues faced during the full-scale construction of electrically conductive concrete

Related publication: Iowa State engineers test heated pavement technology at Des Moines International Airport Mar 2017


Sounds great right?

For air travel it most certainly is, for climate science, not so much. Here’s why this project may have unintended and potentially climatic consequences.

A good portion of the world’s surface air temperature is measured at airports, because in those cases, weather conditions are of primary importance. Because so much importance is placed on accurate and up to date weather information, the weather stations are placed near the runways, because pilots want the conditions at the the runway, not something that doesn’t reflect the landing and takeoff conditions.

Automated Weather Observation System at the Basra, Iraq airport. Image from AllWeather Inc. the contractor for the installation.
Locations of airports using ASOS in the USA.

A good portion of the GHCN (Global Historical Climatology Network) is made up of airport ASOS and AWOS stations, which were co-opted for climate monitoring use. This was NEVER their original mission, and these station are setup right next to runways, because they were designed for reporting aviation weather right at the runway, but not for climate monitoring.

So it stands to reason, that if heated runways become a common thing, we’ll find that the “climate signal” from these stations will likely be biased upwards in the wintertime, due to all that waste heat from the heated runways nearby. And THAT will influence the global climate data in GHCN if the upwardly biased data is allowed to stand.

This will add to the already existing problems of ASOS stations reporting high in the summer, such as what we’ve already seen at ASOS equipped airports in Reno, Tucson, and Honolulu.

(Added) And, if Des Moines becomes the first test airport for large-scale heated runways and tarmac, look where they’ll be measuring the temperature there – right in the middle of a sea of concrete:

DesMoines-ASOS-station
Des Moines International airport ASOS location. Image from Google Earth. Reference: https://www.google.com/maps/@41.53363,-93.65283,769m/data=!3m1!1e3

It will certainly be an excellent example of the law of unintended consequences if airport runways become heated worldwide.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

81 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
ptolemy2
February 23, 2018 8:31 pm

Just to get this straight –
As the earth warms,
We now need heated airport runways
Where we didn’t need them before?

ralfellis
Reply to  ptolemy2
February 24, 2018 1:32 am

🙂

David Chappell
February 23, 2018 8:59 pm

As an aside, I suspect that aircraft movements have an unexpected effect on the temperature. Just recently I’ve been watching the temperature graph at Hong Kong International Airport (Chek Lap Kok) which can be seen here: http://www.weather.gov.hk/wxinfo/ts/display_graph_e.htm?hka&
It is a pretty busy airport but with a quiet time from about 0200 to 0700 local. What may or may not be significant is that the temperature plot is much smoother during the night hours when there are few aircraft movements.

DMacKenzie
Reply to  David Chappell
February 24, 2018 1:44 pm

That’s interesting David, kind of makes a person wonder how much of “global warming” is caused by aircraft movements at thousands of airport weather stations since the arrival more jet aircraft. Those temps on your graph vary by about a degree C during the busy periods. But Mosher previously said there is no difference between airport and non-airport readings, so the Hong Kong graph must be wrong. But with a few thousand readings at other airports, we could get it accurate within a hundredth of a degree /sarc

February 24, 2018 7:06 am

Heating up the runways to heat up the temperature readings could be a big win for warmists — they gotta keep the “hottest ever” meme going.

Richmond
February 24, 2018 9:46 am

Heated runways will attract birds looking to get warm. What could go wrong with that?

February 24, 2018 9:52 pm

Decades ago I flew up to Inuvik NWT in a Boeing 737 and my neighbour Bob was the pilot. He asked me to sit upfront and we had a good flight north. I asked him if engine thrust deflectors were the main component of braking when landing the aircraft, and he said no, the wheel brakes were the primary braking component and the thrust deflectors provided additional braking.
Assume this is true. Heating to melt runway snow is going to result in runway icing, especially under very cold conditions, and I really don’t think we want to land aircraft on icy runways when wheel braking is the primary form of stopping the aircraft.
Running out of runway is not one of the best ways to stop an aircraft. It happened to my friend Diet (our company pilot) when he was piloting a twin-engine aircraft out of Edmonton International – he related that both engines failed just after take-off and wheels-up – he pancaked in a snowy field, slid the length of the field and down into a gully, through a copse of trees, sliced off both wings and ended up nose down in a frozen creek bed. All of our guys were OK – shaken but not stirred.
You know how they say that any landing you can walk away from is a good landing? Not so much in this case – and it was a rental airplane. 🙂

Reply to  ALLAN MACRAE
February 24, 2018 10:20 pm

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmonton/5-dead-in-plane-crash-east-of-edmonton-1.739909
Small planes have their risks.
My friend Diet co-owned an aircraft with Al Williams, of A D Williams Engineering. Al Williams, like Diet, was a meticulous and highly skilled pilot – I flew with him several times. Al was killed in a plane crash in the Rockies in October 2007, but managed to save his three-year-old granddaughter, Kate, who was found safely strapped into a child seat in the upside-down plane’s wreckage. She was the only survivor of the crash.
I just read the above CBC article, and learned that Al Williams’ son Reagan also died in a plane crash, along with four colleagues, six months after his dad’s death. This does not make any sense. These were great guys and great pilots. Sometimes the odds just seem to stack up against you. 🙁

D. J. Hawkins
Reply to  ALLAN MACRAE
February 26, 2018 10:31 am

;
Why would you assume that the system would be turned off once the snow was melted, only to refreeze? If it’s enough to melt the snow, it’s enough to keep the water liquid. If you look at the test patch, it’s enough to dry the runway with snow on adjacent surfaces.

Reply to  D. J. Hawkins
February 27, 2018 10:29 pm

DJ
I assume that the system would not be able to melt all the snow in very cold weather.
Far better to plow and sweep it off the runway that to try and melt it – if the melting system does not work to perfection, it makes the runway worse, not better.

peyelut
February 25, 2018 6:07 am

By 2019, pilots & children won’t know what Ice and Snow covered runways are! Problem solved! CO2Change ™ – there is nothing it cannot do!