Guest essay by Eric Worrall
Dr. Heidi Burdett has published a study which claims intense CO2 shocks cause starfish and coraline algae to dissolve. The study has implications for siting carbon capture and storage facilities.
Carbon dioxide ‘pulses’ threaten Scotland’s coralline algal reefs
Scotland’s marine ecosystems may be more sensitive to carbon dioxide than previously thought, and could be damaged irreparably by the CO2 ‘pulses’ created by industrial activities, land run off or natural tidal processes.
…
Dr Heidi Burdett, a research fellow at Heriot-Watt University’s Lyell Centre for Earth and Marine Science and Technology, said: “Coralline algal ecosystems can be found in all the world’s coastal oceans and are particularly common along the west coast of Scotland. Since coralline algae are highly calcified, we knew they would probably be quite sensitive to CO2.
“These beds have significant ecological and economical value: in Scotland, they act as nurseries for important catches like scallops, cod and pollock.
“We found that there was a rapid, community-level shift to net dissolution, meaning that within that community, the skeletons of calcifying organisms like star fish and coralline algae were dissolving.
“If you think of pulses of carbon dioxide being carried on the tide to a particular site, it’s like a flash flood of CO2.
“Our continued monitoring of the site directly after the CO2 exposure found recovery was comparably slow, which raises concern about the ability of these systems to ‘bounce back’ after repeated acute CO2 events.”
…
“If a local authority or government agency is deciding the location of a new fish farm, forestry or carbon capture site, we should be looking at what marine ecosystems are nearby, and the potential for those ecosystems to be impacted by the new activities as a whole, rather than focusing on the impact on individual organisms.
…
Read more: https://www.hw.ac.uk/about/news/carbon-dioxide-pulses-threaten-scotland-s.htm
The abstract of the study;
Community-level sensitivity of a calcifying ecosystem to acute in situ CO2 enrichment
Heidi L. Burdett, Gabriela Perna, Lucy McKay, Gemma Broomhead, Nicholas A. Kamenos
ABSTRACT: The rate of change in ocean carbonate chemistry is a vital determinant in the magnitude of effects observed. Benthic marine ecosystems are facing an increasing risk of acute CO2 exposure that may be natural or anthropogenically derived (e.g. engineering and industrial activities). However, our understanding of how acute CO2 events impact marine life is restricted to individual organisms, with little understanding for how this manifests at the community level. Here, we investigated in situ the effect of acute CO2 enrichment on the coralline algal ecosystem—a globally ubiquitous, ecologically and economically important habitat, but one which is likely to be sensitive to CO2 enrichment due to its highly calcified reef-like structures engineered by coralline algae. Most notably, we observed a rapid community-level shift to favour net dissolution rather than net calcification. Smaller changes from net respiration to net photosynthesis were also observed. There was no effect on the net flux of DMS/DMSP (algal secondary metabolites), nor on the nutrients nitrate and phosphate. Following return to ambient CO2 levels, only a partial recovery was seen within the monitoring timeframe. This study highlights the sensitivity of biogenic carbonate marine communities to acute CO2 enrichment and raises concerns over the capacity for the system to ‘bounce back’ if subjected to repeated acute high-CO2 events.
Read more (Paywalled): http://www.int-res.com/abstracts/meps/v587/p73-80/
Sadly the study is paywalled, so we don’t get to learn how CO2 enriched the test water was. If Heidi was attempting to simulate an industrial release or maybe a volcanic eruption, the answer is likely “quite a lot”.
There are studies which suggest many calciferous organisms are highly resistant to elevated CO2. Some calciferous species have demonstrated the ability to control the acidity of their immediate environment, regardless of external influences – particularly corals which live in highly variable coastal environments.
It is interesting Heidi mentioned carbon capture sites as a possible risk to coastal ecosystems.
I’m not a fan of carbon capture. An abrupt volcanic CO2 release from Lake Nyos in 1986 killed people up to sixteen miles from the source of the release. Thankfully Lake Nyos was a sparsely inhabited region.
The amount of CO2 released in the Lake Nyos disaster was comparable to the amount of CO2 produced by a medium size coal plant in a month. There are thousands of medium size coal plants in the world, and some very big coal plants. Concentrating CO2 on a large scale is dangerous – the scale of CO2 concentration required for a serious global carbon capture effort would in my opinion ensure someone, somewhere would cut one corner too many. A Lake Nyos scale release near a major city could kill millions of people.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Global warming is SO 1990’s. Even global weirding is old. The new term should be Intense CO2 shocks. That’ll scare ’em.
According to the article, the experiment consisted of three phases: “(1) before CO2 enrichment at ambient (control) conditions (15 h), (2) during CO2 enrichment (28 h), and (3) post-enrichment recovery (37 h).”
The unperturbed in situ pH was 7.9±0.2; the pH during CO2 enrichment was 7.7±0.39, and during recovery was 8.0±0.2. These pH values are identical within one standard deviation.
The major change was in the carbonate equilibrium system, and those changes are not particularly large. Here are the data:
_______________________Ambient______Enrichment______Recovery
p CO2 (μatm)____________821.6±343.4___1747.7±1403.33__646.7±320.6
Bicarbonate (μmol kg^-1)__1961.1±27.5___2033.5±20.35___1927.6±49.2
Carbonate (μmol kg^-1)_____92.0±45.9____67.8±50.77_____113.5±45.5
Calcification (μmol m^2 hr^-1)_0.055±0.03___-0.01±0.02_____0.02±0.04
Calcification was read off Figure 1.
Dissolved CO2 approximately doubled (no surprise there). Bicarbonate increased modestly, and carbonate decreased.
But pH didn’t move materially.
So, whatever caused the coral dissolution, it was not caused by a decrease in alkalinity following dissolved [CO2] increase.
It’s truly amazing that the starfish survived during the time a lot of atmospheric CO2 was in the ocean.
More junk science
In view of the evolution of all calcified phyla – corals, molluscs, echinoderms etc. during the Cambrian era when CO2 levels were 10-30,000 ppm: how do they expect anyone with an IQ larger than their show size to believe this infantile nonsense about stress to marine calcified organisms during a glacial period with low CO2 – only a few hundred ppm? Sorry – this just baffles me.
shoe size
Some truth re organisms that live in the extremes in nature, they are the organisms that most often have the least tolerance to changes because their niche at an extreme, in ocean water context, the high end of the pH and kDH\hardness scale.
Also you won’t find studies on organisms that benefit from some acidity, like many Amazon species of fish, some of which cannot reproduce if their reproductive organs get calcified.
Extremes? Like all those volcanic hydrothermal vents around the coast of Scotland 🏴 , you mean? Please elaborate.
Anyone any idea of the total sulfur\sulfide inputs into the oceans, seem this study’s author didn’t bother to wonder about it
This whole study looks like a joke – up there with bogus papers like “The Conceptual Phallus”.
What a world, what a world…
Thanks to MarkMcD, I’ve read the full text of the article by H.Burdett et al. They bubbled CO2 in a mixing chamber and measured the concentrations of dissolved CO2, bicarbonate, and carbonate ions under ambient, CO2-enrichment, and recovery phase conditions. The fact that carbon dioxide addition favors “net dissolution rather the net calcification” is obvious for anyone familiar with school chemistry:
CaCO3 + CO2 + H2O –> Ca(HCO3)2 (soluble).
The authors found also that in recovery period p CO2 is even less, and pH and carbonate ion concentration are slightly larger than under ambient conditions. In this regard, it’s generally unclear what is a danger from CO2 to marine organisms and does it relate to real conditions in seawater.
Aleks, calcification is an energy-driven biological process. Organismal CaCO3 does not directly respond to pH in an equilibrium chemistry sense.
Also, the calcareous surfaces are typically coated with protein, so the CaCO3 doesn’t directly contact the water in any case.
So, is it necessary to consider CO2 (or H3O+) interaction with protein?
Yes, and no.
Many calcifying organisms (probably not all) don’t actually rely on the supersaturation of calcite or aragonite (crystal forms of Calcium carbonate) to create solid carbonate from solution. They actually cause precipitation of carbonate in localised micro-environments where the living organism itself controls the acidity and salt concentrations, plus specialized proteins that catalyze the precipitation process. This makes sense when you consider that many calcifying life-forms live in environments where the conditions do not favour precipitation of carbonates, but they still do it.
The ‘dissolving coral reef’ stories are usually based solely on a high school understanding of carbonate chemistry which is not relevant to the real world.