Fiji’s ‘sinking’ Vunidogoloa Village – Victim of AGW or opportunistic at #COP23 ?

Guest essay by Barry Brill

The popular press has dubbed this remote Fijian settlement as the world’s first community to be forced to migrate by climate-caused rising seas. But is it true?

Sign erected by OCHA in the new location of Vunidogoloa village. Credit: OCHA

Natewa Bay, the largest bay in the South Pacific, is to be found in Cacaudrove province on Vanua Levu, the second largest of Fiji’s 106 habitable islands. This long and narrow inlet funnels the ocean westwards to Vunidogoloa village, which has long been sited on the estuary of a large river at the end of the bay. The prevailing winds are easterlies.

There was a time when the villagers lived comfortably here, drawing fish from both the sea and river and tending to their plantations.

Then, about 70 years ago, the elders became concerned at the continual erosion of the foreshore, the widening of the river’s mouth, the salinisation of the soil and the surges that swept seawater through their fields during king tides. The problems became so acute that they began discussions about relocating the village to another site. But, as the Fiji Sun reports, there was just no money to begin the work at that time.

Gradual erosion

After 1956, the Vunidogoloans became resigned to living with inundation as best they could. They built a seawall, which helped for a while but then gradually sank into the encroaching sea. They moved their homes within the site and, around 1990, built a second seawall, 80 metres closer.

In 2006, the villagers finally decided they had no choice but to relocate. They petitioned the Government for assistance, and this was forthcoming a few years later. During 2010-14, all the 156 villagers were transplanted to a sheltered site some two kilometres inland.

Is Natewa Bay sinking?

It seems likely that the shores of Natewa Bay are within a subduction zone. Fiji lies in a complex tectonic setting along the boundary between the Australian Plate and the Pacific Plate. The Fiji Fracture Zone runs through Vanua Levu, which has volcanic origins and is still the site of geothermal activity.

Since 1991, the Australian Bureau of Meteorology (BoM) has operated the SEAFRAME project in the South Pacific. As set out in the project’s report for 2010-11:

“The SPSLCMP was originally developed as an Australian response to concerns raised by the member countries of the South Pacific Forum over the potential impacts of global warming on climate and sea levels in the Pacific with the principal objective of ‘the provision of an accurate long term record of sea level in the South Pacific for partner countries and the international scientific community which enables them to respond to and manage related impacts’.

 

The project’s sea level monitoring network consists of 12 SEAFRAME stations providing wide coverage across the Pacific Islands Forum region (Figure 1). The SEAFRAME stations not only measure sea level, but also observe a number of “ancillary” variables – air and water temperatures, wind speed, wind direction and atmospheric pressure.

 

An associated geodetic measurement program, implemented by Geosciences Australia, supports levelling surveys to first order, to determine shifts in the vertical of the sea level sensors due to local land movement, as well as continuous Global Positioning System (CGPS) stations to determine the vertical movement of the land with respect to the International Terrestrial Reference Frame.”

“Vertical movements” are an issue in the Pacific because the sites of many tide gauges are either rising or sinking. The BoM report (p29) sets out the “Trends in the vertical movement of the tide gauge and/or supporting structure” . Of the 12 islands, the greatest movement is in Fiji, where the trend of the long term movement is 0.6mm per year.

There is no tide gauge in or near Natewa Bay, and the SEAFRAME installation at Lautoka is the best available proxy. As it reveals upward movement on the western shore of Viti Levu, one would expect the eastern side of the island to be tilting downwards; and that view is supported by readings from the (sinking) local tide gauge in Suva. It seems very likely that this tilt is mirrored in Vanua Levu and Natewa Bay is also sinking.

Climate Change refugees?

Google “Vunidogoloa” and the 32,900 hits are mainly a cascade of newspaper, magazine and blog articles about the relocation of this village being the result of anthropogenic global warming (AGW). The Fijian Government has enthusiastically taken up this accusation and will use the village as a poster child as it chairs the COP23 in Bonn – with ambition to be the lead claimant for the $100 billion per year of climate ‘reparations’ that developed countries have promised in the Paris Agreement.

But is this just a cynical and opportunistic ploy by an activist media, and others who stand to benefit from falsely accusing AGW?

The first thing to note is that the Google search discloses no peer-reviewed papers or data or other geological evidence regarding the Vunidogoloa site. None are mentioned in the media articles. This is a political story, not a scientific one.

There was no such thing as AGW when the village elders began planning the relocation back in 1956. That was mid-way through a long cooling period, which continued until 1979, amidst scientific concerns regarding an approaching ice age. The IPCC says AGW was not even detectable until 1958.

All the salinisation and inundation that was continuously worsening throughout the 1950s, 1960s and 1970s could only have been caused by the forces of nature and the geology of the village site. Those causes would have continued to operate until the present day. There is no need to look elsewhere.

Sea level rise

Global mean sea levels (GMSL) have risen about 18cm (7 ins) over the past century, continuing a 10,000-year trend. Satellite measurement, which has been available since 1993, puts the rate at 3.2mm (0.13 in) per year. While this underlying rate owes nothing to AGW, there are concerns that it will accelerate as the planet continues to warm.

The SEAFRAME tide gauge on Lautoka wharf tells us the annual average Fiji rise in relative sea level has been a steady 3.9mm (0.15 in) over the past 25 years. At that rate, the coastal seas have risen only 9.75cm (3.8ins) during the past quarter-century.

That microscopic change in the tide certainly hasn’t driven Vunidogoloa from its long-term home. But, conspiring with all the other forces at work, it would have contributed.

However, this particular sea level rise has been ticking away for centuries and has nothing whatever to do with AGW. The SEAFRAME data below makes it quite clear that there has been no acceleration all in the rate of rise during the period since 1992[1].clip_image002

 

Fame and fortune

The only available data strongly suggests that the AGW or ‘climate change’ had nothing to do with the geological and oceanographic factors that progressively degraded the Vunidogoloa site. The village’s worldwide fame is founded on a political lie.

And famous it is. As a UK church bulletin reported:

“Every day we share our story, over and over again to people who are keen to learn about our relocation”, says village elder, Manoa Rokotovitovi. “It can be stressful to be interviewed all the time, even secondary school children come to observe the village for their school projects. But we always welcome people and want to be generous. Just as we have been blessed and give thanks to God, in turn we wish to share our blessings with others”. At this point, Manoa’s earnest expression breaks into a broad smile and he jokes that perhaps the village will soon be listed as the newest tourist attraction in Fiji.”

Fiji’s Prime Minister no doubt feels the end justifies the means. Most of us can sympathise with that, and few will begrudge a few of their tax dollars being applied to the relocation of other rural villages that sit on eroding sites. But the funding flows should be transparently named as ‘Aid’ and not as ’Reparations’. It’s just the deception that sticks in my craw.


[1] Despite the atmospheric concentration of greenhouse gases increasing by 20% during that 25-year period.

5 2 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

76 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
November 9, 2017 12:48 am

There is more solid ground in the arctic. The land is still in rebound from the last glaciation.

Therefore, the most sustainable and durable solution is to relocate the most alarmed tropical paradise island individuals there. It’s nice with $100B cash to spend.
comment image

Good fishing too, whatever the season.
comment image

willhaas
November 9, 2017 2:14 am

They should all move to Colorado, USA, where problems caused by rising sea levels is not likely to happen for quite some time.

crackers345
Reply to  willhaas
November 9, 2017 9:58 pm

wanna pay their
relocation costs?

care about the
psychological cost of
the loss of their
homelands?

willhaas
Reply to  crackers345
November 10, 2017 3:40 am

People move all the time. They can embrace a new homeland. Colorado, USA.

TrentD
November 9, 2017 7:05 am

Nice how the UN have selected the Fijian Prime Minister, to lead the conference. An ex Military Officer who overthrew a democratic govt, arrested and shut down the press. Fiji was thrown out of the Commonwealth for their abuses. Lives on foreign aid like all South Pacific Islands. That $100 Billion must be so enticing to make up stories for.

The other poster child drowning islands are interesting too:
Kiribati http://www.bom.gov.au/ntc/IDO70060/IDO70060SLI.shtml
Tuvalu http://www.bom.gov.au/ntc/IDO70056/IDO70056SLI.shtml

hunter
November 9, 2017 7:07 am

Deception by climate concerned people is a fundamental part of the climate consensus.

Pixie
November 9, 2017 10:45 am

Talk to any well informed archeologist about the many ancient cities that have sunk beneath the waves, many of which disappeared with an attendant earthquake as faults ruptured due to plate movements…. what is new?

crackers345
Reply to  Pixie
November 9, 2017 9:57 pm

who’s going to recompense
those property owners who
are inudundated…. taxpayers.
florida alone will
require a trillion dollars
at least
nyc? boston?
norfolk? open
your wallet. and
those of your
grandchildren.
quite a proud legacy to leave
them

JCalvertN(UK)
November 9, 2017 2:37 pm

Regarding the Suva sea level gauge the PSMSL site:(http://www.psmsl.org/data/obtaining/stations/1327.php ) explicitly warns about “a slow positive sea level trend.”

FOLLOWING PSMSL DOCUMENTATION ADDED 28-SEP-95 :
Data 1975-1991 received from Toga office
=========================== FOLLOWING PSMSL DOCUMENTATION ADDED 28-SEP-95 :
1975-5/1989:Fischer and Porter Analog-to-Digital Recorder 6/1989-1990: Leupold and Stevens ADR gauge Aquatrak acoustic gauge, NOAA Next Generation Water Level Measuring System (NGWLMS) (1991-)March 1989: site moved from 18 07.9S 178 25.6E to 18 08.2S 178 25.6E
=========================== FOLLOWING PSMSL DOCUMENTATION ADDED 2000Apr10 :
For Information: A gauge was maintained on behalf of the TOGA Sea Lvel Center until it was withdrawn in May 1989. A gauge at Kings Wharf was destroyed in November 1983 and was re-located to Walu Bay Naval Facility (operated by University of Hawaii)There was a 3 month overlap between the new NOAA gauge and the Walu gauge.
From November 1997 the responsibility for the station in Suva was taken over by the Australian National Tidal Facility from the US NOAA. Comparison of daily means for Suva with those for Lautoka and satellite altimetry suggest there could be land subsidence at the Suva station equating to a slow positive sea level trend.

crackers345
November 9, 2017 9:55 pm

“There was no such thing as AGW when the village elders began planning the relocation back in 1956”

by 1956 warming from
pre-industrial was 0.3 C
(HadCRUT). not
small

F. Leghorn
Reply to  crackers345
November 10, 2017 2:48 pm

by 1956 warming from
pre-industrial the little ice age was 0.3 C
(HadCRUT). not in any way bad at all

Fify. You are welcome.

crackers345
Reply to  F. Leghorn
November 11, 2017 4:27 pm

so you admit there
was warming.

Gabro
Reply to  F. Leghorn
November 11, 2017 4:39 pm

Crackers,

Few if any scientists have concluded that there was no warming between AD 1850 at the end of the LIA and AD 1956. However, the world was warmer in 1926, 1936 and 1946 than in 1956, 1966 and 1976, despite rapid increase in CO2.

Gabro
Reply to  F. Leghorn
November 11, 2017 4:40 pm

Increase after 1946.

gunsmithkat
November 10, 2017 8:21 am

Did they just move a Marine base there? It sounds like the island is tipping over.

Tom Halla
Reply to  gunsmithkat
November 10, 2017 8:37 am

It was Guam that a congresscritter speculated about tipping over, and it was expanding an existing base. Fiji is not a US possession.

Fred
November 12, 2017 11:47 am

The Graph showing the monthly sea Level is manipulated to make it look Flat. Simply look at the original data and compare for your self.

http://www.bom.gov.au/oceanography/projects/spslcmp/data/monthly.shtml

Jonny Scott
November 14, 2017 5:56 am

I am asking because I do not know. Is there ANY quality check for non sea volume change effects like tectonics, isostasy, dewatering, collapse due to groundwater extraction in the system when using tidal guages as a source of data?

Verified by MonsterInsights