Guest essay by Eric Worrall
President Trump has disbanded a 15 person committee whose job was to interpret a 13 agency, 600+ page climate report, and tell the President what to do. But the credibility of the report is in tatters, after it was discovered that the authors edited out a highly embarrassing section from an earlier draft, which would have distracted from their doomsday narrative.
The Trump administration just disbanded a federal advisory committee on climate change
By Juliet Eilperin August 20 at 7:00 AM
The Trump administration has decided to disband the federal advisory panel for the National Climate Assessment, a group aimed at helping policymakers and private-sector officials incorporate the government’s climate analysis into long-term planning.
The charter for the 15-person Advisory Committee for the Sustained National Climate Assessment — which includes academics as well as local officials and corporate representatives — expires Sunday. On Friday, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s acting administrator, Ben Friedman, informed the committee’s chair that the agency would not renew the panel.
…
The committee was established in 2015, but its members were not appointed until last summer. They convened their first meeting in the fall. Moss said members of the group intend to keep working on their report, which is due out next spring, even though it now will lack the official imprimatur of the federal government. “It won’t have the same weight as if we were issuing it as a federal advisory committee,” he said.
…
This particular climate report may go down as one of the most ineptly politicised documents in Washington DC history.
First we had the ridiculous claim from the New York Times that they had to leak the climate report, to prevent the Trump Administration suppressing it – even though draft copies are publicly available.
The New York Times later appended the following corrections to their sensationalist claims that the report was being suppressed;
Correction: August 9, 2017
An article on Tuesday about a sweeping federal climate change report referred incorrectly to the availability of the report. While it was not widely publicized, the report was uploaded by the nonprofit Internet Archive in January; it was not first made public by The New York Times.
Correction: August 15, 2017
An article last Tuesday about a sweeping federal climate change report misstated the professional credentials of Katharine Hayhoe, who contributed to the report. She is a professor at Texas Tech University, not a government scientist.
Read more: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/07/climate/climate-change-drastic-warming-trump.html
The botched NYT story focussed attention on the report, which revealed multiple climate shenanigans – alleged adjustments to published data, and the removal of an entire section which suggested the 1930s dust bowl years experienced more extreme hot weather than today’s climate.
The committee which wasn’t renewed was supposed to provide recommendations to the President when this tattered piece of political theatre finally limped across the finish line.
No wonder members of the disbanded committee are worried that without the authority of the Federal Government, their scientific recommendations “won’t have the same weight”.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
I was sort of hoping you folks would cover this. “Swamp Draining” in progress?
Big swamp. Lots of nasty critters slithering about, whining to Obama appointed judges. Takes time. And climate is only one patch of it. We got Obamacare, WOTUS, CPP, illegal aliens v. sanctuary cities, and much more to clean up at the same time.
Indeed. “Big f’n Swamp” IMHO 🙂 Without another term he doesn’t stand a chance, and there’s a big risk he’ll be consumed by the swamp itself in that time frame. It may take multiple assaults on the swamp by different people using different strategies.
The Swamp wasn’t built in a day, I think it’s important to remember that.
@Bartleby – depends on how aggressive the ‘gators want to get about defending their patch of malaria-infested mud. Too aggressive, they’re not going to get “relocated” where they can’t hurt anyone else; they’ll find themselves turned into footwear and chicken substitute.
Too many Rinos in there as well.
So they committed fraud. Who is going to be prosecuted? Its not enough to “Drain the Swamp”. It will just be filled again as soon as there is no more Trump. There MUST be consequences. Do NOT pass Go.
I commend the book about Thatcher’s problems with the British coal miners, “The Enemy Within”.
Trumps problem in attempting to drain the swamp is identical to that faced by Thatcher.
She won, despite the odds.
Thatcher had the great advantage that the miners were lead by Arthur Scargill.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-25731328
“The creatures outside looked from pig to man, and from man to pig, and from pig to man again; but already it was impossible to say which was which.”
Yes, Geoff. “There must be consequences.”
Tempting as that may be, you can’t prosecute committee members when you don’t like the results of their work. Good people won’t do it anymore. Just throw it out, throw them out, and move on.
I would prefer not to.
…Remembering my sophomore year lit class
We must surely hope so
The climate change house of cards is starting to collapse.
Not before time.
Just wondering about something…..Do you reckon that any of the members of this committee would be able to explain why the temperature at the Nashville, TN, national weather service monitoring station dropped from about 95 degrees F to about 86 degrees F during yesterday’s solar eclipse? Do you think that the shadow of the moon caused all of the greenhouse gases — water vapor and CO2 included — to ‘piffle’ out of existence or something during the few minutes of totality? Wot a hoot. Them ain’t chickens comin’ home t’ roost. Them’s buzzards.
Katharine Hayhoe, who contributed to the report. She is a professor at Texas Tech University, not a government scientist.
That’s right, Kathy is not a government scientist., she’s a ‘Climate Scientist’. and they are the Really, Really Smart Ones.
Hey Kathy, one comment “Hows that permanent drought in the Texas Panhandle prediction from 4/2015 going? The Plamer map has it as Mid-Range surrounded by moderate to very moist.
https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2015/10/26/the-katherine-hayhoe-permanent-drought/
….and that’s why, in most “institutions of higher learning”, any Climate Science program is grouped over with Geography, et al., and not the hard sciences (physics, chemistry, geology, etc.)?
Hayhoe also wrote this ….https://theconversation.com/i-was-an-exxon-funded-climate-scientist-49855
Bitter –
Why do you think that? This is a religion to many people.
The dodgy makeup job is starting to crack. Do they really believe their manic believers are going to fund them? Australia’s own flim-flam Flannery has received his lifestyle change.This is a script outline worthy of Monty Python.
Have read the entire 5OD of NCR4. It is really awful. Judith Curry has a thread up for serious red team contributions discrediting it. Skeptical Folks as diverse as Nic Lewis and Paul Homewood have already made major apecific contributions, as has JC herself. I suspect Judith is doing this because she has been approached as one of the potential formal reviewers, and is crowdsourcing data via her Denizens. I urge all interested WUWT commenters to contribute to this effort.
It’s my impression that J. Curry’s call for a “red team” analysis of the
report is not to encourage contributions discrediting it but
to foster less polemics and a more discerning parsing of the underlying
data and the pseudo-political assumptions that have been slipped into
the commentary.
The data in a lot of the studies cited should be questioned too.
Ha, HA! #(:))
http://studentedgecontent.blob.core.windows.net/images/articles/2017/07/youre%20fired.gif
Go, Trump, go!
Voting for Donald J. Trump in 2020. Mm, hm.
+1,000,000
Thanks! 🙂
Has he not fired all of his initial inner circle?
Yes Dave, and we knew beforehand they were swampies mostly. Just sorting out the wheat from the chaff; all to plan….
Unfortunately, he can’t fire ivanka and Jared. Right now the former seems to be playing Rosamond to Trump’s Lydgate – but in this case (unlike the novel) with the best of intentions.
There is a crack, a crack in everything –
that’s how the light gets in.
https://youtu.be/E7dLbbXTctU
Why the hell can’t we borrow Pres. Trump for only a 4-year period here in Germany instead of this brainless Merkel pack?
I wish we could.
You can vote for a similar guy. Germans are smart people, you must have couple of them around…
Elections have their consequences…
When I first read that, I thought you’d written “Mackerel”. You know what they say, “Something’s fishy in the state of Denmark.”
Good news, thanks. Now what is needed to sever the US connection to the UN climate programs altogether?
Do you think it may help if a border fence was built around the strangely parasitoid little foreign country that’s called The District of Columbia?
(Look up the definition of ‘parasitoid’ to see if you don’t agree with the usage in this case.)
” ….. credibility of the report is in tatters, after it was discovered that the authors edited out a highly embarrassing section from an earlier draft….”
Report was hacked by none other but the Russian tzar Vladimir Velikiy Putin in person (просто шучу, honest)
I assume you got your information from a creditable anonymous source.
да!
If committee members want to continue meeting, making decisions and issuing reports, that is their business. But they my do so on their own dime, they have no government authority, and they cannot meet using any titles or meeting labels that give any impression otherwise.
The good news for CAGW fans? The greatly-reduced carbon footprint of the committee, forced to telecon and (horrors) email instead of jetting to Resortville for pre-meeting conference.
They can meet in one well known government office. It’s called the Library.
Libraries are hideously dangerous places though.
All those IDEAS ,just laying around, waiting to ensnare minds with thoughts counter to the collective.
Who is ‘Moss’?
No, it is not worth sullying my evening to visit the wretched Washpo website of delusionists, news fakers, alarmists and anti-everything not elite coastal democrat.
The group will keep working on it? For free?
It was always all activism, never about science.
What is embarrassing to the Republicans, is this nonsense should have been identified and shut down back in February.
And Sessions should be seeking their communications, meeting records, travel vouchers.
Purposely editing out portions embarrassing to alarmists is willful malfeasance.
Kayhoe deserves some time on a witness stand answering questions about collusion to render a false government report.
Not for free. I’m sure they’ll hit up their real paymasters to make up the difference, too.
A rolling stone gathers no moss (wise old Indian saying).
Could be WWF’s Richard Moss:
https://nofrakkingconsensus.com/2011/03/04/the-wwf-vice-president-the-new-ipcc-report/
It is indeed he: http://sncaadvisorycommittee.noaa.gov/Membership
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2017/08/trump-administration-disbands-climate-change-advisory-panel.html
“The committee’s chair, Dr. Richard H. Moss, a senior scientist at the Joint Global Change Research Institute, told the Post that disbanding the group was “short-sighted.” “We’re going to be running huge risks here and possibly end up hurting the next generation’s economic prospects,” he warned.”
Richard Moss is a former WWF implant and has been in the climate debate for many years. More here:
“Controlling the Science: National Academies and Consensus”
http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/science-papers/originals/controlling-the-science
“He is or was Vice President and Managing Director for Climate Change at the World Wildlife Fund. He is a former Senior Director for Climate Change and Energy, United Nations Foundation. The UNF was founded in 1998 with $1billion from Ted Turner, its President is Timothy Wirth, who helped to launch James Hansen into global warming fame in 1988.
Moss has been a member of the IPCC since 1993. He was a Review editor for IPCC AR5 WGII Ch. 14, “Adaptation needs and options”. From 2000 to 2006, he served as director of the coordination office for the United States Climate Change Science Program.
His doctorate is in Public and International Affairs.”
His WWF appointment is now described as a “Business Leave of Absence”:
https://www.ametsoc.org/boardpges/cwce/docs/profiles/MossRichardH/profile.html
“He led preparation of the US government’s 10-year climate change research plan (2003) for which he was awarded the United States Department of Energy’s Distinguished Associate award.
He was named a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science in 2006 and a fellow of the Aldo Leopold Leadership Program in 2001.
He has MPA and PhD degrees from Princeton University in public and international affairs and a BA degree from Carleton College in Northfield, Minnesota”
I guess that makes him a political scientist…
Drain the Swamp without further delay. The fake outrage on the part of the committee is that they realize that they authority, if any, derived from the Great Seal of the United States of America. Without the official imprint, they are just people with opinions that will have to compete in the marketplace of ideas. I am sure that idea scares the c*** out of many of them. Drain the Swamp.
A policy based committee to Judge policy based work? One knows the conclusions before one pays for the policy based work. The word “science” does not fit in here?
http://longviewymca.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Sidewalk_Chalk_Flood_4-18-09_7_3457422021.jpg
I know, I KNOW, we don’t have an office anymore. We are FINISHING this thing ANYWAY!
Ha Ha
And we don’t need no stinkin’ badges! 🙂
ROFL 🙂
Oh Janice, that was just too good! Glad I wasn’t drinking anything at the time.
Well, thank you, so much, for the affirmation, Edith, Bartleby, Eric, and D.J..
🙂
Non-extreme weather is gonna wash this all away.
+1
Once again, Janice wins the thread…
OMgosh Janice, you’re good ! LOL!
**why did I not buy stock in crayons and chaulk, pre- President Trump*, bangs head**
…are they doing this on their own time?
Seems like it, but it also looks like their license to shakedown the deep pockets just got revoked…
A couple of tweets by Tom Nelson highlight how completely leftist the “Republicans” in California have gone:
Tom Nelson @tan123 Aug 14
California Republicans face backlash for backing climate change program – LA Times
Tom Nelson @tan123 9h9 hours ago
Support for climate change bill haunts [California Assembly Minority Leader] Republican Chad Mayes https://twitter.com/tan123/status/899634660174684160
We need to “disband” these type of supposed Republicans that kowtow and grovel to the left.
California only has RINO’s and Dumbocrats like Pelosi and Waters.
Most Republicans are RINO’s and are related to the Democrats. Trump is technically a RINO but of a completely different Genus and Species.
I am of the opinion that LA and San Francisco should secede and formally declare themselves City States. As long as the US keeps Oakland and Long Beach I can’t really see much of a problem.
Oh! And they should take Sacramento with them. Completely useless waste of oxygen.
Why stop with SF and LA. I think Chicago, NYC, Portland and Seattle should be included, too.
Well, sure 🙂
But I’m a Californian, transplanted from Washington (state) at an early age. I’ve worked the oil fields, orchards and computers of California and my allegiance is with that once Great State now. I won’t give it up for some Moonbat and the wicked witch of the North. Nope. Not on my watch.
California is to be renamed Guam – in view of the NK threats.
SMC – As a native Chicagoan, I can tell you that politically Chicago is different from Los Angeles, San Fransico, NYC, and Portland. Chicago is controlled by a political machine that is basically an organized crime syndicate. (And yes a certain former American president was a part of it.) While in LA, San Fransico, Portland, and places on the Left Coast the politicians might actually believe in climate change, in Chicago the politicians care about money and power and nothing else. They will embrace any political belief if they think it will help them stay in power. They have no morals or core belief except in so far as it is useful to them. When this climate change superstition eventually weakens with the voters the Illinois politicians won’t hesitate to walk away from it.
Don’t believe me? In my life time four governors have gone to prison. The Chief of Detectives of the Chicago Police Department went to prison for setting up jewel heists with the crime sydicate. Judges were caught-up taking bribes in the Grey Lords Scandal. The Illinois Speaker of the House and father of the States Attorney General openly and legally works part time as a lawyer on property tax appeals in Cook County. Obama dismissed the U.S. Attorney who was independent and had sent the last governor to prison and was investigating local Democrats. Its a F*** joke what goes on here politically.
@Rud Istvan Yup. And here’s the insidious “Republican” traitor Chad Meyers smiling as he poses with Moonbat Brown and the top CA Democrats just after Chad joined them to vote for the climate change idiocy:
http://americanchildrenfirst.org/site/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Chad-Mayes-selling-out.jpg
I honsetly think Moonbeam has seen his last Gubernatorial term. His unilateral “cap and trade” edict, along with his $0.14/gallon gas tax pretty much sowed his political doom. Jerry won’t be making a comeback, nor will the “party” he represents.
@Bartleby And the thing about the Republicans voting for the CA Cap & Trade bill is it allowed several Democrats that are in swing districts to vote against the cap & trade.
Voting for the climate change bill put the seats of those Dems in jeopardy as a large percent of the commoners (of even the Democratic voters including Hispanics) opposed the cap & trade bill and the gas tax increase (which I heard could be as insanely high as 70 additional cents to what is already the highest gas prices in the nation). So, Chad Meyers et al insured that the Democrat super majority will continue. Insane. Boot the “dude” (a word he likes to use).
Well Eric, all I can say is that any Californian who deliberately votes Democrat in the upcoming elections is a fool. Why would anyone vote for a government that already had the highest energy taxes in the world, and then proceeded to raise them?
I lived in Wyoming for 15 years; I was an “escapee”. I found a state that had a great educational system, outstanding roads and infrastructure, and no state taxes at all. Yep. None.
Something is very, very wrong with California. Our job is to fix that. It may not be pretty, but the choice is ceding the entire state to Progressive Socialists who have pension plans…
Bartleby You are correct. Moonbeam can not run again due to term limits. I believe he was able to sneak in two more terms because his first run was before term limits was enacted.
Eric,
The San Gabriel Valley Tribune carried a commentary by a Republican Assemblywoman yesterday, in which she lambasted the Assembly leadership for caving on cap and trade. Looks like there will be a fight for leadership. Here’s the link. (I also had put it on Tips and Notes.)
http://www.sgvtribune.com/opinion/20170820/gop-leadership-requires-principles-and-winning-elections-melissa-melendez
That’s an excellent opinion piece, and I hope she gets the leadership position. It sounds like the current (immediate past?) leader is simply a DIRC (Democrat In Republican’s Clothing) and has no interest in doing what’s right and good for California. Cap and trade is economic nonsense, and this Assemblywoman knows it.
When will Trump appoint administrators for NOAA and NASA? These are currently being run by acting administrators that were promoted from within.
DK, the pace of appointments is one of my few major disappointments with Trump so far. Tillerson is handicapped at State, Mattis is handicapped at the Pentagon, we don’t have a replacement for Kelly at DHS, and there are still over 100 federal judicial vacancies and about 85 US District attorneys needing nominations. As a semiretired senior corporate exec, utterly baffling. No way to run a business. Board woild have fired me by now for organizational incompetence. Rumor has it that Tillerson blew up at whoever is in charge of appointments at WhiteHouse. Justifiably. Trump put Tillerson in at State. So trust Rex to fill out his team. There are bigger fish for Trump to fry.
How much of the appointment process is being slowed down by Congress?
you know guys….I thought the same thing for a while
Beginning to look like there’s very few real republicans…and a whole lot of RINOS to pick from
….it might be because there’s few choices
Don’t underestimate the size of the swamp
ristvan
Perhaps lending some enough rope to hang themselves. Or come to their senses.
Walking in as a new broom is fraught with problems, as you undoubtedly know. And it’s usually better to create a convert than employ a risk. Mooch being a case in point.
^^^ What Rudd said.
“DK, the pace of appointments is one of my few major disappointments with Trump so far. Tillerson is handicapped at State, Mattis is handicapped at the Pentagon, we don’t have a replacement for Kelly at DHS, and there are still over 100 federal judicial vacancies and about 85 US District attorneys needing nominations.”
http://dailycaller.com/2017/08/21/new-campaign-slams-dems-for-dragging-feet-on-trump-judges-video/
New Campaign Slams Dems For Dragging Feet On Trump Judges
“The Judicial Crisis Network (JCN), a conservative advocacy group, is organizing a national campaign to spur judicial confirmation reform.
Senate Democrats have slowed confirmation of judicial candidates by requiring 30 hours of floor debate for each nominee. Another informal Senate protocol has also slowed confirmation. By Senate convention, senators from states where judicial vacancies occur submit an opinion or a “blue slip,” giving a positive or negative evaluation of a nominee named to that vacancy. As a general matter, the Judiciary Committee will not convene a hearing for a nominee until the relevant senators submit their blue slips, effectively giving home-state senators veto power over judicial nominations.”
end excerpt
The Democrats are undermining the governing of the United States. They should be made to pay a political price for this dangerous activity. They aren’t just undermining Trump, they are underminig all of us with their obstructionism. The People are watching.
SMC: The holdup for NASA and NOAA administrators is not Congress but Trump having yet to nominate any. I am a multiple times per day reader of WUWT, and if Trump nominated anyone for these positions, I expect I would have heard their names.
ATheok:. Sounds like.Moss might be the chair of the committee.
NYT identified Kathy Hayhoe as a professor at Texas Tech, not a government scientist. NYT should have identified her as a political science professor at Texas Tech. That would help reveal that it’s really a politicised report.
Wonder if she’s ever called Professor HooHah.
TA: The “blue slip” process for a judicial nominee being able to be blocked by a senator from the nominee’s state is older than Trump, and less of an obstacle for Trump than it was for Obama because Trump has more senators in his party than Obama did. The “blue slip” process explains in part why Trump took office with 120 judicial vacancies to fill, and he filled much more judicial vacancies in his first 6 months than the past few Presidents did. Also, the “blue slip” thing applies to judicial appointments, not to political appointments to high level bureaucracy administrators and undersecretaries to Cabinet secretaries. (The NOAA Administrator is “dual hatted” as the Under Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere.)
“The NOAA Administrator is “dual hatted” as the Under Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere.”
Well, I’ll be darned, I learn something every day.
Before Congress’s August recess (which GOP leaders declared was not a “recess”, so Trump could not make any recess appointments), Trump had sent over 550+ nominations, and the Senate had confirmed 10% of them. At the same point in time in 2009, the Democrat Senate had confirmed more than 500 of Obama’s nominations. McConnell says Trump just doesn’t understand how things in Congress (don’t) work!
They should be stripped of all credentials, told to return federal property, and cautioned about any future representations of federal association and subject matter expertise. Pretty much like any fired employee caught in an office crime. Plus warned about any attempts at subversion.
Mike
The problem is the scientific community seem able to produce whatever they want and say whatever they want with no threat to their qualifications for misleading science.
Do we know of any scientists over the last 40 years of the climate scare who have had their professional qualifications rescinded? It happens in law, in commerce, in medicine, why not science?
And whilst scientists can’t be punished for publishing one paper that’s proven wrong, shouldn’t there be a publicly accessible scorecard system that tracks a scientists successes Vs their failures throughout their lives. If nothing else, it might encourage them to get at least something right before they fall off their perch.
HotScot
They have QUALIFICATIONS? (I mean good ones?)
Hotscot – There is a publicly accessible scorecard system, and they control most of it: publication and reference counts. If you create another system, without having first drained the swamp, they will easily control that system too.
Be careful about stripping scientists of their qualifications – in the current hysteria the liars and adjusters hold the majority of places in academia. They would jump on any mechanism which would enable them to strip the sceptics who still practice real science of credibility by claiming they were so bad at their science they had to be disqualified.
That’ why Trump is doing such a good job, he’s attacking their structures and money. Hitting them where it really hurts. Now in the U.K. If only our pathetic MPs would hold the wind (subsidy) farmers to account by demanding the money back if the bird and whale killing installations failed to reach – let’s be reasonable – and say 70 per cent of the output they claimed they would generate when hustling through planning permission, we might see some real gnashing of teeth.
Great news!
“disbanded committee are worried that without the authority of the Federal Government, their scientific recommendations “won’t have the same weight”. ”
They are not worried about that at all, I would say. It’s the Per Diem, Travel Costs, 5-Star Hotel Bill and especially the Cash Bar at the Saloons in town and the “Red Light District” “accommodations” that they are worried about.
Probably save about $2 Million per year.
Ha ha
The review committee was Obama appointees, and should have resigned or been fired Jan 20,2017.
“Moss said members of the group intend to keep working on their report, which is due out next spring, even though it now will lack the official imprimatur of the federal government.”. The same thing happened here in Australia a couple years ago. I am amazed that our government allowed the group to continue using the title, giving the renegades and their ‘report’ a tacit imprimatur. White ants (termites) are so difficult to exterminate.
Here in California, we use “Orange Oil” to exterminate termites. 🙂
Here in California, the wrong Jerry died this week.
It didn’t. The “Climate Commission” went to “Clmate Council” and has since collapsed.
A ‘Quango’ has been eradicated,lets hope for more.
Appointed last summer by guess who?
https://www.epa.gov/climate-indicators/climate-change-indicators-high-and-low-temperatures
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._state_temperature_extremes
“It won’t have the same weight…”
This carp is weightless any way. I could write their entire report without reference to any other. Probably a computer generated 5bell alarm report would be close to the unwavering narrative these clones spew.
Go Trump , given the watermelons have still not accepted he won the election makes it that little bit harder , in oz our green lefty govt broadcaster have a show dedicated to make him look bad and the MSM are all too eager to make a mountain out of a molehill.
I simply don’t believe anything our presstitutes say about Trump anymore because it’s always overblown or just made up .
“I simply don’t believe anything our presstitutes say about Trump anymore because it’s always overblown or just made up .”
I bet you are not the only one either, Robert.
The MSM are exposing themselves for what they really are: partisan, political hacks who constantly seek to try to do Trump and his millions of conservative supporters harm. The truth is not in them.
Good points, TA.
The press has abandoned its role in our Republic.
The 4th estate is now a 5th column.
It’s like eating the elephant…… one bite at a time. Trump has always been rejected by the elites and he’s getting even. Trump is their worse nightmare come true. With all the violence, shenanigans, and biased press from the Progressive camp we can probably count on more people supporting Trump than before. People realize what’s happening, that it’s historic, and they are getting back into the driver’s seat of government. CAGW is a small but important part of this awakening.
But just as during the election cycle last year, the MSM is vapidly presenting Trump as a popular failure. They’re attacking his mandate with the claim that he lacks public support and his numbers are falling.
Of course, they’re running the polls…
The same polls that predicted a landslide victory for Hillary. Those folks.
Same thing happened with Australia’s Climate Commission
https://australianclimatemadness.com/tag/climate-commission/
Nice move by Trump.