President Trump just announced that the U.S. will “withdraw” out of the Paris Climate Accord. But “begin negotiations to re-enter”.
Trump said:
“We will cease honoring all non-binding agreements”, and “will stop contributing to the green climate fund”.
“I can not in good conscience support a deal that harms the United States”.
“The bottom line is that the Paris Accord is very unfair to the United States”.
“This agreement is less about climate and more about other countries getting a financial advantage over the United States”.
“The agreement is a massive redistribution of United States wealth to other countries.”
“Fourteen days of carbon emissions alone would totally wipe out the U.S. contribution to reduction by 2030”
“Compliance with the terms of the Paris accord… could cost America as much as 2.7 million lost jobs by 2025.”
“India makes its participation contingent on receiving billions and billions and billions of dollars in foreign aid.”
“We need all forms of available American energy or our country will be at grave risk of brown-outs and black-outs.”
“Withdrawing is in economic interest and won’t matter much to the climate.”
“We will be environmentally friendly, but we’re not going to put our businesses out of work… We’re going to grow rapidly.”
“No responsible leader can put the workers and the people of their country at this debilitating and tremendous disadvantage.”
“The same nations asking us to stay in the agreement are the countries that have collectively cost America trillions.”
“My job as President is to do everything within my power to give America a level playing field.”
“The same nations asking us to stay in the agreement are the countries that have collectively cost America trillions.”
“I was elected to represent the citizens of Pittsburgh, not Paris.”
“Foreign leaders in Europe, Asia, & across the world should not have more to say w/ respect to the US economy than our own citizens.”
“Our withdrawal from the agreement represents a reassertion of America’s sovereignty.”
“It is time to exit the Paris Accord and time to pursue a new deal which protects the environment, our companies, our citizens.”
Scott Pruitt: “America finally has a leader who answers only to the people.” “This is an historic restoration of American economic independence.”
The Paris Accord is a BAD deal for Americans, and the President’s action today is keeping his campaign promise to put American workers first. The Accord was negotiated poorly by the Obama Administration and signed out of desperation. It frontloads costs on the American people to the detriment of our economy and job growth while extracting meaningless commitments from the world’s top global emitters, like China. The U.S. is already leading the world in energy production and doesn’t need a bad deal that will harm American workers.
UNDERMINES U.S. Competitiveness and Jobs
- According to a study by NERA Consulting, meeting the Obama Administration’s requirements in the Paris Accord would cost the U.S. economy nearly $3 trillion over the next several
- By 2040, our economy would lose 6.5 million industrial sector jobs – including 3.1 million manufacturing sector jobs
- It would effectively decapitate our coal industry, which now supplies about one-third of our electric power
The deal was negotiated BADLY, and extracts meaningless commitments from the world’s top polluters
- The Obama-negotiated Accord imposes unrealistic targets on the U.S. for reducing our carbon emissions, while giving countries like China a free pass for years to
- Under the Accord, China will actually increase emissions until 2030
The U.S. is ALREADY a Clean Energy and Oil & Gas Energy Leader; we can reduce our emissions and continue to produce American energy without the Paris Accord
- America has already reduced its carbon-dioxide emissions
- Since 2006, CO2 emissions have declined by 12 percent, and are expected to continue to
- According to the Energy Information Administration (EIA), the U.S. is the leader in oil & gas
The agreement funds a UN Climate Slush Fund underwritten by American taxpayers
- President Obama committed $3 billion to the Green Climate Fund – which is about 30 percent of the initial funding – without authorization from Congress
- With $20 trillion in debt, the U.S. taxpayers should not be paying to subsidize other countries’ energy
The deal also accomplishes LITTLE for the climate
- According to researchers at MIT, if all member nations met their obligations, the impact on the climate would be The impacts have been estimated to be likely to reduce global temperature rise by less than .2 degrees Celsius in 2100.

Defying his daughter, now that takes courage!
Daughters need to listen to their dads!
My thanks to “The Donald”. Gives proof to the old saw,”You can’t fool all of the people all of the time”.
The hard UN Framework exit isn’t indicated which means all the junk science cartel members remain in place.
It’s more intense then the Reagan economic messaging on green excess but it will have the same issues over time. All the usual suspects from climate science corruption keep their jobs and narrative intact with this approach.
They will hate no less by this gesture. Skeptics pleased with half a loaf as predicted.
My sympathy is for the US sceptics, not much left to fight for, but here in Europe the battle is just about to start, lot of fun to be had,
We need a European edition of WUWT.
How about a full UN Framework exit?
Goodness gracious, there will be plenty more to fight for in the US. Besides, we care about humanity itself, unlike the Greenie thugocracy.
How about a simple UN exit? UN is mostly anti-American, did put Gaddafi in charge of human rights, and Saudi Arabia on a woman’s rights commission.
No, not over by a long shot.
We have to utterly destroy the anti-CO2 scam, and that will probably take a lot longer.
“My sympathy is for the US sceptics, not much left to fight for,”
That’s not true. Skeptics still have a science battle to wage over whether CO2 is causing the climate to change.
You have one, WUWT is read worldwide..
“…Trump pulls out…”
Good move. It would have been criminal to inseminate that monster.
Thank you, Anthony, for all you’ve done with this site to encourage honest research into climate while also allowing open discussion of the political aspects of CO2-based CAGW.
Take a bow!
Take 1776 Anthony.
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/448156/paris-agreement-treaty-requiring-two-thirds-senate-vote?utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Daily%20Trending%20Email%20Reoccurring-%20Monday%20to%20Thursday%202017-06-01&utm_term=NR5PM%20Actives
I agree. Force Democrats to defend their support of the accord.
I’m delighted to get this looming albatross of ‘global governance’ off our national neck. But I wish the President had invited Richard Lindzen or John Christy or another real scientist up there to debunk CAGW. Time to drive a stake through that fraud’s heart.
https://WalkingCreekWorld.wordpress.com
“Your comment is awaiting moderation.”
Oh come on. It’s way past time to get the word f-r-a-u-d out of the list that sends comments to moderation. Or shall we say h-o-a-x?
Thank you Anthony and President Trump
Congratulations and thanks for all your help Anthony and Watts Up With That.
I think the oceans are really receding this time…. 🙂
for all those pearl clutching ninnies who thought Trump would not back out of Paris or he would do some half measure … I would suggest a nice Chianti to help was down the crow 🙂
Anthony, you and your blog WUWT most certainly deserve a big round of applause for this outcome. You had no idea what you started. But that is how all GREAT ideas start. This accomplishment is on you. The entire world has turned a corner because of what you (and others, of course) started.
If anyone deserves a Nobel prize, you do.
+1,776,000,000,000
I’ll second that. I have learned so much from this site, the postings, the informed comments and Anthony’s hard work and commitment. In fact I would probably still be a warmist had I not found this site which truly opened my eyes.
Thank you.
Absolutely agree! Thanks for staying the course, Anthony!
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/content/dam/news/2017/06/01/matt-gallery-01062017-large_trans_NvBQzQNjv4BqqVzuuqpFlyLIwiB6NTmJwfSVWeZ_vEN7c6bHu2jJnT8.png
telegraph
I’ve been trying to track down what covfefe means. Some say it’s the capital of Kekistan. Others have memed it into coffee. Some other stuff. Now this. The only thing I can come up with is that it’s a portmanteau of “coverage” and “fake”, with the latter becoming “fefe” (like “cray cray” means “crazy”).
Look it up in Arabic cov fe fe
I will stand. Could be. Kind of fits the context.
Buuurrrpppp… mmm, popcorn.
I love the smell of popcorn in the morning… and in the afternoon, and evening.
As for exploding heads, check out the movie “Mars Attacks”
‘Kingsman’ does, too.
New York City is saying that they will continue to abide by the Paris climate deal. We’ll see if it is just moral preening or Mayor DeBlasio will actually send the $80M for their portion of the US payments to the foreign bureaucrats. I’m not sure the citizens of New York City will really want to see their money go for that instead of roads and garbage collection.
Right now DeBlasio’s city is one solid grid-lock of immovable trains. No one can get anywhere, so they’re slashing each other, running their cars up on the sidewalks, and people are afraid to come out on the streets for fear off the lunatics they allow to sprawl around loose. And NO ONE wants him for President, EVER. Just more delusional-Democrat foaming while his “sanctuary” city gangs behead teenage kids.
This will be regarded as a declaration of war by many. There are a lot of seriously disturbed people out there who can’t be convinced by rational arguments simply because they are totally out of wack with reality. Many of them you find in Politics, Government positions and Institutions. Than we will see a barrage of opposition coming from a number of States. Today Soros claimed that Europe was in a death struggle for it’s survival. Although a political crash would finally provide some breathing room for those shackeld by this horrible political construct, the financial implication could have a massive impact on the lively hoods of may citizens. The Trump opposing response in the Dutch and German media today however was massive and I expect the establshment and their minions will be fighting for the pluche and the free money untill the beitter end. Fowl play and massive propaganda and even treason included. Trump really needs to take care of his personal security. For me his decission was music to my ears simply because his decission restored the old image of the USA as a beacon for freedom in the world. Trump jsut pulled the USA away from the ports of hell. However, without a thorrow clean up to simply remove all the obstructionist that are wheel barrowing massive amounts of sand into wheels of the the governmental crank case, the economic revival won’t come from the ground. As for all those green business that were living from state funded perks and free money I would say grow up, introduce sensible products and solutions that make a positive contribution to the life of US citizens or go extinct if you can’t live with the new reality. I really hope Trump will finally picks up the broom to clean house.
Much sturm und drang afoot, for sure.
“Much sturm und drang afoot, for sure.”
At hand as well.
“Europe was in a death struggle for it’s survival.”
It most certainly is.
The influx of the “religion of piece”
The fact that the green anti-human, anti-plantlife agenda has taken such a strong hold.
The fact that the far-left EU agenda is also rife.
This cannot end well for Europe.
“Fourteen days of carbon emissions alone would totally wipe out the U.S. contribution to reduction by 2030”
What does this mean? 14 days of emissions by China? I don’t see the context.
The announcement of the US withdrawal from the Paris Accord is a disappointment. Not the withdrawal itself – that is to be celebrated. It is the rationale provided for the withdrawal that is disappointing. He indicates it is because of American jobs (the real focus) and the bad deal for America (sending U.S. funds overseas). It would have been so much more fitting, and accurate, had the rationale also focused on how bad the science is that is supporting CAGW, how bad the politics have become in pushing the CAGW mantra, and how little the actions under the Paris Accord would actually affect future climate.
As he left it, it is an argument about US jobs versus climate ruin, rather than a more appropriate argument about it being bad science that is predicting climate ruin.
Nevertheless, I’ll still be celebrating the pullout.
You need to see the forest through the trees. The politics of CAGW was their protective cover. It prevented discussion of the non-existent science. Now that has been stripped away. They are left without cover. And they are sitting ducks.
Sadly, most of the lay audience isn’t there. The UN Framework left in place to spend years more on the public money politically lobbying efforts for the junk science climate cartel.
I get and share your point.
It would be great if he could deny the science. If all he’s capable of doing is calling it a job-saver, that’s fine. He got it done.
… and just be glad (if) you don’t live in a “sanctuary climate city” (NY), or state (CA).
@PJ
“As he left it, it is an argument about US jobs versus climate ruin, rather than a more appropriate argument about it being bad science that is predicting climate ruin.”
What was left out was that “CO2 is not pollution” and that “severe weather of all kinds have not increased from the norms” The debate is not over, the debate on the science never happened.
None of the media is discussing the science today…
This is such a welcome and wonderful action by President Trump. It is amazing to share this moment with all of you, as well.
Thank God. I am just weeping right now, as if a huge weight has been lifted from our household. Well actually a huge weight has been lifted from our household. (:
Now let’s go after those state mandates for worthless wind, and carbon tax. Here in Wa, we roundly rejected a carbon tax at the ballot box, and immediately afterwards, a bill for a carbon tax was introduced.
ref
HB 1646
Bill Description – Promoting an equitable clean energy economy by creating a carbon tax that allows investment in clean energy, clean air, healthy forests, and Washington’s communities.
Thank you Anthony, and the 315,257,540+ views, the WUWT story submitters, and the posters to this site and it’s debate. It probably wouldn’t have happened without you.
+1000
You brilliant man Mr Trump. I watched his announcement live and every word he said was true and gives those of us elsewhere in the world hope in fighting the outright lies, fraud and deceit that characterizes the elitist green warmest agenda. It was followed on the U.K. Broadcast media by a hysterical one-sided succession of untruths about melting polar ice caps, Florida being like Atlantis, pictures of steam being called CO2 etc,etc.
If only we had a politician in the U.K. with Trump’s courage and vision.
Well done USA!
Yes, Moderately, exactly!
“It was followed on the U.K. Broadcast media by a hysterical one-sided succession of untruths about melting polar ice caps, Florida being like Atlantis, pictures of steam being called CO2 etc,etc.”
How on earth can they, the BBC, print the following rubbish on their web site and get away with still being subsidised by the taxpayer?:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/editorialguidelines/guidelines/impartiality
I wish I had the money to take them to court.
Trump’s offer to renegotiate = Letting China and India (and other trough feeders) demonstrate their complete hypocrisy. I am all for that renegotiation. The idea of renegotiation is probably already striking terror in their hearts.
Eugene WR Gallun
It’s a little like how we “renogiated” with nazi Germany. Well. we went through Paris, didn’t we?
Oops, I said the “N” word.
+1000
The consensus still has its fungal rhizomes lodged in the language of this announcement.
EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt is being interviewed on Fox News right now and he said the U.S. seat at the UNFCCC was “secure”. That would seem to signal that Trump is not getting ready to pull out of the UNFCCC. Perhaps because he wants to do a deal with the Israelis and the Palestinians.
Maybe he will send a bunch of sceptics to the next confab.