Environmental Priorities vs. ‘Climate Change’

From MasterResource

By Robert Bradley Jr.

Classic articles are worth remembering. One in the environmental field was a prioritization of environmental issues back in 2020 by Bjorn Lomborg, “Welfare in the 21st century: Increasing development, reducing inequality, the impact of climate change, and the cost of climate policies

“What is the world’s deadliest environmental problem?,” asks Bjorn Lomborg. The answer:

Not climate. Outdoor and indoor air pollution. Let’s not get so scared about climate that we forget the much bigger problems. Read more in my peer-reviewed article: https://sciencedirect.com/…/article/pii/S0040162520304157.

This result explains why today, climate alarm is just not resonating with the public to the chagrin of the alarmists. Bill McKibben faults the New York Times and Democrats for throwing in the political towel. “I’m saddened to see how little our representatives in DC seem to really care, even the Democratic ones,” he begins:

Too many Democratic leaders are feeling comfortable waving off climate concerns, because of a feeling that it might be a political problem for them. That was exemplified this morning in the New York Times when center-right pundit Matt Yglesias issued a strident call for liberals to ‘support America’s oil and gas industry’.

So is the voting public dumb, miscalculating their own self-interest? Or are the alarmists fooling themselves? This is a question that not only Bill McKibben but also Joe Romm and many others need to ask themselves as the mitigation failures mount, leaving adaptation as the one viable alternative.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
4.3 6 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
19 Comments
September 11, 2026 11:27 pm

where are the UAH temperatures for August?
too scary for you to update the graph?

leefor
Reply to  alexbuch
September 11, 2026 11:33 pm

Seems you missed it. It was published a week ago. never mind, try again another time.

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2026/09/03/uah-v6-1-global-temperature-update-for-august-2026-0-68-deg-c/

Reply to  leefor
September 12, 2026 4:53 am

The main page got stuck at July
The August page is buried

Art Slartibartfast
Reply to  alexbuch
September 12, 2026 1:02 am

As if they matter. Torture the data long enough and they will tell you anything. “Global temperature” is a non-physical measure from which no sensible conclusions can be drawn.

Reply to  Art Slartibartfast
September 12, 2026 5:27 am

CO2 cannot cause these swings in temperature. Need to look elsewhere….

… like a build-up of absorbed solar anergy in the oceans..

… and a release mechanism in the tropical Pacific.

The Peruvians used to call it “little boy”… and it has been happening like, forever..

Reply to  Art Slartibartfast
September 12, 2026 5:32 am

It is a physical measure: Scientists determine the global average temperature by combining millions of air and sea surface measurements from land weather stations, ships, and ocean buoys, converting them into “temperature anomalies” (differences from a long-term baseline average), mapping them onto a global grid, and averaging the results. Major scientific organizations like NASA and NOAA independently analyze these records to track planetary warming. 
Data Collection

  • Land stations: Thermometers record air temperatures about 1.5 meters above the ground at tens of thousands of weather stations.
  • Ocean coverage: Floating buoys and ships measure sea surface temperatures.
  • Satellite support: Satellites help fill data gaps and monitor broader atmospheric layers. 

Calculating Anomalies Instead of Absolute Values

  • The baseline concept: It is hard to average absolute temperatures because a mountain peak is naturally colder than a coastal city.
  • The math: Scientists subtract the local historical baseline average (often a 30-year span like 1951–1980 or 1991–2020) from each new reading.
  • The result: This difference is the anomaly showing how much warmer or cooler a specific place is compared to its normal state.

Grid Mapping and Adjustments

  • Grid systems: The Earth’s surface is split into equal grid cells.
  • Weighting: Data points are mathematically weighted by the area of the grid box so that polar regions and the equator balance properly.
  • Bias correction: Scientists adjust data to filter out artificial warming caused by urban growth around a station (the urban heat island effect). 
Art Slartibartfast
Reply to  Warren Beeton
September 12, 2026 7:25 am

It is nonphysical because temperature is an intensive property. Let me ask you, would rather be in a tropical rainforest or in the shade in the dry desert when temperatures hit 40 °C (104 °F)? Temperature is not the whole story when it comes to warming effects, you also need to take humidity and air pressure into account. Temperature in an of itself is not enough.

Randy Stubbings
Reply to  Warren Beeton
September 12, 2026 7:35 am

Temperature is an intensive thermodynamic variable that does not scale linearly with mass. Averaging the temperatures of Honolulu and Anchorage does not produce a physically meaningful result. A more meaningful average would be total energy per cubic metre of air. But even that is of questionable value because the effect of increasing the energy per cubic metre of air in Honolulu will not be the same as an equal increase in Anchorage. Earth does not have a single climate. I’m not aware of any material changes to any location’s Koppen-Geiger classification.

John Hultquist
Reply to  Randy Stubbings
September 12, 2026 8:05 am

 My Köppen climate classification is BSk, cool to cold winter, hot summers, semi-arid. Seems not to have changed for the past 13,000 years. I’m a little fuzzy on that exact date.  

John Hultquist
Reply to  Warren Beeton
September 12, 2026 7:53 am

equal grid cells” and “weighted by the area
 “… what you’ve just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having …”

Laws of Nature
September 12, 2026 4:33 am

In 2023 NYT posted the articl “Environmental Groups Cut Programs as Funding Shifts to Climate Change”,
detailing how small environmentall groups loosing funding to climate change organizations and reduce local programs as a result. This has been going in for many years… What the most important environmental issue is might be a matter of opinion depending where you live!

Bob Weber
September 12, 2026 5:21 am

What result should anyone expect after crying wolf about the climate for over forty years?

Reply to  Bob Weber
September 12, 2026 5:28 am
Bob Weber
Reply to  Warren Beeton
September 12, 2026 5:31 am

So sayeth the house dipsh!t.

MarkW
Reply to  Warren Beeton
September 12, 2026 7:41 am

Ah yes, the old everything bad has never happened before and is caused by CO2, argument.

Laws of Nature
Reply to  Warren Beeton
September 12, 2026 8:01 am

Uhm, I could say that one major result of this particular report was that the models it used (cmip6 generation) had significantly better resolution and improved physics. This means that all older reports came from models that we now know were lacking. All these older reports and publications show incorrect uncertainty. So yes, I agree this report is important as it shows all the previous ones need to be corrected as they are wrong. So far we are looking at 40 years of incorrect nonsense and no- effort to improve anything. At the same time uncertainties about the atmospheric CO2-effect remain basically unchanged and large.. nobody knows anything about manmade warming with any significant certainty

September 12, 2026 5:27 am

Lomberg has no scientific trading; his education is in Political Science. https://www.desmog.com/bjorn-lomborg/

MarkW
Reply to  Warren Beeton
September 12, 2026 7:41 am

The vast majority of climate alarmists have no scientific training either.

Laws of Nature
Reply to  Warren Beeton
September 12, 2026 8:03 am

A few posts up I mentioned a journalists article how the climate efforts hurt local environmentalists.. he has a point too..