Cutting The Grass

Guest Post by Willis Eschenbach

Sufi stories of the wisdom of the foolish Mulla Nasrudin have been around for a thousand years or more. One of them tells how the Mulla was walking down the street one day. Three stories above him, a man was working on a roof. The workman slipped and fell. He landed on the Mulla. Fortunately, the workman was totally unharmed. The Mulla, however, was injured enough that he had to be taken to the local hospital to recover.

When the Mulla’s disciples came in to see him, they asked him what lesson could be learned from the incident.

“Shun reliance on theoretical questions,” said Nasrudin, “questions like, if a man falls three stories from a roof, will he have to go to the hospital?”.

=======================

With that as prologue, in the Americas both North and South we have birds called “turkey vultures”, Cathartes aura. Where I grew up they were known as “buzzards”. In parts of the South they are known as a “carrion crow”. I’ve always felt a kinship with them because back in the 1800’s my great-grandfather, The Captain, named his tugboat the “Carencro” after the local name for buzzards.

Plus buzzards have a very important job. They’re the garbagemen, the cleanup crew for all the corpsicles left behind by nature, our allegedly loving mother nature who is also famously “red in tooth and claw” … you go, Mom. Here’s a turkey vulture eating a dead armadillo somewhere down south.

turkey vulture II

The buzzards visit our place a lot, but fortunately, not to eat. We live in a hillside clearing in a redwood forest. It’s the place with the tiny house icon, to the right of and above the center in the photo below. Because there are no trees, the cleared area around our house is warmer than the surrounding forest. This warm air rises.

llane

The buzzards know about warm air rising, of course, because those jokers hate to flap their wings. They are champion gliders, going for mile after mile without ever flexing their wings. In their search for free rides, they regularly use the warm air off of our clearing to work their way up to the ridgetop behind us. They’ll come in and wheel round and round, gaining altitude with each pass Once they’ve gotten high enough on the warm air rising from our clearing, they drift off majestically along the ridge, in their perpetual search for the dead.

Here’s the curious part. A few days ago while I was working outside, I noticed that the buzzards were coming in over the clearing as usual.

But they weren’t gaining the altitude that they were expecting to gain. They weren’t able to get their usual lift. I watched as bird after bird tried their usual route without much success. One even had to flap his wings to get out of the top corner of the clearing. For a buzzard, that’s a sure sign of failure.

Finally, one buzzard ended up gliding so close to the ground that it couldn’t even make it over our eight-foot (2+ metre) deer fence. It flared out its wings, gained a little altitude, and settled on one of the wooden fence posts. This almost never happens. Nothing to attract them here.

turkey vulture

All of this set me to pondering. Why were the buzzards getting fooled about the amount of lift? What had changed?

The only thing I could think of that had changed was that the previous day I’d had the grass cut. I couldn’t cut it earlier because of the endless rain. By the time I got back from Fiji, the grass had gotten up to about chest high in parts. Literally. Chest high.

But that explanation didn’t seem right to me. I’d always figured that if you had a grassy field, it kept the surface from getting too hot. And if there was no vegetation, like in the desert or on the beach, the surface would get hot. As computer modelers like to say, it’s just “simple physics” …

But if that were so … why were the buzzards getting fooled? I love the natural world for exactly this kind of puzzle.

My conclusion was that I was looking at the wrong metric. The issue for the buzzards was not how hot the surface got. It was how hot the air got … and that’s a very different question. The sun heats the surface, and the surface heats the air. So a big issue is not how hot the surface gets, but how well the surface acts as a heat exchanger. Here are the two surfaces in question, mowed and unmowed.

cut grass albedo

It seems to me that the field of grass on the right side of the photo is a pretty good sun –> surface –> air heat exchanger. The grass slows down the passage of the air over the surface, allowing it to be warmed. This warm air will then rise into the free atmosphere. The grass also increases the amount of surface area exposed to the air by orders of magnitude. Finally, the grass acts as a pretty good solar trap, where the solar energy goes in but not much is reflected back out.

Regardless of the explanation, I cannot deny that I expected that cutting the grass would increase the surface warmth and thus the lift for the buzzards. However, the buzzards proved me 100% wrong.

Now, suppose we were trying to model this on the computer. This is far below the size of a single gridcell in a climate model. So it would have to be “parameterized”, meaning that we’d put in numbers that we think are reasonable for this kind of a change … but that’s just putting numbers to a theory about what will happen.

Which brings me back to Nasruddin and the issue of relying on theoretical questions, like “If a field of tall grass is mowed, will the buzzards fly higher or lower?”.

In this case, to my surprise, the answer was “lower”. Which is how I found myself looking into the eye of a buzzard sitting on my fence post. Oh, I didn’t stare at him. That kind of reckless eyeballing makes any wild creature nervous. So I looked at him in glances and pauses, and generally pretended that I didn’t see him.

Now, the birds circling so low to the ground had attracted two cats to the action. And when the buzzard landed on the fence post, the neighbor’s cat crept slowly over to the base of the buzzard’s post. The buzzard paid little attention until the cat was directly below him (her?). Then they both froze, with the cat looking straight up along the post at the buzzard looking down, and the buzzard looking straight down between its toes at the cat looking up.

Our cat just sat and watched them both. I watched all of them.

Then some other poor sucker of a buzzard came in, and he couldn’t get enough lift either. As a result, he came right past the ear of the buzzard on the post. Startled, the post sitter took off. The two cats both immediately vanished into hiding.

Me? I laughed and shook my head at the wondrous intricacies of the climate, and I went back to work.

Best of the springtime to everyone,

w.

PS—Perhaps the most intriguing part of the experience to me was the exquisite judgment of the buzzards as to how much lift they could expect off of our clearing. Birds are quite surprising in their ability to learn. And in that vein, after avoiding the clearing for a couple of days, today for the first time I saw a buzzard come through. However, it didn’t push its luck, and it didn’t get close to the ground. The buzzard just came in, got the main lift from the center of the clearing, and wheeled back out again. What a world, amazingly intelligent beings on all sides.

5 1 vote
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

179 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
May 22, 2017 11:43 am

I are’s a glider pilot and we go by color and time of day and topography and clouds, etc. Mostly though it is wind direction and velocity.
Moist air is less dense than dry air, especially moist warm air and it doesn’t provide much lift. Yeah it might be rising, but on a whole it may not do much. We aren’t talking about afternoon thermals ( I don’t think) which are a different animal and very powerful.
What we really look for is albedo changes and try to pick the lift side and avoid the downward side. Another thing that makes it hard is that it changes during the day a hillside in the morning that reliably produces lift often reverses in the evening after the surrounding area has warmed up.
I am guessing that cutting the grass field lessoned the albedo difference between it and the surrounding area, taking away all of the lift.

brians356
May 22, 2017 12:17 pm

A Turkey Vulture’s main defensive ploy when cornered is to project vomit profusely on the attacker. A friend who worked around them while studying wildlife management in college said a mere whiff of their vomit produces instantaneous violent retching in humans. Also, the ground under their favorite roost trees stinks to high heaven, quickly becomes barren, and the roost trees themselves may well eventually die. The birds sometimes circle in numbers over natural gas pipeline leaks, since a key ingredient in the odor of carrion is ethyl mercaptan, the same substance added to odorless natural gas so that humans can readily smell it.

tty
Reply to  brians356
May 23, 2017 10:29 am

New World vultures are virtually unique among birds by having a keen sense of smell.

Chimp
Reply to  tty
May 23, 2017 10:39 am

From 1988, when Paul Ehrlich still participated in science:
https://web.stanford.edu/group/stanfordbirds/text/essays/Avian_Sense.html

eyesonu
May 22, 2017 12:32 pm

I may make a couple of comments on this. But first and foremost, check the barometric pressure and temp at the time . Was it rising, steady, or falling? Key parameters.

bruce
May 22, 2017 1:39 pm

Thermals are more indicative of warm “ground” and less warm ground. The notion that the ground may feel cooler having given off its heat is hard to accept. Not saying it isn’t so, just hard for me to understand. Because I see an asphalt parking lot being a generator of thermals.
I suppose it doesn’t take much temp differential to fire off a thermal. A thermal can pop from different parts of a uniform field over the course of time.

Rob Dawg
May 22, 2017 1:42 pm

From where I post I can literally look up and see the Sespe Condor Sanctuary to the north. California Condors surviving because of a fortunate name. Had they been named Fillmore Ugly Dumb Scavenger Vultures no one would be missing them. In tough times they would travel here and nibble on the inevitable roadkill. The recent rain has meant they are not as desperate and sticking closer to home.

Chimp
Reply to  Rob Dawg
May 22, 2017 1:59 pm

IMO they’re big enough, with eight to ten-foot wingspans, to have attracted attention even were they not named condors.
I’ve been buzzed by Andean condors in the mountains above Santiago, Chile, not because I smell like rotting flesh, but because the scavenger was swooping in on a dead cow.
The two species overlap in wingspan, with Andeans typically bigger and heavier birds. California condors ranged much more widely in North America during the Pleistocene, when there were so many megafauna to scavenge.

brians356
Reply to  Chimp
May 22, 2017 2:57 pm

Minnesota Fats once said: “They say there’s only eighteen California Condors left in the wild. If one craps on my Cadillac, there’ll be seventeen.”

eyesonu
Reply to  Chimp
May 22, 2017 6:31 pm

I once shot and ate a condor. The meat taste something between a baby seal and an eagle!

Chimp
Reply to  Chimp
May 22, 2017 6:47 pm

Eagles aren’t endangered, so you get no un-PC style points for that. Neither are baby seals.

eyesonu
Reply to  Chimp
May 22, 2017 6:49 pm

Polar bears?

Chimp
Reply to  Chimp
May 22, 2017 6:55 pm

Also not endangered.
Polar bears taste like seals.

eyesonu
Reply to  Chimp
May 22, 2017 7:04 pm

Hell, I’m going to get a big mack and a frosty. It’s not endangered but may make me sick!

Chimp
Reply to  Chimp
May 22, 2017 7:24 pm

LOL!
Is that a Big Mac made with polar bear meat and a Frosty with baby seal blubber?
I should hope so.

James at 48
Reply to  Rob Dawg
May 23, 2017 1:37 pm

The Fillmore part would have been the single word that did ’em in. 🙂
(Sorry, couldn’t resist, I used to live somewhat near there .,… ).

May 22, 2017 1:52 pm

My theory:
1. Albedo. Less Sunlight is reflected, all heat goes into the tall grass. Maximum heat input.
2. At an eara with cut grass the heat goes into the soil, wich is heated up. Ist is only released later or at night. No lift for the buzzards.
3. Long grass is a good heat exchanger through higher area. All available in the grass goes into the air – maximum and immediate heat release of all availabe energy.
Any sunlight wihich comes in is immediately used to heat the highest possible amount of air and give maximum lift.

Richard
May 22, 2017 2:01 pm

I see other people already thought about transpiration, and since moist air rises, the long grass likely would contribute to lift the vultures love so dearly. They certainly couldn’t care less how the lift is generated, so long as they don’t have to flap.

Don K
May 22, 2017 2:24 pm

Might be of interest to measure the air temp a couple of meters above the cut area and the uncut area. Hopefully it’ll confirm that the air above the uncut area is warmer. If it doesn’t … I dunno another hypothesis … vultures cause thermals maybe? Or we can just ignore the data and go with the model.

dmacleo
May 22, 2017 2:31 pm

is it possible there is also a relative humidity issue at play with the uncut grass vs cut grrass that causes more “uplift”?
very interesting observations, thanks for posting this..

May 22, 2017 2:40 pm

I do not think that humidity helps lift. Evaporation means cooling.
Just humid grass absorbs sunlight and gives immediately the minimum warmth to the air by contact, without much evaporation.

David Joyce
May 22, 2017 2:47 pm

Wonderful observations. I am a sailplane pilot and am always amazed at vultures ability to detect and use the smallest of thermals. Your observations show that they also base their abilities on local knowledge. Interesting hypothesis about the mechanism, wonder if evapotranspiration is playing a part.

brians356
May 22, 2017 2:59 pm

You know, it’s just possible those vultures simply partied too hard the night before. Think outside the box, folks.

dmacleo
Reply to  brians356
May 22, 2017 3:13 pm

turkey vultures drunk too much wild turkey perhaps?

Chimp
Reply to  brians356
May 22, 2017 3:16 pm

Or one of their prey carcasses had fermented.

Brian Adams
Reply to  Chimp
May 22, 2017 11:26 pm

I’ve seen robins drunk on fermented berries. It’s comical, but they do become more vulnerable to predators like house cats.

tty
Reply to  Chimp
May 23, 2017 10:33 am

Waxwings fairly often get drunk on fermented berries. They tend to fly into things, and to start singing for absolutely no reason in the middle of winter.
Not very different from humans actually.

Chimp
Reply to  Chimp
May 23, 2017 10:44 am

I’ve seen intentionally drunk parrots staggering down a street in Panama City, apparently unable to fly.
Too drunk to fly, thanks to fermented fruit.

Ack
May 22, 2017 4:00 pm

Watched a flock of about 12 soar around my house a few minutes ago.

H. D. Hoese
May 22, 2017 4:08 pm

These must migrate, although have not seen that verified. We just had a bunch of black ones come in. There is a two mile causeway across the bay that pelicans and gulls, no vultures recalled, cross by riding the updrafts and there was a paper written about this long ago. Should have paid better attention, but wonder if thermals develop more in low winds off the Gulf when land heats up and cloud lines develop. During migrations they should benefit more with higher winds which they might get at altitude. One would think that someone has studied this, but probably not something that would get you tenure.

Brian Adams
Reply to  H. D. Hoese
May 22, 2017 11:36 pm

Turkey Vultures in N. America migrate south in winter. They return to where I live usually the same week every April.
Remember this classic poster? The warmista “climate scientists” are like these vultures: “Patience my _ss! I’m gonna predict something!”comment image

Gene
Reply to  H. D. Hoese
May 23, 2017 12:45 pm

Gulls seem to have the expert knowledge of all sorts of updraft: thermal, ridge lift, or any other disturbance that can give them a free ride. I was amazed to see them catch wake vortices from ferry boats I rode from Oyster Point to Oakland. It was not unlike a human surfer catching a wave with his board, except I had to use my imagination to visualize the wave they were riding. They used a special maneuver to approach and catch the vortex, and it only worked some of the time, but when it did work, it worked extremely well. They would hang in it for minutes, without flapping their wings (but with a fierce action on the stick and pedals, as it were), and once in a while one of them would dive and catch something. I noticed that they could tell from a great distance whether the ferry was of the right kind and did not bother trying if it was not; they also knew when wind direction or strength would affect vortex stability. There were two or three different types of ferry sailing on that line, and apparently one of them was not suitable for that sort of fun and they only flew by to check if it turned anything up in the water but never attempted to ride in its wake.

Scott
May 22, 2017 5:57 pm

A few have mentioned that a breeze always takes away the heat from the cut grass, but the tall grass is such a resistance that it turns any breeze to 0 mph, so all the sun’s heat stays in the tall grass and “cooks” it. This is what I believe is at work the most.
When I walk along the Lake Michigan shore on an onshore windy day, I’m always amazed that if I walk just inside the shoreline scrub brush treeline, the wind speed will drop from a nasty 25 mph to almost zero. Vegetation is very effective at nullifying a breeze.
[In the first 1/2 for grasses, first meter for shrubs, perhaps 1-1/2 meter for full bushes. .mod]

May 22, 2017 8:04 pm

Willis wrote

I expected that cutting the grass would increase the surface warmth and thus the lift for the buzzards. However, the buzzards proved me 100% wrong.

Of course it could have been as simple as you mowed in better weather typically associated with high pressure systems and general downward motion of the air whereas low pressure systems are associated with rising air moving the water to the sky where the clouds then form and it rains. And the buzzards get their lift.
The real test would be whether the lift returns over the next week or two despite the length of the grass.

Reply to  TimTheToolMan
May 24, 2017 6:07 am

Recalled local extension guy mentioning comparison of temperatures with bare soil, grass, trees just a few days ago, and tried to look it up. Of course, did not find it, but these few filtered from the false positives are interesting.
http://www.frostburg.edu/fsu/assets/File/clife/mscenter/FinalPapers/2008/Heat.pdf
http://escholarship.org/uc/item/2563v814
http://www.turfresearch.org/pdf/2014/Turfgrass%20Benefits%20and%20Issues%20Stier%20el%20al.pdf
Had more elaborate notes, but the interface ate them.

Old Woman of the North
May 22, 2017 8:51 pm

Great observation, Willis.
A hang-glider told me he finds thermals by looking for little puffy clouds forming. They are where the moisture in the r condenses.
When we first got TV back in the 1970s on our farm the cattle dogs (outside dogs) were so fascinated they came inside and looked behind the set to find what was moving!

Anders Valland
May 23, 2017 12:03 am

I haven’t read all the comments, so maybe it has already been covered. I am a glider pilot, albeit not an experienced one, and we learn to distinguish between surfaces on the ground to look for thermal sources and sinks.
In your story you say that cutting the grass has been delayed due to a long period of rain. I would then assume that the ground was wet, and if so the ground would be sucking up a lot of heat because of this. It would therefore be less of a thermal source until dry.
The whole point here is that the buzzards fly on the temperature differential between the warm (and in this case moist) air and the surroundig air. If some other area is generating warmer air, then your field is the sink. After all, if some air goes up, other air needs to come down. A thermal is always covered in sinking air.
I think your initial hunch was good, but this example shows it is not always so.

Peta from Cumbria, now Newark
May 23, 2017 1:04 am

To my mind explains a lot of things, not least a thought I’ve had for some while.
The GHE says the atmosphere, very close to the dirt and esp. where people and thermometers are, is warmer than it should be (because of of Stefan Boltzmann’s Law) exactly because of the GreenHouse Effect.
Vertical things on the surface, grass, fairly isolated trees and of course buildings, will absorb more solar energy during morning & late afternoons than a flat surface.
The tall things will absorb along the lines of a cosine (of the sun’s angle above the horizon) curve while level surfaces will absorb along a sine curve throughout the day. But at noon time, even the vertical things look like a flat surface so the 2 curves must be added and that gives greater energy overall daily energy absorption.
The tall things also are typically not well connected thermally to the dirt, so they will achieve higher temperatures and dissipate this energy into the air near the surface.
At my old farm was a cement rendered breeze-block wall that directly faced the setting sun. Even on otherwise cool but clear days, the late afternoon heat coming off that wall was incredible. You could feel it from 3 or 4 metres away. And it was a very light grey colour, probably very high albedo.
Looking at real things in the real world explains why the GHGE is garbage, why the Urban Heat Island is a reality and why my old Cumbrian home farm was cooling.
Farming areas, especially livestock in the UK, are getting ever more intensive, the grass is being cut & grazed ever more often. Hence Willis’ observation.
In arable areas, the converse applies and they are warming – lots of low albedo dirt lying around and tall dark coloured plants (because of all the Nitrogen fert they get) that are good a collecting heat from morn till dusk yet efficient at dissipating it into the air.

May 23, 2017 1:13 am

“And in that vein, after avoiding the clearing for a couple of days, today for the first time I saw a buzzard come through. However, it didn’t push its luck, and it didn’t get close to the ground. The buzzard just came in, got the main lift from the center of the clearing, and wheeled back out again.”
Good observations as always Willis.
I think that tall grass acts like an insulator, protecting the soil from excessive drying. Think straw bale houses, thatched roofs etc
Cut grass exposes the soil surface to the harsh drying sun. It would take time, a couple of days in your case, for the sun to burn off the soil moisture.
During those couple of days, we have the cooling effect of the upper surface soil moisture being evaporated.
Once the upper soil has dried, thermals return, along with the birds.
I haven’t looked it up but I have a sneaky feeling that H2O and its phase changes has a stronger effect than albedo/colour/surface quality.

May 23, 2017 2:02 am

It would be interesting to erect a met tower and actually measure temperature and humidity at various heights above the ground and the fluxes.
Glad to see you are still around, Bruce Friesen.

Poor Richard
May 23, 2017 3:54 am

Wonderful post!
I might be wrong, but IMHO, it seems obvious that a field with tall grass would be a better heat exchanger than a field with short grass. More surface area.

Griff
May 23, 2017 4:39 am

Glider pilots tell me they will often share a thermal with birds of prey… and that inevitably they find the birds know where the greatest rate of lift is and position themselves there. A glider pilot has an instrument to measure the lift – they wonder how the birds are finding that sweet spot without one…

The Original Mike M
May 23, 2017 5:27 am

They have a very keen sense of smell to detect rotting flesh. Is it possible that convection has nothing to do with their change in behavior and it was really that cutting the grass killed some small varmints, (small snakes, field mice, etc.) so they came down to investigate the menu?
I propose a test Willis. Collect an adequate supply of fresh small critter road kill in the freezer, and when the grass is nice and high again – scatter it around on the morning of what will be a nice hot day and see if they exhibit this same behavior as when the grass was just cut.

eyesonu
May 23, 2017 6:25 am

Check your barometer. Even hot flue gases can’t rise when pressure is low or perhaps falling. Just take a glance at the smoke from local chimney in the area you hunt and if the smoke is not rising or if it’s falling even the best tracking dogs can’t work.
You will also not see any birds soaring. Ambient temperature also has an effect.

The Original Mike M
Reply to  eyesonu
May 23, 2017 8:28 am

“hot flue gases can’t rise when pressure is low”
Huh? They seem to rise just fine at ~15,000 feet, (~24.9″ Hg)comment image
https://www.airbnb.com/rooms/7864834

The Original Mike M
Reply to  The Original Mike M
May 23, 2017 8:30 am

Ooops! 5000′ not 15000′ altitude, 28.3″ Hg

RACookPE1978
Editor
Reply to  The Original Mike M
May 23, 2017 8:34 am

I think you are conflating the very low outside air actual pressure (at low humidity and very high altitudes and very cold air temperatures – that DOES draw very strongly when passing heated firestove air!) with the low draws of humid (high relative humidity and low pressure regional air around the house) trying to “pull” air up an open chimney at 100 – 1000 feet altitudes.

The Original Mike M
Reply to  The Original Mike M
May 23, 2017 9:38 am

I should have picked hot air balloons as an example; they still go up when the barometer is low, (just not as fast). I don’t question the validity of the observation but suspect if there might be more going on to explain why smoke tends to hang lower in the air. I wonder if humidity could have an influence on the chemistry of the smoke itself to make it a little heavier?

eyesonu
Reply to  The Original Mike M
May 23, 2017 1:29 pm

My observations are generally between 1000 to 2500 ft above sea level. You can hardly get charcoal lighted in a starter chimney on a low pressure day.
Poured 5 gal old gasoline on a brushpile and tried to light it once on a low pressure system before approaching rain by throwing burning newspaper ‘comets’ (rocks wadded to allow throwing) on the wet fuel. I ran out of paper and matches. No fire. So I thought I would try and light from the bottom. I was 40 or 50 feet away and when i struck the lighter at ground level it rolled me 2 or 3 times. The vapors were laying on the ground. Not gonna do that again!
Anyway with 30 years of hunting with dogs (80 – 90 days annually) a low pressure is just a walk in the woods. Even a grouse spotted walking along a forest service road and 5 minutes later the dogs can’t take the track. On a high pressure they can take a 24 hour old track. When the scent is falling they do o good job of locating treed/roosting birds. Same goes with rabbit dogs, best beagles can’t run a rabbit 25 yards. Same with bear dogs unless the brush is dense and high, then it’s iffy after 10 minutes
If someone can explain my observations and smoke from a household chimney other than barometric pressure, I’m all ears or eyes on you. Better be a hell of a good explanation.