The Bugs are Back: Another Eating Insects Study

Insect variety plate – Image from kittymowmow.com – click

Guest essay by Eric Worrall

A new study suggests that people could be eased into an eco-friendly insect protein diet by slipping insect protein into pre-packaged foods.

Edible insects could play key role in cutting harmful emissions

May 4, 2017

Eating insects instead of beef could help tackle climate change by reducing harmful emissions linked to livestock production, research suggests.

Replacing half of the meat eaten worldwide with crickets and mealworms would cut farmland use by a third, substantially reducing emissions of greenhouse gases, researchers say.

While consumers’ reluctance to eat insects may limit their consumption, even a small increase would bring benefits, the team says. This could potentially be achieved by using insects as ingredients in some pre-packaged foods.

Using data collected primarily by the UN’s Food and Agriculture Organization, scientists have compared the environmental impacts of conventional meat production with those of alternative sources of food. It is the first study to do so.

Researchers at the University of Edinburgh and Scotland’s Rural College considered a scenario in which half of the current mix of animal products is replaced by insects, lab-grown meat or imitation meat.

They found that insects and imitation meat—such as soybean-based foods like tofu—are the most sustainable as they require the least land and energy to produce. Beef is by far the least sustainable, the team says.

Read more: https://phys.org/news/2017-05-edible-insects-key-role-emissions.html

The Abstract of the study;

Could consumption of insects, cultured meat or imitation meat reduce global agricultural land use?

Peter Alexandera, Calum Browna, Almut Arnethc, Clare Diasa, John Finnigand, Dominic Moranb, e, Mark D.A. Rounsevella

Animal products, i.e. meat, milk and eggs, provide an important component in global diets, but livestock dominate agricultural land use by area and are a major source of greenhouse gases. Cultural and personal associations with animal product consumption create barriers to moderating consumption, and hence reduced environmental impacts. Here we review alternatives to conventional animal products, including cultured meat, imitation meat and insects (i.e. entomophagy), and explore the potential change in global agricultural land requirements associated with each alternative. Stylised transformative consumption scenarios where half of current conventional animal products are substituted to provide at least equal protein and calories are considered. The analysis also considers and compares the agricultural land area given shifts between conventional animal product consumption. The results suggest that imitation meat and insects have the highest land use efficiency, but the land use requirements are only slightly greater for eggs and poultry meat. The efficiency of insects and their ability to convert agricultural by-products and food waste into food, suggests further research into insect production is warranted. Cultured meat does not appear to offer substantial benefits over poultry meat or eggs, with similar conversion efficiency, but higher direct energy requirements. Comparison with the land use savings from reduced consumer waste, including over-consumption, suggests greater benefits could be achieved from alternative dietary transformations considered. We conclude that although a diet with lower rates of animal product consumption is likely to create the greatest reduction in agricultural land, a mix of smaller changes in consumer behaviour, such as replacing beef with chicken, reducing food waste and potentially introducing insects more commonly into diets, would also achieve land savings and a more sustainable food system.

Read more: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211912417300056

From Table 2 of the full study;

… Consumer acceptability barriers in some regions. A lower level of uptake in combination, perhaps as an ingredient, e.g. in pre-packaged foods, seems more likely. …

Read more: Same link as above

Packaged food is already substantially contaminated with insect waste, the FDA allows shocking levels of insect contamination in everyday foods. So it could be argued that they are simply allowing the insects to have a bit more of a munch on the goods before they reach the consumer.

Nevertheless I don’t think intentionally eating insects is going to catch on, even amongst greens. Greens seem to be mostly hypocrites, WUWT frequently showcases the amount of petroleum based synthetic fabric on show at your average anti fossil fuel eco-protest.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

172 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
higley7
May 5, 2017 2:30 pm

To reduce agricultural and use, all they have to do is cancel all of the evil and ill-intentioned BIOFUEL programs. Pressure to use more land is caused by the use of land for a failed idea, which decreases the food supply and adds pressure to use more land.

Chimp
May 5, 2017 6:16 pm

Greens so hate humanity that they won’t be happy until we’re all eating nothing by pond scum instead of plant crops and protozoans instead of insects. And even then they’ll say that there are too many of us.

James Bull
May 6, 2017 12:22 am

Seems like I’m ahead of the game as I took delivery of 10kg of dried mealworms yesterday but I have no plans to eat them myself they are for the Blackbirds, Starlings, Robins and Sparrows that are the main visitors to my garden.
James Bull

Reply to  James Bull
May 6, 2017 1:26 am

If you eat any form of cereal, bread, biscuits, etc, you will be eating quite a bit of insect protein. When grain is milled, the insects are not removed and so become part of the product. Bon Appetite!

Reply to  Gareth Phillips
May 6, 2017 6:01 am

Yep, few people know that there is an acceptable FDA approved level of insect bits in their processed foods !!

May 6, 2017 5:01 am

It’s a deal. I’ll eat bugs, but recycle them through my chicken first.

May 6, 2017 6:44 am

Ever wonder why Sierra Club, World Wildlife Fund, Greenpeace and any other Marxist Watermelon Environmental organization never produce any “green products” that actually prove the theories they are supporting will actually do any good? The reason is simple, the economics simply aren’t there. Watermelon groups spend most of their money lobbying the government to spend tax dollars to fund their projects.
https://co2islife.wordpress.com/2017/05/06/watermelon-environmentalist-economics-more-waste-inefficiency-and-incompetence-than-conservation/

fretslider
May 6, 2017 11:00 am

I am not now nor have I ever been an insectivore.
That is not going to change.

Jake
May 6, 2017 5:15 pm

freasysite
This from The American Bug ebookhttp://links.survivallife.com/a/216/click/3371255/338576459/_78fe7622056d13367ed59fce6c6af6a79aefc8c7/3fa709651c87a1c965787100dc2ce80fd740d22e

Jake
May 6, 2017 5:19 pm

That didn’t come out right
Insect meat is very much like a shrimp or crab but with more omega-3 fatty oily stuff. The chemical composition of related species may vary as it often depends on the plant they eat, so the nutritional value is location specific. However, some generalizations can be made. The protein content is comparable to conventional meat. The fiber content (chitin from the exoskeleton) is higher than in conventional meat and similar to that of cereal grains. All food insects are a significant source of short-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids, a good source of iron, calcium and vitamin B complex. In general as a food group, insects are nutritious, rich in protein and fat, providing ample quantities of minerals and vitamins. The amino-acid composition is in most cases better than that of grains and legumes.
The American Bug Eater’s Handbook 4
t