Claim: climate change made the modern horse, of course

From the SPANISH NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL (CSIC) and the department of “climate change, is there anything it can’t do?” comes this:

Climate change responsible for the great diversity in horses

A study led by CSIC points to environmental factors in causing the rapid expansion of species over the last 20 million years

Three species of Hipparion, that lived in the Iberian peninsula between 9 million years and 5 million years ago CREDIT MAURICIO ANTÓN
Three species of Hipparion, that lived in the Iberian peninsula between 9 million years and 5 million years ago
CREDIT MAURICIO ANTÓN

Changing environments and ecosystems were driving the evolution of horses over the past 20 million years. This is the main conclusion of a new study published in Science by a team of palaeontologists from Spain and Argentina. The team analysed 140 species of horses, most of them extinct, synthesising decades of research on the fossil history of this popular group of mammals.

Their conclusions challenge a classic theory, which links the evolutionary success of horses to several novel adaptations in response to the spread of grasslands around 18 million years ago. “According to the classic view, horses would have evolved faster in when grasslands appeared, developing teeth that were more resistant to the stronger wear that comes with a grass-dominated diet. They also became bigger to more effectively digest this low quality food, and as a strategy against predators in these new, open habitats”, explains Juan L. Cantalapiedra, researcher at the Museum für Naturkunde in Berlin, Germany.

But did teeth and body size indeed evolve that fast? It seems they didn’t. According to the new results, these evolutionary changes could have been much slower than previously assumed. In fact, Cantalapiedra and colleagues were able to show that all these newly evolved species of horses were ecologically very similar. Thus, rather than a multiplication of ecological roles, the new results point to external factors, such as increasing environmental heterogeneity, as the main evolutionary force.

“Environmental changes would have produced a lot more fragmented, mosaic-type ecosystems, where populations of horses with similar demands and adaptations could have evolved isolated from one another, resulting in different species but with a similar appearance”, points Manuel Hernández Fernández at the Complutense Univerity in Madrid. “This was probably only possible in ecosystems with a lot of energy and biomass, so that very similar species, which otherwise would have been in strong competition, were all able to survive”, adds Jose Luis Prado, at the National University of the Center of Buenos Aires Province.

Diversification accelerated again two more times, “when changes in sea level allowed their migration from North America into Eurasia and Africa, 11 and 4 million years ago”, explains María Teresa Alberdi, at the National Museum of Natural Sciences in Madrid. “Then, again, new species appeared very fast, but without showing dramatic changes in appearance”, concludes Cantalapiedra.

###

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
93 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
michael hart
February 10, 2017 9:59 am

“climate change, is there anything it can’t do?”
Like tell us which horse will win the Kentucky Derby, or something else actually useful.

Moderately Cross of East Anglia
February 10, 2017 11:19 am

Co2isnotevil sets off an interesting train of thought with the idea that adapting to be useful to man in some ways has acted as an evolutionary advantageous trait to some animals. I find myself slightly disappointed our ancestors didn’t come up with a useful task to keep saber-tooths going. But then like the modern cat they would probably have spent their time planning how to kill us – which modern cats do very efficiently of course by infecting us with all sorts of nasty diseases.

Joel Snider
Reply to  Moderately Cross of East Anglia
February 10, 2017 12:22 pm

My guess is the allegiance with dogs (wolves) went a long way to ensuring the demise of saber-toothed cats – that and the crash of the big herbivores like mammoths (which our species probably also helped along) – the long-fanged cats weren’t really adapted for anything other than very large prey.

Gloateus Maximus
Reply to  Joel Snider
February 10, 2017 2:17 pm

They probably preyed upon juvenile mammoths by ambush, at great personal risk:comment image

Joel Snider
Reply to  Joel Snider
February 10, 2017 3:39 pm

I’m sure they targeted the young, weak, and old, whenever possible, which was still big prey – and predators rarely take on the biggest meanest bulls that are lookin’ right at ’em.

Gloateus Maximus
Reply to  Joel Snider
February 11, 2017 4:37 am

Lions take on mature, healthy male Cape buffaloes, but only as a pride, not alone. Dunno if sabertooths were pack hunters or not.

Joel Snider
February 10, 2017 12:16 pm

Environmental conditions are a forcing factor in evolution? They actually did a study to determine this? Boy, what an innovative idea. SCIENCE magazine is really ahead of the times.
Did they run out of coke for their test chimps to sniff?

Dahlquist
February 10, 2017 2:50 pm

Looks like dinosaurs did have feathers. 99 million year old dinosaur tail found in amber.
http://www.latimes.com/science/sciencenow/la-sci-sn-dinosaur-feathers-amber-20161208-story.html

Gloateus Maximus
Reply to  Dahlquist
February 11, 2017 5:21 am

That dinosaurs had feathers hasn’t really been in doubt for over 20 years now, since 1996.
That birds are dinosaurs was first proposed in the 19th century, based upon anatomy, but this correct assessment fell out of favor in the 20th century, for the sole reason that no dinosaur then yet discovered had a wishbone. Yet even for long after many theropod dinosaur wishbones were found, the mistaken conclusion as to avian origins persisted, ie that birds are archosaurs closely related to dinosaurs, but not themselves dinosaurs, which in fact they are. Maniraptoran coelurosaurian tetanuran theropods, to be precise.
http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/museum/events/bigdinos2005/images/dino_tree.gif
http://scienceblogs.com/tetrapodzoology/wp-content/blogs.dir/471/files/2012/04/i-e739d6024d965bc896f1d32910ccebb3-Holtz%20Eumaniraptora%20cladogram.jpg

Patrick MJD
February 10, 2017 10:11 pm

Same is said for early primates. Grassland grew in favour of trees forcing primates to walk up right, as in the case of “Lucy”.

Gloateus Maximus
Reply to  Patrick MJD
February 11, 2017 4:47 am

And, as noted, for a lot of other groups, to include especially antelopes, which evolved in adaptation to the spreading savannahs.
Antelope BTW aren’t a formally classified subfamily or tribe of Family Bovidae, but are defined more by what they aren’t than what they are. They aren’t cattle or caprids, for instance. The American pronghorn “antelope” is not a bovid.

Reply to  Gloateus Maximus
February 11, 2017 5:44 pm

Anonymous Highland poem:
On yonder hill
There stood a kooo
It must ‘ave shifted
Cos it’s no there nooo

Gloateus Maximus
Reply to  Gloateus Maximus
February 11, 2017 5:51 pm

Doo Scots koos goo moo?

February 11, 2017 9:45 am

Zebrass too? Climate change is likely also responsible for human evolution.
http://humanorigins.si.edu/research/climate-and-human-evolution/climate-effects-human-evolution
So is the AGW meme simply an Oedipus syndrome driven “I wish you’d never had me” childish tantrum?

February 11, 2017 12:35 pm

More great topics to write grants to study and publish papers on:
Humans Evolved In A Nitrogen-Based Atmosphere
Cells Divided To Produce New Life Forms
The Sky Developed A Blue Color
Life On Earth Advanced Due To Aerobic Respiration
Gravity Caused Rain To Fall Downward

February 11, 2017 4:32 pm

The evolution of the horse and the horse’s type of foot – walking on a single finger / toe, also evolved independently in South America during that continent’s isolation.

Gloateus Maximus
Reply to  ptolemy2
February 11, 2017 8:10 pm
February 11, 2017 5:23 pm

THE END IS NEIGH
(Or at least the worst case scenario.)