Guest essay by Eric Worrall
A new study “Brief exposure to Pope Francis heightens moral beliefs about climate change” claims looking at a picture of Pope Francis is more likely to cause Republicans to view climate change as a moral issue.
The Lasting Effects of Pope Francis’ Climate Change Edict
New research finds thinking about the pontiff changes the way we frame the issue.
By Tom Jacobs
Last fall, a study reported that Pope Francis’ much-discussed encyclical on climate change largely fell on deaf ears. Researchers from Texas Tech University found the appeal “failed to rally any broad support on climate change” among Americans, whether or not they were Catholic.
But newly published research suggests the pontiff’s call for taking care of the Earth has had a more subtle impact on American public opinion. It finds brief exposure to a photograph of the pope “increased perceptions of climate change as a moral issue.”
What’s more, this shift in how the issue is perceived was particularly strong among Republicans — a group that has traditionally been resistant to acknowledging the fact that humans are affecting the Earth’s climate in dangerous ways.
“The pope’s message may transcend political boundaries and fundamentally reshape how the issue is conceptualized among the public,” a research team led by Jonathon Schuldt of Cornell University writes in the journal Climatic Change.
…
This gap was particularly large among Republicans. Thirty-nine percent of those who were exposed to the pope’s image said they considered it a moral issue, compared to 30 percent among those who were not. That’s a potentially important shift, as pondering about the ethical consequences of environmental destruction may shift behavior more effectively than thinking in utilitarian terms.
…
Thinking about the pope did not increase the percentage of Republicans who felt personal responsibility for climate change, which stayed steady at 36 percent.
…
Read more: https://psmag.com/the-lasting-effects-of-pope-francis-climate-change-edict-89e5c111159b
The abstract of the new study;
Brief exposure to Pope Francis heightens moral beliefs about climate change
Jonathon P. Schuldt, Adam R. Pearson, Rainer Romero-Canyas, Dylan Larson-Konar
In his recent encyclical letter Laudato Si’: On Care for Our Common Home, Pope Francis issued a moral appeal to the global community for swift action on climate change. However, social science research suggests a complex relationship between religious concepts and environmental attitudes, raising the question of what influence the pope’s position may have on public opinion regarding this polarizing issue. In a national probability survey experiment of U.S. adults (n = 1212), we find that brief exposure to Pope Francis influenced the climate-related beliefs of broad segments of the public: it increased perceptions of climate change as a moral issue for the overall sample (and among Republicans in particular) and increased felt personal responsibility for contributing to climate change and its mitigation (among Democrats). Moreover, prior awareness of the pope’s views on climate change mattered, such that those who indicated greater awareness of the pope’s position showed stronger treatment effects, consistent with a priming account of these effects. Results complement recent correlational findings and offer further evidence of the Vatican’s influence on climate change public opinion.
Read more: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10584-016-1893-9
Unfortunately the full study is paywalled, but the statement in the press release that thinking about the pope did not increase feelings of personal responsibility for climate change is intriguing.
Looking at a picture of Pope Francis stimulates my concerns about climate morality; but I doubt my thoughts about the morality of Pope Francis’ climate posturing will lead to the outcome the study authors appear to want.

Oh, if you want a picture to have some effect on impressing the truth, then I can help out there:
The Pope doesn’t stand a chance against my poster boy.
That should have been “affect”. I hate it when I blow a joke.
It is a sign of our times.
Certain people will use “Science”, “Islam”, “Catholisism”, etcetera, to further their political ends. They also pay psychologists and various academic wannabes to tell them how to abuse the above concepts to bend the populace to their will. In doing so they usually corrupt the basic underlying principles, which is why I put all three examples above in quotation marks.
OK, republicans have to cope with
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utilitarianism
and
https://youtu.be/BEJmP8T07JU
and anthromorphistic deities.
OR Astrology.
Nothing new in the real world.
Well, even if you don’t adhere to anything else, you gotta admit that Mariah can blow a song out of the water like no other.
Now if we could just get her singing about truth in climate science, then I think the tables might turn for the better. (^_^)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albrecht_von_Wallenstein
didn’t hire managers – his career was built on astrology.
Albrecht Wenzel Eusebius von Wallenstein (About this sound pronunciation ; Czech: Albrecht Václav Eusebius z Valdštejna;[1] 24 September 1583 – 25 February 1634),[2] also von Waldstein, was a Bohemian[a] military leader and politician who offered his services, and an army of 30,000 to 100,000 men, during the Thirty Years’ War (1618–48), to the Holy Roman Emperor Ferdinand II. He became the supreme commander of the armies of the Habsburg Monarchy and a major figure of the Thirty Years’ War.
( astrology doesn’t change probabilities – but enhances decision finding ).
Nice gag, still giggling.
But it’s not April 1st yet, is it?
The study results support the idea of psychological priming. That is, associating an idea with a symbol so that the attributes of the symbol get attached to the idea. It’s been demonstrated in numerous times and ways. That’s why the climate propagandists use cuddly polar bears and baby seals as symbols, for example. How effective the transfer of good feelings is to personal responsibility is questionable for mature people; for the young who lack experience and judgement it might be stronger.
It is very interesting and strange that so many of us call “scientists” stupefied policy and did not know the power relationship of the sun and planets, according to what we Avak weak stimulate the energy, we can change in relation to climate.
I have to repeat, climate change and global warming on the planets, to the consequences of mutual relations of the planet, each other and the sun.
I’m interested in why you are in your newspaper do not have any interest to publish prove to refute all previous stupid ideas and theories on climate change, and on this idea is in vain, spent several tens of trillions of dollars, why?
Is there any tool that will influence to awaken those who believe in the truth.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/one-14-catholic-priests-accused-abuse-australia-054712261.html
Commie Frank ignores real moral issues in the Church for fake environmental plots.
Conservative Catholics strike back against Communist pope installed in palace coup.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/italy-police-hunt-authors-anti-pope-posters-155849159.html
It IS a proven psychological technique (trick?) to trigger positive emotions.
Question: If I get warm fuzzy thoughts about climate change when I see a picture of the Pope, what is it I’m supposed to feel when I see the famous picture of Gina Lollobrigida coming out of the water from the film ‘Boy on a Dolphin’?
It makes me think more about the other current headlines about the Catholic Church coming out of Australia today.
When do they start in with the climate change chants and phrases on elevators and in-store music subliminal messaging? There are few areas left for the psych ops teams to explore.
BREAKING: Showing a brightly backlit monochromatic blue photograph of the Pope that flickers around ~40 cycles per second might trigger the brain’s own ‘clean up mechanism’ and reverse Alzheimer’s..