Earth's magnetic poles may be poised to flip

Article by Phil Livermore, Associate Professor of geophysics, University of Leeds and Jon Mound, Associate Professor of Geophysics, University of Leeds

Schematic illustration of the invisible magnetic field lines generated by the Earth, represented as a dipole magnet field. In actuality, our magnetic shield is squeezed in closer to Earth on the Sun-facing side and extremely elongated on the night-side due to the solar wind. Earth's polarity is not a constant. Unlike a classic bar magnet, the matter governing Earth's magnetic field moves around. Geophysicists are pretty sure that the reason Earth has a magnetic field is because its solid iron core is surrounded by a fluid ocean of hot, liquid metal. The flow of liquid iron in Earth's core creates electric currents, which in turn creates the magnetic field. Credit: Peter Reid, The University of Edinburgh
Schematic illustration of the invisible magnetic field lines generated by the Earth, represented as a dipole magnet field. In actuality, our magnetic shield is squeezed in closer to Earth on the Sun-facing side and extremely elongated on the night-side due to the solar wind. Earth’s polarity is not a constant. Unlike a classic bar magnet, the matter governing Earth’s magnetic field moves around. Geophysicists are pretty sure that the reason Earth has a magnetic field is because its solid iron core is surrounded by a fluid ocean of hot, liquid metal. The flow of liquid iron in Earth’s core creates electric currents, which in turn creates the magnetic field. Credit: Peter Reid, The University of Edinburgh

The Earth’s magnetic field surrounds our planet like an invisible force field – protecting life from harmful solar radiation by deflecting charged particles away. Far from being constant, this field is continuously changing. Indeed, our planet’s history includes at least several hundred global magnetic reversals, where north and south magnetic poles swap places. So when’s the next one happening and how will it affect life on Earth?

During a reversal the magnetic field won’t be zero, but will assume a weaker and more complex form. It may fall to 10 percent of the present-day strength and have magnetic poles at the equator or even the simultaneous existence of multiple “north” and “south” magnetic poles.

Geomagnetic reversals occur a few times every million years on average. However, the interval between reversals is very irregular and can range up to tens of millions of years.

There can also be temporary and incomplete reversals, known as events and excursions, in which the magnetic poles move away from the geographic poles – perhaps even crossing the equator – before returning back to their original locations. The last full reversal, the Brunhes-Matuyama, occurred around 780,000 years ago. A temporary reversal, the Laschamp event, occurred around 41,000 years ago. It lasted less than 1,000 years with the actual change of polarity lasting around 250 years.

see caption

Above: Supercomputer models of Earth’s magnetic field. On the left is a normal dipolar magnetic field, typical of the long years between polarity reversals. On the right is the sort of complicated magnetic field Earth has during the upheaval of a reversal.

The alteration in the magnetic field during a reversal will weaken its shielding effect, allowing heightened levels of radiation on and above the Earth’s surface. Were this to happen today, the increase in charged particles reaching the Earth would result in increased risks for satellites, aviation, and ground-based electrical infrastructure. Geomagnetic storms, driven by the interaction of anomalously large eruptions of solar energy with our magnetic field, give us a foretaste of what we can expect with a weakened magnetic shield.

In 2003, the so-called Halloween storm caused local electricity-grid blackouts in Sweden, required the rerouting of flights to avoid communication blackout and radiation risk, and disrupted satellites and communication systems. But this storm was minor in comparison with other storms of the recent past, such as the 1859 Carrington event, which caused aurorae as far south as the Caribbean.

The impact of a major storm on today’s electronic infrastructure is not fully known. Of course any time spent without electricity, heating, air conditioning, GPS or internet would have a major impact; widespread blackouts could result in economic disruption measuring in tens of billions of dollars a day.

In terms of life on Earth and the direct impact of a reversal on our species we cannot definitively predict what will happen as modern humans did not exist at the time of the last full reversal. Several studies have tried to link past reversals with mass extinctions – suggesting some reversals and episodes of extended volcanism could be driven by a common cause. However, there is no evidence of any impending cataclysmic volcanism and so we would only likely have to contend with the electromagnetic impact if the field does reverse relatively soon.

We do know that many animal species have some form of magnetoreception that enables them to sense the Earth’s magnetic field. They may use this to assist in long-distance navigation during migration. But it is unclear what impact a reversal might have on such species. What is clear is that early humans did manage to live through the Laschamp event and life itself has survived the hundreds of full reversals evidenced in the geologic record.

The simple fact that we are “overdue” for a full reversal and the fact that the Earth’s field is currently decreasing at a rate of 5 percent per century, has led to suggestions that the field may reverse within the next 2,000 years. But pinning down an exact date – at least for now – will be difficult.

The Earth’s magnetic field is generated within the liquid core of our planet, by the slow churning of molten iron. Like the atmosphere and oceans, the way in which it moves is governed by the laws of physics. We should therefore be able to predict the “weather of the core” by tracking this movement, just like we can predict real weather by looking at the atmosphere and ocean. A reversal can then be likened to a particular type of storm in the core, where the dynamics – and magnetic field – go haywire (at least for a short while), before settling down again.

The difficulties of predicting the weather beyond a few days are widely known, despite us living within and directly observing the atmosphere. Yet predicting the Earth’s core is a far more difficult prospect, principally because it is buried beneath 3,000 km of rock such that our observations are scant and indirect. However, we are not completely blind: we know the major composition of the material inside the core and that it is liquid. A global network of ground-based observatories and orbiting satellites also measure how the magnetic field is changing, which gives us insight into how the liquid core is moving.

The recent discovery of a jet-stream within the core highlights our evolving ingenuity and increasing ability to measure and infer the dynamics of the core. Coupled with numerical simulations and laboratory experiments to study the fluid dynamics of the planet’s interior, our understanding is developing at a rapid rate. The prospect of being able to forecast the Earth’s core is perhaps not too far out of reach.


This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article. Graphics added by WUWT

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
114 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Moderately Cross of East Anglia
February 1, 2017 8:58 am

Relax – just keep a pot of white paint nearby to brush over yourself if it happens and so deflect the extra radiation, warming , micro-meteorites…..insert your own concern here….etc.

rocketscientist
February 1, 2017 9:08 am

All of these magnetic reversals have occurred far in the past where the effects of magnetic fields were at most influencing migration patterns. The level of human advancement to become dependent on electro-magnetic technology introduces a whole new paradigm with regards to electromagnetic fields on a planetary wide scale.
This could have profound effects on systems not prepared for unwanted electromagnetic (EM) interference. The concept of “hardening” components and systems against EM interference has been practiced by the military and most space programs since the discovery of radio. However this practice is not wide spread throughout the commercial sector as it has not, so far, presented much of an issue to justify the added expense of ‘hardening” the product.
We also must be cautious to not conflate this potential into something akin to the present hysteria. Weakening of Earth’s magnetic “deflector” shield only allows the potential of exposure to external EM radiation, not the cause of it nor a greater attractor of it. It is akin to walking around without an umbrella on a cloudy day. If it rains you may get wet, but not having an umbrella doesn’t make the rain more likely.

Tom in Florida
Reply to  rocketscientist
February 1, 2017 9:36 am

Perhaps we might want to reconsider keeping all records in the Cloud without proper backup to a more EM safe environment..

rocketscientist
Reply to  Tom in Florida
February 1, 2017 10:09 am

Computers per se are not any more in danger than your toaster, yet the effects can be more devastating. Much like the Y2K non-event even a large CME (coronal mass ejection) wouldn’t “kill” all the servers in the world, not even most of the computers. Locating sensitive information in numerous locations is a very good method of ensuring that it will survive un effected. The issue will be in reconciling all the disparate data sources an delineating which have become corrupted.
Back-up and save…often.

MarkW
Reply to  Tom in Florida
February 1, 2017 10:17 am

While the total amount of energy created by a large CME is great, it’s rise time is much slower than say a lightning bolt.
It’s the combination of fast rise time and high energy that kills electronics.
Fast rise times with little energy are easily absorbed by the existing surge protectors.
Slow rise times with lots of energy give the circuit breakers plenty of time to respond.
Another thing I was wondering about.
I’ve examined the circuitry in several types of surge protectors. Most of the ones that I have looked at have two types of circuits.
The first is basically an inductor and a capacitor, who’s job is to spread out and absorb the energy from fast spikes in voltage levels. This also gives the circuit breaker portion of the protector time to activate.
10’s to 100’s of millions of these surge protectors have been added by consumers over the last few decades. I wonder if all these protectors plugged into the power grid will help to protect against major surges?

rocketscientist
Reply to  Tom in Florida
February 1, 2017 10:47 am

Yes, the addition of numerous “surge” protectors will keep connected electronics from damage due to EMI effects on external transmission systems, yet they will not necessarily protect the internal elements of computers and electronic devices from accumulating electrical charges due to EM impingement. the EMI will effect any conductive surface an build up a static charge. If this potential isn’t properly controlled or bled away it will eventually arc to somewhere you don’t want it. This is well known to anyone who has inadvertently placed a piece of aluminum foil in a microwave oven. The EM field generated by the microwave generator quickly builds an electric charge on the foil and it arcs with nasty results.
Hardening against EMI is a bit more than a surge protector, but essentially the same principle.

MarkW
Reply to  Tom in Florida
February 1, 2017 12:25 pm

The gradient in the EM field isn’t high enough to produce damaging voltage potentials in electronic devices.
It takes miles of conductor to do that.

MarkW
Reply to  rocketscientist
February 1, 2017 10:10 am

My understanding was that when a CME hits the earth’s magnetic field, the magnetic field distorts.
It’s this distortion that generates power surges in the electric grid, as the magnetic field that surrounds miles upon miles of distribution lines change.
If the earth’s magnetic field were to weaken, would this mean that there is a weaker magnetic field around those same power lines.
As a result of this, the same amount of distortion would result in a weaker response in the power lines.
On the other hand, a weaker magnetic field might distort more when hit by the same size CME.
It’s possible that a weaker field, combined with greater distortion could result in not that much change in the size of any power response in the power grid.

JJ, too.
February 1, 2017 9:10 am

So recent flagging strength of the mag field will allow more of the suns energy to impinge in the Earth’s atmosphere/oceans/land…especially at the ‘polar’ regions? Is there any way to determine if this increased radiative energy is actually contributing to recent warming? I’m guessing the effect is minimal, but curious if anyone has any knowledge of any cause and effect.

Moderately Cross of East Anglia
February 1, 2017 9:11 am

Oh and if John Stover is right about the Japanese discovering there are masses of Silicon at the core then whoever gets down there first is going to makes a killing making non-stick iron frying pans…

lawrence
February 1, 2017 9:19 am

Speed up the colonization of Mars I say!

Bartemis
February 1, 2017 9:30 am

We’ll probably be wiped out by supervolcano eruptions before then, like those at Vesuvius or Yellowstone, and a few others. No reason to stress about something you can’t do anything about.

February 1, 2017 9:48 am

ja ja
I knew it
I could not figure out why there has been no warming in the SH
It must be the movement of earth inner core more northward
the elephant in the room….

Reply to  HenryP
February 1, 2017 9:51 am

north east
I think
but you can check it
and realize why the ice at the north pole is melting

FerdinandAkin
February 1, 2017 9:50 am

This crisis calls for an immediate increase in taxes to lower the demand for magnetism. People are going to have to accept a lower standard of living and Government imposed austerity if mankind is to survive. If we make these sacrifices now, future generations will be able to enjoy sustainable magnetic fields.

Tom in Florida
Reply to  FerdinandAkin
February 1, 2017 12:30 pm

I think these tax increases should be applied to making sure we have a renewable magnetic field.

RTC
February 1, 2017 10:15 am

In what way is the magnetic field unlike an invisible force field?

Peta from Cumbria, now Newark
February 1, 2017 11:38 am

Reading how a few folks comment on the ‘lack of info’ in the original post, I’m reminded of a program from the BBC Horizon series that went out very recently on exactly this magnetic business.
Full of scare & alarm but very low on actual content.
(Lots of nice computer graphics of Earth’s core but sadly, no sign of Raquel Welch in a fur-lined bikini. sigh)
Seemingly a new instrument onboard Hubble kept going wrong when it passed over the bit of South Atlantic next to Argentina. Apparently there are parts in Argentina itself that actually tiny North Poles when they should be southerly magnetized.
This magnetic anomaly was letting cosmic rays get closer to Earth’s surface than everywhere else and these were upsetting Hubble in its relatively low orbit. And of course this is sign that Earth’s field is decreasing/changing/reversing.
Tell me I’ve remembered wrong but I recall from somewhere that (some) cosmic rays are coming in with the energy content of a cricket ball at 100mph. For a single hydrogen nucleus, that’s quite some and I get to be near 500 Joules.
So, how many of these things are there coming in? Just one per second per square metre is 500W per square metre, presumably mostly scattered in the atmosphere as it crashes its way in/down.
That’s potentially a lot of grunt as regards Climate Change where ‘the average’ solar insolation is 340W per sqm. Presumably Earth equilibrates so that that power is absorbed and becomes the norm but it would make Earth quite exquisitely sensitive to both magnetic changes in the sun and Earth itself?
Do the fantastic all powerful, all seeing, always perfect, always super computer climate models include this?

Sensorman
February 1, 2017 11:43 am

Fun project – use the magnetometers in a billion smartphones to chirp with local mag field strength every so often. Phones know where they are, and their orientation. Look for statistical changes. Limited global coverage though…

Hocus Locus
February 1, 2017 12:02 pm

Al Gore: An Inconvenientest Truthiness [in production] talking points:
Climate Change causes magnetic pole reversals.
Pole reversals cause moonspots.
Moonspots trigger volcanoes.
Volcanoes cause hurricanes to become hurricanier.
Hurricanes generate cosmic rays.
Lots of CO2 causes lots of temperature.
Computer models cause cancer.
Sea level impregnates polar bears.

SMS
February 1, 2017 1:22 pm

I’m confused and I’m hoping someone can clarify how magnetic flipping is suppose to occur. As I understand it, the Earths core is made up of an inner core of ferrous magma and an outer core of ferrous magma, each rotating at slightly different speeds. Its the difference in rotating velocities that creates Earths magnetic field. Is someone suggesting that either the inner or outer core changes direction? That’s not going to happen.
So what is the mechanism for our magnetic poles flipping?

quaesoveritas
Reply to  SMS
February 1, 2017 2:09 pm

In 1967 they didn’t know, but “Understanding the Earth” said in 1967, “Spontaneous rhythmic reversals of the direction of the magnetic field is a well known characteristic of the Faraday disc dynamo”.
I don’t know if modern science has produced an explanation yet!

Moderately Cross of East Anglia
February 1, 2017 1:34 pm

Dear SMS you obviously haven’t seen the explanation in Ice Age four (I think) in which the squirrel rat causes the core to spin and the continents to drift.
Actually isn’t the core a strange sort of crystalline structure that is effectively phase changed into a solid by pressure and heat, while the outer core is liquid and sloshes around producing the magnetic fields. But maybe the Scrat creature is the better explanation.
In reality the serious contributions on various geophysics topics on WUWT are brilliant and enlightening.

RoHa
February 1, 2017 1:45 pm

So, we’re doomed, then?

Moderately Cross of East Anglia
February 1, 2017 2:09 pm

Probably…

Dean - NSW
February 1, 2017 3:26 pm

I hate to think what Carbon Capture and Storage will do to the earths core!
Hang on its obviously got something to do with Fraccking!!!
I am going to have some fun at the pub this afternoon winding some greenie mates up. 🙂

Patrick MJD
February 1, 2017 3:48 pm

The US Navy, when mapping the ocean floor in the 50’s, discovered this.

MarkW
Reply to  Patrick MJD
February 2, 2017 10:15 am

How do you detect magnetic reversals using sonar?

quaesoveritas
Reply to  MarkW
February 2, 2017 11:44 am

They didn’t use sonar but some sort of magnetic anomaly detector.
As the ocean floor spread out from the Mid-Atlantic ridge, at a rate of approx. 1 cm/year, the magnetic anomalies were “recorded”, as in a giant tape recorder.

scarletmacaw
February 1, 2017 4:01 pm

I am still skeptical of the core-magnetohydrodynamics theory of the Earth’s magnetic field. Since the Earth typically has a vertical (wrt surface) electric field which implies a +/- distribution of charge vs. height. Since the Earth rotates and the higher (vertical) charge moves faster being farther from the center, wouldn’t that create a magnetic field?

scarletmacaw
Reply to  scarletmacaw
February 1, 2017 4:04 pm

Damn the lack of an edit function. Scratch the first “since.”

ozspeaksup
February 2, 2017 6:49 am

somewhere in USA they already had to change a runways path I gather due to nth not being nth there anymore..
I have been watching the spaceweather pages for a fair while
increased radiation in atmosphere in areas and weakening fields allowing more in, may well see some mutation effects
how soon and what? anyones guess.

Paul belanger
February 3, 2017 11:16 am

“Trouble is the Currie point of iron well below its melting point, so “molten iron” is NOT magnetic.”
You are correct.
However, the explanation of molten core magnetic generation is that of the dynamo.
copper is not magnetic either but is the “conductor” for free electrons, guiding them along an appropriate path to generate a current which will generate the magnetic field.
By this same mechanism the molten core acts as a free electron conductor making a “current loop” which in turn generates a magnetic field.

February 5, 2017 6:29 pm

Could it be the sun again?. When the sun goes into a slump the solar wind exert less pressure on earth’s magnetic field and core wobbles about.