Bill Nye the Science Propaganda Guy just can’t seem to keep his foot out of his mouth. We’ve chronicled many of his blunders here, including his involvement in Al Gore’s “High School Science” experiment where the experiment was so flawed, that they had to fake the results in video post-production to make it believable. If Bill Nye was really about science, he would have caught the fact that the experiment could never work, and refused to participate. Instead, he did, and the video still exists today with Bill Nye’s voice attached to it. So much for credibility.
In 2014, Bill Nye said this while calling people who disagree with him names:
And in the case of the California drought, a recent study suggests that there is 95 percent confident that human-caused climate change tripled the chance of the development of a persistent high pressure system in the Northern Pacific Ocean, which is the cause of the California drought because it deflects precipitation away from the region.
Bill wants it both ways. Just a couple of days ago, he said this:
An article in The Daily Caller outlines his hypocrisy.
Thanks to (((The Dividist))) on Twitter, we have this handy comparison:
UPDATE: About 20 minutes after this post was published, Nye Tweeted this:
Update2: his linkage of CA drought and AGW go all the way back to 2012: (h/t Hifast)
Bill Nye ‘The Science Guy’ Links Drought with Global Warming
https://www.yahoo.com/news/video/bill-nye-science-guy-links-163016623.html
Bill Nye the Propaganda guy would be just a funny joke except that he is in my kids classrooms all the time.
I try to be non-judgmental in child rearing but I did hear my kid say this…
“My mommy is a scientist and she says never believe anything Bill Nye says”
So I’m getting the word out…LOL
The nightmare is almost over, along with the court jesters like Nye.
Bill Nye, The Stupid Guy.
Oh yes, what else they could say:
‘On a global scale, there’s little to no evidence flooding events have been on the rise. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change found in 2013 that “there continues to be a lack of evidence and thus low confidence regarding the sign of trend in the magnitude and/or frequency of floods on a global scale”’