From Georgia Tech, a news release that we missed when it first came out, but still well worth talking about.
First Optical Rectenna – Combined Rectifier and Antenna – Converts Light to DC Current
Using nanometer-scale components, researchers have demonstrated the first optical rectenna, a device that combines the functions of an antenna and a rectifier diode to convert light directly into DC current.

Based on multiwall carbon nanotubes and tiny rectifiers fabricated onto them, the optical rectennas could provide a new technology for photodetectors that would operate without the need for cooling, energy harvesters that would convert waste heat to electricity – and ultimately for a new way to efficiently capture solar energy.
In the new devices, developed by engineers at the Georgia Institute of Technology, the carbon nanotubes act as antennas to capture light from the sun or other sources. As the waves of light hit the nanotube antennas, they create an oscillating charge that moves through rectifier devices attached to them. The rectifiers switch on and off at record high petahertz speeds, creating a small direct current.
Billions of rectennas in an array can produce significant current, though the efficiency of the devices demonstrated so far remains below one percent. The researchers hope to boost that output through optimization techniques, and believe that a rectenna with commercial potential may be available within a year.
“We could ultimately make solar cells that are twice as efficient at a cost that is ten times lower, and that is to me an opportunity to change the world in a very big way” said Baratunde Cola, an associate professor in the George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering at Georgia Tech. “As a robust, high-temperature detector, these rectennas could be a completely disruptive technology if we can get to one percent efficiency. If we can get to higher efficiencies, we could apply it to energy conversion technologies and solar energy capture.”
The research, supported by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), the Space and Naval Warfare (SPAWAR) Systems Center and the Army Research Office (ARO), was reported September 28 in the journal Nature Nanotechnology.
Developed in the 1960s and 1970s, rectennas have operated at wavelengths as short as ten microns, but for more than 40 years researchers have been attempting to make devices at optical wavelengths. There were many challenges: making the antennas small enough to couple optical wavelengths, and fabricating a matching rectifier diode small enough and able to operate fast enough to capture the electromagnetic wave oscillations. But the potential of high efficiency and low cost kept scientists working on the technology.
“The physics and the scientific concepts have been out there,” said Cola. “Now was the perfect time to try some new things and make a device work, thanks to advances in fabrication technology.”
Using metallic multiwall carbon nanotubes and nanoscale fabrication techniques, Cola and collaborators Asha Sharma, Virendra Singh and Thomas Bougher constructed devices that utilize the wave nature of light rather than its particle nature. They also used a long series of tests – and more than a thousand devices – to verify measurements of both current and voltage to confirm the existence of rectenna functions that had been predicted theoretically. The devices operated at a range of temperatures from 5 to 77 degrees Celsius.
Fabricating the rectennas begins with growing forests of vertically-aligned carbon nanotubes on a conductive substrate. Using atomic layer chemical vapor deposition, the nanotubes are coated with an aluminum oxide material to insulate them. Finally, physical vapor deposition is used to deposit optically-transparent thin layers of calcium then aluminum metals atop the nanotube forest. The difference of work functions between the nanotubes and the calcium provides a potential of about two electron volts, enough to drive electrons out of the carbon nanotube antennas when they are excited by light.
In operation, oscillating waves of light pass through the transparent calcium-aluminum electrode and interact with the nanotubes. The metal-insulator-metal junctions at the nanotube tips serve as rectifiers switching on and off at femtosecond intervals, allowing electrons generated by the antenna to flow one way into the top electrode. Ultra-low capacitance, on the order of a few attofarads, enables the 10-nanometer diameter diode to operate at these exceptional frequencies.
“A rectenna is basically an antenna coupled to a diode, but when you move into the optical spectrum, that usually means a nanoscale antenna coupled to a metal-insulator-metal diode,” Cola explained. “The closer you can get the antenna to the diode, the more efficient it is. So the ideal structure uses the antenna as one of the metals in the diode – which is the structure we made.”
The rectennas fabricated by Cola’s group are grown on rigid substrates, but the goal is to grow them on a foil or other material that would produce flexible solar cells or photodetectors.
Cola sees the rectennas built so far as simple proof of principle. He has ideas for how to improve the efficiency by changing the materials, opening the carbon nanotubes to allow multiple conduction channels, and reducing resistance in the structures.
“We think we can reduce the resistance by several orders of magnitude just by improving the fabrication of our device structures,” he said. “Based on what others have done and what the theory is showing us, I believe that these devices could get to greater than 40 percent efficiency.”
This work was supported by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), the Space and Naval Warfare (SPAWAR) Systems Center, Pacific under YFA grant N66001-09-1-2091, and by the Army Research Office (ARO), through the Young Investigator Program (YIP), under agreement W911NF-13-1-0491. The statements in this release are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official views of DARPA, SPAWAR or ARO. Georgia Tech has filed international patent applications related to this work under PCT/US2013/065918 in the United States (U.S.S.N. 14/434,118), Europe (No. 13847632.0), Japan (No. 2015-538110) and China (No. 201380060639.2)
CITATION: Asha Sharma, Virendra Singh, Thomas L. Bougher and Baratunde A. Cola, “A carbon nanotube optical rectenna,” (Nature Nanotechnology, 2015).http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2015.220
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
I can’t believe that no one noticed the 77K number. That’s liquid N2, uses a lot of energy getting there.
WS Briggs: Read it again. That is a C not a K.
That’s “5 to 77 Celsius”, not Kelvin.
“We could ultimately make solar cells that are twice as efficient at a cost that is ten times lower, and that is to me an opportunity to change the world in a very big way”
Better hurry up, we are already headed for 25 cents per watt LCOE with thin film panels using chemical vapor deposition within 1 to 1.5 years. That is down from 32 cents now.
I love the “it will ultimately make solar cells twice as efficient and cost half as much” stuff. It almost never pans out. Decent silicon cells now produce 20 – 25% percent efficiency at about $3 per watt (not installed). So we have a technology that has demonstrated 1% efficiency but will eventually get to 50% efficiency for $2 per watt. Give me a break.
This has also been done with planar graphene. The system theoretically can convert any light of any frequency. It uses two electrodes, one a sawtooth pattern and the other a simple stripe, spaced at optical wavelengths away from the sawtooth electrode. Because of the points on that electrode charge builds up on the points and quantum tunneling gets it across the space. And, graphene is transparent and a very good conductor of electricity, so the rectifying pattern can be implemented several layers deep. The substrate can be any none conducting material.
A link to a pdf: http://ecee.colorado.edu/~moddel/QEL/Papers/Zhu13a.pdf
I described an early version. I see from the pdf (there are many papers on the subject) the structure has been simplified even more.
Doesn’t matter. Solar cannot be a major power source for modern civilizations — way too diffuse & undependable.
As Scotty said, “Capt’n, I canna change the laws of physics”.
“We could ultimately make solar cells that are twice as efficient at a cost that is ten times lower, and that is to me an opportunity to change the world in a very big way”
And make people energy independent?
Big Government won’t allow it. In Spain it already happend.
https://www.quora.com/Has-Spain-really-banned-private-solar-panels
http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/articles/2015/10/spain-approves-sun-tax-discriminates-against-solar-pv.html
in a year?sounds like rectennas are in use now…though for some reason sounds as if the the research was abandoned years ago so has to be a good reason why…anyway I would not get to excited as distance attenuates anything associated with this type of energy instead of volts we are talking microvolts…it simply does not work
I’ve heard of radio and micro-wave rectennas. This is a first for optical rectennas.
For the most part, it’s cheaper to just run a wire than it is to build a big enough transmitter and rectenna when it comes to transmitting power.
The *measured* thermal equivalent power (IOW, I used a bolometer or thermocouple HP uWave power meter) was about -17 dBm on my outside, multi-element “Log Periodic” TV antenna (A Jerrold model 933 at the time) some years back. The effective ‘peak’ RF voltage when all voltage phasors are ‘in phase’ briefly would, of course, be a much higher value …
re: “distance attenuates anything”
You are probably speaking of the “inverse square law” wherein received energy is inversely proportional to the distance squared.
This is *not* so much a matter of ‘attenuation’ (otherwise, where does the energy go? It does not get converted to ‘heat’ in free space.) but rather a ‘spreading’ of the energy in *two* dimensions (when the source is acting like a ‘point source’. Large ‘Line Arrays’ (as in acoustics) as sources, for instance, act differently.) …
What ever happened to Dr. Alvin Marks(inventor of Polaroid film) and his Lumeloid photovoltic film (80% efficient)
You’ll know some new tech is a turkey if our Green Betters push to mainstream it. They sure like stuff that don’t work.
“That’s what gets me out of bed in the morning…”
Son, if I was doing what you’re doing, I’d never go to bed at all!
Did I forget to say I love this? I love this! (And not because it’s “Green”, you ninny!)
(Not that some nearly-free kilowatts would be a bad thing…)
Jmorpuss: EPRI project, 1997, 10 MEGAWATTS over 10 miles between two mountains in CA.
Cheers for that Max .
Rectenna efficiency potential
Optical rectenna operation: where Maxwell meets Einstein
2016 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 49 265602 May
Seems to me a very, very long way to go, and the longer the way, the more expensive it becomes. I hope the taxpayer won’t have to pay the taxi-bill…
“though the efficiency of the devices demonstrated so far remains below one percent.”
Translation: Greater efficiency can be had by burying thermocouples in a compost heap.
What’s “DC current”? 🙂
It’s a current that you can’t turn off, so it flows forever. Well of course you can’t turn it on in the first place or it wouldn’t be DC.
g
More than 50% is not possible as for a normal antenna. The currents needed to make some power would radiate back.
Microwave rectennas are cited as attaining 85-90% conversion efficiency. Don’t be dogmatic.
Svend Ferdinandsen October 20, 2016 at 2:23 pm: “More than 50% is not possible as for a normal antenna. The currents needed to make some power would radiate back.”
Stipulate “normal.”
You realize, of course, with proper engineering (choice of structure, configuration, topology, etc.) this is not the limiting factor to efficiency.
The money shot: “I believe that these devices could get to greater than 40 percent efficiency.”
I believe. Only two words, but charged with infinite potential to delude and distract.
Gottlieb Daimler and Carl Benz first produced automobiles with engines of 1 horsepower. Where are we today? What is the point in casting aspersions (“delude and distract”) at those who are honestly working at the forefront of technology. Nowhere in that article were any Greenies touting it as The Path to an environmental utopia. Microwave rectennas are in the 85-90% efficiency range. There is no outstanding physical reason to think optical rectennas are incapable of matching this.
Can anyone confirm that this is up and running ? http://gizmodo.com/362271/280-megawatt-solar-boiler-uses-magnifying-glass-bug-killer-technique
And if so, how hard would it be to scale down for a single house power supply?
Search: Abengoa Solana CPS
Then search Abengoa Solar Bankruptcy
Looks pretty easy, eh? You should try it…
Here’s the sat view:
https://www.google.com/maps/place/Solana+Generating+Station/@32.9218525,-112.9595341,4863m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m7!3m6!1s0x80d522189023d07f:0x36a56187cdb173fc!8m2!3d32.9234723!4d-112.9782225!9m1!1b1
Thanks for that Dan .
It looks like their in trouble not because it doesn’t work, although 25% down on production must be a cut to the hip pocket. I think it’s more to do with a company internal problem. I wouldn’t want to be a bird or insect flying overhead at midday.
Should every backyard have one of these ? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rzhzeA4VRSc
Thank you for having highlight that technology that I didn’t know before.
It looks a good attempt to do something different in the field.
But the claim that that system doesn’t need an inverter because it produces an AC current directly by the Stirling motor is clearly naive, if not deceptive.
When in late 80s I worked on the FIAT (now FCA automobiles) TOTEM generators thought to work attached to the power grid, I learnt how much is important that not only the frequency must perfectly the same of the power grid, but the phase too.
So I wonder how they dealt the phase issue, since the Stirling motor have to be synchronized to the grid sinusoid.
The only way I know, it is continuously adjusting the motor speed to match the motor instantaneous rotational position with the sinusoidal instantaneous voltage of the power grid.
That should not be an easily feasible task with a Stirling motor when the incoming heat is not under control, such as in the parabolic heater in subject.
Have a great day.
Massimo
Massimo,
Why not ‘skip’ the middle man and a) heat water directly or b) bake foodstuff also directly with the sun?
The intermediate step, converting to ‘moving’ electrons along a wire is a process that always wastes a fair amount of energy in a conversion process using the Carnot cycle ..
Massimo and Jim
It’s a shame big business monopolies the patent system . “a government authority or licence conferring a right or title for a set period, especially the sole right to exclude others from making, using, or selling an invention.” This process not only stifles energy innervation but also hobbles science across the board. Turning science into a competition means everyone holds their playbook close to their chest. and that should be a crime against humanity. Here’s how big business works http://educate-yourself.org/ga/RFcontents.shtml .