Affordable energy brings jobs, improved living standards and pursuit of happiness
By Paul Driessen
For 16 years, in a scene out of pre-industrial America, Thabo Molubi and his partner made furniture in South Africa’s outback, known locally as the “veld.” Lacking even a stream to turn a water wheel and machinery, they depended solely on hand and foot power. But then an electrical line reached the area.
The two installed lights, and power saws and drills. Their productivity increased fourfold. They hired local workers to make, sell and ship more tables and chairs, of better quality, at higher prices, to local and far away customers. Workers had more money to spend, thereby benefitting still more families.
Living standards climbed, as families bought lights, refrigerators, televisions, computers and other technologies that many Americans and Europeans simply take for granted. The community was propelled into the modern era, entrepreneurial spirits were unleashed, new businesses opened, and newly employed and connected families joined the global economy.
People benefited even on the very edge of the newly electrified area. Bheki Vilakazi opened a small shop so people could charge their cell phones before heading into the veld, where rapid communication can mean life or death in the event of an accident, automobile breakdown or encounter with wild animals.
Two hundred miles away, near Tzaneen, other South African entrepreneurs realized their soil and tropical climate produced superb bananas. After their rural area got electricity, they launched the Du Roi Nursery and banana cloning laboratory, where scientists develop superior quality, disease-free seedlings that are placed in gel in sealed containers and shipped all over Africa and other parts of the world.
Educated in a rural school only through tenth grade, Jane Ramothwala was a hotel maid before becoming a general nursery worker with the company. Over the ensuing decades, she worked hard to learn every facet of business operations, taught herself English, and took adult training and education courses – eventually attaining the position of manager for the company’s plant laboratory.
She now earns five times more than she did previously. During that time, the lab grew from 800,000 plants to 10 million, and today the laboratory, nursery and shipment center provide employment for several college graduates and 45 workers with limited educations. Their lives have been transformed, many have built modern homes, and their children have far brighter futures than anyone could have dreamed of a mere generation ago.
Access to electricity, Jane says, “has had a huge impact on the quality of life for many families in rural parts of Limpopo Province.” It has improved her and her neighbors’ lifestyles, learning opportunities and access to information many times over.
These scenes are being repeated all around the world, from Nigeria and Kenya, to Chile, Peru, China, India, Indonesia and dozens of other countries. Thousands of other communities, millions of other families, want the same opportunities. But for now many must continue to live without electricity, or have it only sporadically and unpredictably a few hours each week.
Across the globe, nearly three billion people – almost half the world’s population – still lack regular, reliable electricity. Nearly 1.3 billion people have no access to electricity.
In sub-Saharan Africa, over 600 million people – almost twice the population of the United States, and 70% of the region’s population – still have no or only limited, sporadic electricity. Over 80% of its inhabitants still relies on wood, dung and charcoal fires for most or all of their heating and cooking needs, resulting in extensive smoke and pollution in their homes and villages.
In India, more than 300 million people (almost as many as in Mexico and the United States) still have no electricity at all; tens of millions more have it only a few hours a day.
Countless people in these communities live in abject poverty, often on just a few dollars a day. Sub-Saharan Africa’s per capita income is roughly $1 per day, Zambia-born economist Dambisa Moyo writes, giving it the highest proportion of poor families in the world.
Mothers in these communities spend hours every day bent over open fires, their babies strapped on their backs, breathing poisonous fumes day after day. Many are struck down by debilitating and often fatal lung diseases. Their homes, schools, shops, clinics and hospitals lack the most rudimentary electricity-based technologies: lights, refrigerators, radios, televisions, computers and safe running water.
Their mud-and-thatch, cinderblock and other traditional houses allow flies and mosquitoes to zoom in, feast on human blood, and infect victims with malaria and other killer diseases. Women and children must walk miles, carrying untreated water that swarms with bacteria and parasites that cause cholera, diarrhea and river blindness. Unrefrigerated food spoils rapidly, causing still more intestinal diseases.
Hundreds of millions get horribly sick and five million die every year from lung and intestinal diseases, due to breathing smoke from open fires and not having refrigeration, clean water and safe food.
When the sun goes down, their lives largely shut down, except to the extent that they can work or study by candlelight, flashlight or kerosene lamp.
The environmental costs are equally high. Rwanda’s gorilla habitats are being turned into charcoal, to fuel cooking fires. In Zambia and elsewhere, entrepreneurs harvest trees by the thousands along highways, turning forest habitats into grasslands, and selling logs to motorists heading back to their non-electrified homes in rural areas and even large sections of cities.
As quickly as rich-country charities hold plant-a-tree fund raisers, people around the world cut trees for essential cooking and heating.
Unless reliable, affordable electricity comes, it will be like this for decades to come. Little by little, acre by acre, forest habitats will become grasslands, or simply be swept away by rains and winds. And people will remain trapped by poverty, misery, disease and premature death.
That unsustainable human and ecological destruction can be reversed, just as it was in the United States. A vital part of the solution is power plants that come equipped with steadily improving pollution controls – and burn coal or natural gas that packs hundreds of times more energy per pound than wood or dung or plant-based biofuels.
“Access to the benefits that come with ample energy trumps concerns about their tiny contribution of greenhouse gas emissions,” New York Times columnist Andrew Revkin observed in his DotEarth blog. Africa sits on vast deposits of coal, natural gas and liquid condensates that are largely ignored or simply burned as unwanted byproducts, as companies produce crude oil. Can someone find a business model that can lead to capturing, instead of flaring, those “orphan fuels,” he wondered.
Ultimately, the energy, environmental, climate change and economic debate is about two things:
Whether the world’s poor will take their rightful places among the Earth’s healthy and prosperous people – or must give up their hopes and dreams, because of misplaced health and environmental concerns.
And whether poor countries, communities and families will determine their own futures – or the decisions will be made for them by politicians and activists who use phony environmental disaster claims to justify treaties, laws, regulations and policies that limit or deny access to dependable, affordable electricity and other modern, life-saving technologies … thereby perpetuating poverty, disease and premature death.
Paul Driessen is senior policy analyst for the Committee For A Constructive Tomorrow (www.CFACT.org), and author of Eco-Imperialism: Green power – Black death and other books on environmental issues.
To read the complete version of this article, go to https://www.masterresource.org/developing-countries/powering-countries-empowering-people-part-i/
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

The opposite picture of reversion back to pre-industrial times can be clearly seen in Venezuela today with power cuts, lack of store-bought food and medicines, widespread crime…..
Tramping around Europe in recent years, I noticed how people burn what they can get their hands on. In cities, that’s not much. In the countryside, however, even a twig is worth incinerating. We’re not talking about impoverished eastern countries but regions like Tuscany and Galicia.
The reasons are simple: tradition, but also the sky-high cost of power. And when you consider that the greater part of European “renewables” is still biomass of one sort or other you have to wonder how much “carbon” is being saved by all the fiddling and regulation. (Vigorous wars can now be fought in North Africa over European energy needs since NATO decided to destabilise that region – as well as the other regions. Maybe we could find a bright spark to calculate what wars cost in the way of “carbon” and add that to all the biomass and twig burning.)
Amazing that all these years after Edison, Tesla and Westinghouse we now have intellectuals incapable of appreciating power which provides cheap light and heat over huge areas while concentrating and controlling the hazards at source.
As to getting our choicest Australian intellectuals to consider the real cost of imported, emergency and back-up fossil fuel power for the Great Green Basket Case also known as South Australia…
Best to say nothing, or they’ll just invent another South Australian non-industry to subsidise!
No probs whatsoever for South Australia when Treasurer Tom gets more interconnection to Victoria to smooth out any minor discrepancies with his windmills. Err.. no wait a minute-
http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/hazelwood-shutdown-victorias-dirtiest-power-station-set-to-close-early-next-year-20160923-grn0ph.html
WE;ll there ya go.
Green energy enforced on the third world is simply more Neo Colonialisim.
You know, the thing those who support green policies, are always accusing the Neo conservatives of.
..Once Donald Trump becomes president, the liberal left will start to destroy itself from within as it tries to understand why it’s message of a “Green” Utopia, with it’s Special Unicorn Farts, has failed…as can be seen in the following video…( no, I will not pay for your new video monitor or keyboard…or your wasted coffee….) lol…O.K….Maybe I need more coffee…but it’s funny..
https://www.facebook.com/ownagepranks/videos/10153974295798929/
Fail safe modular nukes gifted to the 3rd world is the best contribution developed nations can make to help raise people out of poverty. No need to waste money on corrupt officials or useless programs that merely help people subsist in poverty. Power to the People can have a real meaning. Sorry if this comment is redundant. Didn’t have time to read the others.
Mosomoso is spot on with his comments about people in Europe looking for fuel to burn. A recent EU report said that 42 million people in the EU were now struggling between having to choose to have enough food in winter or enough heating. That’s the EU note, supposedly one of the wealthiest regions in the world.
Naturally this wasn’t headline news on the BBC, which on the scale of rank dishonesty in its reporting of climate and environmental issues and its flagrant disregard of its charter which requires fair and informative reporting puts the Corporation in the company of the North Korean television news. Maybe I’m even being unfair to the North Koreans. But then it’s increasing reliance on an ever diminishing circle of BBC luvvies forming a self selecting, self editing and narrowing band of viewpoints leaves the Corporation immune to anything which contradicts their blinkered values and beliefs.
When even a former Chancellor of the Exchequer is now banned from appearing on the BBC to talk about climate issues, because he is so effective in his critique of the green blob, and our soporific MPs fail to act, it is indeed late in the day for fair and honest news reporting in Britain.
Instead, last night the BBC news treated viewers to a 5 minute whine about the Corporation loosing a smug, middle class, programme about cake making to a higher bidder. Obviously encouraging diabetes and obesity ranks higher in the concerns of the BBC than more important world issues. And certainly higher than old and poor people having to choose between food or warmth because of our insane energy policies. The founders of the BBC would be weeping with shame and rage.
I was in Laos recently watching this village generating electricity by little home made turbines in the stream. It lengthened their day a little. We MUST get them a power station NOW
In my experience in the 3rd world, the cooking fuel problem gets solved by availability of natural gas or propane — not electricity.
Electricity does provide all the other benefits described in the main article. Life is miserable without reliable 24/7 adequate electrical power — the lack of which guarantees poverty.
We worked with the profoundly poor in the DR for ten years — and never found electricity providing fuel (power) for cooking (other than the occasional electric kettle for tea or coffee).
The alternative to wood/charcoal for cooking was bottled gas/propane — I believe subsidized (somewhat) by the federal government there.
Are you this Griff?
http://www.ren21.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/GSR_2016_Full_Report1.pdf
No.. I have no employment or income from any renewable or green group. This is just a private interest of mine
(Griff is a nickname derived from my surname, the 13th most common in the English speaking world, so I’m told. My brother is also Griff, which used to get confusing when we were both still living in the parental home…!)
I went to lie in a third world country for 5 years as a child. In approximately 15 years, with the impact of globalisation and trade, stone age cultures went from walking everywhere, no metal, isolation, no written tradition, no roads and death before 45 yrs. That country how has roads, electricity, metal tools, ships, air transport. There is manufacturing – still limited. Life expectancy is increasing. It’s not perfect, but despite major issues including corruption I see year on year improvement. My brother went back.
I took my children to another third world nation. At independence after the Japanese left, there were four engineers, no doctors all industry had been destroyed, there were a hand full of trucks. People lived to 45 years and were midgets from malnutrition With globalisation, that same country builds and exports aircraft, has multiple car manufacturers with native designs, has a ship building industry, a national road system, a national electricity grid. People now live decades longer. Malnutrition is much less of an issue. There are multiple universities. It’s not perfect, but despite major issues I see a year on year improvement. I went back.
Don’t dare tell me how bad globalisation is. People criticising globalisation have NO idea how powerful or massive it’s effect on quality of life or life expectancy has been amongst the poor. Many of these people were friends or colleagues. In general critics just want to hold back development, to freeze the diasadvantaged in some supposed idealistic state – while stopping the rate of change in global society.
Renewables working well in Australia;
http://www.smh.com.au/business/renewables-shift-brings-threat-to-power-supply-20160921-grl0bs.html
Teething troubles in SA, certainly.
but with the high level of insolation and falling prices for solar panels and batteries, Australian demand will increasingly be met by solar.
There are several large storage projects underway too…
https://cleantechnica.com/2016/09/20/australian-hopes-revive-660-mw-dispatchable-solar-plan/
https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/2016/sep/12/energy-storage-how-an-abandoned-goldmine-will-be-converted-into-a-world-first
Griff,
Is your post satire?
You are aware that this site is well populated by Australians and that the South Australian ‘teething’ problems are more akin to someone having no teeth and not a denture maker in sight.
For overseas posters check out this South Australian farce.
Eric Worrell. WUWT July 14 2016
‘$14,000 per MWh – the price South Australia Pays for Renewables Madness’
Teething troubles with solar power in one of the sunniest countries on earth? Surly you jest! South Australia is a basket case, get’s a substantial amount of power from Victoria via the interstate inter-connector.
Your sources, Cleantechnica and The Guardian, are woefully inaccurate.
President Obama
“Ultimately, if you think about all the youth that everybody has mentioned here in Africa, if everybody is raising living standards to the point where everybody has got a car and everybody has got air conditioning, and everybody has got a big house, well, the planet will boil over — unless we find new ways of producing energy.”
But we already have, it was invented in our own national labs in the 1960’s, with a few years of engineering it could be powering the world for less than coal, both upfront capital cost and operating cost. Molten Salt Reactors. check out Thorcon Power, Terrapower, Terrestrial Energy, Moltex, Transatomic Power, or Flibe, all start-up reactor companies that could be in mass construction within 10 years. Here is just a sample.
The technology is still 10 years off – more like 20 for large Thorium reactors – and an African state would still have to find the money and technicians to build it…
I note also
http://cleantechnica.com/2016/05/08/small-modular-reactors-wishful-thinking/
A whole string of interesting African solar projects are listed in this article…
https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/2016/sep/26/africa-solar-mobile-revolution-stolen-mali-kenya-ghana
an interesting summary of power in SA – coal plant build 4 years late, nukes on hold, renewables increasing
https://cleantechnica.com/2016/09/25/south-africas-changing-energy-landscape/
The only ‘green’ thing that really worked well here in South Africa is the solar heating of water. The installation works like the opposite of a car radiator, collecting heat from the sun and transferring it into a solar geyser filled with water. If the T is not high enough due to lack of sun, your normal electricity supply can be used to bring the T of the geyser up. I did not see any of those in California – although I am sure it would work well there. It would also work well in Australia but I don’t know if they sell them down there.
I did try putting up some solar panels for electrically powering the office, but I find the maintenance – and other issues – too much trouble to bother about it further.
Nuclear is a disaster, unless they came with a plan for a thorium reactor.
Mind you, be careful in areas where freezing occurs in winter. I had mine frozen up one year,
which cost a bundle –
the insurance companies always have an escape formula [for freezing conditions]
Yup! Very common in Australia and efficient because the heat is stored in the water.