From NASA Goddard and the “runaway greenhouse” department:
Venus may have had a shallow liquid-water ocean and habitable surface temperatures for up to 2 billion years of its early history, according to computer modeling of the planet’s ancient climate by scientists at NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) in New York.

The findings, published this week in the journal Geophysical Research Letters, were obtained with a model similar to the type used to predict future climate change on Earth.
“Many of the same tools we use to model climate change on Earth can be adapted to study climates on other planets, both past and present,” said Michael Way, a researcher at GISS and the paper’s lead author. “These results show ancient Venus may have been a very different place than it is today.”
Venus today is a hellish world. It has a crushing carbon dioxide atmosphere 90 times as thick as Earth’s. There is almost no water vapor. Temperatures reach 864 degrees Fahrenheit (462 degrees Celsius) at its surface.
Scientists long have theorized that Venus formed out of ingredients similar to Earth’s, but followed a different evolutionary path. Measurements by NASA’s Pioneer mission to Venus in the 1980s first suggested Venus originally may have had an ocean. However, Venus is closer to the sun than Earth and receives far more sunlight. As a result, the planet’s early ocean evaporated, water-vapor molecules were broken apart by ultraviolet radiation, and hydrogen escaped to space. With no water left on the surface, carbon dioxide built up in the atmosphere, leading to a so-called runaway greenhouse effect that created present conditions.
Previous studies have shown that how fast a planet spins on its axis affects whether it has a habitable climate. A day on Venus is 117 Earth days. Until recently, it was assumed that a thick atmosphere like that of modern Venus was required for the planet to have today’s slow rotation rate. However, newer research has shown that a thin atmosphere like that of modern Earth could have produced the same result. That means an ancient Venus with an Earth-like atmosphere could have had the same rotation rate it has today.
Another factor that impacts a planet’s climate is topography. The GISS team postulated ancient Venus had more dry land overall than Earth, especially in the tropics. That limits the amount of water evaporated from the oceans and, as a result, the greenhouse effect by water vapor. This type of surface appears ideal for making a planet habitable; there seems to have been enough water to support abundant life, with sufficient land to reduce the planet’s sensitivity to changes from incoming sunlight.
Way and his GISS colleagues simulated conditions of a hypothetical early Venus with an atmosphere similar to Earth’s, a day as long as Venus’ current day, and a shallow ocean consistent with early data from the Pioneer spacecraft. The researchers added information about Venus’ topography from radar measurements taken by NASA’s Magellan mission in the 1990s, and filled the lowlands with water, leaving the highlands exposed as Venusian continents. The study also factored in an ancient sun that was up to 30 percent dimmer. Even so, ancient Venus still received about 40 percent more sunlight than Earth does today.
“In the GISS model’s simulation, Venus’ slow spin exposes its dayside to the sun for almost two months at a time,” co-author and fellow GISS scientist Anthony Del Genio said. “This warms the surface and produces rain that creates a thick layer of clouds, which acts like an umbrella to shield the surface from much of the solar heating. The result is mean climate temperatures that are actually a few degrees cooler than Earth’s today.”
The research was done as part of NASA’s Planetary Science Astrobiology program through the Nexus for Exoplanet System Science (NExSS) program, which seeks to accelerate the search for life on planets orbiting other stars, or exoplanets, by combining insights from the fields of astrophysics, planetary science, heliophysics, and Earth science. The findings have direct implications for future NASA missions, such as the Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite and James Webb Space Telescope, which will try to detect possible habitable planets and characterize their atmospheres.
###
“according to computer modeling of the planet’s ancient climate”
Ah, so according to some sci-fi fantasy constructed by people who only pretend to be scientists.
In a couple of comments made above, I have suggested that the early Earth had a rotational speed of just over 4 hours. I now think that I was mistaken and that it was around 6 hours. See Progress in Physics, Volume 1 January 2009.
https://www.scribd.com/document/9498374/Length-of-Day-Earth-rotation
<blockquote"The Length of the Day: A Cosmological Perspective (Arbab I. Arbab)
"We have found an empirical law for the variation of the length of the Earth’s day wi h geologic time employing Wells’s data. We attribute the lengthening of the Earth’s day to the present cosmic expansion of the Universe. The prediction of law has been found to be in agreement with the astronomical and geological data. The day increases at a present rate of 0.002 sec / century. The length of the day is found to be 6 hours when the Earth formed. We have also found a new limit for the value of the Hubble constant and the age of the Universe."
Always good to check facts and not simply rely on one’s memory before posting a comment! That said,the thrust of the point I made is not altered by this error.
Always impressed when US officers prompt their chief by Sir, yes Sir.
Regardless man /woman.
Same why Vena is referred Venus:
When God of War is looked upon Mar(u)s then God of peace is looked upon Ven(u)s.
Not that bad, good ol’ indogerman.
So they made stuff up regarding the early Venus world, run it through models proven to have low skill in a real world, and the best they can come up with is nobody knows: “These results show ancient Venus may have been a very different place than it is today.” It is impossible that early Venus would not have been a very different place than it is today. For one thing it is trillions of miles away from where it was then, and nobody knows what was happening there, then. We’re paying an awful lot of money for science that reliably produces “We dunno” results.
How can it be habitable, when pressure at the surface is 90 atm ? Even if you magically somehow replace the atmospheric composition to reflect that on Earth, you still have the pressure, therefore the hellish temperatures.
Trigger alert – run to your safe space!
Venus’ high atm pressure is due the its high density, this in turn is due to the high temp from the outset boiling off high MW compounds.
It (Venus atm) would have be 10 times deeper than ours; density and initial HT is the key.
Like Earth, Venus heated from the centre with high internal pressure but unlike Earth the whole lot heated up; due to the thin crust the atmosphere generated was hot and dense from the beginning. This atmosphere of boiling H2SO4, SO2, SO3 etc was opaque to radiant energy from the Sun and there never was much if any GHE
I doubt it.
https://youtu.be/JS2OxSGda6o