Thank you, America!

By Christopher Monckton of Brenchley 

head for the brexit

For my final broadcast to the nation on the eve of Britain’s Independence Day, the BBC asked me to imagine myself as one of the courtiers to whom Her Majesty had recently asked the question, “In one minute, give three reasons for your opinion on whether my United Kingdom should remain in or leave the European Union.”

My three reasons for departure, in strict order of precedence, were Democracy, Democracy, and Democracy. For the so-called “European Parliament” is no Parliament. It is a mere duma. It lacks even the power to bring forward a bill, and the 28 faceless, unelected, omnipotent Kommissars – the official German name for the shadowy Commissioners who exercise the supreme lawmaking power that was once vested in our elected Parliament – have the power, under the Treaty of Maastricht, to meet behind closed doors to override in secret any decision of that “Parliament” at will, and even to issue “Commission Regulations” that bypass it altogether.

Worse, the treaty that established the European Stability Pact gives its governing body of absolute bankers the power, at will and without consultation, to demand any sum of money, however large, from any member state, and every member of that governing body, personally as well as collectively, is held entirely immune not only from any civil suit but also from any criminal prosecution.

That is dictatorship in the formal sense. Good riddance to it.

I concluded my one-minute broadcast with these words: “Your Majesty, with my humble duty, I was born in a democracy; I do not live in one; but I am determined to die in one.”

And now I shall die in one. In the words of William Pitt the Younger after the defeat of Napoleon, “England has saved herself by her exertions, and will, as I trust, save Europe by her example.”

Indeed, No-way and Nixerland having already voted down the EU, Brexit may well be swiftly followed by Frexit, Grexit, Departugal, Italeave, Czechout, Oustria, Finish, Slovakuum, Latviaticum and Byebyegium.  At this rate, soon the only country still participating in the European tyranny-by-clerk will be Remainia.

The people have spoken. And the democratic spirit that inspired just over half the people of Britain to vote for national independence has its roots in the passionate devotion of the Founding Fathers of the United States to democracy. Our former colony showed us the way. Today, then, an even more heartfelt than usual “God bless America!”

All who have studied the Madison papers will grasp the greatness of the Founding Fathers’ vision. They were determined that no law and no tax should be inflicted upon any citizen except by the will of elected representatives of the people in Congress assembled.

They regarded this democratic principle as of such central importance that they wrote it down as Article 1, Section 1 of the Constitution of the United States: “All legislative power herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives.” Period. No ifs. No buts. No exceptions.

Except one. The Constitution establishes that foreign treaties ratified by a two-thirds majority of the Senate shall have the same force of law throughout the United States as enactments of Congress.

It is, therefore possible for any U.S. Government that can muster that Senate majority to ratify any treaty and thereby to thwart the central principle of Congressional democracy: that no Congress may bind its successors.

The Republicans, who are not always as lively in their understanding of the threat to democracy posed by supranational and global institutions such as the EU, the UN and its bloated climate bureaucracy, are too often snared or charmed by determined “Democrats” who fully understand and thirst to exercise the power to inflict perma-Socialism on their nation by bilateral, multilateral or global treaties.

It is astonishing how many of the GOP are willing to be cajoled and schmoozed into supporting monstrosities such as the Transatlatic Trade and Investment Partnership, which on its face sounds like a free-marketeer’s dream but is in its small print a series of outright Socialist measures which, once the Senate has ratified them, cannot be repealed. Its climate provisions, for instance, are highly dangerous.

It is no accident, therefore, that the bankers, the corporate profiteers, the Greens and the National Socialist Workers’ Party of Scotland – the corporatists and the communists together – made common totalitarian cause and heavily promoted the campaign to keep Britain in the EU, that paradise of vested interests and their poisonous lobbyists.

It is likewise no accident that precisely these same national and global vested interests heavily promote the campaign to subject Britain and the world to various unnecessary and damaging measures whose ostensible purpose is to control the climate but whose real ambition is to curb capitalism, fetter freedom, punish prosperity,. limit liberty and deny democracy.

The necessity to protect the flagile flower of democracy from the scythe of Socialism is now surely self-evident. Here are two modest proposals to ensure that the will of the people prevails over the power of the politicians, the Press, and the profiteers.

First, every new treaty, and as many pre-existing treaties as possible, should be made subject to repeal by a national referendum – and not just by a referendum called by the governing party because it thinks it can win it but by the people via the initiative procedure. Britain would have left the EU long before now if we, the people, and not those who govern us, had had the right to put referendum questions on the ballot.

Secondly, the governing bodies of all new supranational or global bodies exercising real sovereign power or spending taxpayers’ money from the states parties to the treaty that establishes them should be elected at frequent intervals by the peoples of those states parties.

Otherwise every international treaty, being a transfer of power from elected to unelected hands, diminishes democracy. Britain’s membership of the European Union effectively took away our democracy altogether, so that three new laws in five (according to the researchers of the House of Commons Library) or five in six (according to the German Government in a submission some years ago to the German Constitutional Court) are inflicted upon us solely because the unelected Kommissars require it.

Till now, our obligation has been to obey, on pain of unlimited fines.

The vote by the people of Britain to break free from this stifling, sclerotic tyranny has sent a shock-wave through every major international governing entity. It was no accident that the the International Monetary Fund, the Organization for Economic Corruption and Devastation, and various world “leaders” including Mr Obama, broke with democratic convention by openly promoting a “Remain” vote in a flagrant attempt to interfere in Britain’s decision.

Mr Obama’s intervention was decisive. The moment he demanded that Britain should remain within the EU, the polls began to swing against it. It was only when, in his maladroit fashion, he had sought to interfere in Britain’s decision that so many undecided voters woke up to the danger that the maneuverings and posturings of the international governing class represent to democracy.

What will Britain’s decision mean for the climate debate? Of course, it will break us free from the EU, whose governing elite had seized upon the climate issue as a purported ex-post-facto justification for the now-hated bloc’s continued existence.

We are left with our own British governing class, which has until now been no less determined than the EU to damage our economic and environmental interests by shutting down vital coal-fired power stations and carpeting our once green and pleasant land with windmills.

Now that the EU and its devoted poodle Mr Cameron have been consigned to the trashcan of history, it is near-certain that any new British Cabinet will take a more alert and less acquiescent stance than the present lot on the climate question.

It may even occur to the new Cabinet to check whether the rate of global warming is anything like what the profiteers of doom had predicted; to count the number of downstream businesses – such as cinder-blocks made from fly-ash out of coal-fired power stations – that have been destroyed by the EU’s war on coal; and even to wonder whether the forest of windmills that infest our once beautiful landscape are now extracting between them so much kinetic energy from passing storms that they are slowing them down, causing far more flash flooding than slightly warmer weather would (if and when it happened).

In the past, there was no point in our politicians asking any such questions, for our policies on all matters to do with our own environment were set for us by the unelected Kommissars of Brussels, whether we liked it or not.

Now that our politicians are going to have to learn to think for themselves again, rather than acting as an otiose, automated rubber stamp for directives from Them in Brussels, perhaps the Mother of Parliaments will begin to calculate the enormous economic advantage that Britain will gain by abandoning all of the climate-related directives that have driven our coal corporations, our steelworks and our aluminum works overseas, and have killed tens of thousands by making home heating altogether unaffordable.

We, the people, are the masters now. Our politicians will have to reacquire the habit of listening not to Them but to us. Here, and in the rest of Europe, and eventually throughout the world, let freedom ring!

Thank you, America, and God save the Queen!

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

509 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
ralfellis
June 25, 2016 7:02 am

I liked the idea of a European Federation (a union of independent nation states working together), but that is not what we got. We got a faux-United States, without the Republican Party. Just Frau Clinton-Merkel.
And when Vcav Claus, the Czech president, appealed for greater democracy and the establishment if an opposition party in the EU parliament, they booed him and walked out of the chamber. So much for democracy.
As to (Prime Minister) Boris:
He is a luke warm climate skeptic, and so the more loony green targets will be dropped.
He is also for a new London airport in the Thames Estuary, which I think would be a good idea. The UK cannot be a leading economic and banking hub, without a wirld-class airport.
Ralph

ramtastic
June 25, 2016 7:21 am

It is curious that the Lord would advocate democracy so strongly here when he is the beneficiary of an unelected title from his father and he proclaims elegance to the (unelected) Queen.

Marcus
Reply to  ramtastic
June 25, 2016 11:54 am

Ummm, he doesn’t have the power to pass laws that make other people suffer !!!

ramtastic
Reply to  Marcus
June 25, 2016 1:03 pm

He has tried to use his unelected title to legislate in the past. And he congratulates the US on the declaration of independence which detailed their refusal to be dictated to by a King and yet he finishes has rant with God Save the (still unelected) Queen – the irony!

Gabro
Reply to  Marcus
June 25, 2016 1:08 pm

The unelected British monarch is subject to Parliament, which writes her speeches for her. The people of Britain can get rid of the monarchy any time they want.
Not so with the faceless rulers of the EU.

rw
Reply to  ramtastic
June 28, 2016 12:00 pm

ramtastic,
How long did it take you to come up with that non sequitur?

John Bethany
June 25, 2016 7:54 am

Brilliant reflection. Now perhaps we would Mr Cameron please make public comment on America’s upcoming vote in November? It might help keep the ship upright!

Hoplite
June 25, 2016 8:13 am

Anthony Watts,
You have very deservedly received much praise over the years for your sterling work here on this website. From a website on general scientific matters, it quickly focussed on the scientific issue du jour and today is the one of the most visited websites on the issue – and deservedly so. I fear however that will quickly change if you allow many more nakedly political articles like this one that have nothing whatsoever to do with science in general and definitely nothing to do with climate change.
I am convinced by the empirical evidence that catastrophic man-made global warming has been conclusively falsified, however I worry sometimes about the bedfellows that that lumps me with when I see this sort of delusional and petty nationalistic ramblings (The Lord talking to his Sovereign – really? and this guy is democracy lovin’??). I am embarrassed to be associated in any way with the political ramblings in this article.
Reading this article and many of the comments I’m really left wondering if this website is all it’s cracked up to be…………I think I will visit less often and take things here with a much larger pinch of salt.

Tom in Florida
Reply to  Hoplite
June 25, 2016 8:36 am

Bye bye

ralfellis
Reply to  Hoplite
June 25, 2016 8:47 am

I am afraid that climate has become political, and it is supported by the same political classes that support and benefit from the EU. So a giving black-eye to the EU project is simulaneously giving a black-eye to the climate scaam.
Science should be apolitical, but it is not. Cameron, the great EU supporter, was the politician who wanted to make Britain the greenest ‘province’ in the EU. It was Cameron who hugged huskies in the Arctic, and changed the Tory torch icon into a stupid green tree.
But Boris is a climate luke-warmer, bordering on complete skepticism. Thus this political change in Europe, will also herald a change in climate policy and support (just as it did in Oz recently). Don’t be surprised if Boris orders a review of East Anglia CRU funding, and a review and dissection of any real demonstrable science supporting the climate scaam.
R

Hoplite
June 25, 2016 8:14 am

Brexit is and will be a disaster for Britain. Just yesterday alone the following happened:
– Sterling dropped by over 8% and had the largest intraday swing in history >10%
– the PM resigned
– motion of no confidence in the opposition leader – he’s toast
– Scotland PM said they will almost certainly hold another secession referendum (they will secede this time)
– NI joint First Minister called for an all-Ireland referendum on re-unification – NI voted stay in
– UK EU commissioner resigned (motion of no confidence was put down against him)
– Bank of England had to re-assure the markets and activate its emergency plan
This is only the beginning and if this is something to celebrate I’m a monkey’s uncle.
Many Brexiteers will turn quickly into Bregreteers. People like Christopher Monckton claim great allegiance to the Unitied Kingdom but the vote means that that kingdom is shortly going to dissolve (anyone with half a brain knew that in advance) as the Scots are most certainly going to remain in the EU and we in Ireland will not accept border posts to NI so either it will re-unify with Ireland or a special arrangement for it will be made. Amusingly, there’s even a petition with 100,000’s of signatures for London to declare itself independent from England and remain in the EU!! – I kid you not.
The leaders of the Brexit campaign are like a dog chasing a bus: having caught up with it they don’t know what to do with it. The Brexit leaders (Johnson and Gove) looked as despondent yesterday as the Remain leaders including Cameron. Their main message yesterday seemed to be that they want to leave the EU – but not yet. There’s conviction for you. The EU tried to keep them in but after the result said firmly they must exit quickly. The British response? ‘Oh no, not yet. We don’t know exactly what we want, who the PM is and how we’re going to negotiate this’ and they are talking about many years to put it into effect. Interestingly BoJo and Gove even refused to take any journalists questions yesterday at the ‘Press Conference’ – quite remarkable for the winning side in a democratic event. I strongly suspect Johnson never wanted Brexit but took the leading role in order to forward his own career (he’s current front runner for the PM job). Now he’s responsible for causing brexit, he is alarmed as he probably knows how damaging this is will be to the UK that Monckton claims such love for.

Tom in Florida
Reply to  Hoplite
June 25, 2016 8:44 am

This is but the first step in a process that can take up to 2 years AFTER the Article 50 notice. As in any divorce, there are many things to be negotiated and as this progresses most will find the positions that benefit both sides. The initial global market reaction is just that, a reaction of fear which will soon subside and the business of business will move forward. It was similar to 1776 when the loyalists spread the word that a disaster awaited from any break with Britain and we all know how that turned out.

ralfellis
Reply to  Hoplite
June 25, 2016 9:04 am

And yet Sterling and the Stock Market both rebounded, just as every sentinent commentator predicted.
An independent UK is likely to become the new Switzerland, which happens to be one of the richest nations on the planet. While the EU, bogged down by EU regulation and EU climate laws, is likely to become the new Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq, or Pakistan – nations that also live under a similar sclerotic (religious) dictatorship.
Germany is not giving up its nuclear power and doubling its energy costs based upon science, safety or economics, it is doing so to conform to the papal bulls of a new Green religion. And these absurd creed-based regulations will have the same effect as the absurd creed-based rules and regulations in Islamia – it will stiffle industry and production, and result in decay and poverty.
Remember that even an industrious people can be brought to their knees by absurd regulation. Even the industrious Gremans were brought to their economic knees by the absurd diktats of the socialist USSR. Even the industrious Syrians, which was once the wealthiest province in the Roman and Byzantine empires, were brought to their knees by Islam. And in a very similar fashion, the EU will be brought to its knees by the fantasy politics and the fantasy technology of the Euro-Greens.
R

Hoplite
Reply to  ralfellis
June 25, 2016 11:54 am

Ralf,
Fact bomb: sterling ended up around 1.35 down from 1.5. The lowest in the day was just under 1.33. Some rebound!! Stop kidding yourself. It will of course fluctuate but the longer term trajectory is down.

ralfellis
Reply to  ralfellis
June 25, 2016 12:31 pm

Hoplite – the average pound-dollar rate over the last six months was 1:40, and it is now 1:36. What is the problem? Stop trying to make a crisis out of nothing.

Hoplite
Reply to  ralfellis
June 25, 2016 1:28 pm

If you can’t see there is a crisis facing Britain now on so many fronts then you are in complete denial. Btw the low sterling rate recently was due to the Brexit fears. No point arguing – what’s done is done and time will tell what the future holds for England & Wales.

Gabro
Reply to  Hoplite
June 25, 2016 11:30 am

England and Wales will be better off without NI and Scotland. The Scots will be free to be as Commie as they want to be. When oil revenues run low, they’ll beg to be let back into the Sterling Zone and out of the funny money Eurozone.
The Pound won’t stay low forever, but in the meantime, its decline will boost British (or English and Welsh, less Scottish) exports.
Switzerland and Norway have prospered outside the EU, and so will the UK or England and Wales.

Michael Carter
Reply to  Hoplite
June 25, 2016 11:30 am

Why should there not be an independent Scotland and a united independent Ireland? Good luck to them too
All established businesses go through phases of retrenchment: trim the fat, re-implement disciplined control and efficiency. I believe that the sovereign countries that make up Britain will be better off in the long term.
Europe has always been messy. No one could envy their predicament and that has not gotten better. That part is sad

mwh
Reply to  Hoplite
June 25, 2016 3:46 pm

point 1 markets go up and down – Bexit was always going to see movement – by end of friday Sterling recovered and the stock market ended higher than the start of the week (BTW 1 day of turmoil is not going to suddenly drop UK down the rankings especially seeing as the nations just below faired even worse in their own stock markets)
Point 2 – he damned well should resign – he has lied, bullied and attempted to frighten the nation along with his Chancellor. He used his position and the Civil Service and stiil lost. Much as they both seem like decent blokes, I never want to see them again and nor do most people in the UK.
Point 3 – and that matters at all? Corbyn is a decent man but was persuaded to take a line he doesnt believe in – he has more credibility with ordinary Labour voters than his fellow MPs. I would rather see those that call for his resignation and campaigned for Remain do the decent thing and resign. That way there would be a half credible Labour Party and a good opposition that would be needed to unravel the UK from the monstrous EU. The no confidence vote will not make a jot of difference to what happened on thursday
Point 4 – If the Scottish want independance so badly and want to cosy up to the EU I wish to goodness they would stop bleating and just go, they are now (since thursday) a massive liability to the progress of the UK. If the independance vote was nationwide they probably would already have gone and with the drastic change in oil price would be on the way to bankruptcy. UK might no longer be in the top 10 nations without Scotland but where would Scotland be without the UK. Personally I think Nicola Sturgeon is just stirring the pot – the Scottish would not be that daft would they?
Point 5 – N Ireland voting by a not huge majority to remain is not the same as asking whether they wish to remain in the UK – wont happen no matter what.
Point 6 – so what – nobody new who he was or what he did and nobody outside of the Brussels Elite had any say in his appointment in the first place and he wasnt working for the UK but for the Commission. Seeing as the UK has just voted ‘no confidence’ in the EU then it follows the UK has no confidence in the commissioner. If we could vote no confidence in the entire commission we would and have tried several times to bring their book keeping to account but to no avail – that is one of the greatest undemocratic problems with the entire monolithic EU structure
Point 7 – and very good at reassuring they are too – thats why the market recovered – well done BoE job well done
If Johnson and Gove could leave tomorrow I am quite convinced that they would – the enforced ‘negotiations’ will be expensive and spiteful I am sure but worth every penny, they didnt set the timetable – Cameron did and there is little they can do about it even though he is now on the way out – there is a process you know! Johnson may have been a closet remainer but he chose Brexit and now he needs to follow through or let someone else do it – thats why there is a process (good grief)
Get over it Hoplite – you need some time with your family’s monkeys!!

Nigel S
Reply to  Hoplite
June 25, 2016 3:55 pm

‘UK EU commissioner resigned (motion of no confidence was put down against him)’. (Hoplite 08:14)
When was a motion of no confidence put down against Lord Hill? Who did it? Can’t find any reference to that.
From the BBC: ‘He will be replaced by Latvian politician Valdis Dombrovskis, currently European Commissioner for the euro.
Asked whether the UK would be sending anyone to Brussels to take Lord Hill’s place on the Commission, Downing Street said: “It will be for the next prime minister to decide, following discussions with European partners, what role the UK plays in the European Commission, given we remain a full member of the EU until we have left.”‘

mwh
Reply to  Nigel S
June 25, 2016 4:19 pm

The Uk doesnt appoint or ‘send’ commissioners. The commission appoints a commissioner to the UK portfolio.

Hoplite
Reply to  Nigel S
June 26, 2016 11:12 am

Some Euro MP’s were to put the motion to the European parliament and announced to media they would do so. See Financial Times.

catweazle666
Reply to  Hoplite
June 26, 2016 12:40 pm

“Brexit is and will be a disaster for Britain.”
Absolute, 100% 24-carat uninformed – pig ignorant in fact – nonsense.
You really haven’t a clue.

Hoplite
June 25, 2016 8:21 am

I notice in Monckton’s rantings here against the EU he mentions only 2 out of the 3 institutions. The one he left out? The council of ministers of course. They are the directly elected representatives in the governments of the individual members. They are the sole obstacle to creating more direct accountability in the other EU institutions as they refuse to concede any further democratic accountability to the EU as they see that as a threat to their own authority. The British government has been foremost in taking that stance. Ironic, then that Brits like Monckton blame that democratic deficit then on the institutions themselves and not on their own government that they elected.
Btw what will the ‘British’ flag look like after the exit of Scotland and possibly N Ireland? Suggestions on a postcard please…….Monckton get drawing.

Nigel S
Reply to  Hoplite
June 25, 2016 11:05 am

Letter in today’s Telegraph.
SIR – As a southern Irishman, I would like to express my thanks to all in the United Kingdom who voted for democracy above capitalism.
We in Ireland were bullied by Europe in the economic crash and were forced to bail out the euro, while our politicians turned the other way.
In the centenary year of our own independence, the vote will be a lifeline for Ireland’s democratic future.
Nick Crawford
Dalkey, Co Dublin, Ireland

Hoplite
Reply to  Nigel S
June 25, 2016 11:59 am

Nigel – Ireland has always had obsequious West Brits. Nuttin’ new there. And a Telegraph reader!! – you need know no more about the guy to know his politics.

Nigel S
Reply to  Nigel S
June 25, 2016 3:29 pm

I guess it’s a question of to whom you are obsequious. Your choice seems to be EU.

pbweather
Reply to  Nigel S
June 25, 2016 7:18 pm

Astonishing short memory. The Irish were net receivers not contributers of vast sums of EU money for a decade or more because their public services and infrastructure were way below standards in the rest of the EU. They went on a massive spending spree partly from EU money and mostly from cheap borrowed money, just like Greece, Spain etc and when suddenly they were called to pay back that debt they call foul. These countries especialy Greece borrowed too much money that they could never pay back. This is the reason their economies are toast and also the reason why they now face austery and cutbacks. Self inflicted financial pain yet some how it is the EU’s fault. I lived in Dublin at the height of this boom growth and I remember asking people then how could the tiny Irish economy fund all this building of infrastructure? The answer was always the same. The EU. Now we have people claiming the EU has bullied them? Have your cake and eat it to springs to mind.

Hoplite
Reply to  Nigel S
June 26, 2016 11:16 am

Ireland is a partner in the European project. Quite different to our experience of, ahem, ‘partnership’ with England for eight centuries. We Irish know the who are friends really are. The European project is in our interests and we are and will benefit greatly from it as well as contribute to it meaningfully as a small nation. Our ‘partnership’ with England left us Cromwellian massacres, penal laws, famine and economic ruin.

Gabro
Reply to  Hoplite
June 25, 2016 11:23 am

Directly elected? By whom?

Hoplite
Reply to  Gabro
June 25, 2016 11:57 am

Gabro – by the UK electorate in the general election. It is the members of that government that sit in the council of ministers.

Gabro
Reply to  Gabro
June 25, 2016 12:27 pm

That is not direct election, which means that the entire electorate votes.
The people don’t get to elect their commissars and councilors in Brussels. Their pals in office, who look forward to the EU’s cushy pay and perks for themselves in future chose them. That is indirect election at best, but certainly not direct election by the people.

Alan Robertson
Reply to  Hoplite
June 25, 2016 3:24 pm

Hoplite-
Did it not occur to you that the fall of the British pound has been a long time in the making, as the sound monetary footings have been eroded by the faceless and unelected bureaucrats, the minions of those hands on the reins, to which you publicly come here and pledge allegiance?
As far as I can see, the British people have thrown off the serfs yoke which has slowly been fitted round their necks. Monckton sees that, regardless of whether his Scot neighbors would rather act up than stand up as independent men and women.. You Leave Monckton Alone!
Ps You said you were leaving, yet here you still are.

Gabro
Reply to  Alan Robertson
June 25, 2016 3:40 pm

In 1973, when Britain joined what would become the EU, the Dollar-Pound exchange rate was $2.45.
I recall, since I was in grad school there then.

Monckton of Brenchley
Reply to  Hoplite
June 26, 2016 12:42 am

In reply to “Hoplite”, I did not mention the Council of “ministers” because this is not a council of ministers but yet another cabal of unelected, unaccountable, unsackable bureaucrats.
And don’t imagine that Scotland will leave the UK in a hurry. There was a large margin against Sexit in the recent referendum, notwithstanding the near-unanimous support for it among the usual suspects and chattering classes in Scotland, because the people realized full well that leaving the UK would mean canceling the massive English subsidies, as well as leaving the EU. The Scottish economy is run on quasi-Communist lines because it is extravagantly subsidized by England. Without those subsidies, Scotland would fail, as the superb independent analysis for the Scottish Research Society showed.
If Scotland were to leave the UK, England and Wales would be more prosperous to the extent of the subsidies that now flow northward. The SRS analysis, like almost all other serious analyses, indicated that Scotland would face bankruptcy within months if the English subsidies stopped.

Hoplite
Reply to  Monckton of Brenchley
June 26, 2016 11:25 am

Monckton, precisely the same things were said by the English in the 20’s about Ireland that we would never be capable of governing ourselves without the steady (read Protestant and not feckless Catholic) hand of England at our tiller. While Ireland didn’t enjoy the post-war boom it started to catch up in the 60’s. Today Ireland is one of the fastest growing economies in the world. I think we can give the Scots the confidence that they can indeed go it alone without the English there in loco parentis.
I am more than a little curious why people like you and Rees Mogg pledge such undying loyalty to a state when you are not members of that state’s official religion and ineligible to hold its Prime Ministerial office due to your Catholic faith (Blair deferred his conversion to Catholicism until he left that office to avoid a constitutional crisis). Maybe it’s a kind of Stockholm syndrome.

catweazle666
Reply to  Monckton of Brenchley
June 26, 2016 12:42 pm

Hoplite, you really are most extraordinarily ignorant.
And very rude and unpleasant with it.
Grow up.

Hoplite
Reply to  Monckton of Brenchley
June 27, 2016 5:01 am

Catweazle – you’re English I assume. You probably are horrified at such accusations of institutional sectarianism in your beloved country. Don’t shoot the messenger though as he is only saying what is in fact the constitutional reality in Britain today. I understand why English Catholics tend to keep their heads down and not emphasise their faith that has traditionally been treated so badly in the English reformation and subsequent penal law history. I don’t get, however, why they so publicly and studiously ignore the last vestiges of that sectarianism which undeniably are still in existence and which have no place in this world.

Gabro
Reply to  Monckton of Brenchley
June 27, 2016 5:06 am

Hoppy,
You are indeed profoundly ignorant.
There is no barrier to a Catholic being PM. Monarch, yes.
The last Labour PM was a nominally Jewish atheist. Blair attended Catholic services while PM.

Hoplite
Reply to  Monckton of Brenchley
June 27, 2016 1:56 pm

Gabro
Start with this:
https://www.thecourier.co.uk/news/politics/91663/jim-murphy-says-uk-is-not-ready-to-elect-a-catholic-prime-minister/
The Act of Settlement of 1701 explicitly prohibits Catholics (and only Catholics) from being heirs to the throne or being married to same. It is truly extraordinary that up until only a couple of years ago an heir to the throne in Britain could not marry a Catholic. They could marry an atheist, Muslim, Sikh, Mormon or whatever, but explicitly not a Catholic – by law.
Just to show how modern, progressive and egalitarian Britain really is, this law was only PARTIALLY repealed in 2013. A Catholic is still prohibited BY LAW from being an heir to the throne today in Britain. This is because England and Wales are the only countries in Europe or North America to have a state religion and the head of state is also the head of that state church.
What of the Prime Minister’s office? Well, constitutionally, amongst his many duties is the role is to advise the head of the state church (the Queen) on episcopal appointments and other ecclesial matters as required. However, it is against the law for a Catholic (and only a Catholic) to so advise or influence the monarch on these matters. Hence there is a constitutional impediment – even though there is no law explicitly stating that a Catholic cannot be Prime Minister – which is what you are relying on to muddy the waters and pretend there is no sectarian character to the British establishment today.
Tony Blair deferred his conversion until after he left office, so as to avoid legal and constitutional difficulties, he was though attending Mass with his family (who are Catholics) which is certainly not the same as being a Catholic. In no other country in Europe or North America would his religion have been of interest – but it certainly was to the media in Merry Protestant Old England. The Scottish Labour MP in the article above clearly believes even today that a Catholic PM in Britain is a no no to many English.
In Northern Ireland in recent years, we saw the most vicious aspects of this sectarianism in Belfast when Protestant adults were intimidating, shouting at and spitting on young Catholic girls who were just on their way to school and had to be shielded by their parents from it and run through that gauntlet. So, self righteous were these bigots they dared do it all in front of the world’s media. We, in Ireland, have experienced this caustic sectarianism for centuries and know it and its consequences only too well. The Irish man and founder of the European conservative political movement, Edmund Burke, expressed it well when speaking about the penal laws enacted by the English as: “a machine of wise and elaborate contrivance, as well fitted for the oppression, impoverishment and degradation of a people, and the debasement in them of human nature itself, as ever proceeded from the perverted ingenuity of man.”
Don’t know who the last Labour Jewish PM you are referring to. Brown was not Anglican but Church of Scotland. He certainly wasn’t Jewish – atheist or otherwise.

Hazel Anderson
June 25, 2016 8:55 am

Super, Excellent, Eliquent well put together piece.
Rule Britannia

ralfellis
June 25, 2016 9:13 am

Consilium (the Council of Ministers) is elected?
By who? Not by the people.
And if they are not elected, they are not accountable.
BTW, The Consilium logo is the All Seeing Eye:comment image

Janice Moore
Reply to  ralfellis
June 25, 2016 10:12 am

And good ol’ United Kingdom just socked it to the EU, right in the eye!
Independence DayWelcome to earth.

(youtube)

Derrell1970
June 25, 2016 9:31 am

We hold these Truths to be SELF evident… -That to secure these rights Governments are instituted (upon principles of righteousness) among (mere) men, deriving their Just powers from the CONSENT of the Governed!! (Declaration of Independence – 1776)
My personal “Consent” as an American and an Americanist is The Constitution of the United States. You don’t have to be an American to be an Americanist! You only need realize the TRUTH in the words ALL men are created Equal – no one is more human or less human than any other human – CONTRARY to Karl Marx’s lament that the Middle Class destroyed the Feudal System and the idyllic relationship between man and his Natural Superiors, the lords of the Feudal Estate!
Socialism – communism – IS – the feudal estate!
The Feudal Lords have no less an objective than to STEAL THE ENTIRE PLANET for themselves!
The Brexit demonstrates that their power is still primarily vested in what LIES they can sell to the minions and how can they Deceive and trick us further! We need only be educated to the truth and then determined to destroy the lies!
THANK YOU Britain for standing up for true human rights where the defense of the minority starts with defending the rights of the smallest minority of all – the minority of ONE!!

carlo napolitano
June 25, 2016 9:55 am

Cupio Dissolvi
Ask to the patients that will no longer able to freely move to and from UK to find better cures
Ask to scientists who are funded by EU grants (and use the money also to pay younger UK scientists who have to start theirs careers.
Ask to anybody who have ongoing cross border joint ventures.
This is a wired concept of freedom

Janice Moore
Reply to  carlo napolitano
June 25, 2016 10:06 am

Dear Carlo Napolitano,
There are free-market (i.e., non-EU) solutions to every one of those problems! There will be a bit of a transition period, but, all of those concerns can be easily handled by UK legislation and other measures.
Prendere il coraggio a due mani — and LIVE FREE!!!
#(:))
Take care, over there in Italia,
Janice

Reply to  Janice Moore
June 25, 2016 1:05 pm

An honest and ethical “deal” (business or political) is one where both parties “get what they want and paid for”, even in the fine print.
With the EU and the UN and (fill in the blank), only the controlling “party” gets what it wants.
The bigger the bureaucracy, the more totalitarian it becomes. “Left” or “Right” doesn’t matter then. The slower it grows, the less likely the minions will notice they’ve becomes cogs in a machine, a Government, gone wrong.
Someone quoted the Declaration of Independence above. It bears repeating.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

Congratulation to the UK for cutting themselves free from the particular “Form of Government” called the EU.

carlo napolitano
June 25, 2016 10:18 am

PS Building walls and divisions has never been a good way to freedom. Surely is tougher to find ways to stay together than to break everything apart (easiest and quicker solution)….. cupio dissolvi

Janice Moore
Reply to  carlo napolitano
June 25, 2016 10:34 am

Dear Carlo Napolitano,
The UK just broke out of the prison wall in which the nations of the EU languish, enslaved by socialist policies. We need not link arms and stumble along in a line to get along, you know. We can, as frightening as this may sound, simply meet together, shake hands on a deal, and walk away, back to our own castle — with a wave and a smile!
Courage!
Janice

Stephen Richards
Reply to  Janice Moore
June 25, 2016 11:38 am

Well said, Janice

Janice Moore
Reply to  Janice Moore
June 25, 2016 1:04 pm

Why, thank you, I mean, merci, Monsieur Richards! 🙂

Reply to  Janice Moore
June 25, 2016 1:27 pm

😎
And as far “divisions” based on race, ethnicity, or whatever goes; ever been in a major US city on St. Patrick’s Day? For a day, everybody’s Irish that wants to be.
Key point: If they want to celebrate it, they can. If they don’t want to celebrate it, they won’t have the police forcing them to watch the parade go by.
Personal freedom allows that.

John Robertson
Reply to  carlo napolitano
June 25, 2016 11:08 am

“PS Building walls and divisions has never been a good way to freedom. Surely is tougher to find ways to stay together than to break everything apart (easiest and quicker solution)….. cupio dissolvi”
Except when you are being overwhelmed by fools and bandits.
Then erecting barricades and dividing your attackers is essential.
Kleptocracy has yet to be reformed from within,collapse is the usual way that parasitic overload has been resolved in past civilizations.
The unelected,unaccountable agencies all love the super country,citizen of the world symbolism.
The people who foot the bill?. Not so much.
The current crop of educated beyond all wisdom, life time feeders at public troughs, are arrogant beyond belief, in their ignorance.
Human nature has changed very little.
Fools,bandits and the insane have always been part of life, however productive people do not enjoy being ruled by such.
There has been no historical example of rule by fools,thieves or crazies ending well for the ordinary citizen.
The upcoming collapse of what we call the financial system will educate some people way beyond their comfort zones. And collapse it will because the public trust has been massively betrayed by our current elitist leaders.(No trust No trade).

Stephen Richards
Reply to  John Robertson
June 25, 2016 11:32 am

+10

Evan Jones
Editor
Reply to  carlo napolitano
June 27, 2016 5:38 pm

Building walls and divisions has never been a good way to freedom.
Hmm. #B^) Since when?

Zeke
June 25, 2016 10:43 am

For the so-called “European Parliament” is no Parliament. It is a mere duma. It lacks even the power to bring forward a bill, and the 28 faceless, unelected, omnipotent Kommissars – the official German name for the shadowy Commissioners who exercise the supreme lawmaking power that was once vested in our elected Parliament – have the power, under the Treaty of Maastrich…

Kommissars with a President appointed by Merkel,
Chancellor of the Free Worldcomment image?quality=75&strip=color
Do you know where your treaty-signing Boomer president is? Do you know what is in Clinton’s emails? They probably contain her work in forging TTIP in secret with the European Commission.comment image
And Britain somehow got out!

Stephen Richards
Reply to  Zeke
June 25, 2016 11:37 am

Britain does not yet know have brave and foresighted they have been. I had English friends at my door today worried sick about the brexit vote. I explained that it was very likely the beginning of the end that will come in 5 to 10 yrs but that when it does the British in EU countries will be fine (stressed) because the UK economy will be flourishing and the £ € will be enormous. Difficult to carry the €s around surely but they will be relatively rich and able to return to the UK.

Zeke
June 25, 2016 10:46 am

image
Merkel Chancellor of the Free World
http://media.vogue.com/r/w_480/2015/12/09/time-person-of-year.jpg

Stephen Richards
June 25, 2016 11:30 am

Christopher Why is this your last broadcast.?

RayG
June 25, 2016 11:40 am

Gabro June 24, 2016 at 5:25 pm said:
“She was a “Red Bolling”, ie descended from Matoaka “Pocahontas” Powhatan. Most Bollings are “White”, but there are also a few “Blue Bollings”.”
But were the Bollings green?

Gabro
Reply to  RayG
June 25, 2016 12:36 pm

Only in Kentucky.

Stephen Richards
June 25, 2016 11:40 am

“PS Building walls and divisions has never been a good way to freedom. Surely is tougher to find ways to stay together than to break everything apart (easiest and quicker solution)….. cupio dissolvi”
I don’t suppose the East Germans would have agreed with you before ’89

Amber
June 25, 2016 12:31 pm

Cameron resigns . How convenient …. for him . Looks good on this pretender .
The UK will be just fine and now that some “hard ” work is about to start the light weight EU puppets leave .
Quite a blow for the scary global warming industry and so well deserved . Let’s hope fuel poverty deaths will begin to decline .
Cameron should be walked to the door before he and his tribe can pull any stunts before October .

whiten
Reply to  Amber
June 25, 2016 1:04 pm

Amber
June 25, 2016 at 12:31 pm
He could not have stayed any more. as the referendum lost all its meaning and purpose at the moment that an elected politician was killed, murdered, for not saying massacred, and he did not have the courage to have delayed the referendum or stopped it altogether.
It already had backfired prior even of taking place……….against any expectation.
The referendum was his call and he could have stopped or delayed it under that circumstance, if he had courage enough, and in mean time honor the lost one.
He let it go completely out of his hands, and has no much choice but to leave now.
cheers

mwh
Reply to  whiten
June 25, 2016 4:02 pm

The random actions of a complete nutter should not determine the future path of a nation. For such a terrible thing to happen was awful but even though the actions of her killer were linked to the referendum, the actual effect was a swing back to remain in the polls of some 3%. I hardly think she would have wanted her death to stop the democratic process – she seemed to be an honest, hard working and dedicated politician.
To use this to bolster your argument is poor indeed

Mickey Reno
June 25, 2016 1:22 pm

Congrats to Lord Monckton and the Leave campaigners and voters. Much work now needs to be done, both to extirpate yourselves from the creeping bureaucratic tyranny of the EU, and also to start rebuilding the economy of Britain under your own rules. You had to destroy your fishing boats under EU rules, but maybe now a fishing industry can start to grow again. American business is anxious to trade with you. Obama will soon be gone (thank God/Allah/Satan/Zeus) and when he’s gone, I humbly ask on behalf of my countrymen, that the people of Great Britain condescend to send back the bust of Winston Churchill Obama ignorantly rejected at the beginning of his term. If you do, I think it’s safe to say it will never be returned again. Anyway, a good economic result, based on lots of individual efforts, entrepreneurship, and good will, over time, is the best way to make Fabian world government Utopians cry.

Latitude
June 25, 2016 1:44 pm

heh….you would think none of these countries survived before there was a EU
Including the US globalization carp
And some people are still trashing a bunch of countries that have taken in millions of legal and illegal refugees, some of the terrorists
..without shining the mirror on the Arab world
Muslims would not put up with us in their countries for one second…and they don’t

Simon Evans
June 25, 2016 1:59 pm

Remember that about a quarter of the UK population chose not to exercise their democratic right to vote, presumably because they did not feel strongly enough on the issue. We can therefore assume they are equally happy to accept the outcome of the referendum either way. It is therefore can be argued that around three quarters of the population are happy to leave the EU, not just the 52% that said so out load!

Simon Evans
Reply to  Simon Evans
June 25, 2016 4:02 pm

Now I’ve thought about it – my maths was a bit wrong: 52% of the 73% turnout voted leave, plus the remaining 27% who didn’t bother to vote means about two thirds of the population did not vote to remain in the EU.

June 25, 2016 2:16 pm

“…Departugal, Italeave, Czechout, Oustria, Finish…”
Those five words were worth the price of admission. Thank you, M’ Lord.

Reply to  naggme
June 26, 2016 8:11 am

“Remainia”
Wins!

Niels
June 25, 2016 2:20 pm

Sadly it’s all an illusion. There’ll be another referendum, just like the Irish had to vote several times on the Euro. The Eurocrats will work with the Elite to block the exit. Good reasons to remain in the EU will be found, and the next PM will agree that the referendum is not legally binding.
I would love to be wrong.

Jørgen F.
Reply to  Niels
June 25, 2016 2:54 pm

Yes, but in the meantime the UK will win the cup as we danes did in 1992 after refusing Maastrict – If you can’t join them – beat them!

whiten
Reply to  Niels
June 25, 2016 3:02 pm

Niels
June 25, 2016 at 2:20 pm.
Not very workable, besides lot of damage already done.
It will take time to implement such as, something that does not seem as a luxury anymore to the Brits now, still in no man’s land for longer, simply extending the problem and the expense for a longer period…
Unless the next PM, gets to have “Iron Bolls” and outright default the referendum as unacceptable, as soon as he can, and shows a very good reason, then is no much else to do, but accept the condition for better or worse
cheers.

mwh
Reply to  Marcus
June 25, 2016 4:36 pm

I hardly think that the petition will get far as this has been discussed for months and a referendum held that the 2 million petitioners lost – hardly going to be taken seriously is it. We didnt get a second crack at it in 1975 why should there be a second vote now. All that would happen is the EU will make a few consessions to swing the vote and then hold another referendum. The next weeks will be interesting in France and Germanys……oops the EUs response (after all Hollande and Merkel are meeting on Monday or is that just pure conicidence)

TA
June 25, 2016 2:46 pm

I think England left the EU just in time. Think of all that money England is going to save, and all that EU debt England is going to avoid. Good timing.

TA
Reply to  TA
June 26, 2016 6:46 am

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/06/24/46-6b-annual-cost-hated-eu-rules-caused-brexit/
“Open Europe is a non-partisan think tank with offices in London and Brussels that produces an annual report measuring the cost burden of 40,000 EU-derived legal acts, 15,000 Court verdicts and 62,000 international standards on the United Kingdom.
Their 2015 report for the “Top 100” regulations estimated the financial burden on the UK economy at $46.6 billion. To put that drain on the economy in perspective, the top 100 EU regulations cost more than the $37.8 billion in local property taxes, called “Council Tax,” paid by British citizens to the UK Treasury last year.”
As an example.

Gabro
June 25, 2016 2:52 pm

Movements are afoot in Spain, Italy, France, the Netherlands, Denmark and Sweden at least to have referenda. The results might well be to Remain in all those countries, but in many nations, the people at a minimum want to have a say on staying in what has become a dictatorship by the venal and greedy rather than the union as which it was sold.
But if there are Nexits and Swexits, the EU could end up looking like the Third Reich in Lebensraum as well as in its form of regime, ie Germany and its Eastern European colonies. Possibly allied with Italy and maybe dominating northern France and the Low Countries, with a neutral Spain, but opposed by Russia and its subject and client states.

Boels
Reply to  Gabro
June 26, 2016 3:34 am

I’m Dutch and sick of a bureaucratic EU.
Nevertheless, I would want to know ALL the consequences before casting a vote on Nexit.
Bureaucrats needs up to 2 years to sort things out, so no Nexit within 2 year.