Future summers could be hotter than any on record

From the NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION and the “it’s always hotter in the city than the country department comes this collection of spin:

The urban heat island effect further raises summer temperatures in cities. CREDIT NASA
The urban heat island effect further raises summer temperatures in cities. CREDIT NASA

In 50 years, summers across most of the globe could be hotter than any summer experienced by people to date, according to a study by scientists at the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) in Boulder, Colo.

If climate change continues on its current trajectory, the probability that summers between 2061 and 2080 will be warmer than the hottest on record stands at 80 percent across the world’s land areas, excluding Antarctica, which was not studied.

If greenhouse gas emissions are reduced, however, that probability drops to 41 percent.

“Extremely hot summers always pose a challenge to society,” said NCAR scientist Flavio Lehner, lead author of the study. “They can increase the risk for health issues, and can also damage crops and deepen droughts. Such summers are a true test of our adaptability to rising temperatures.”

The study is part of an upcoming special issue of the journal Climatic Change that will focus on quantifying the benefits of reducing greenhouse gas emissions. The research was funded by the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF) and the Swiss National Science Foundation.

Simulating a range of summers

The research team, which includes NCAR scientists Clara Deser and Benjamin Sanderson, used two existing sets of model simulations to investigate what future summers might look like.

They created both by running the NCAR-based Community Earth System Model 15 times, with one simulation assuming that greenhouse gas emissions remain unabated and the other assuming that society reduces emissions.

NSF and the U.S. Department of Energy fund the Community Earth System Model. The team ran the simulations on the NCAR-Wyoming Supercomputing Center’s Yellowstone system.

“We’ve thought of climate change as ‘global warming,’ but it’s important to understand how this overall warming affects conditions that hit people locally,” said Eric DeWeaver, program director in NSF’s Division of Atmospheric and Geospace Sciences, which funds NCAR.

“Extreme temperatures pose risks to people around the globe,” DeWeaver said. “These scientists show the power of ensembles of simulations for understanding how these risks depend on the level of greenhouse gas emissions.”

By using simulations created by running the same model multiple times, with only tiny differences in the initial starting conditions, the scientists could examine the range of expected summertime temperatures for future “business-as-usual” and reduced-emissions scenarios.

“This is the first time the risk of record summer heat and its dependence on the rate of greenhouse gas emissions have been so comprehensively evaluated from a large set of simulations with a single state-of-the-art climate model,” Deser said.

The scientists compared results to summertime temperatures recorded between 1920 and 2014 and to 15 sets of simulated summertime temperatures for the same period.

By simulating past summers — instead of relying solely on observations — the researchers established a large range of temperatures that could have occurred naturally under the same conditions, including greenhouse gas concentrations and volcanic eruptions.

“Instead of just comparing the future to 95 summers from the past, the models give us the opportunity to create more than 1,400 possible past summers,” Lehner said. “The result is a more comprehensive look at what should be considered natural variability and what can be attributed to climate change.”

Emissions cuts could yield big benefits

The results show that between 2061 and 2080, summers in large parts of North and South America, central Europe, Asia, and Africa have a greater than 90 percent chance of being warmer than any summer in the historic record if emissions continue unabated.

That means virtually every summer would be as warm as the hottest to date.

In some regions, the likelihood of summers being warmer than any in the historical record remained less than 50 percent, but in those places — including Alaska, the central U.S., Scandinavia, Siberia and continental Australia — summer temperatures naturally vary greatly, making it more difficult to detect effects of climate change.

Reducing emissions would lower the global probability of future summers that are hotter than any in the past, but would not result in uniformly spread benefits. In some regions, including the U.S. East Coast and large parts of the tropics, the probability would remain above 90 percent, even if emissions were reduced.

But reduced emissions would result in a sizable boon for other regions of the world.

Parts of Brazil, central Europe, and eastern China would see a reduction of more than 50 percent in the chance that future summers would be hotter than the historic range. Since these areas are densely inhabited, a large part of the global population would benefit significantly from climate change mitigation.

“It’s often overlooked that the majority of the world’s population lives in regions that will see a comparably fast rise in temperatures,” Lehner said.

###

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

124 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
KevinK
June 13, 2016 4:29 pm

Didn’t Hansen make this same prediction in the 1980’s…. He guessed 20 years (come and gone) so the replacement clowns have to use 50 years instead,

Pop Piasa
June 13, 2016 4:35 pm

Who gives a [snip] about the temperature alone? It’s the %RH that makes humans uncomfortable.

Reply to  Pop Piasa
June 13, 2016 9:49 pm

You do realize that over the course of generations “snip” will become a prohibited word?

June 13, 2016 4:36 pm

“could be hotter”… I like that. They could also say “could NOT be hotter” or “could be cooler”.
I think it depends on the Sun and natural variability. That’s my “hunch”…

June 13, 2016 4:49 pm

Temperatures “could be” warmer than the Little Ice Age. But a warmer world is entirely a good thing. There “could be” a reason for alarm — if the natural rise in global temperatures was accelerating fast, year over year. But it’s not.
In fact, global temperatures stopped rising for nearly twenty years, throwing the alarmist contingent into fits of consternation as they tried to ‘explain’ that no global warming was being caused by… global warming!
What is being observed is simply a continuation of the planet’s natural recovery from the extremely cold LIA, which was one of the coldest periods of the entire Holocene. And despite the rise in (harmless and beneficial) CO2, global temperatures have not responded as predicted.
When they talk about “on record”, they’re cherry-picking as usual. If they used just the Holocene record, they would see that current temperatures are still very cool. It would require an improbably large rise in global temperatures to come anywhere close to the earlier Holocene:comment image

Reply to  dbstealey
June 14, 2016 1:44 pm

Indeed..
“Extremely hot summers always pose a challenge to society,” said NCAR scientist Flavio Lehner, lead author of the study. “They can increase the risk for health issues, and can also damage crops and deepen droughts. Such summers are a true test of our adaptability to rising temperatures.”
Or rather: Extremely cold centuries are extremely dangerous to humanity, making nearly all northern latitudes uninhabitable, even to Polar Bears. The last inter-glacial as warm as this was 120,000 years ago!

Freedom Monger
June 13, 2016 4:57 pm

“The study is part of an upcoming special issue of the journal Climatic Change that will focus on quantifying the benefits of reducing greenhouse gas emissions.”
This sounds like a politically motivated endeavor rather than a scientific endeavor. If it were truly a scientific endeavor they would also focus on quantifying the benefits of increasing greenhouse gases impartially.

John Harmsworth
June 13, 2016 4:57 pm

If there is an 80% probability of summers being hotter than any on record, I interpret that two different ways.
A- 20% of summers will not be hotter than records up til 2015, in other words, no worse than last year! That’s after 45 more years of cumulative CO2 emissions. If that’s the case I can’t see the years that are above current records being much above.
B)- There is a 20% probability that no years in the period will be hotter than 2015. With CO2 levels at 450 ppm or higher by then, even with no increase in emissions, how would they explain that?
They can’t mean B. Scenario A is not severe enough to worry about. Also, I believe in 45 years we will be into more expensive fossil fuels and have other energy options available to us. This piece of high cost, low value modelling actually demonstrates the stupidity of taking significant action to control emissions. Well done!

Chris Hanley
June 13, 2016 5:02 pm

Birmingham (UK) should be bracing itself for an influx of Climate Change™ refugees.
The place to be is Central England, not only has that region escaped the ravages of human-induced Climate Change™ in the last 60 years but also the general warming trend that has undoubtedly accompanied the recovery from the equal coldest episode in the past 10,000 years has occurred mostly in the winters.comment image

SocietalNorm
Reply to  Chris Hanley
June 18, 2016 3:13 am

My God, man! Can’t you see by the plot that temperatures have gone up 1 degree C in the last 350 years! In only 35,000 years the temperature of the earth will be 100 degrees hotter than now and it will be a disaster. WE MUST DO SOMETHING NOW!

prjindigo
June 13, 2016 5:11 pm

That article reads to me as a string of AGW bullshit remarks glued together with fervor.

June 13, 2016 5:13 pm

just to recap …
Arctic ice cap will be gone
Antarctic will melt
children will not know snow
coral reefs die
islands will swamp
polar bears (and other cute creatures) die
more hurricanes
permanent drought
more rain
malaria out of control
oh yeah … wars
possible threat to beer
oh and … more sex assaults
now extra hotter summers (except where I live but weather is not climate)
Just trying to keep up in my collection of fears
I’m sure I left stuff out
isn’t

Reply to  rebelronin
June 13, 2016 5:15 pm

was just gonna say, before my computer rudely interrupted …
isn’t Trump the result of climate change?

Latitude
Reply to  rebelronin
June 13, 2016 6:05 pm

in a round about way….
Climate change caused radical Islam
http://www.independentsentinel.com/john-kerry-thinks-climate-change-causes-radical-islam/

Todd
June 13, 2016 5:15 pm

You mean we can finally have summers as hot as the 1930s, in 65 more years?

PA
June 13, 2016 5:36 pm

Well, according to Guinness (the beer people) the record is:
Who
DEATH VALLEY
What
56.7 DEGREE(S) CELSIUS
Where
UNITED STATES
When
10 JULY 1913

jpatrick
Reply to  PA
June 13, 2016 5:51 pm

Yep. Death Valley came to mind as I read through this. The time I was there, there were 30 mph winds. I don’t know the temperature, but I’d guess it was around 120F (49 C). That was by Badwater, not too far from Stovepipe.

Pop Piasa
Reply to  PA
June 13, 2016 6:08 pm

Really, not at Heathrow while a jet engine was blowing on the “official” thermistor?

June 13, 2016 5:59 pm

it’s one of those “honey i ran the climate model” papers. also the stated motivation for the research, “to quantify the benefits of emission reduction” has a built in bias.

PA
Reply to  chaamjamal
June 13, 2016 6:11 pm

Well, they whine and snivel about the PETM.
During the PETM Florida was about 27°C.
We know the Arctic didn’t get below 9°C because crocodiles lived there.
So the whole planet was around 20-30°C.
The warm parts weren’t any warmer. Only the cold parts were warmer.
This is the awful fate we are being saved from.
At the current time we can’t warm the Antarctic and any attempt will cause more than the current, less than 2 inches, of annual precipitation – which will make the ice grow.
3-4 inches of annual precipitation on the Antarctic can’t melt fast enough and the core is too high (therefore too cold) to melt.

Bruce Cobb
June 13, 2016 6:27 pm

On the other hand, maybe we shouldn’t be so dismissive. After all, the model was “state of the art”.

alx
Reply to  Bruce Cobb
June 14, 2016 7:58 am

Well that’s part is true, it is more like art than science. AGW views of climate is like DeKooning abstract expressionist views of women.

Louis
June 13, 2016 6:39 pm

“In some regions, including the U.S. East Coast and large parts of the tropics, the probability would remain above 90 percent, even if emissions were reduced.”
So, what is the incentive for the Eastern U.S. to reduce carbon emissions? To make people in China and Central Europe more comfortable?

June 13, 2016 6:49 pm

There is an old saying, Russian I believe, that states – “where-ever there is a trough, there will be pigs”. It looks as if the NCAR is repeatedly running computer models, that are known to be wrong, in order to keep the gravy train going.
My study of the Scripps Institute atmospheric CO2 data from the Mauna Loa Observatory and the UAH satellite lower tropospheric temperature data for the Tropics Land component clearly revealed that the annual rate of change in CO2 concentration lags the annual rate of change in temperature. It is obvious from a comparison of the local maxima caused by El Nino events on a time plot of each of these factors. That is, CO2 did not cause a change in temperature for the Tropics over the period since satellite temperature recording began in December 1978.
Further it gave a statistically significant correlation between the annual rate of change in CO2 concentration and the 12 month running average temperature again obvious on a simple graphical plot. That means that the temperature level controls the rate of change in CO2 concentration. This was confirmed by a statistically significant correlation between the annual rate of temperature change and the second derivative of the CO2 concentration.
This may be expressed mathematically with the differential equation:
d(CO2)/dt = A x Temperature + B
where A and B are constants. The Mauna Loa data produced a climate sensitivity, A, of 1.7 ppm CO2 per annum per degree Celsius using Ordinary Linear Regression and 1.9 ppm CO2 per annum per degree Celsius using Generalised Linear Regression for a First Order Autoregression Model to take account of the autocorrelation in the time series.
Simple plots of data from 23 other locations across the globe gave support to the above proposition. Note that a pencil and graph paper can be used to illustrate these results. No multimillion dollar supercomputer needed.

Louis
June 13, 2016 6:49 pm

“This is the first time the risk of record summer heat and its dependence on the rate of greenhouse gas emissions have been so comprehensively evaluated from a large set of simulations with a single state-of-the-art climate model,” Deser said.

What makes this single climate model “state-of-the-art”? Did it successfully predict average global temperatures for the past decade or so? Or is the model so new that it can be called state-of-the-art because it hasn’t been around long enough to be proven wrong yet?

Louis
June 13, 2016 7:09 pm

In some regions, the likelihood of summers being warmer than any in the historical record remained less than 50 percent… including Alaska, the central U.S., Scandinavia, Siberia and continental Australia…

That’s odd. Other studies like Cowtan and Way claim that the polar regions are warming 8 times faster than the rest of the planet. So how could Alaska, Scandinavia, or Siberia be the regions less likely to experience hotter summers from increased CO2? I wish they could keep their stories straight. Such conflicting claims make it more difficult to believe that the science is settled. If this keeps up, 97% of climate scientists will claim to believe in contradictions. And if they say they believe in as many as 6 impossible things before breakfast, they will stand a much better chance of getting their next project funded.

June 13, 2016 7:40 pm

Sun going red giant in just a short 2 billion years is going to fry us all. Be worried , be very worried.

littlepeaks
Reply to  Donald Kasper
June 13, 2016 7:55 pm

Don’t worry. They will have invented SPF 10^6 sunscreen by then.

Bill Hunter
June 13, 2016 7:51 pm

was there any indication of how much warmer?

Bob in Castlemaine
June 13, 2016 8:12 pm

In 50 years, summers across most of the globe could be hotter than any summer experienced by people to date, according to a study by scientists at the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) in Boulder, Colo.
If climate change continues on its current trajectory, the probability that summers between 2061 and 2080 will be warmer than the hottest on record stands at 80 percent across the world’s land areas, excluding Antarctica, which was not studied.

Yes future summers could be hotter but they could also be colder.
The current climate change trajectory as determined by models that have been shown to date to have little if any predictive skill – really?
Is there any need to read further, I can't help but wonder how the western MSM gets away with its continued regurgitation of this sort of junk as science reporting?

June 13, 2016 8:19 pm

It’s very optimistic when the planet is cooling.
Question: How can we stop life in it’s tracks and make life pay for it?
Forecast: I bet all our billionaires, millionaires and polichickens will be warm this winter, drawing/sucking all they can in a hit ‘n run attack on the job seeking engineers.

emsnews
Reply to  Sparks
June 14, 2016 6:41 am

Just make all these alarmists and rich people stay in Manhattan all winter long. The north wind howls as it passes between sky scrapers during winter there (I used to work there).

bw
June 13, 2016 8:49 pm

Climate does not have a “trajectory”
Since the temp indexes have been altered, here is another perspective on extreme temps
https://www3.epa.gov/climatechange/science/indicators/weather-climate/high-low-temps.html
There are many temperature analysis papers that confirm that the 1930s were the warmest decade in the 20th century. Eg. The CRU paper Vinther et al shows the 1930s were the warmest.
Enter Vinther greenland temperature record into a search engine.

AndyG55
June 13, 2016 9:42 pm

umm.. if they are only going to be warmer in 50 years time…
… what is going to happen in the interim ?
Is there something they KNOW but aren’t telling us?

June 13, 2016 9:42 pm

Or it might be colder. Hope it isn’t colder.

Steve Fraser
June 13, 2016 10:33 pm

Finally had a chance to read part of the paper. I am amazed that the proper cites submitted (not accepted or published) papers. Holy. Sh*t.

Steve Fraser
Reply to  Steve Fraser
June 13, 2016 10:34 pm

Sorry for spelling. Too late, here.