Future summers could be hotter than any on record

From the NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION and the “it’s always hotter in the city than the country department comes this collection of spin:

The urban heat island effect further raises summer temperatures in cities. CREDIT NASA
The urban heat island effect further raises summer temperatures in cities. CREDIT NASA

In 50 years, summers across most of the globe could be hotter than any summer experienced by people to date, according to a study by scientists at the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) in Boulder, Colo.

If climate change continues on its current trajectory, the probability that summers between 2061 and 2080 will be warmer than the hottest on record stands at 80 percent across the world’s land areas, excluding Antarctica, which was not studied.

If greenhouse gas emissions are reduced, however, that probability drops to 41 percent.

“Extremely hot summers always pose a challenge to society,” said NCAR scientist Flavio Lehner, lead author of the study. “They can increase the risk for health issues, and can also damage crops and deepen droughts. Such summers are a true test of our adaptability to rising temperatures.”

The study is part of an upcoming special issue of the journal Climatic Change that will focus on quantifying the benefits of reducing greenhouse gas emissions. The research was funded by the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF) and the Swiss National Science Foundation.

Simulating a range of summers

The research team, which includes NCAR scientists Clara Deser and Benjamin Sanderson, used two existing sets of model simulations to investigate what future summers might look like.

They created both by running the NCAR-based Community Earth System Model 15 times, with one simulation assuming that greenhouse gas emissions remain unabated and the other assuming that society reduces emissions.

NSF and the U.S. Department of Energy fund the Community Earth System Model. The team ran the simulations on the NCAR-Wyoming Supercomputing Center’s Yellowstone system.

“We’ve thought of climate change as ‘global warming,’ but it’s important to understand how this overall warming affects conditions that hit people locally,” said Eric DeWeaver, program director in NSF’s Division of Atmospheric and Geospace Sciences, which funds NCAR.

“Extreme temperatures pose risks to people around the globe,” DeWeaver said. “These scientists show the power of ensembles of simulations for understanding how these risks depend on the level of greenhouse gas emissions.”

By using simulations created by running the same model multiple times, with only tiny differences in the initial starting conditions, the scientists could examine the range of expected summertime temperatures for future “business-as-usual” and reduced-emissions scenarios.

“This is the first time the risk of record summer heat and its dependence on the rate of greenhouse gas emissions have been so comprehensively evaluated from a large set of simulations with a single state-of-the-art climate model,” Deser said.

The scientists compared results to summertime temperatures recorded between 1920 and 2014 and to 15 sets of simulated summertime temperatures for the same period.

By simulating past summers — instead of relying solely on observations — the researchers established a large range of temperatures that could have occurred naturally under the same conditions, including greenhouse gas concentrations and volcanic eruptions.

“Instead of just comparing the future to 95 summers from the past, the models give us the opportunity to create more than 1,400 possible past summers,” Lehner said. “The result is a more comprehensive look at what should be considered natural variability and what can be attributed to climate change.”

Emissions cuts could yield big benefits

The results show that between 2061 and 2080, summers in large parts of North and South America, central Europe, Asia, and Africa have a greater than 90 percent chance of being warmer than any summer in the historic record if emissions continue unabated.

That means virtually every summer would be as warm as the hottest to date.

In some regions, the likelihood of summers being warmer than any in the historical record remained less than 50 percent, but in those places — including Alaska, the central U.S., Scandinavia, Siberia and continental Australia — summer temperatures naturally vary greatly, making it more difficult to detect effects of climate change.

Reducing emissions would lower the global probability of future summers that are hotter than any in the past, but would not result in uniformly spread benefits. In some regions, including the U.S. East Coast and large parts of the tropics, the probability would remain above 90 percent, even if emissions were reduced.

But reduced emissions would result in a sizable boon for other regions of the world.

Parts of Brazil, central Europe, and eastern China would see a reduction of more than 50 percent in the chance that future summers would be hotter than the historic range. Since these areas are densely inhabited, a large part of the global population would benefit significantly from climate change mitigation.

“It’s often overlooked that the majority of the world’s population lives in regions that will see a comparably fast rise in temperatures,” Lehner said.

###

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
124 Comments
June 13, 2016 2:37 pm

More computer games–GIGO.

June 13, 2016 2:47 pm

Just a question…Is there some future date that we can predict when the world record for the 100 meter dash will never ever be broken again?

Robert of Ottawa
June 13, 2016 2:55 pm

Why the need to ratchet up the fear now? Is there some up-coming political announcement?

Jim Watson
June 13, 2016 3:02 pm

Do they mean summers will be as hot as they were in the Medieval Warm Period or the Roman Warm Period? Oh, I forgot. They “disappeared” those data sets.

June 13, 2016 3:07 pm

How do you validate the percentage likelihood of something like this? So, when the date comes, and it is not hotter than previously, how do you know that it was not a guarantee that it would not have been hotter? In other words, where does the 80% come from?
This is like the argument that there should have been trillions of advanced civilizations in the history of the universe. Based on what?
The most persuasive argument about life emerging is that if every atom in the universe were in an ideal state to promote the creation of the building blocks from which life could emerge, it would take orders of magnitude longer for the first life form to develop, let alone evolve into intelligence, if it could develop on its own at all. The reason it might not be possible, is that the components from which life exists require different diametrically opposed environments to come into being.

June 13, 2016 3:10 pm

They will have to swap turtles with tortoises. Tortoises can take the heat (all the way down)

Steve Fraser
June 13, 2016 3:16 pm

Wish we had a link to the study, even if just to get what they thought were the ‘warmest Summers’, and their current rate of ‘Climate’ change. The idea that…if it keeps getting warmer, it could get hotter than Evah seems like a ‘duh’ moment

June 13, 2016 3:21 pm

Future summers could be hotter than any on record
It would be great if the average temps worldwide rose over the next decades. We were told that most of the warming would come at night and towards the poles. So if we have record summer time warmth, then that means the whole planet will be shaking off the ice age we are in.
Glory be to the highest! A celebration is in order … what? … oh hell, … you mean it is just stuff from a computer game??? Drat.

Noel Hebert
June 13, 2016 3:23 pm

I noticed they mentioned “business as usual” scenario which usually means the IPCC 8.5. You know the one that highly unlikely. But hey, why let that get in the way of the good story.

Walter Sobchak
June 13, 2016 3:23 pm

Well, it could be.

TA
June 13, 2016 3:25 pm

From the article: “If climate change continues on its current trajectory,”
What climate change? You mean the flatline we’ve been on for the length of the 21st century?
Article: ““Extreme temperatures pose risks to people around the globe,” DeWeaver said. “These scientists show the power of ensembles of simulations for understanding how these risks depend on the level of greenhouse gas emissions.””
The results depend on a hotter atmosphere, which CO2 is supposed to enhance, but today we have higher CO2 levels but no measurable increase in temperature as a result. There is no evidence that increased greenhouse gases are a risk.
““This is the first time the risk of record summer heat and its dependence on the rate of greenhouse gas emissions have been so comprehensively evaluated from a large set of simulations with a single state-of-the-art climate model,” Deser said.
The scientists compared results to summertime temperatures recorded between 1920 and 2014 and to 15 sets of simulated summertime temperatures for the same period.”
You compared your results to NOAA/NASA bastardized surface temperature data. Should we expect to get an accurate result from that?

Barbara Skolaut
June 13, 2016 3:35 pm

Could, might, maybe, possibly . . . .
Call me when a “prediction” you clowns made comes true (“no more snow,” anybody?)
Until then, sod off.

M Seward
June 13, 2016 3:37 pm

Well duhh!
If we keep building bigger and bigger heat sinks aka cities using concrete and bitumen etc more people will live in said heat sinks. I think that trend is clear in the unfit for purpose, kriged into statistical sausage meat, land surface temperature record but has conveniently been blamed on CO2. Little wonder the models don’t work, eh.

Snarling Dolphin
June 13, 2016 3:44 pm

Al Gore is right! (my apologies to Mel Brooks)

Latitude
June 13, 2016 3:47 pm

If greenhouse gas emissions are reduced, however, that probability drops to 41 percent…and 50% and sometimes 90%
…are they saying that in some places we are responsible for less than 10% of the warming?

Bruce Cobb
June 13, 2016 3:50 pm

In 50 years, schoolchildren will learn about a period of time spanning several decades, where mankind collectively went cuckoo over climate. It will be called the “age of insanity”, and the fact that otherwise intelligent people were worried about the completely-beneficial gas CO2 will be marveled about.

Robert from oz
June 13, 2016 3:51 pm

Need to change the name of “Models” to Exercise bikes , no matter how hard you peddle you don’t actually get anywhere .

Gerald Machnee
June 13, 2016 3:53 pm

Have those bozos actually looked at the real records?
We have not matched the number of temps above 100 or 90 since the 30’s.
Can they show the graph and the source of the readings?

June 13, 2016 3:57 pm

They talk about the “present trajectory”, but are in denial about what it is. The pattern for decades has been warming in the cold seasons and summers showing little change or slightly cooling. For example, this analysis compares the two hemispheres:
https://rclutz.wordpress.com/2015/06/22/when-is-it-warming-the-real-reason-for-the-pause/

Logos_wrench
June 13, 2016 4:02 pm

Yaaaaaaaaawwwwwwnnnnnn.

The Old Man
June 13, 2016 4:08 pm

Sure.. They’re always correct in these matters. Skeptics are always wrong.
https://notonmywatch.com/?p=655

FJ Shepherd
June 13, 2016 4:12 pm

Correct. Future summers could be as hot as the ones in the 1930s. Wow, then we could learn about climate cycles.

NW sage
June 13, 2016 4:25 pm

Future summers will ALWAYS be warmer – in the cities – than in previous years. The ‘climate change” is caused by the cities always getting bigger and creating more of a heat island. (and more cities and bigger heat islands). The models have nothing to do with it whether they are right or wrong. Simple common sense tells us that the temperatures there will always be bigger that they would otherwise have been.

Evan Jones
Editor
June 13, 2016 4:27 pm

Let me see . . .
If it gets warmer it will be warmer.
Oooooookay . . .

TonyL
June 13, 2016 4:28 pm

Oh you people of little faith, allow me to explain.
The models utilize advanced multivariate statistical techniques, which interact to give rise to an emergent property known as Great Skill. (As an aside, Great Skill was introduced in climatology in the groundbreaking paper MBH 1998, the “Hockey Stick” paper) This allows the models to make predictions with unfailing accuracy.
One fact which is often overlooked is that the property of Great Skill itself has the property of Symmetry. This means that the models can predict the past as easily as they can predict the future.

“Instead of just comparing the future to 95 summers from the past, the models give us the opportunity to create more than 1,400 possible past summers,” Lehner said.

There is no reason to assert that the model future predictions are any less accurate than their predictions of the past.
Remember, these models have Great Skill, and therefor are not to be questioned.

1 2 3