UPDATED: (new graphic) Climate Blamed for Worst Paris Floods since 1910

Paris_spin

Guest essay by Eric Worrall

Paris, France recently suffered severe flooding. Naturally Climate Scientists have blamed the May 2016 Paris floods on Climate, though it was admitted the floods fell well short of the Great Flood of 1910.

Flooding began first on smaller rivers including the Yvette and Loing — south of Paris (Figure 1). The Loing River, a tributary of the Seine, rose to levels not seen since 1982 but still short of the catastrophic January 1910 Paris floods when the Seine reached 8.0 meters (26.2 feet). The Seine – which runs directly through the heart of Paris – peaked at 6.1 meters (20 feet ) above its normal height during the night of June 3rd — a 34-year high. Farther south, in the heart of the Loire basin, tributaries of the Loire River, including the Retreve and the Sauldre Rivers, reached 50-year highs between May 31st and June 1st, flooding highways and the historic 16th-century Chambord castle. The timing of this flood was quite unusual as virtually all previous floods along the Seine and Loire River basins have occurred during winter (as opposed to spring) due to buildup of excess water over several months during the winter. Only two instances in the historical record — July 1659 and June 1856 — show flooding in months other than December, January, February or March. Clearly, this event appears to be a combination of a very wet month of May in general, coupled with very high 3-day rainfall totals in particular. Managing resulting flood risk is particularly challenging at this time of year because many reservoirs are already close to full to prepare for a typically dry summer season.

This year’s May rainfall amounts were exceptional at some stations in France (see Figure 2). The Paris-Montsouris station, recording 179 mm (7 inches), received roughly 3 months worth of rain in one month. The previous record of 133 mm (5.2 inches) was set in 1992. Orleans saw 181 mm (7.1 inches), also about 3 months of precipitation in one month. The old record was 148 mm (5.8 inches) set back in 1985.

Read more: https://wwa.climatecentral.org/analyses/european-rainstorms-may-2016/

What is the history of flooding in Paris? Information on floods is a little difficult to find, perhaps because I don’t speak French, but the following from a critical OECD report on Parisian flood risk preparedness is revealing;

While the possibility of a major flood of the Seine River may initially seem remote, it comes back regularly and arouses public attention as was the case during the spring of 2013 when floods took place upstream of the Seine River basin. Even though the flooding did not cause any major damage, it reopened the question of risk management and the region’s vulnerability to flooding. The prospect of a historic event is a key concern for French risk management stakeholders. The 1910 flood was particularly destructive in the context of an era marked by industrial and technological progress. Such events illustrate the difficulties societies have in compromising between economic development and the management of increased vulnerability of society and multiple economic sectors.

1924 and 1955 also saw major flood events in the Paris region and in the entire Seine basin. Nevertheless, the lack of a significant flood for more than 60 years tends to lessen the memory of risk. Seine floods are characterised by their slow progression and, following on a period of submersion which may be very long. For instance, the waters took almost two months to subside in 1910. Even if the effect of climate change on the frequency and extent of the Seine floods is still uncertain, greater floods than the one of 1910 are still possible, such as the one that occurred in 1658. In other countries, many recent floods significantly exceeded the 100-year levels. This was the case with the floods in Queensland, Bangkok, and Pakistan; as well as during the coastal flooding following hurricane Sandy in New-York, and the 2013 floods in Germany. The EU Floods Directive uses the 1000-year frequency as a reference for extreme events.

Read more: https://www.oecd.org/gov/risk/Flood-risk-management-seine-river-executive-summary.pdf

On the basis of the OECD report, the claim that the 2016 flood was climate related seems a little thin. Not only was the 2016 flood significantly less severe than a comparable flood which occurred in 1910, the 2016 flood occurred after a 60 year absence of major Paris floods, after major floods in 1910, 1924 and 1955.

There does not appear to be any evidence which supports the theory that climate is somehow exacerbating the frequency or severity of flooding in Paris.


UPDATE: They say a picture says a thousand words, this one not only does that, but speaks with authority. Thanks to Josh for the image, originally sourced from the BBC here. – Anthony

paris-flood-gauge-statue

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

186 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
June 11, 2016 2:49 pm

Something to consider.
A gauging station near me was there before a dam was built upstream.
7 of the top 10 crest were before the dam was built.
But what “historic crest” don’t tell you is how long flood conditions lasted.
Those 7 flood levels may not have lasted very long.
A dam near capacity with semi-controlled release may be able to keep the flood crest lower but the flood conditions may last longer.
PS Environmental regulations may also come into play. Much is said here in the US about the water level in Lake Mead near Las Vegas. It’s been dropping steadily. Some would point to AGW alone and not the larger water demand.
But, if I’m not mistaken, the dam that formed Lake Mead has been required for many years now to annually “dump” a bunch of water to simulate flash flooding downstream and so clear out sediments so as to not “change” the ecosystem.

Reply to  Gunga Din
June 11, 2016 5:31 pm

The last time in the early 1990’s when the Hover Dam was filled and spilling, the Army Corp which is responsible, took a lot of heat from the flooding downstream. I can see how the dam level would be lower. I don’t know how much is due to lack of snowfall in the Rockies and how much has been drawn down down to accommodate the people downstream. It’s not like there aren’t droughts in the west. Not having a good understanding of water rights usually leads to erroneous statements. Every piece of water in the west has been measured, averaged, studied and somebody owns it. Its a dry place. You get outside of some well watered areas in California, and you can certainly wonder how could anybody live here

1sky1
June 11, 2016 3:05 pm

What’s truly at unprecedented levels is the cost of a beer on Champs-Elysses. Unlike floods on the Seine, they will not recede.

Reply to  1sky1
June 11, 2016 5:23 pm

I’ve found they’re cheaper if you don’t choose a table on the sidewalk…

simple-touriste
Reply to  1sky1
June 11, 2016 11:36 pm

“What’s truly at unprecedented levels is the cost of a beer on Champs-Elysses”
Sometimes the waiter will charge maximum price of tourists and minimum for Parisians.
Avoid the ultra touristic zones! Discover the “real” Paris.

June 11, 2016 7:09 pm

The Seine floods with some regularity, and a flood of this magnitude was statistically overdue. The lack of preparedness for this expected flooding was discussed in this BBC report from 2013. Fortunately, the forecast for the current flood is 5.2 meters, far below the 8.6 meters of 1910. Any suggestion that elevated carbon dioxide is responsible for the French floods is historically ignorant, and unsupported by data.
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-25524327

simple-touriste
Reply to  UnfrozenCavemanMD
June 11, 2016 11:19 pm

“The lack of preparedness for this expected flooding was discussed in this BBC report from 2013”
“Crue de la Seine : un exercice pendant deux semaines pour simuler le pire”
https://www.francebleu.fr/infos/climat-environnement/crue-de-la-seine-un-exercice-pendant-deux-semaines-pour-simuler-le-pire-1457121804
Flooding of the Seine: a two weeks exercise to simulate the worst
“Paris se prépare à la future crue du siècle”
http://www.lemonde.fr/planete/article/2016/03/02/paris-se-prepare-a-la-future-crue-du-siecle_4874745_3244.html
Paris is getting ready for the futur flooding of century
Date of the exercise: March 2016

simple-touriste
Reply to  simple-touriste
June 11, 2016 11:26 pm

Exercice EU Sequana 2016 par Prefecture de police de Paris
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2qows3_exercice-eu-sequana-2016_news
http://www.prefecturedepolice.interieur.gouv.fr/Sequana/EU-Sequana-2016
Flood preparation exercice, or PR exercice?

Reply to  simple-touriste
June 15, 2016 6:38 am

Preparedness does not mean conducting flood drills. Preparedness means dredging the f-ing rivers!

June 11, 2016 11:04 pm

Seine peaks at under 1982 level (and less than in 1955, 1945, 1924 and 1910).
https://ktwop.com/2016/06/04/seine-peaks-at-under-1982-level-and-less-than-in-1955-1945-1924-and-1910/

feliksch
June 12, 2016 6:18 am

Most German TV-stations have abandond their climate-alarmist explanation of recent fatal flooding in Bavaria and let critics of water-management and acricultural malpractice (corn for bio-fuel at all environmental costs) speak openly.
Prof. Dr. Dr. (?) Stefan Rahmsdorf and Prof. Dr. Mojib Latif are not expected to retract their statements, though, tat it was “climate change” whodunnit.

4 eyes
June 12, 2016 3:53 pm

‘Nevertheless, the lack of a significant flood for more than 60 years tends to lessen the memory of risk”. Living memory is the cornerstone of alarmist climate change reporting.

wws
June 12, 2016 4:25 pm

Climate Change does EVERYTHING, and Climate Change is the Greatest Threat we face. We just last night, Climate Change walked into a bar in Orlando and shot 50 people to death.

Frederik Michiels
June 12, 2016 4:57 pm

strange in belgium we had the same tons of rain and nowhere got any river reached historic flood levels.
Yes there was flooding even very local big flooding, but neither were any of them historical.
the same for France there was very important local flooding the seine reached a high level but not a historical one and this since quite a long time.

Admad
June 13, 2016 6:32 am

Entirely unprecedented flooding, don’tcher know

Resourceguy
June 13, 2016 7:38 am

The difference is that in 1910, 1955, and 1982 there was no $100 billion annual climate fund pot-o-money to incentivize the spinning of tall climate tales.

Mike
June 13, 2016 9:52 am

Imagine that…climate and weather connected.

Bob Kutz
June 13, 2016 10:13 am

So . . . they stopped heavy dredging decades back . . . delta smelt or whatever the French equivalent may be, then they left the reservoir levels high so as not to run low in the summer . . . and now the flooding is a result of . . . climate change.
You know, this just keeps getting more and more ridiculous.
Perhaps, and this is just hypothetical . . . but perhaps they ought to consider managing their reservoirs for flood control rather than for the chamber of commerce. (As we found out here in the states back in 2011.)
And yes, I know quite well that the real problem was the U.S. Army Corp of Engineers board being commandeered by the greens who figured out a way to have a ‘natural’ spring flow to ‘restore’ the river. But don’t get me started on that.

James at 48
June 13, 2016 10:27 am

How about the height of the levees now vs 1910… oh wait, ain’t got no levees! DOH!!!!